Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 5



Template:Infobox PKP station

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC) seems like a fairly simple wrapper. all it does is generate the address and services parameters, which is probably why it isn't used by all the the PKP station articles. I found this while cleaning up some of the location maps (before my recent edits, it didn't support map_type and a few other parameters). we could probably just substitute and delete it after figuring out what to do with the unsupported |depot= and |water tower= parameters. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Infobox PKP station
 * Subst and delete as redundant wrapper. As for depot and water tower, they don't show anyway currently since Infobox station (which this template is a wrapper of) doesn't support them. And since they're yes/no parameters, I think they're just trivia anyway. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Number format

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 18. (non-admin closure) –Piranha249 (Discuss with me) 18:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Number_format
 * Number_format
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Cary Grant

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Songwaters with the reason "The consensus is now FOR an infobox"  F ASTILY   01:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Editnotices/Page/Cary Grant
 * Delete no longer needed. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major video game companies

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC) As discussed at Template talk:Major video game companies, the template has arbitrary criteria, is (by nature) frequently outdated, and generally useless as a navigation template, as the entries are not related in any way. Pinging linked discussion's contributors:. IceWelder &#91; &#9993; &#93; 00:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Major video game companies
 * Delete, difficult to keep maintained and is highly subjective anyway. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 01:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — "Major video game companies" is very subjective. The template's criteria requires constant maintenance, which for something as simplistic as this one should not be necessary. It's useless as a navigation template too, because none of these companies are actually related to each other outside of them being game companies. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 01:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Would be much better to have a list of the major video game companies in an article somewhere, where it can be described and referenced properly. Nigej (talk) 10:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment, looks like this was created after this discussion was closed. You may wish to examine all the templates in Template:Major information technology companies.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)  15:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * delete for the same reasons why I thought Template:Major information technology companies should be deleted: the arbitrary cut-offs are WP:OR. Frietjes (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not that useful as a nav template. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Strongly delete this template was inapproriate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.165.35.155 (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roberrt date
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted by per G2  –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 16:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC) Unused template and has only one date. Alcremie (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Roberrt date
 * Delete Perhaps some sort of test, difficult to tell exactly. Nigej (talk) 10:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).