Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 February 24

 &lt; February 23 February 25 &gt;

Template:Rune inscription

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  23:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC) No tranclusions or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2020. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Rune inscription
 * Seems that every transclusion has been deleted today (24th) by without any explanation, replaced with a different template (Template:Fs interlinear, which is fine, but no explanation is given.) I will admit that it is something of a low-quality template, but I feel that deleting it because there are no transclusions not even a day after they were removed is a bit unfair.  wound theology  ◈  17:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I did it because the template seemed low-quality, yes, but more because it was being used on all of two pages. Since it was barely being used at all, it seemed to make sense to remove it altogether, Eievie (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Module:Lang-mni

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC) It's junk. I created it. Should have sandboxed! Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:05, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Lang-mni
 * If you would like to request speedy deletion of a Lua module, see Criteria for speedy deletion. I added the db-g7 tag for you. PleaseStand (talk) 13:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-USGov-CIA-WF

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:45, 2 March 2024 (UTC) No longer used copyright tag. Category:CIA World Factbook images is now empty, all further files where this tag would apply can/should be uploaded to Commons. --TheImaCow (talk) 07:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * PD-USGov-CIA-WF
 * Delete. I was going to say that this template should be redirected to Template:PD-USGov, or at least the category changed, which might be useful if such images need to be locally uploaded in exceptional cases. Mainly, these would be images that need to be protected before they go on the Main Page. Apparently, there is now an adminbot on Commons that adds the Main Page images to a gallery in a cascade-protected page there, making that practice obsolete. Note: Besides File copyright tags/USA, there are a couple of references in the upload interface: MediaWiki:Licenses/en-usgov and MediaWiki:FileUploadWizard.js. An interface admin would need to remove the latter one. PleaseStand (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.