Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 1



Template:Db-gallery-notice-NPF

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  06:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Obsolete template: Doing an insource search turns up no copies of the templates HTML comment so this doesn't appear to have ever been used anywhere. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 18:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Db-gallery-notice-NPF
 * The U3 Speedy deletion criteria was depreciated in July
 * The PageTriage extension doesn't seem to have ever been configured to allow tagging with the user space specific CSD templates
 * Delete ... and "-NPF" templates shouldn't exist anyway since it shouldn't have overriden the community's choice on how to structure CSD notices. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Universal Animation Conventions

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  06:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC) I'm not seeing the navigational benefit of this navbox that only has two links. Each article already links to the other in the "See also" sections. There is no overarching page linked to help further define the scope for expansion, either. 2pou (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Universal Animation Conventions
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inkpot Award

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  06:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC) The creator has apparently left WP, so I can't ask directly, but I can't tell what this template was created for. It doesn't appear to be used anywhere. My best guess is that it was intended to nest the other navboxes in Category:Inkpot Award templates, but that's just a guess. As it stands now, everything on this navbox is already contained in Inkpot Award footer, which is nested in each decade's navbox. Perhaps someone has ideas how to complete this project? If not, this duplicated/unused template should be deleted. - 2pou (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Inkpot Award
 * Delete Too small for a navbox. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Slovakia – Identifier population

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Nominator supports keeping now that the errors have been done away with, so this is essentially a withdrawal of the nomination. ✗ plicit  06:41, 9 September 2021 (UTC) Expression error Whiteguru (talk) 03:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Slovakia – Identifier population
 * I removed . Error has been fixed. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 03:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC) & ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Serves no use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Template is used on Districts of Slovakia.

If u want strict delete, please don't give, but You give  , because You can destroy pages with called template.


 * I delete, because problem was only technical character (syntax error or doesn't used), but actual is none actual. Have You another problem with this template. I doesn't think.
 * U check better. Template was doesn't use in first Your report, but in second yes, at 16:01, 1 September 2021.


 * It would be good to delete template after 24 hours. I first created template, but to use in the article was not so fast. Look Special:Diff/1041727945 and maybe You will understand. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 00:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC), ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 00:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I never said it wasn't being used. Serves no use means it's useless. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Exist some real argument, why delete this template? Answer as "because", "I don't like" is not real argument. This is our project, no only. So, is this template so real big catastrophe and one right way is only delete this template? And You, You added to delete as first. It's ok, now? I see more energy to delete or talk about that, but i don't listen about way to be this template better. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 14:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

If actual template is okey, so You write the "Okey" for another users. ✍️ Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 15:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * When it came up, all I found was expression error and orphan, not connected to any pages. Both issues appear to be sorted, now. I now support Keep and close. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).