Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 17



Template:Seizure warning

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was substitute and delete. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 15:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC) This template is not used anywhere, likely because consensus is that we do not use disclaimers. Natureium (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2021 (UTC) — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk ) 23:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Seizure warning
 * The term "disclaimer template" is defined by No disclaimers as templates [...] inserted into an article that duplicate the information at one of the five standard disclaimer pages. This template clearly duplicates the seventh bullet point of Content disclaimer (Wikipedia may contain images and videos which can trigger epileptic seizures and other medical conditions.). * Pppery * it has begun... 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete as single-use. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Substitute and delete per above. Disclaimers are not used per No disclaimers and the site already has a general seizure disclaimer so this template is not needed. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 02:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete per WP:NDA. —  csc -1 02:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete given the consensus. — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk ) 04:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suicidal content

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Wikipedia does not put disclaimers on articles. Natureium (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Suicidal content
 * save This is simply not true. While I would not call them disclaimers, as they don't fall under the guidelines of WP:NDA, there is precedence for adding warnings. Such warnings are already in use, like Template:Seizure warning. — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk )
 * Doesn't look like this is in use anywhere. Natureium (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Why don't you delete that too then? I mean, screw the epileptics, right? — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk ) 23:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a fair suggestion, since there's no point in keeping a template when consensus is against its use. Natureium (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You make it quite difficult to have a humane discussion. — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk ) 23:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * delete we don't include disclaimers on articles, WP:NOTCENSORED. CUPIDICAE💕  23:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This is on the edge of a strawman fallacy, as it clearly is not censorship to inform readers of the type of content they can expect. — F ORMAL D UDE ( talk </b>) 23:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * We do not censor articles or warn about content. There, better? It would behoove you not to bludgeon this discussion to death. CUPIDICAE💕  23:44, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Look, I just want to understand how a brief warning can possibly be constriued as censorship. Even WP:NOTCENSORED makes no mentions of the use of warnings. Is that too much to ask? — F ORMAL D UDE (<b style=";font-size:100%;"> talk </b>) 00:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 01:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The relevant policy is in the No disclaimers guideline based upon the failed content labelling proposal. Disclaimers are not used in articles (or anywhere else), so this has no use. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 01:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NDA. —  csc -1 02:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seven Great Rivers of China
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Entirely redundant with Template:China Rivers. Ungulates (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Seven Great Rivers of China
 * Delete - The link in the template: "The Seven Great Rivers of China" actually takes you to List of rivers of China. The first two rivers I looked at fail to mention that are one of the seven great rivers of China. Also we have no article: The Seven Great Rivers of China or Seven Great Rivers of China and there are no links to those articles either. Nigej (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant. Tradedia talk 17:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jimmy Cauty
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC) Redundant to Template:The KLF, as Cauty has been an active half of the duo, and the template repeats the same links. — Kochas 14:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Jimmy Cauty
 * Delete: redundant template. Only contains one actual link to Cauty's works. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-split
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 24. Izno (talk) 23:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Uw-split
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).