Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 March 21



Template:Donehelpme

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC) This template is supposed to be used to easily close helpme requests, however it is redundant to Help me-helped which has the same purpose. Everything is possible but nothing is real... (PorkchopGMX) (t - c) 16:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Donehelpme
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Duplicate and also no need for a separate template.--Tom (LT) (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brazil squad 1972 Brazil Independence Cup

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Per WP:FOOTY consensus, only highest-level international tournaments are supposed to have individual squad template for each team. These Brazil squads are not for any of such tournament. --BlameRuiner (talk) 06:40, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Brazil squad 1972 Brazil Independence Cup
 * Brazil squad 1964 Taça das Nações
 * Brazil squad 1956 Taça do Atlântico
 * Brazil squad 1952 Panamerican Championship
 * Brazil squad 1956 Panamerican Championship
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page deletions. GiantSnowman 13:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 13:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 18:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Members

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Insufficient complexity of markup to warrant a template, even assuming the mostly-inactive WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction really needs this structured members list, unlike all other WikiProjects. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Members

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete cute, but not generally necessary. --Izno (talk) 17:35, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TV Fool

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC) Some links are outdated; may be linkspamming Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * TV Fool
 * Delete per nom. Csworldwide1 (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Clear WP:SOFIXIT case with OOD links; site provides a clearer picture of a station's coverage area and there was never any 'linkspamming' intent with this template.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).