Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 May 4



League of Legends roster templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 12:42, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Unused, already subst. into articles. Pbrks (talk) 21:42, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ahq eSports Club roster
 * Berjaya Dragons roster
 * DAMWON Gaming roster
 * DetonatioN FocusMe roster
 * Dignitas Academy roster
 * Dignitas roster
 * Dominus Esports roster
 * Edward Gaming roster
 * EVOS Esports roster
 * Excel Esports roster
 * FC Schalke 04 (League of Legends) roster
 * Flamengo Esports roster
 * Flash Wolves roster
 * FlyQuest Academy roster
 * FlyQuest roster
 * Fnatic roster
 * FunPlus Phoenix roster
 * GAM Esports roster
 * Gambit Esports roster
 * Golden Guardians Academy roster
 * Golden Guardians roster
 * Hong Kong Attitude roster
 * Hong Kong Attitude (Overwatch) roster
 * Invictus Gaming roster
 * Isurus roster
 * J Team roster
 * JD Gaming roster
 * LGD Gaming roster
 * LNG Esports roster
 * Machi Esports roster
 * MAD Lions roster
 * MAD Team roster
 * Misfits Gaming roster
 * Montreal Rebellion roster
 * Moscow Five roster
 * Moscow Five.CIS roster
 * Origen roster
 * Rogue Warriors roster
 * Royal Club roster
 * Royal Never Give Up roster
 * Saigon Buffalo roster
 * SK Gaming roster
 * Suning roster
 * Talon Esports roster
 * Team Flash roster
 * Team SoloMid roster
 * Top Esports roster
 * Unicorns of Love roster
 * Vaevictis Esports roster
 * Vega Squadron roster
 * Vici Gaming roster
 * Victory Five roster
 * Delete - I see little reason to use these restrictive templates when we can more easily edit the Esports roster header in each article. Also, some of these are outdated. Rekkles does not play for Fnatic. Anarchyte  ( talk  &#8226;  work ) 09:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - unneeded, overly specific templates. Agreed with above comment. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete — The last four templates are for discussions only and aren't referred from any article. They are useless and pollute template namespace. -- AXO NOV  (talk) ⚑ 15:32, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3555

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC) replaced by Frietjes (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis3555
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes-2Reseeds

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 12:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC) replaced by Frietjes (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 16TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes-2Reseeds
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Finals3reseed

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC) replaced by Frietjes (talk) 20:20, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 16TeamBracket-Finals3reseed
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-FinalsReseed

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 12:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC) replaced by Frietjes (talk) 20:16, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * 16TeamBracket-FinalsReseed
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:X mark big
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Xmark. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 18:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC) X mark big is the same as Xmark, just with a default value of 23px rather than 20px and less options.. It should be substituted and then redirected to Xmark / deleted. Most of its transclusions come from Done/See also. Terasail &#91;✉&#93; 17:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * X mark big
 * Keep - used regularly in some places, as noted in nomination, and incapable of confusing readers or editors. Useful to have multiple sizes depending on context. Ganesha811 (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Even though it's I think it should be redirected to a smaller Xmark. --  AXO NOV  (talk) ⚑ 15:28, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comparison for reference: ❌❌ The difference is tiny and I wouldn't be able to identify which one is which without the comparison. Might as well redirect imo. --Trialpears (talk) 19:38, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It also looks like the line spacing gets slightly larger with the bigger version which is undesirable. --Trialpears (talk) 19:41, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect. These are almost exactly the same, with this being overall worse per Trialpears. As a personal note, which should be disregarded as it's entirely WP:IDONTLIKEIT and yet, still worth mentioning, editors should really stop creating the same exact icon templates, because the current ones aren't their exact flavor. There are 10 "x" templates just in the /doc of this one, and I'm pretty sure there are even more undocumented. Wikipedia isn't a blog or a personal website and editors should work with what is already present (and hopefully complies with accessibility guidelines, which some of these obviously do not). --Gonnym (talk) 12:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Trialpears, given the spacing quirks noted by them in their statement. Hog Farm Talk 23:46, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * redirect, minor difference in size. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:ProcessArgs
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 12:40, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Previously used by Module:Delimited tag, has become unused after that module's deletion. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 03:32, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * ProcessArgs
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Designer labels
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC) The scope of this template is too broad, better served by a cat or list, fails WP:NAVBOX. Störm  (talk)  02:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Designer labels
 * Delete per nom, way too large in scope. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 12:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. Would it be possible to split it by e.g. country? – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 12:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * delete or re-purpose as a list article. Frietjes (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Motorways and Trunk Roads in England
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 17. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 21:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Motorways_and_Trunk_Roads_in_England
 * Motorways_in_the_United_Kingdom
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).