Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 August 17



Template:Saarland state election, 2009

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  03:17, 25 August 2021 (UTC) unused, duplicates the results in the article Frietjes (talk) 19:50, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Saarland state election, 2009


 * Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Unused and not needed. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Persian Constitutional Revolution

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 August 25. ✗ plicit  03:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Persian_Constitutional_Revolution
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:USA PATRIOT Act sidebar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after placing the infobox directly into the article. Whether the infobox is kept or removed from the article is beyond the scope of this TFD. Primefac (talk) 19:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC) single-use infobox and I don't see any discussion as to why it isn't included directly in the article. it should be merged with the parent article unless there is a strong reason to keep it separated. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * USA PATRIOT Act sidebar


 * Subst and delete. An infobox should be used on its article and not created as a template. Gonnym (talk) 11:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete This shouldn't be on the history article. Articles about U.S. Federal Laws infoboxes on U.S. Federal Laws use Template:Infobox U.S. legislation. Not sidebars. But the history article shouldn't be an exception. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 FA Cup Final line-up

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC) As far as I can see, (certainly in the 2010's) it is the only FA Cup Final template in existance on enwiki. It is only used by 2014 FA Cup Final, allthough I couldn't find it in editing. (but that's probably due to my limited editing skills). It is also wildly out of place in the only category it's in. Dutchy45 (talk) 12:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2014 FA Cup Final line-up
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:14, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - there are other similar images, such as File:Arsenal vs Aston Villa 2015-05-30.svg in 2015 FA Cup Final, File:Crystal Palace vs Man Utd 2016-05-21.svg in 2016 FA Cup Final etc. Both appear to have been uploaded by . I note that the latter is a FA, so the images are probably appropriate. GiantSnowman 14:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The images are appropriate, but the template isn't. – PeeJay 14:33, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * In which case can we 'convert' the template into a file, or re-upload the image as a file, and then delete the template? GiantSnowman 14:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The image is already uploaded at Image:Arsenal vs Hull City 2014-05-17.svg --SuperJew (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * In which case delete the template. GiantSnowman 15:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Don't see why the lineup has to be like this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't need a template, and already covered as a file (which is the correct way to do this). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CSM Știința Baia Mare squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Romanian rugby sides compete in non-notable leagues, so the majority of players involved in these templates are non-notable. Some teams have more players with pages, but not all are up to date, and are notable for their international achievements anyway, instead of club achievements. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * CSM Știința Baia Mare squad
 * CS Dinamo București rugby squad
 * CSA Steaua București rugby squad
 * SCM Rugby Timișoara squad
 * ACS Tomitanii Constanța squad
 * CS Universitatea Cluj-Napoca squad
 * Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jaguares squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:06, 24 August 2021 (UTC) Squad templates for rugby teams that aren't currently competing in any major notable leagues, and are not set to compete in any notable leagues until 2023 at the earliest. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Jaguares squad
 * Cheetahs squad
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete they can be recreated if they rejoin a "notable" league in future. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nagaland Nationalist Organisation/meta/shortname

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Currently in use and part of a system of similar templates. Discussions about collating these into a single module or group of modules is a discussion to be had elsewhere, though comments here indicate that it might have a favourable outcome. Primefac (talk) 12:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Appears to be a nonsense template Whiteguru (talk) 03:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Nagaland Nationalist Organisation/meta/shortname
 * Keep It's similar to Template:Bharatiya Janata Party/meta/shortname and Template:Liberal Party of Australia/meta/shortname. Most Indian political parties are shortened to 3 or 4 letter acronyms. See others in Category:India political party shortname templates. When present, these shortname templates are used by Template:Infobox election instead of the full names of the parties. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * keep, clearly not nonsense. Frietjes (talk) 17:36, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: really not relevant to this TfD but felt the need to add this. Eventually these templates should really be recreated in a module as a pseudo-database. There is really no need for thousand of these templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. The same should be considered for the color templates as well. e.g. Template:Democratic Party (US)/meta/color -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The parry is defunct and the template is used on two election articles that happened decades ago. No need for this to be continued to be used. A simple fix is needed to apply on current usage. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This template is also automatically used by Template:Election box candidate with party link which is usually added to election results within constituency pages. When someone gets around to adding old election results to the various constituencies, about 60 of them would have it. I've added this to Akuluto (Vidhan Sabha constituency) just to show its usage. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Template in use. Party being defunct is no reason to delete. Number   5  7  21:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).