Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 May 6



Template:Doo-Wops & Hooligans track listing

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC) Redundant navigation to Bruno Mars songs which lists each of the songs with articles and in the same order as the track listing. Plus, for some reason it was only added to one article by the template's author, making it unuseful, too. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 22:53, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Doo-Wops & Hooligans track listing
 * Delete: this template is used to add Extra track listing to the infobox, and the documentation for that template specifically states, "it should not be used if there is a navigation template or navbox at the bottom of the article which already lists the songs". Richard3120 (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * speedy delete, template is redundent. → Lil- ℧niquԐ1 - ( Talk ) - 21:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Shortcut/policy

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 May 16. Primefac (talk) 00:21, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Shortcut/policy
 * Shortcut/further
 * Shortcut
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NotifyPOTD2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:NotifyPOTD. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 22:32, 13 May 2020 (UTC) Originally nominated for speedy deleteipon by @Ravenpuff with the reason "No longer in use; superseded by as per guidelines at WP:POTD/G."   F ASTILY   22:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * NotifyPOTD2
 * Redirect * Pppery * it has begun... 22:52, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect; no objection. &mdash;  RAVEN PVFF  &middot; talk &middot; 02:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcomeshort

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:W-short. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Welcomeshort with Template:W-short.
 * Welcomeshort
 * W-short

These two old short welcome templates are nearly identical. I propose that Welcomeshort be merged into W-short, since the latter has better documentation, and of the few differences, I prefer its version. Once merged, they should probably be moved to Template:Welcome short, a cleaner title. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 19:03, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Support keep at Template:W-short as its the third most used template that's already integrated with twinkle.... renaming it would just cause work for everyone for no reason.-- Moxy 🍁 21:31, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Twinkle seems to be able to handle renames fine; I checked recently for another template. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 23:07, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge per above. Overall am strongly in favour of consolidating these sorts of templates and these are so similar in purpose they should be merged.--Tom (LT) (talk) 01:38, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge and eventually move per suggestion. (I created Welcomeshort, the older one of the two.) ◀ Sebastian 05:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).