Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 22



Template:PM/Line A–F

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:19, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Unused, less-detailed versions of Porto Metro A–Porto Metro F, created in an obsolete format by a "one and done" editor (possibly a sockpuppet of ?). AlgaeGraphix (talk) 23:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * PM/Line A
 * PM/Line B
 * PM/Line C
 * PM/Line D
 * PM/Line E
 * PM/Line F
 * Delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Weird name

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. czar 01:12, 30 May 2020 (UTC) This template doesn't seem particularly useful. It's only used on two pages: Breast-shaped hill and Slippery dick. I think most readers already realize that a) those pages' names are sort of funny, b) those are the articles' real titles and not a joke, and c) those pages will experience more vandalism than average, so I don't really see what purpose this template serves. Might even encourage vandalism by pointing out the silliness of the name. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 22:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Weird name
 * Delete per nom. I agree with the point that (1) this is not used much, (2) is pretty pointless and (3) we have existing ways of noticing and protecting articles that work just fine. Having this template around is a risk for future editors wasting time putting it then removing it and discussing it on articles, and as mentioned also invites vandalism. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PPEMES (talk) 11:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. An emperor /// Ave 23:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bavarian Royal Family

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 30. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Bavarian_Royal_Family
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aircraft Lessors

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 30. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Aircraft_Lessors
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steam locomotive exhaust systems

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Locostyles. czar 01:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Steam locomotive exhaust systems with Template:Locostyles.
 * Steam locomotive exhaust systems
 * Locostyles

As a section within the locomotive styles and designs template. PPEMES (talk) 10:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge these two small but related templates. Reduces template overhead and makes it easier to navigate between similar topic areas.--Tom (LT) (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge seems OK, neither is particularly big and they should both always appear on the same articles. Guy (help!) 16:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge but rename "Locomotive styles" to "Locomotive design" or Locomotive design features". "Styles" may have been okay for the original template but doesn't describe what we're merging into it, noting that there is also a proposal to merge Template:Locomotive running gear into it as well. Bermicourt (talk) 12:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure. PPEMES (talk) 11:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).