Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 April 20

 &lt; April 19 April 21 &gt;

Template:Echinoderm phylogeny

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  11:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Unsed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Echinoderm phylogeny
 * Delete Not even the consensus phylogeny given the Ophiuroidea+Echinozoa grouping. Using Asterozoa for a grouping excluding ophiuroids is also uncommon, and contradicts what we're doing in that article. Indeed, most of our articles seem to use the more accepted phylogeny placing Ophiuroidea as a sister group of Asteroidea in Asterozoa. Chaotıċ Enby   (talk · contribs) 10:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Provinces of the Valencian Community

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  11:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Unused and only three links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Provinces of the Valencian Community
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Turkey province population/Ankara

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  11:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Unused data chart. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Turkey province population/Ankara
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tampa Bay Radio/doc

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  11:57, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Unused. Parent template uses Navbox documentation. DrChuck68 (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Tampa Bay Radio/doc
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Welcome-arbpia

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Toadette Edit! 18:37, 27 April 2024 (UTC) Per WP:CTOP, only officially designated templates can be used to alert an editor to a contentious topic. This unfortunately contradicts this, although I commend the effort made to attempt to be less bitey to newcomers. Awesome Aasim 16:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Welcome-arbpia


 * I use this template quite a lot but always in conjunction with the official template, just for new users that venture into the AI/IP area and cannot be expected to "get" the complications of Arbpia/CT and WP:ARBECR right off the bat. I don't use it for editors that have already met the requirements for editing in the topic area, for those only the official template. It is on balance useful even if some editors do not get that either. If it would go away, I would probably go back to just adding the same kind of thing as a plain text addition to the official template, so why not just leave this be? If not, then probably we need an official version.Selfstudier (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I use this template frequently as well but never without also adding the official template. It's great to have this option to kindly welcome new users trying to edit in the topic area in addition to the official template. If anything the language in this template could be incorporated into the official template which would require a broader discussion than this. Philipnelson99 (talk) 16:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * and I don't believe this template is intended to replace the official CTOP warning. Philipnelson99 (talk) 16:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is not per
 * Philipnelson99 (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't disagree with this; I just think that deviation from a formalized process that has been discussed by the community and agreed upon by ArbCom should not be done without good reason. This is a good question to raise on Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee - if there can be a way to get editors aware while not sounding super harsh. Maybe ArbCom creates a welcome-ct template. Awesome Aasim 00:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I brought this up at WT:ACN here, and it was discussed there and the village pump. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * This template is a lot more clear on the requirements than the official one. The only problem I have is that it looks like overkill to place this one as well as the official one. A better solution would be to get changes to the official template to make it as user-friendly as this one. Meanwhile I don't think this one should be deleted. Zerotalk 06:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I concur with the comments above, this template should be used as inspiration to make the official one more user-friendly. Chaotıċ Enby   (talk · contribs) 10:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.