Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 October 27

 &lt; October 26 October 28 &gt;

Template:Nazi

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. RL0919 (talk) 12:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) This new template appears to be being added to the talk pages of articles about far-right subjects, directing people to WP:NONAZIS. While I'm sure few of us disagree with the principle of WP:NONAZIS, the issue is that it's a user essay, not an official policy. It's therefore not appropriate for users on high-profile articles to be directed to it as if it were policy. — Czello (music) 20:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Nazi
 * Delete per nom. Izno (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Like WP:NONAZIS, WP:BRD is an essay, not official policy, but there is general consensus in its favor, and not following it is often viewed as disruptive. In addition, there is precedent for users being blocked for editing articles with a pro-Nazi slant (example). CJ-Moki (talk) 21:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't think of examples where WP:BRD has its own banners on article talk pages in the manner of this one. — Czello (music) 22:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - it's really not necessary to have a talk page banner pointing to the NONAZIS essay. Reminds me of that "stay calm" banner--these sorts of notices don't work. The negative is that it adds to banner blindness, particularly where Nazi-related pages already have a lot of banners (ctop notices and whatnot). I don't see a positive. Well intentioned but counterproductive. Levivich (talk) 22:17, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - this seems to be more of an editor’s essay/comments, which are not necessary. If an editor pushes a certain point of view, they are dealt with under official policy-current rules and also guidelines. I agree with Czello and Levivich, “well intended but counterproductive”. Kierzek (talk) 22:31, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ― Ö S M A N (talk · contribs) 13:22, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It lets people know what to do when they see a Nazi 123957a (talk) 12:04, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Buildings on Olvera Street

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  00:05, 4 November 2023 (UTC) This is content in the template namespace. Should be substed and deleted. And I'd suggest it be substed on only one of the pages and deleted from the other entirely. Izno (talk) 09:29, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Buildings on Olvera Street
 * Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * delete, now merged with Olvera Street. Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.