Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 30



Template:Miss Universe Organization

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Miss_Universe_Organization
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ÖPNV Nürnberg

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Unused fork of Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ÖPNV Nürnberg
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zee Rishtey Awards

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 7. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Zee_Rishtey_Awards
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MyProtect

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Disruptive template by a disruptive editor. Kinu t/c 09:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC) Personal templates like this should not be here at all. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * MyProtect
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

MediaWiki:Nocreatetext

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue. This should be at MediaWiki talk:Nocreatetext (presumably to make it the same as Mediawiki:Noarticletext-nopermission) since it is not acting like a template (no transclusions, just a standard interface message). —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC) Propose merging MediaWiki:Nocreatetext with Template:No article text.
 * No article text
 * No article text

I ran into the MediaWiki:Nocreatetext notice when testing out the create page input box from H:YFA while logged out. It appears to be a less well-developed duplicate of Template:No article text (which is transcluded at MediaWiki:Noarticletext). The stated distinction at Template talk:No article text is that one is used when trying to view a non-existent page whereas the other is used when trying to edit a non-existent page, but there seems to be nothing tailored in the notices themselves, and I'm not sure what distinction we would want to make. Could we merge them to the design at Template:No article text? &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 00:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wrong venue This is effectively an edit request that belongs at MediaWiki talk:Nocreatetext, not a TfD discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , I put a notice there, but the MediaWiki page is effectively acting like a template, and this is the venue for proposing template merges. It's not a perfect fit, but MediaWiki talk:Nocreatetext has a measly number of watchers, so I'm not sure a proposal there would receive adequate scrutiny, and I initially went to XfD but I'm not sure how technical the folks there are or whether they accept proposed merge-and-redirects. You're free to notify VPT if you think it'd help or anywhere else that might be interested, but after that I think we'll be better off if we focus on the proposal itself than on trying to find the ideal venue. So in that spirit: Do you have any thoughts on whether or not we should do the merge? &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 02:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Some details on how these are used:
 * : shown when viewing a page that does not exist and the user has permission to create it; =no article text
 * : same as above but for unregistered users; trancludes the above
 * : shown when viewing a page that does not exist and the user does not have permission to create it; =
 * : shown when attempting to create a page that does not exist and the user does not have permission to create it
 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:57, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).