Wikipedia:Times that 100 Wikipedians supported a policy change

This is a list of occasions when at least 100 Wikipedians (ideally excluding sock puppets) explicitly voted for a policy change.

See also:
 * Times that 100 Wikipedians supported an RFX
 * Times that 100 Wikipedians supported an ArbCom candidate
 * Times that 100 Wikipedians concurred in a deletion debate
 * Times that 100 Wikipedians participated in a miscellaneous matter
 * WP:200 and WP:300 for similar lists with 200- and 300 (plus)-participant events
 * WikiProject Democracy


 * Ratification vote on C-Class
 * 153 in support, 107 opposed; passed


 * Criteria for Speedy Deletion Proposal
 * 1) Unremarkable people – 120 to implement
 * 2) Attack pages – 110 to implement


 * Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress
 * 126 users endorsed this Request for Comment.


 * Semi-protection policy straw poll
 * 103 voted in favor of the policy.


 * Three revert rule enforcement
 * 159 voted to implement the enforcement.


 * Userbox debate
 * 1) Requests for comment/Kelly Martin/Original – 127 to endorse the view that Kelly Martin abused her sysop powers
 * 2) Templates for deletion/userbox templates concerning beliefs and convictions – 185 to keep
 * 3) Userbox policy poll – 163 in favor
 * 4) May Userbox policy poll – 105 in favor of moving userboxes to a userbox namespace, as proposed by User:TheTrueSora


 * Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
 * 133 voting in support of the policy in straw poll.


 * Wikipedia:Blocking policy proposal straw poll
 * Of the two options in favor of the policy, 97 voted for option A and 126 for option B, a total vote in favor of 223 (to 11 against).


 * Jehochman's proposal at the BLP RfC
 * 163 in support when the discussion was paused for cohesion late on 31 January 2010 (UTC).


 * The 2010 Rfc on 'Community de-adminship' which would have enabled a process for editors to remove adminship tools
 * 167 in support, 190 opposed


 * The petition condemning IAR abuse by administrators
 * 100 signatures in a week


 * A proposal to create a Protected Page Editor user right (first attempt)
 * 134 in support (consensus not reached)


 * A proposal to create a Protected Page Editor user right (second attempt)
 * 141 in support, 149 opposed


 * A proposal to restore the orange "You have new messages" bar for notifications of user talk messages
 * 153 in support


 * A proposal to expand the use of extended confirmed protection
 * 153 in support of widening the usage of extended confirmed protection to combat disruption of any form


 * An amendment to the arbitration policy
 * 113 in support


 * Introduction of desysop policy as proposed by
 * 168 in support, 138 in opposition; consensus not reached