Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 20



Template:2009 NCAA Division I FCS independents football standings/doc

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:47, 27 November 2022 (UTC) No longer used on the main template page since yesterday. A doc page for a standings template isn't necessary. All categories and information are going to be edited and displayed on the main template space. A doc page is counterintuitive for a template like this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:13, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2009 NCAA Division I FCS independents football standings/doc
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ted

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC) Navbox created by blocked sockpuppet. Redundant to Seth MacFarlane. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:24, 12 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  05:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ted
 * Keep Enough links for a navbox and there is a franchise associated with Ted despite the creation by the sockpuppet. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete 5 link navboxes may at times be justified but if all the links are included in another navbox, as is the case here, I don't see a reason to have two different ones. --Trialpears (talk) 22:09, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Trial. --Izno (talk) 21:53, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).