Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 12



Template:Pakistan–United Arab Emirates relations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Pakistan–United Arab Emirates relations

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and the UAE used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Given that there are ~200 countries, we could end up with 200*200/2=20,000 articles like Pakistan–United Arab Emirates relations, but surely that doesn't mean we need 20,000 corresponding templates. On that basis, this style of template needs to be limited to the small number of most important bilateral relationships, like Russia–United States relations or India–Pakistan relations. This particular template is not in that group, containing a small number of loosely related articles and categories. The article Pakistan–United Arab Emirates relations, Foreign relations of Pakistan and Foreign relations of the United Arab Emirates seem to me to be sufficient. Nigej (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan–Turkey relations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Pakistan–Turkey relations

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and Turkey used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comment above, I don't see anything special about Pakistan–Turkey relations that warrant this template. Pakistan–Turkey relations exists and is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 11:12, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comment above, I don't see anything special about Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations that warrant this template. Pakistan–Saudi Arabia relations exists and is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 11:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australia–Pakistan relations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Australia–Pakistan relations

Infrequently used. The majority of the links in the template are linked to categories, some of which are cricket tours that have nothing to do with the two countries relations. Aside from the eponymous article, there are no specific articles about the relations between Australia and Pakistan used in the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comment above, I don't see anything special about Australia–Pakistan relations that warrant this template. Australia–Pakistan relations exists and is sufficient. Nigej (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ig header

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:International goals header. Izno (talk) 00:28, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Propose merging Template:Ig header with Template:International goals header.
 * Ig header
 * International goals header

Duplicate templates, Template:International goals header has proper documentation and includes a column for a reference to is more useful Joseph2302 (talk) 18:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge Clearly serving the same purpose. "International goals header" is the better name. Only about 200 transclusions of each, indicating that most international goalscorers don't use either. On that basis subst/delete would be another plausible option. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge into International goals header. GiantSnowman 10:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment see related Ig footer which is up for discussion. Nigej (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lfc

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Not transcluded anywhere, and it's more effort to use this template than to just write L.F.C. Combined with the fact that many football teams are now called X Women rather than X L.F.C, there doesn't seem a point to it Joseph2302 (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Lfc
 * Delete as unused. Nigej (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIFA World Cup Bronze Boot

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC) The FIFA World Cup Golden Boot is notable, but we don't need a template for people who scored the 2nd or 3rd most goals in a competition <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * FIFA World Cup Bronze Boot
 * FIFA World Cup Silver Boot
 * FIFA World Cup Silver Ball (added to nom on 14 March)
 * FIFA World Cup Bronze Ball (added to nom on 14 March)
 * Delete Treats navboxes as decorations. Why would someone want to navigate between footballers that scored the second/third most goals in a competition? Fails much of WP:NAVBOX. Nigej (talk) 18:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 10:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Per the nom rationale, I would suggest bundling into that FIFA World Cup Silver Ball and FIFA World Cup Bronze Ball. --SuperJew (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree, I have added them, and tagged accordingly. I support deletion of both of these (and would have nominated them at the same time had I realised they existed). <b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b><b style="color:#000000">2302</b> (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support deleting the other two too. Rationale also applies to these - why would someone want to navigate between the 2nd or 3rd best players in a competition. Nigej (talk) 11:45, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arthur Marvin
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 16:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC) Cinematographer credits are not applicable under WP:FILMNAV. And the single director credit obviously doesn't require a template.  DoubleCross  ( ‡ ) 15:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Arthur Marvin
 * Delete per nom. Article Arthur Marvin has a "Filmography" which provides sufficient navigation. Nigej (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Earthquakes in 1812
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 March 25. Izno (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Earthquakes_in_1812
 * Earthquakes_in_1855
 * Earthquakes_in_1868
 * Earthquakes_in_1894
 * Earthquakes_in_1901
 * Earthquakes_in_1902
 * Earthquakes_in_1904
 * Earthquakes_in_1905
 * Earthquakes_in_1906
 * Earthquakes_in_1907
 * Earthquakes_in_1909
 * Earthquakes_in_1911
 * Earthquakes_in_1914
 * Earthquakes_in_1915
 * Earthquakes_in_1917
 * Earthquakes_in_1918
 * Earthquakes_in_1920
 * Earthquakes_in_1921
 * Earthquakes_in_1925
 * Earthquakes_in_1927
 * Earthquakes_in_1929
 * Earthquakes_in_1930
 * Earthquakes_in_1931
 * Earthquakes_in_1932
 * Earthquakes_in_1933
 * Earthquakes_in_1934
 * Earthquakes_in_1935
 * Earthquakes_in_1940
 * Earthquakes_in_1941
 * Earthquakes_in_1942
 * Earthquakes_in_1943
 * Earthquakes_in_1944
 * Earthquakes_in_1946
 * Earthquakes_in_1948
 * Earthquakes_in_1949
 * Earthquakes_in_1952
 * Earthquakes_in_1953
 * Earthquakes_in_1956
 * Earthquakes_in_1957
 * Earthquakes_in_1959
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).