Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 June 16

 &lt; June 15 June 17 &gt;

Template:Escape page link from within

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Unused template that does what Template:Delink does. Gonnym (talk) 06:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 23:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Escape page link from within
 * Keep. It is currently used, at the ANI header (just sporadically, so not showing up currently), as well as somewhere else I'm forgetting and don't have time to find at the moment (I'm on mobile with limited internet). It is not the same as delink — please reread the documentation. Delink won't help you for a parameter value that has the linking in the parent template. There's plausible use in the future, and a suitably strong warning in the documentation that in most cases you don't really want to use it, so overall no reason to delete. I suggest withdrawing the nomination, .  Sdkb  talk 14:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I've looked at the code at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Header. Am I missing something or was this entire template created just because you wanted to add a silly smile to the header ? Because without 4-1, the code works fine:
 * If that is the sole reason for that, I'm still sticking with the delete rational and also remove the smiley. Gonnym (talk) 15:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Gonnym, please do not remove the documentation that explains this template's purpose (and which I just referenced above) in the midst of this TfD. I created this template because there are various circumstances in which someone might want to use a template field that is normally wrapped in a link, but not want a link in a particular niche circumstance. The linked example is one — this template allows the 4-1 (which is better characterized as the mandatory humor disclosure than a "silly smiley") to be added — but there are others. I have indeed used this template in other circumstances (which were since resolved, thus why it's no longer transcluded elsewhere), which I can try to remember and dig up if you or others are curious. The example in the documentation with redirect is also only quasi-hypothetical. But it's somewhat immaterial, as the overall use case is laid out clearly in the documentation, and WP:TFD is very clear that being unused is not sufficient rationale for deletion unless the template also has no likelihood of being used in the future.  Sdkb  talk 23:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I removed the "documentation" as it isn't documentation, but you telling a irrelevant story. Documentation should be short and to the point. So far you aren't adding any usages other than the one at the header template which isn't really needed. Gonnym (talk) 07:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I don't think that something like this can have any legitimate uses, and it's something of an extreme hack – notably, it adds a couple of invisible links pointing to the Main Page, which would be visible to users browsing in certain unusual ways (e.g. when using the keyboard to cycle through links, rather than finding them visually – this is something a blind person might plausibly do when trying to navigate a page). In general, if a template is asking for a page name (and thus creating a link to the page), the template is designed to have a page name entered there, and if you're trying to enter something else you are using the wrong template. As such, deleting this is probably for the best because a) it doesn't quite work properly and b) its existence implicitly encourages people to use it, which in the case of this template is probably a bad idea. (This is, however, entirely different from delink and thus the nomination statement is incorrect.) --ais523 05:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You're correct that the template is an extreme hack. When the template was created, the documentation included a prominent warning to try to dissuade inappropriate usage. I'd say that that warning has worked. I don't think the number of legitimate uses is completely zero, though — for situations like the above, you don't want to modify the underlying template, so there is no other solution to achieve the same functionality. With this as a template, it's at least possible to track usage (and curtail inappropriate usage), which seems better than having users stumble on the code independently without any guidance. There are plenty of templates with abuse potential; documenting them works better than trying to hide away the knowledge the code exists. (And yes, thank you for affirming that the nomination is based on an erroneous understanding; it should not be given weight.)  Sdkb  talk 11:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. I understand the intention of this template, but it is not done in a "good" way; we should not be encouraging templates that throw in invisible links to the Main Page just to make something happen. I will also note the /doc example is a somewhat over-trivialised hypothetical that (as near as I can tell) will never actually be used. If there are strong enough warnings on the template to discourage people from using it, and people haven't used the template because of it (and/or because it's not necessarily a useful template) then it should be deleted. If a specific template should allow for non-wikilinking in a parameter but doesn't, the template itself should probably be changed. Primefac (talk) 13:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I'm not a fan of hacky solutions like this which are hard to understand and liable to cause nasty surprises for casual template authors.  I've reviewed the arguments above and am unconvinced that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks -Fastily  22:40, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Grand Rapids and Indiana Railroad

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 June 24. Izno (talk) 02:17, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Grand_Rapids_and_Indiana_Railroad
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Piccadilly Page

 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  23:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC) WP:Picacadilly is about to get deleted as it is literally self serving so this should be deleted too. xq 23:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Piccadilly Page
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Piccadilly :?]           Ned1a Wanna talk?   15:44, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Huang Xiaoyun
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  23:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC) Empty navbox. DB 1729 talk 22:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Huang Xiaoyun
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TP (Taiwan)
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:34, 23 June 2024 (UTC) No transclusions or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * TP (Taiwan)
 * Delete: Unused template for fringe party.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 06:14, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, pretty self-explanatory  C F A   💬  13:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.