Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 November 25



Template:Furry Topicon

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as G7 by User:Athaenara. However I made a reworked version in my user space at User:PorkchopGMX/sandbox/furry topicon, so this also may be considered as Userfy, however I think that is unlikely as the creator of the original template didn’t userfy it. (Incoming redirects were also speedy deleted.) (non-admin closure)  (Push to talk) 18:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC) Broken and unused topicon. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Furry Topicon
 * Delete per nom, unless someone wants to salvage it. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 00:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I couldn’t get it working properly. If someone wants to try and fix it, be my guest. Littlecat456💬(.log) 09:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Seems like the TOPICON template was looking for more parameters. I copied the code from another TOPICON template and made this working: User:PorkchopGMX/sandbox/furry topicon.  (Push to talk) 14:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Well in that case, a redirect should work. Littlecat456💬(.log) 14:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oops... i accidentally moved instead of just redirecting... :P Littlecat456💬(.log) 15:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I wouldn’t recommend a redirect in this case, because it creates a cross-namespace redirect from Template namespace to User namespace. I think Userfying would be good (moving the topicon to a subpage of your user page like User:Littlecat456/Furry topicon) and then deleting the template redirect.  (Push to talk) 15:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Whoops. I tried fixing Littlecat’s accidental move above, but when moving I forgot to capitalize the T in “Topicon”, which did nothing to help. In addition, Littlecat wants the original template deleted as G7. So can somebody delete the redirects Template:User:PorkchopGMX/sandbox/Furry topicon and Template:Furry Topicon, then delete the template Template:Furry topicon as G7 as requested by Littlecat?  (Push to talk) 16:19, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ftd

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure)  EN - Jungwon Talk 08:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Unused --TheImaCow (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Ftd
 * Keep as it says on the page, it's an always susbt template. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC).


 * Keep: The reason why the transclustion count is low, is that this template is intended to be always subst:. Techie3 (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment if kept, it should be renamed to a sensible name, leaving this as a redirect. Say template:Category: Fossil taxa described in X or somesuch -- 65.92.246.246 (talk) 05:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per obvious reason mentioned above. But also agree with the need for a rename to something more descriptive, like simply opening the abbreviation "Fossil taxa described". Debresser (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FrenchPostwarAircraft

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Unused, very unusual navbox format --TheImaCow (talk) 20:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * FrenchPostwarAircraft
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Broken map templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:03, 26 November 2020 (UTC) All of these are unused and broken --TheImaCow (talk) 20:10, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Flower Hill Park
 * Flower Hill Park Location
 * Flower Hill Village Park Location


 * Delete All- Thank you; I've been meaning to do this for some time. I'm rather new at making templates and have yet to master making them; these were the result of a person having no idea what to do. So yes - I completely agree that these most certainly should be deleted (and I thank you for nominating them, and I apologize for forgetting to do so)!LINYperson615 (talk) 20:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * LINYperson615 if you simply put at the top of a page you are the only substantial contributor to, a kind admin will come along and delete them for you.  Since you've requested deletion, I'll add the template.   All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FieldHockeyAt1920SummerOlympics

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC) Sidebar with only one link --TheImaCow (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * FieldHockeyAt1920SummerOlympics
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Requests for feedback templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 December 4. (non-admin closure)  EN - Jungwon Talk 08:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Feedbackreply-sm
 * Feedbackreply-alt
 * Requests_for_feedback
 * No_Feedback_Given
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-he-n

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. after replacing with Lang-he. Consensus that a redirect would not be helpful and potentially confusing. Primefac (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Propose merging redirecting Template:Lang-he-n to Template:Lang-he.
 * Lang-he-n
 * Lang-he

This was proposed on the talkpage in 2010 and in 2015. The latter discussion was closed as "Nominate it for a merge at TFD", which was never done. The reasons remain the same: Lang-he is perfectly capable of showing niqqud, so this template is superfluous. In addition there are two problems with this template: 1. the one raised in this talkpage discussion, that this template is meant for text in the Hebrew language, but transcludes another template which is specifically meant for Hebrew script which is not actually in the Hebrew language. 2. the fact that it uses another font than Lang-he makes it stand out (although that can be changed by changing the fonts in Template:Script/styles hebrew.css, I guess), and also makes it more prone to change (like what happened after this edit, as can be seen in this talkpage discussion). The second problem is not much of an issue, of course, but still. Debresser (talk) 09:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I invited all editors whom the template history showed to have edited this template more than incidentally to comment here. Debresser (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I support this, this is probably legacy template from the early days of Wikipedia when Unicode was poorly supported and templates sometimes needed to nudge the browser into choosing the right font. This is no longer necessary, the "lang" templates should mark strings as in sa specific language regardless of the font used (i.e it should be possible/recommended to use lang-he even for transliterated Hebrew, or for Hebrew written in Paleo-Hebrew/Pheonician characters). --dab (𒁳) 12:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * It is not clear to me what 'merging' means in this case? Here are comparisons of  and
 * בֵּית
 * בֵּית
 * Hebrew: '"`UNIQ--templatestyles-00000001-QINU`"' בֵּית &lrm;, lit. home
 * בֵּית
 * The obvious differences are:
 * uses ; does not
 * does not have a  html attribute
 * italicizes the linked static text 'lit.'
 * does not render the value assigned to lit as a linguistic gloss (not wrapped in single quotes)
 * If the proposal is to merge some or all of these differences into, then I will have to oppose because Module:Lang should not be tweaked to support exceptions to the style it applies to the renderings of all of the other templates.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I meant redirecting or replacing. Debresser (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I can support replacement of, wherever it exists, with . Since you apparently do not mean that these templates should be merged, it would probably be best to change the  templates and bolded text at the top of this discussion and to also change the  template at.
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * —Trappist the monk (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Partially support. At a minimum, they should both have a  html attribute, both support none, both support lit and should both document all parameters and all differences in rendering and semantics.
 * What about ? Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, I should like to point out that the font of the lang-he template is, in my opinion, much better the the font font of lang-he-n which is unnecessary flamboyant. Ibn Daud (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, I should like to point out that the font of the lang-he template is, in my opinion, much better the the font font of lang-he-n which is unnecessary flamboyant. Ibn Daud (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support, I should like to point out that the font of the lang-he template is, in my opinion, much better the the font font of lang-he-n which is unnecessary flamboyant. Ibn Daud (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment after 4 editors expressed their opinion There are a lot of cases where this template is used even though there is no niqqud. See e.g. today's edit. That could be considered a third reason for redirecting. Debresser (talk) 16:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Very much support. Would cause fewer headaches for people deciding on which one they should be using, and lang-he-n is most certainly redundant anyway. Stephen Walch (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Replace uses of lang-he-n with lang-he and delete lang-he-n as it won't be a helpful redirect at all. --Gonnym (talk) 00:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree that after the replacement, Lang-he-n can be deleted. Debresser (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Support I suspect lang-he-n is now only used as a stylistic preference because of the font in which it renders the Hebrew (which is, admitedly, probably slightly easier to read the niqqud). There have been IPs (not sure if it's the same person) changing lang-he to lang-he-n for years, I would guess for this reason. Number   5  7  17:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree with you regarding the font. I personally also prefer the font of Lang-he-n over the Lang-he font, which is less classical and more modern. Debresser (talk) 16:53, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sandbox heading/Talk/doc

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC) originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Moxy under WP:CSD as a test page  F ASTILY   05:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Sandbox heading/Talk/doc
 * Delete I don't think this is a test page, but I also don't think this documentation actually provides any useful information. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not useful AFAICS. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tllsep/begin and Template:Tllsep
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC) Unused/redundant template. The redirect is also nominated for deletion, at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 25 -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  01:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Tllsep/begin
 * Tllsep
 * Delete. Unused and unneeded. --Gonnym (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).