Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 11



Template:Did you know nominations/LattePanda

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was wrong venue, pretty sure we don't delete these anyway. Primefac (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC) A waste of my time Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Did you know nominations/LattePanda
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Steam Awards GOTY

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Following a preliminary discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games, I am nominating this new navbar template for deletion. This represents a user-voted award that is itself not independently notable. It's on a line akin to WP:USERG, and MOS:VG states not to include user-voted awards in award/reception sections, so the navbar runs counter to that. While Steam is of course notable, and while Steam Awards has an article, the "Game of the Year" award itself is not independently notable. See also nomination for Indie DB Indie of the Year recipients. Navbars of this nature run the risk of games having dozens of user-voted/user-generated awards from publications cluttered at the bottom. -- ferret (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Steam Awards GOTY

I agree with the decision, the reasons that have been presented seem to me to be adequate, reasonable and expressed with cordiality. Please proceed as you see fit. My best wishes -- AntonioMDA (talk) 11 January 2021 — Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indie DB Indie of the Year recipients

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:11, 12 January 2021 (UTC) Following a preliminary discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games, I am nominating this new navbar template for deletion. This represents a user-voted award that is itself not independently notable. It's on a line akin to WP:USERG, and MOS:VG states not to include user-voted awards in award/reception sections, so the navbar runs counter to that. While IndieDB is notable, their awards do not appear to be. See also nomination for Steam Awards GOTY. Navbars of this nature run the risk of games having dozens of user-voted/user-generated awards from publications cluttered at the bottom. -- ferret (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Indie DB Indie of the Year recipients

I agree with the decision, the reasons that have been presented seem to me to be adequate, reasonable and expressed with cordiality. Please proceed as you see fit. My best wishes -- AntonioMDA (talk) 11 January 2021 — Preceding undated comment added 16:03, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).