Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 15



Template:WMF IP

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:WMF IP. No prejudice against any decision or discussion that determines the target should be the other template. Primefac (talk) 02:14, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Propose merging Template:WMF IP with Template:Private IP.
 * WMF IP
 * Private IP

These templates basically serve the same purpose, in fact the template Template:Private IP was actually mostly copies from Template:WMF IP. The templates also link the same meta page in the "more info" link. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Support They do actually serve a slightly different purpose. Template:WMF IP (the original) is used for IP addresses that face the Internet at large, also known as "WAN" or "external" IP addresses. These can show up when a person or automated tool (accidentally) makes edits through a Foundation data center internet connection. Even if a person or bot were to edit from within the Foundation network and the same data centre, these interactions still go through the "front door" and have a WAN source address. On the other hand, Template:Private IP describes an internal "LAN" or "private" IP address (such as User:127.0.0.1 and the various ). It is not be possible, even by human mistake, to interact with the wiki in such a way that one's IP address appears as a LAN address. However, over the past ten years there have been one or two occasions where the wiki was misconfigured and interpreted IP information incorrectly. When we edit the wiki, we go through many servers over the Internet between our device and the Foundation web servers processing the edit. If the wiki software loses track of part of that chain, or looks at the wrong end of the end of the chain, it could think the edit came from itself, which manifests as the edit being assigned to   or   addresses. In a nut shell: Template:WMF IP generally refers to edits actually made from a Foundation server, usually due the editing user themselves doing so by mistake. Template:Private IP generally refers to normal external edits that where, due to a technical mistake on the wiki side, the source IP is lost and thus got wrongly attributed to a private LAN address. Both of these are very unlikely now, since these address sets are generally blocked by abuse filters and such. I support merging them, because the distinction is confusing and not useful to people, and for those technically interested, the distinction remains evident from the address itself. --Krinkle (talk) 23:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Question,, should a merged template provide a parameter to provide a distinction between these two? e.g. a Private IP that has a type with values "internal" vs "WMF", which changes the display output of the template slightly. Or do you think the distinction is not even worth noting in that manner? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * @ProcrastinatingReader I don't think the distinction is worth noting. I believe those who would know what to set it to, or want to read it, already do this based on the shape of the IP address alone. For the purpose of wiki admins and patrollers, I'm not aware of this being a factor into how they would or should respond. --Krinkle (talk) 23:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment if merged, it should use "WMF IP", and there should be a switch indicating the private address space IP -- 70.31.205.108 (talk) 14:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:US-ryrm-sa

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Unused, and duplicates obsolete text that has been removed from Template:RoutemapSeeAlso. Would have qualified for WP:SPEEDY under criteria T3. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * US-ryrm-sa
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bob Willis Trophy templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 29. Primefac (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 2020_Bob_Willis_Trophy_North_Group
 * 2020_Bob_Willis_Trophy_Central_Group
 * 2020_Bob_Willis_Trophy_South_Group
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beethoven violin sonatas

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Unused and deprecated in favor of Beethoven duo sonatas intforce (talk) 14:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Beethoven violin sonatas
 * Beethoven cello sonatas


 * Delete – good call. Aza24 (talk) 05:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rachael Heyhoe Flint Trophy templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 January 29. Primefac (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 2020_Rachael_Heyhoe_Flint_Trophy_North_Group
 * 2020_Rachael_Heyhoe_Flint_Trophy_South_Group
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Schubert piano sonatas

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:36, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Unused duplicate of Schubert piano compositions intforce (talk) 14:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Schubert piano sonatas


 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Composition genre navboxes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete following replacement or removal as appropriate. Primefac (talk) 00:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * duplicate to Malcolm Arnold:
 * Arnold symphonies
 * duplicate to Milton Babbitt:
 * Babbitt string quartets
 * duplicate to Béla Bartók:
 * Bartok concertos
 * Bartok string quartets
 * duplicate to Max Bruch:
 * Bruch concertos
 * duplicate to Anton Bruckner:
 * Bruckner symphonies
 * Bruckner masses
 * duplicate to Johannes Brahms:
 * Brahms symphonies
 * Brahms concertos
 * duplicate to John Harbison:
 * Harbison symphonies
 * duplicate to Franz Liszt:
 * Liszt symphonic poems
 * Liszt piano concertos
 * duplicate to Bohuslav Martinů:
 * Martinů symphonies
 * Martinů string quartets
 * duplicate to Alexander Glazunov:
 * Glazunov symphonies
 * duplicate to Gustav Mahler:
 * Mahler songs
 * duplicate to Felix Mendelssohn:
 * Mendelssohn chamber music
 * Mendelssohn symphonies
 * Mendelssohn concertos
 * duplicate to Richard Strauss:
 * Richard Strauss symphonies
 * Strauss tone poems
 * duplicate to Louis Spohr:
 * Spohr string quartets
 * duplicate to Walter Piston:
 * Piston string quartets
 * Piston symphonies
 * duplicate to Sergei Prokofiev:
 * Prokofiev symphonies
 * Prokofiev piano sonatas
 * Prokofiev concertos
 * duplicate to Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky:
 * Tchaikovsky symphonies
 * Tchaikovsky string quartets
 * Tchaikovsky concertos
 * Tchaikovsky ballets
 * duplicate to Ralph Vaughan Williams:
 * Vaughan Williams symphonies
 * (added on 18 January) duplicate to Robert Simpson (composer):
 * Robert Simpson symphonies
 * (added on 19 January) merge to Niccolò Paganini:
 * Paganini violin concertos
 * (added on 31 January) merge to Christopher Rouse:
 * Rouse symphonies
 * (added on 31 January) merge to Robert Schumann:
 * Schumann symphonies
 * Schumann concertos
 * Schumann vocal works
 * Schumann choral works

Same reasoning as with the Rachmaninoff templates and Dvořák templates; I thought it best if we do this altogether. The individual genre templates are significantly older than the unified composer templates, and largely deprecated. Many pages transclude both templates, which is a significant duplication of content. intforce (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all These are all a sub-section of the main template, eg Arnold symphonies contains just the symphonies listed also in Malcolm Arnold. The Arnold symphonies only contain the Arnold symphonies template, not the main Malcolm Arnold template. Firstly, who's to say that someone in a symphony article only want to navigate to other symphonies. Secondly, it's all overall complicated, the user expects a certain consistency and finding radically different templates about the same composer will simply confuse them. Nigej (talk) 17:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete with caveat – in general,, I'm supportive of deleting the ones you have put here but we need to be sure that the pages with removed templates will be substituted with their appropriate duplicates; e.g. an article like String Quartet No. 2 (Piston) won't be left with out the Walter Piston navbox. I don't know if you want to do this, or a bot can, but this is certainly something that should be addressed. Aza24 (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Should not be a problem, once the discussion is closed with consensus to delete, I can do a pass with AWB. intforce (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete all as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've just created Robert Simpson (composer), if you want to add Robert Simpson symphonies to the nomination Aza24 (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Good call. @Nigej @Andy Mabbett, just in case this changes your assessment. intforce (talk) 23:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I've also added Paganini violin concertos. intforce (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I prefer the new template, more in line with what our readers expect. Nigej (talk) 07:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * also: Christopher Rouse and Rouse symphonies Grimes2 (talk) 21:52, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Added, thanks intforce (talk) 12:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Irish-railway-routemap

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Obsolete and unused; replaced by Railway-routemap. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Irish-railway-routemap
 * Northern Ireland-railway-routemap
 * LIRR-routemap
 * NJTransit-routemap
 * SMRT-routemap
 * UAE-railway-routemap


 * Delete all, per nom and Templates for discussion/Log/2021 January 7. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Then how do we change the pages that still adopt the template (e.g. Canberra MRT station, Toa Payoh MRT station and Bras Basah MRT station.)--ZKang123 (talk) 01:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * SMRT-routemap is not linked to or from any other files. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).