Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 September 8



Template:JK Sillamäe Kalev squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  07:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Template not used and not to be used any time soon as the team is now amateur. Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:32, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * JK Sillamäe Kalev squad
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:05, 9 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - insufficient links to justify. GiantSnowman 18:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1973 Buffalo Bills roster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  07:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC) An unused fork that is redundant as the 1973 Bills season article already has the roster in table format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:59, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 1973 Buffalo Bills roster
 * delete was [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1973_Buffalo_Bills_season&type=revision&diff=1035583145&oldid=999381639 merged here] with attribution. Frietjes (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Karting stub

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  07:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC) Malformed and unused stub template. Karting-stub would be the correct form and (perhaps surprisingly) does not exist: motorsport-stub seems the best current stub template for this topic. Pam D  19:50, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Karting stub
 * Delete Not a stub template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:42, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archive list long inline

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 September 16. ✗ plicit  07:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Archive_list_long_inline
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ibox-US

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  10:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Seems to be unused in articles. -- Beland (talk) 07:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Ibox-US


 * Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Flagbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  10:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Seems to be unused. -- Beland (talk) 07:37, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Flagbox


 * Delete per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:25, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 15:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Articles on first-level administrative divisions of North American countries

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC) This can be replaced with: Administrative divisions of which shows all of the Americas rather than just North America. But it seems silly to have two different navigation scopes for this. This template also seems to be ill-maintained, as for the U.S. it links to U.S. state even though there are also territories and the District of Columbia. -- Beland (talk) 06:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Articles on first-level administrative divisions of North American countries
 * Comment Beland, aren't the other first-level administrative templates for the other continents the same as this? Wouldn't those be subject to a Tfd like this? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I have no idea; I only noticed this one while doing other things. -- Beland (talk) 23:07, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yeovil Town W.F.C. squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  10:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Bring back Daz Sampson with the reason "G8: squad template for a football club that no longer exists"  F ASTILY   02:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeovil Town W.F.C. squad
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:03, 8 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - club no longer exists, so there is no 'current' squad to navigate between. GiantSnowman 19:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. With only two entries on it, seems pretty pointless. Govvy (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - club is no longer active so can't have a current squad Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).