Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 December 31



Template:Intersperse

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC) This template was created by a sockpuppet and also is not being used. Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Intersperse
 * No opinion on whether this should be deleted, but was created by a sockpuppet is not true, as the user wasn't blocked under any account until 3 days after this template was created. is not used isn't necessary true either, since this sort of template is often substituted. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Template creator Ron Duvall was a sockpuppet of Sarsaparilla. Liz Read! Talk! 02:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Woodcuts by Albrecht Dürer table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC) No longer used. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Woodcuts by Albrecht Dürer table
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Happy New Year fireworks without header

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after converting existing transclusions. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC) I've added a heading suppression parameter to the main Template:Happy New Year fireworks. Let's redirect this fork back to there (or wrapperify if we must). &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 07:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Happy New Year fireworks without header
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete NavjotSR (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Empty-warn-deletion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Db-nocontext-deleted. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Empty-warn-deletion with Template:Db-nocontext-deleted.
 * Empty-warn-deletion
 * Db-nocontext-deleted

In a previous templates for discussion the argument was keep because the redirect target was Db-nocontext-notice. The original redirect target was for general notices, whilst the new one is for letting a person know about page deletions. Similar to spam-warn-deletion, this template is unecessary and redundant. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 22:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Link to the prior TfD (Feb 2019). ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 15:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 16 seems rather relevant, cc, , and . ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 15:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge There should not be two templates accomplishing the exact same goal. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. NavjotSR (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spam-warn-deletion

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Db-spam-deleted. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Spam-warn-deletion with Template:Db-spam-deleted.
 * Spam-warn-deletion
 * Db-spam-deleted

Unecessary and redundant. Most administrators do not use the Spam-warn-deletion template anymore to notify people that their article has been deleted as advertising or promotion. Please redirect to the db-spam-deleted template. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 22:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: Templates for discussion/Log/2020 October 16 seems rather relevant, cc, , and . ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 15:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have never understood the argument "let's get rid of this because not many people use it." If anyone ever uses it, even rarely, then keeping it serves some useful purpose, and getting rid of it confers no advantage. If, on the other hand, nobody ever uses it, then it makes no difference at all whether it is kept or not. So we have two possibilities: either getting rid of it will it confer a disadvantage, or getting rid of it will make no difference. That being so, why would anyone want to get rid it? JBW (talk) 21:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 04:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge There should not be two templates accomplishing the exact same goal. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 19:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:CONSOLIDATION, which speaks to the "why" question above. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).