Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 28



Beyoncé track list templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 08:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC) The use of track listing templates in infoboxes has been depreciated a long time ago. The default collapse of information is discouraged per MOS:COLLAPSE ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 21:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Lemonade (Beyoncé album) tracks
 * Beyoncé (album) tracks
 * 4 (Beyoncé album) tracks
 * B'Day (Beyoncé album) tracks
 * Note: The above templates were previously nominated for deletion at this TfD in March 2019, but delete per the existence of Beyoncé songs navbox. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 15:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all: all of these songs are already included in the navbox Beyoncé songs, and Extra track listing states "Track listings should not be added to infoboxes if there is a navigation template or navbox at the bottom of the article which already lists the songs". These track listings are redundant. Richard3120 (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Simon J. Smith

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 00:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC) With one redirected and one up for deletion, this template now navigates only three films. Even if that weren't the case, they are all DreamWorks Animation properties, so this template is entirely redundant to DreamWorks Animation. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Simon J. Smith
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Megamind

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 08:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Only three articles, plus the primary so fails WP:NENAN suggestion of five plus the primary. Also has redirects to the primary page. Unnecessary when so few articles. Indagate (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Megamind
 * Delete Per nom - only one of the game articles seems notable so there are ultimately very few real articles to navigate between. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Per nom - a game article of Mega Team Unite is in the works. It will be hard to find any sources for the game but we need to keep it just for the Franchise page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Mega Team Unite does not seem notable so shouldn't have its own article, I couldn't see enough sources. Franchise page is currently at AfD but why is this template needed for it? Surely everything will be linked there also. Indagate (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Megamind: Music from the Motion Picture also exists, but is not included in the navbox yet. -B RAINULATOR 9 (TALK) 18:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's now in there. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete- the franchise spans across multiple media of mixed notability. WP:TOOSOON and WP:NENAN. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 00:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep it now [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&hidelinks=1&target=Template%3AMegamind&namespace=0 connect six articles], which is enough for a navbox. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk)  22:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No, it's four articles. One is being merged into another and the title page is subject of an Afd until further notice. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The cart goes after the horse. You nominate the template for deletion after the articles have been deleted and merged.  By the way this AfD doesn't look like it is closing as delete any time soon.   Plastikspork ―Œ (talk)  14:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 5 articles because AfD for Megamind: The Button of Doom closed with consensus to merge so shouldn't survive much longer, so fails WP:NENAN "at least five articles (not counting the primary article" Indagate (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The cart goes after the horse and WP:NENAN is an essay. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk)  15:41, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * True but consensus already achieved to merge article. True but t's widely cited and don't see reason to deviate in this case Indagate (talk) 15:43, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inccat

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  23:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC) Unused template that is not substituted when used on category spaces. Template:Companies established in the year is better used alternative. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Inccat
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KTM Komuter color

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC) replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/KTM Komuter Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * KTM Komuter color
 * KTM Komuter lines
 * KTM Komuter style
 * S-line/KTM Komuter left/Bukit Mertajam-Padang Rengas
 * S-line/KTM Komuter right/Bukit Mertajam-Padang Rengas
 * S-line/KTM Komuter left/Padang Besar-Butterworth
 * S-line/KTM Komuter right/Padang Besar-Butterworth
 * S-line/KTM Komuter left/Seremban Line
 * S-line/KTM Komuter right/Seremban Line
 * S-line/KTM Komuter left/Tanjung Malim-Port Klang
 * S-line/KTM Komuter right/Tanjung Malim-Port Klang
 * KTM Komuter stations
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KLRT line

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC) replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/KLRT Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * KLRT line
 * KLRT color
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:29, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lambrecht-surname

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC) There is no sourced article on the name Lambrecht as either given name or surname (although there is a list of nameholders in a dab page), so the connections in this template appear to be unsourced. The template adds unverified clutter to pages. An article on the name, with sources, would be more appropriate and could include a list of related names. Pam D  06:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Lambrecht-surname
 * Delete per norm. --Vaco98 (talk) 11:27, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The template has now been renamed to be Lambert-surname, but the only sourced info about related names in Lambert (name) is " variant forms include: Lamberty, Lambertot, Lamberton". Pam  D  03:55, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * And note that Lamberton, mentioned (sourced) as a variant in Lambert (name), is not mentioned in this template, which casts further doubt on its reliability. Pam  D  17:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Lambrecht claims it is a variant of Lambert (name) as well -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I suggest that the way forward would be to add content to Lambert (name), listing and discussing variants, with sources for each, and then to add a line to each surname page saying "xxx is a variation of the name Lambert (name)", again with a source each time. Pam  D  17:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).