Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 13



Template:URLIcrossfireKM.org

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC) A completely pointless template, used only to transclude a URL at Crossfire KM. I feel like this should be speedy deleted, but I'm not sure it meets CSD G2. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * URLIcrossfireKM.org
 * Delete. We have Official website for that. --Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Replace with Official website. --Bsherr (talk) 21:42, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Swiss Federal Railways s-line templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete - F ASTILY   01:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
 * SBB-CFF-FFS color
 * SBB-CFF-FFS lines
 * SBB-CFF-FFS stations
 * SBB CFF FFS style
 * S-line data modules
 * S-line/SBB-CFF-FFS left/
 * S-line/SBB-CFF-FFS right/

templates for Swiss Federal Railways. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Swiss Federal Railways. All transclusions replaced. There are two dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 22:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rhaetian Railway s-line templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * RhB color
 * RhB lines
 * RhB stations
 * RhB style
 * Rhatische Bahn style


 * S-line/RhB left/R11
 * S-line/RhB left/R21
 * S-line/RhB left/R31
 * S-line/RhB left/R4
 * S-line/RhB left/R5
 * S-line/RhB left/R6
 * S-line/RhB left/R7
 * S-line/RhB left/RE1
 * S-line/RhB left/RE2
 * S-line/RhB left/RE3
 * S-line/RhB left/S8
 * S-line/RhB left/S9
 * S-line/RhB right/R11
 * S-line/RhB right/R21
 * S-line/RhB right/R31
 * S-line/RhB right/R4
 * S-line/RhB right/R5
 * S-line/RhB right/R6
 * S-line/RhB right/R7
 * S-line/RhB right/RE1
 * S-line/RhB right/RE2
 * S-line/RhB right/RE3
 * S-line/RhB right/S8
 * S-line/RhB right/S9

templates for the Rhaetian Railway. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Rhaetian Railway. All transclusions replaced. There are 24 dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

ITF tournament details

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 20:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC) The ITF website recently changed all of its tournament links without redirecting the old to the new, so these templates based on the old link format are now obsolete. I've already gone through and replaced/removed all of their transclusions. Calbow (talk) 11:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ITF male tournament details
 * ITF female tournament details
 * Question: Couldn't the templates be updated to use the new link style? --Gonnym (talk) 09:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Not really. Here's an example of the change:
 * http://www.itftennis.com/procircuit/tournaments/men's-tournament/info.aspx?tournamentid=1100034114 (broken)
 * https://www.itftennis.com/en/tournament/australian-open/aus/2015/m-sl-aus-01a-2015/draws-and-results/
 * As can be seen, the old format needed only 1 parameter (id), whereas the new format needs 4 (name, country, year, edition). Any efficiency/ease gain from having a template has been lost as it's simpler to just use the links directly. Also, it should be noted that these templates were used on only a few hundred out of the many thousands of tennis tournament articles, so they were never really adopted by the community. Calbow (talk) 10:43, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).