Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 March 25



Template:Clist mergers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 April 2. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Clist_mergers
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Short association football matches navigational boxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation provided they actually contain useful content. Primefac (talk) 01:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC) I think these templates should be deleted because they each have less than four wikilinks and redlinks combined. I would rather prefer if these navboxes were instead merged with the main navbox for each of these clubs. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 23:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Pyramids FC matches
 * C.D. Aves matches
 * C.F. Estrela da Amadora matches
 * S.C. Farense matches
 * Leixões S.C. matches
 * S.C. Olhanense matches
 * Smouha SC matches
 * Wadi Degla FC matches
 * L.R. Vicenza Virtus matches
 * Nîmes Olympique matches
 * Brisbane City FC matches
 * Brisbane Roar FC Youth matches
 * Adelaide United FC Youth matches
 * Gold Coast United FC Youth matches
 * Melbourne City FC Youth matches
 * Perth Glory FC Youth matches
 * Sydney FC Youth and Under-23s matches
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 02:15, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: This is a procedural relist; the original discussion closed as "merge to club navbox" but these do not have a club/parent navbox. Looking for more opinions on whether to convert to "general" navboxes, delete outright, or other.
 * Merge with the relevant parent navbox, no need for a separate one just for 2/3 matches. GiantSnowman 17:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge for the same reason. Asturkian (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 01:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Admin note the following is copied from WP:TFDH and led to this relist. Posting it mainly for thoughts from those already involved. Primefac (talk) 01:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Two options - either rename and expand so that these templates become the parent navbox, or delete. If nobody can be bothered with the former then I suggest the latter. GiantSnowman 17:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Taking Pyramids FC matches as an example. It has 3 links: Pyramids FC, Egypt Cup and 2019 Egypt Cup Final. Only the club is actually relevant. I wouldn't want to see a page like Egypt Cup have a navbox for every single team that ever played in the cup for the past 99 years. A navbox like that should definitely be deleted. Since no one actually supporting a keep of any of the above templates has responded here, I'll vote to delete all. If anyone wants to keep any of these, please ping me so I can respond to any specific template. --Gonnym (talk) 11:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Addition table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2020 (UTC) Unused, and not even presented as a standard matrix-style addition table anyway. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Addition table
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).