Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 September 16

 &lt; September 15 September 17 &gt;

Template:Infobox Indian state or territory/styles.css

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2023 (UTC) Unused styles.css template. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:44, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Infobox Indian state or territory/styles.css
 * Delete per nom. SWinxy (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Weren't

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC) Unused. Unnecessary. Just type "wasn't" or "weren't". --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:40, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Weren't


 * See they were. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Both strings are they same, unlike the template you linked. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 10:56, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * There are strings, and the last ("weren't") differs from the first two ("wasn't"). This template exists for the same reason as the other pronoun templates. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a certain point where it's easier to just manually look up the person's gender and compose your message appropriately rather than using a series of baroque templates. A situation in which one would say that a specific user wasn't something in a discussion seems pretty rare. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * What's easiest for you may not be easiest for everyone. If you have no use for this template, simply don't use it. It exists for consistency with the other pronoun templates. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Have

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC) Unused. Unnecessary. Just type "has" or "have". --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 05:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Have


 * See they have. jlwoodwa (talk) 07:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The "have" form only makes sense when preceeded by "they", in which case you might as well use they have. In any other context, you would say " has foo", even if goes by singular they pronouns. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Counterpoint: Adverbs. "They recently have been&hellip;" jlwoodwa (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.