Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 27

 &lt; May 26 May 28 &gt;

Template:Lang-ru/sandbox/doc

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC) I'm renominating this in my own name (after yesterday's speedy keep) with a clearer rationale - this is an obsolete test from 2009, and it can't be redirected to the main /doc because Template:Lang-ru/doc doesn't exist. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Lang-ru/sandbox/doc
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC) Effective duplication of Template:Cardiff, Newport and the Valleys railway stations, no good reason for this one to be separate in my opinion. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales
 * It's not a duplicate. Whilst both cover the route between Cardiff and Maesteg, all the other routes are in either one navbox or the other, but not both. I should point out that I created Template:Commuter Stations: Cardiff Local Lines run by Arriva Trains Wales to clean up what had been doing in sixteen or so articles, basically creating a lot of maintenance overhead and defeating the purpose of a template. See [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Redrose64?offset=20120311003100&limit=23 these edits of mine]. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep – on the basis that it is not entirely a duplicate of the other template, it contains stations in England where the other one does not. Wouldn't mind it be renamed though, unless it forms part of a consistent titling scheme or the lines in question were only operated by ATW and no other operator.  Dank Jae  20:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It's definitely not a consistent titling scheme. explains why I chose that name. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Does not duplicate the template cited. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Festiniog Railway Company

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC) Duplicate of Template:Ffestiniog Railway. Not sure what purpose it achieves, given the first two lines cover the same 3 pages? Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Festiniog Railway Company
 * Again, this is not a duplicate - only four links are found in both navboxes. As for the first two lines cover the same 3 pages, try following the links - eight different pages are linked in all. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep – The two are not duplicates, and if you follow the links the second line directs to the relevant rolling stock lists, not the main article as the first line.  Dank Jae  20:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Merge both templates into one. We do have two templates that pretty much cover the same ground. And this is not a duplicate of any template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LSDXOXO

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 3. Izno (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
 * LSDXOXO
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).