Wikipedia:Training/For students/Leave feedback

Training feedback Ansel.borhauer (talk)
The videos and the interactive training are great teaching tools.
 * What I liked:

I feel like there could be more activities for the training rather than a quick run through.
 * What I didn't like:

Explanation of the signature, I didn't think it just to be the tildes, I thought I had to write my name in.
 * What was missing:

Nothing really, it all seemed appropriate.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was great, Wish there was more.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ansel.borhauer (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Great videos explaining details, if you have basic HTML knowledge it ends up being managable
 * What I liked:

I wish there were more sections where you could test out how to use the information give
 * What I didn't like:

What i stated above for uploading photos
 * What was missing:

What makes a good article
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good, took some getting used to but overall it was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jamesjohnson3 (talk) 01:58, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... the interactive part ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lozmeister (talk) 02:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Helped me get a better understanding of how wikipedia works behind the scenes
 * What I liked:

... Some common knowledge presented that was unnecessary
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

... simple common things anyone with knowledge of wikipedia and writing skills should know
 * What was unnecessary:

... I did not try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Scienceguy21 (talk) 03:33, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... the videos explaining and showing content.
 * What I liked:

... a lot of reading
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Psych2015 (talk) 19:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... the interactive part
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... more activities where we try each thing ourselves rather than just watch an informational video
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was very useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jjp73 (talk) 02:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

The incorporation of videos throughout the tutorials.


 * What I didn't like:

I thought the interactive editing tutorial could be improved.


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought the tutorial was short but to the point. It had some issues/bugs but it was still effective.

--Kkg123 (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The broad overview.
 * What I liked:

Maybe it could have been a little more specific.
 * What I didn't like:

More real examples of how to do things.
 * What was missing:

The lecture on who other people on Wikipedia are.
 * What was unnecessary:

Neat.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vrastall (talk) 03:48, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I loved the interactive editing tutorials; they were very helpful. I liked the overall tutorial

--COV Western (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were very helpful and not too long
 * What I liked:

... Very wordy and sometimes hard to follow.
 * What I didn't like:

... Everything seemed to be covered. ... All the words, visuals would be better, like pictures as well as the videos. ...It was hard to follow because sometimes they way you clicked the order of the buttons in the tutorial, it would take you out of the tutorial and then you couldn't get back into the tutorial unless you started over from the beginning.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Katelynn.cox (talk) 06:18, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Very simple to navigate

...
 * What I didn't like: I got stuck on the citation part of the tutorial, after completing what it said to do it still did not work.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing i could tell, however this is new for me.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful I need hands on training so it was great

--Tgoodkey (talk) 20:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The information and videos were quite thoroughly beneficial. ...
 * What I liked:

... Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... I think it was very educational. Gave me a new view of Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--StanLeehen (talk) 01:40, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were very helpful!
 * What I liked:

...The text, videos, and tutorials seemed a bit redundant... Maybe get rid of one of them.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing
 * What was missing:

... As I said earlier, the three forms of portraying the same information was a bit redundant.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I found it very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Semaj311 (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very helpful and straightforward. I liked that it gave links to find other resources without including an excessive amount of information in the training.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deitkm (talk) 02:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The interactive editing tutorial and how straightforward the training was.
 * What I liked:

... Pressing X on the interactive sandbox tutorials caused the helpful hints to stop. popping up
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing; all of the main components seemed to be there. The information presented seemed to be adequate enough for a beginner to understand the basics.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing; the tutorial was to the point.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I like it, but my concern was with exiting the hints. When pressing the arrow, the tutorial continues but when you click X it stops. It was hard to find my place in the tutorial afterwards and I felt a bit lost until I gave up and restarted it, realizing that I shouldn't press X. Besides that, I think the tutorial was helpful with my first user experience with Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ChipsAndChopsticks (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...How comprehensive the training was!
 * What I liked:

...It was kind of difficult to navigate when the pages took me out of the training modules.
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing!
 * What was missing:

...nothing!
 * What was unnecessary:

...best part!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chandlerbuchanan (talk) 15:01, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:The step by step tutorials.

...
 * What I didn't like:There was nothing that I did not like.

...
 * What was missing:I believe that there was nothing missing.

...
 * What was unnecessary:There was nothing that I thought was unnecessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?I thought that it was very helpful rather than reading.

--Buchaly15 (talk) 19:36, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... ...
 * What I liked: I liked the videos provided!--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like: too much text involved, maybe words should complement the videos--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...
 * What was missing: someway to train and edit while completing the editorial--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...
 * What was unnecessary: The links taking me away from training--21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Overall it helped me dramatically!--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

--Luisq15 (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

The text instructions will probably be forgotten soon. I learned much more when having to edit using the tutorial than reading about editing.
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive tutorials would be great!
 * What was missing:

-
 * What was unnecessary:

It was great. More of this would, rather than videos/text instruction would help.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Btw777 (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:visual interaction

...
 * What I didn't like:

live interactive typing examples of editing, such as the user being able to type along with the tutorial to try some things
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Altb478 (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
…easy to navigate
 * What I liked:

…when you clicked the links you couldn't get back to where you left off
 * What I didn't like:

…N/A
 * What was missing:

…N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

…I didn't know how to get back to page I was on without starting over
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Spidey1994 (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Simple, easy to follow

...
 * What I didn't like: Videos rely on java.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing really, serves the purpose of an intro

...
 * What was unnecessary: I didn't feel the videos added anything to the training, seemed a bit repetitive of the text.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try it.

--Veterinarydreams (talk) 03:39, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: it had some humor embedded in the instruction

...
 * What I didn't like: it was quiet lengthy, and it would not be possible to memorize everything on the spot anyways.

...
 * What was missing: I think it would be helpful to have a demo as the person actually works through for the first time.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? i liked it better than just reading about it. But based on size of your window, you are sometimes unable to click the links that you want to move on to the next step.

--Jukaredaa (talk) 05:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Othrowt (talk) 06:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Clear and Concise tutorial about how to Edit Wikipedia Articles, Also liked the interactive tutorials along the way giving a chance to practice making edits.
 * What I liked:

... Loved it all
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Really helpful feature, favorite part of the entire process.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--VarunS93 (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The tutorial was very simple and it really helped me see what goes into making articles and edits. ...
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the box that shows the progress was in the way of what I did so I could not see if it was correct. ...
 * What I didn't like:

I cannot think of anything ...
 * What was missing:

Nothing ...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was awesome ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rgirar1 (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the step-by-step tutorials in module 3
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Caitlinmcgrath (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I like because is very fun new things
 * What I liked:

...i really like all
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jangola27 (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
…I like that each part of the training was well organized and concise. I thought the train gin was extremely in depth and well though out. Each step of editing was addressed.
 * What I liked:

…I did not like how long the train took. It took me about 2.5 hours to finish this and I don't remember a lot of what I learned because the process was so lengthy.
 * What I didn't like:

…I know it was training, but it was extremely morning and it took all my brain power to focus for only a few minutes.
 * What was missing:

…The readings were uneasy when a video was posted that explained the exact same thing. i though the videos were the most helpful part of the process.
 * What was unnecessary:

…The interactive tutorial was ok, I did not try it for very long but I though it was helpful in understanding the editing process.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LLP210 (talk) 05:15, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was engaging and I did not get bored.
 * What I liked:

It was hard to find the training.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

well thought out and good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tmartin3576 (talk) 07:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos helped give a visual example to the process of code.
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe more examples of how to use the code
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good for practicing how to do everything. --MeganMcIlvenna (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LiRuiQing (talk) 19:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xiaoxuxu0313 (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: very informative

...
 * What I didn't like: The interactive editing tool had an X button that blocked words, and was annoying at times

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ArjunChawla175 (talk) 00:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
This training was very informative and helped lay out the specifics in creating your on wiki page.
 * What I liked:

Some things were still a little difficult to understand, such as citations and how to include pictures with the correct format, however, I know we will be discussing more and more of these topics in class and with a librarian so I feel as though I will understand more of what is expected after doing so.
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't feel as though anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

Everything in this training was necessary and was definitely needed in order to make a successful wiki page.
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try the interactive editing tutorial, but based off what it said it is going to be useful to have and getting other peoples opinions and feedback on things is what will help you become a better writer. Just remember to not take anything personally because it is all for our benefit.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kcabral18 (talk) 15:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos and the helpful modules where you were actually using the programs helped a lot ... Some of the information seemed redundant or repeated ... Not Much ... Repeated information ... Friggin awesome --AGSPianoMan (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
very informative, especially the editing It doesn't say where the information can be accessed in the future. Nothing, it was thorough
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

Definitely, and helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Enthusiast006 (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--X-pert Dreamer (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: the videos were clear

...
 * What I didn't like: I find coding difficult

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It helped me understanding

--GiuliaBalsamo (talk) 20:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:Easy and quick to work through

...
 * What I didn't like:Lack of videos

...
 * What was missing: More videos

...
 * What was unnecessary: Too much information about the community

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a

--MariaCabrera23 (talk) 22:36, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Detailed explanation on every point. Well organized helpful information.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SlavicaZ3 (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
All of the useful information I would like the option to advance to the next page with keyboard shortcuts Nothing!! Nothing!! Very Helpful! --KTB123english (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
Very concise and relevant. Videos were short and very helpful.
 * What I liked:

Some of the instructions had grammatical errors.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very useful to actually do the editing rather than just read about it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zchen373 (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bellre (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

The interactive portion and the videos.


 * What I didn't like:

I didn't like all the information that did not include interactive portions.


 * What was missing:

I can't think of anything that was missing.


 * What was unnecessary:

Learning communication skills to use when talking with others on Wikipedia.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I think it was very helpful.

Training feedback
Very interactive.
 * What I liked:

Overly extensive.
 * What I didn't like:

no
 * What was missing:

The advanced editing section
 * What was unnecessary:

useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wiggins jake (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

Very informative, and had lots of helpful videos

...
 * What I didn't like:

Constant reiteration of the same things

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ehylemon (talk) 23:34, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The interactive editing training.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some aspects could have been a little more thorough.

...
 * What was missing: A handout displaying each step of the editing process.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The videos.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were very helpful

--Krb45698 (talk) 07:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...There was detailed step by step instructions to follow which made it easier to practice. I also enjoyed actually submitting editing which will help me when I embark on the wiki page project.
 * What I liked:

... There were lots of clips through the tutorial which I was unable to listen to due to being in a classroom with other students. This could have been disruptive to others. If I had known in advance I could have brought some headphones.
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...I have enjoyed the tutorial as it gives me the hands on experience of editing the page and attempting other tasks relevant to the use of wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Victoria Mealor (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked how thorough the training was and how helpful all the tips are.
 * What I liked:

... My videos not working.
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe more pictures rather than videos.
 * What was missing:

... The confusing graphs and charts.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought it was great and incredibly helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Laurendiaz (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: it was very informative a lot information liked the links and practice in the sandbox

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: the java links

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked them they worked very well and were very straight forward and helpful

--RERoyal (talk) 02:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The amount of information. ... The amount of information. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oklamert (talk) 02:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Informative and helpful with most sections that included a video tutorial
 * What I liked:

...The structure of bracketing, coding and reference points, but I guess that will come with time and repetition. The coding seems overwhelming at first.
 * What I didn't like:

...Perhaps a few more tutorial videos and some try it out and apply examples.
 * What was missing:

...All necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful. I would of liked to seen more for all parts of training.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djac88 (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The tutorial is pretty thorough and answered a lot of my initial questions.
 * What I liked:

There is a lot of information, which means I will have to look up a lot of this information again in the future.
 * What I didn't like:

I can't think of anything that was missing.
 * What was missing:

I thought the "advanced" section was misnamed, not unnecessary. The advanced section was more along the lines of random bits of information. The only thing that felt advanced was the "Adding images and other media" slide.
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked the interactive editing tutorial, it allowed me to test my knowledge and make sure I understood what was explained.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jessemcmanus (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The training was short and relatively simple.
 * What I liked:

...The videos were full of fluff
 * What I didn't like:

...More simple practice tutorials
 * What was missing:

...The length of some of the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Trevorcallarman (talk) 05:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the videos because they showed how to do things on the pages themselves.
 * What I liked:

...The descriptions of how to use the different codes were confusing.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think everything was covered or there was a link to how to learn more about whatever was missing.
 * What was missing:

...I think everything was necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KMFischer (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked how the directions were very precise. ...
 * What I liked:

...I often thought it was complicated.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:Everything was important.

...It was pretty difficult.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jaimev10 (talk) 14:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Specific information and structure.
 * What I liked:

...The video need to download (probably my own problem).
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Axingmayra (talk) 16:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The review process is great.

...There is lot to learn
 * What I didn't like:

... more video and less issues streaming through my computer. I review the video on-line using you tube.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... there were good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AbeBasicUnit12358 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Videos length
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

a single video explaining all of it
 * What was missing:

editing
 * What was unnecessary:

good, but needed more videos
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yuskhawas (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked how it was set up into four modules. It made it easier to comprehend.
 * What I liked:

... It was a bit long, but I know it was necessary.
 * What I didn't like:

...I haven't ran across anything just yet.
 * What was missing:

...Everything seemed pretty relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked well and really helped me! The only issue I had with it was that if I wanted to go back and edit it I couldn't move forward through the training afterwards and it took me a while to get back to where I left off.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Agray5 (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Step by step directions

...
 * What I didn't like:leaving page for videos

...
 * What was missing:Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Yes

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ryanbeddes (talk) 07:07, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
everything! nothing!
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

nothing, very informative!
 * What was missing:

nothing!
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KTB123COD (talk) 16:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very thorough and easy to understand! The interactive helped me a lot and the videos were great too.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rlira123 (talk) 19:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The casual tone of the text
 * What I liked:

...Nothing!
 * What I didn't like:

...Maybe add some more graphics
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was useful, but it was tough to navigate back to the page I was originally on.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tartancircus (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Straight forward. Easy to understand. Very thorough
 * What I liked:

Should be a timer on each page ensuring each page has been completed
 * What I didn't like:

a timer
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stephalkidis (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Video tutorials
 * What I liked:

repetition
 * What I didn't like:

Content was sufficient.
 * What was missing:

Repetition
 * What was unnecessary:

The tutorial helped me understand.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sean.Chris95 (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the interactive links
 * What I liked:

...the long explanations
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...worked very well and was useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ZarathustraSay20 (talk) 13:45, 9 February 2015 (UTC)ZarathustraSay20

Training feedback
...The tutorial was very informative for how to edit a wikipedia article.
 * What I liked:

...The tutorial was very wordy at times and there was some irrelevant information that just made the tutorial longer.
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...some parts were boring and unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

... It helped a lot with learning how to use wikipedia. --Cstauch1 (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Texidor94 (talk) 04:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the videos were convenient.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the slides were redundant.
 * What I didn't like:

...more help for people who don't quite understand codes for adding pictures and other media.
 * What was missing:

...I don't think any was completely unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I did not try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AnthCulturee (talk) 06:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos were used well.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EncycloMan2 (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Sandbox section was new to me. Also, the information about VisualEditor was great. (Loving VisualEditor very much.) Nice videos made by users! The tutorial assumed I was a beginner. It would have been nice if some script at the beginning parsed my username to "intelligently" provide me a tutorial tailored to my likely ignorance based on my contributions. An example of an editorial disagreement that was amicably resolved using Talk among users. I only needed a small fraction of the tutorial. It was great except that I kept getting interrupted by the message that I am not a recognized, verified contributor to Wikipedia. Then, when I pursued this latter message, the editing tutorial messages followed onto the pages for getting recognized.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mavaddat (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

It was concise and efficient. The interactive tutorials had no bugs and were quite helpful and informative. The specialized section at the end for editing medical articles was especially helpful.


 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.


 * What was missing:

See above.


 * What was unnecessary:

Nothing.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Very helpful and complete.

Training feedback
...Is how detailed the Training was.
 * What I liked:

...Is that I had some computer issues with some of the videos and so I had to skip some of them.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KJames94 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos and descriptions were easy to follow and very informative. ...The training was rather long and somewhat repetitive.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing, I found it very comprehensive (perhaps a bit TOO much...).
 * What was missing:

...I feel like the plagiarism details were self-explanatory.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ExpressElevatortoHell (talk) 03:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the fact that the tutorial was done with in a timely matter. ... I felt like I could've used a little more information on the articles that I'd be editing. ... A little more information about the content that I'm to edit. ... No Comment. ... I found the tutorial extremely helpful, and useful. I now know how some of the tools work. --Cassidypj (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

...

...
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing was missing, everything was great. ...
 * What was missing:

In my opinion, everything was perfectly explained. Everything was necessary. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shirley Jusino (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC) The process of getting the certificate is quite complicated.Bauyrzhanabuov (talk) 00:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The tutorials and the videos really showed how to do everything and the explanations explained why.
 * What I liked:

The videos were slow.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

There was a lot of common sense about how to interact with other people on the site.
 * What was unnecessary:

It's very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Christinabillias (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It is an in-depth and informative training.
 * What I liked:

...It could have been simplified a little and took a long time to complete.
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't think it was missing anything.
 * What was missing:

...The length of the modules may have been to long.
 * What was unnecessary:

...The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful in explaining how to use the editing tools.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rkuklok (talk) 21:59, 2 March 2015 (UTC)rkuklok

Training feedback
... I enjoyed the thoroughness of the training and the information that it gave me. ... There wasn't anything I didn't enjoy. ... I think I got all the basics form the training. ... Nothing, it is all important for using wikipedia. ... I did not try. --Rmosiervt (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...Most of it
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...A description of how to set up different sandboxes, and links to them, right after first introducing sandboxes. As a new user, I appreciate the more_markup sandbox as a training and reference, and wanted to be able to set up a link to it right away. I figured out how to do that, but not through the tutorial.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good, except it didn't allow you to go return to a step if you accidentally skipped it. Had to finish then start over and click thru to the step I missed.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Radeachar (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...simple, clean, informative: written words accompanying spoken video
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hotgardener (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mmcluckie (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: clear wording and easy to understand

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sspen138 (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... clear, simple ...boring, especially the videos which are dull and painfully slow-paced
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...how to give wikilove. general slow pace
 * What was unnecessary:

...n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mcelroys (talk) 04:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hay weyer (talk) 08:19, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Good videos
 * What I liked:

...Bad interactive aspect
 * What I didn't like:

...Easier interactive process
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was confusing and hard to do because the tutorial didnt show how to do the requested actions very well.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amohamed2526 (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos inserted broke up tedium
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I got stuck a couple of times for various reasons. Clicking the X at the top of the dialog box seemed to stop the interactive tutorial rather than just close the box.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MsTCason (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:I liked that wikipedia requires people to shows both sides of any claim in an article instead of giving one opinion.

...
 * What I didn't like:That any one can edit a source without having any education or experties in a subject

...It would nice to have more information in rules for copyright.
 * What was missing:

... The information was to basic in the orientation.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was a good source to obtain information.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EDgan7 (talk) 06:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I appreciated the relative brevity of the training.
 * What I liked:

... I do not think most people will be able to absorb that amount of basic coding in one training session, that may require additional training or editing controls.
 * What I didn't like:

... Possibly a downloadable formatting/coding reference.
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... I enjoyed the fact that the program follows your progress and gives you the ability to make mistakes and try again.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anationmaritime (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked everything. Especially the videos that were included.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kimfrancissalles (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Everything was straight forward and helpful.
 * What I liked:

It took a long time.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful to fully understand how to do things.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Carolynnt (talk) 16:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I thought everything was explained very well.
 * What I liked:

...The website is very confusing with a lot of "ins and outs".
 * What I didn't like:

...I thought there should have been more tutorial videos. Those helped me out the most.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the "slides" were a little too wordy and hard to follow
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved it! It helped me tremendouslyMet2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Met2812 (talk) 20:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CMATSGB (talk) 19:56, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:The simplified text and videos, that helped get me through this.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Theresa L Gregory (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was descriptive and helpful. I really enjoyed the tutorials in the editing section
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the descriptions were a little wordy
 * What I didn't like:

Certain criteria that get an article deleted
 * What was missing:

I found everything necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

Again, I found it very helpful but could use some more direction
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elly7677 (talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Tutorial covered a range of topics and videos helped make explanations clearer
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

Was pretty comprehensive, and can't think of anything in particular that I disliked or still need to know
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Editing tutorial was probably the most helpful part. It gave me a chance to practice useful wikicode and actively learn the ropes.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meganhumburg (talk) 03:10, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was straight and to the point
 * What I liked:

There was a lot of technical things that were hard to grasp
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe a tad more pictures and diagrams
 * What was missing:

The videos that didn't work
 * What was unnecessary:

n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Indyaudri (talk) 04:18, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback from Communist-party-van
I appreciated how academic the introduction was. Frankly, it was a bit surprising to see such a collegiate course-type module on the site. It reminded me of some of the less-than-thrilling alcohol education modules we have to take, but instead of being a bore, it was kind of fun to receive one from Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--&#91;communist party van&#93; (talk) 07:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...All of the steps were clearly described, to the point, and were separated into easily digestible portions.
 * What I liked:

...The audio on some of the videos was of poor quality.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think everything was covered pretty well.
 * What was missing:

...It was short enough, no need to cut stuff out.
 * What was unnecessary:

...As expected, not bad, not great.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DWBCoding (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AlphaMaleMcBrowski (talk) 19:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Interactive editing tutorial, Videos.
 * What I liked:

Module 3 is slightly long.
 * What I didn't like:

Better links within the interactive editing tutorial, as it is still rather glitchy.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Useful as it allows us to practise what we have just learnt.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ABonheur (talk) 10:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: great descriptions

...
 * What I didn't like: hard to return to sections

...
 * What was missing: would have liked more pictures

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pskellerstudent (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
*The interactive editing tutorial, the simplicity of the way it was written.
 * What I liked:

*N/A
 * What I didn't like:

*There should be more interactive editing tutorials.An easier to read and understand list of wikicodes would be helpful.
 * What was missing:

*N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

*IT WAS GREAT!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ZulaikhaN (talk) 11:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very thorough and user friendly experience.
 * What I liked:

Navigation back to training page is hard.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe a final 'project' at the end requiring the user to edit an article with requirements would be good.
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

The step by step approach was useful and easy to understand.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kua Wei Qi Wendy (talk) 10:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Great interactive tutorials that really helped in the process of learning wiki code.

...
 * What I didn't like: Videos didn't play properly on Safari.

...
 * What was missing: NA

...
 * What was unnecessary: NA

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was my favorite part!

--Hai jatai (talk) 18:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was straightforward, and I really liked the guided practice for editing.
 * What I liked:

A lot of it felt redundant, because it felt like common sense when it was said the first time, and then you had me watch a video about it, and I started to feel like it was wasting my time.
 * What I didn't like:

I can't think of anything that was missing, but I think it would be nice if you could have a guided editing practice that you could go back to even after the training was finished and that you could keep going back to if you want to practice certain things, just so you can practice and check your work.
 * What was missing:

The "edit" video that was about the edit button seemed a little pointless. If I'm taking this training, I'm probably already interested in editing a page, so adding a little promo for editing seemed excessive.
 * What was unnecessary:

This was the best part of the module, in my opinion. Because I am already familiar with academic writing, plagiarism, and common courtesy, a lot of this training seemed like common sense, to me, but the editing tutorial was really helpful and gave me a lot of confidence that I could figure out how to edit an article, if I want to.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SKPsych237 (talk) 21:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Interactive tutorials and short videos
 * What I liked:

...Not enough hands on
 * What I didn't like:

...Pictures
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It provides a first hand guided assistance. Allowing us to be familiarised with the steps to editing
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--StevenZHMH (talk) 07:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the videos, they were short but very informative.
 * What I liked:

very easy to use and very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Matthews8978 (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

What I didn't like is that some of the information seemed repetitive at times.
 * What I didn't like:

There was nothing missing from this training module.
 * What was missing:

There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked how there were videos to give better explanations of how to do something on Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

I did not the length of this training module. I feel like I will not remember a lot of what was being taught.
 * What I didn't like:

There was nothing missing from this training module.
 * What was missing:

There was nothing unnecessary about this training module.
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial allowed me to understand how to edit and format articles better.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gwill6955 (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: You made it easy for a beginner to understand and follow easily.

...
 * What I didn't like: There was a lot. However, because you made it easy to follow and easy to navigate through the training program, that made it easier to digest and remember.

...
 * What was missing:No idea. I am a newbie.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The repeating was a little... repetitive, but I understand the need for it.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Not bad. Made the digestion of all the information a bit easier.

--Owenspg (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The step by step instruction was easy to follow. I liked the links to the video content as well.

...
 * What I didn't like: The training takes quite a bit of time and is quite in depth. There's a lot to learn and to remember. I was hoing for a "quick start" type of guide, but maybe that's not realistic.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: The "edit tab" youtube video was fun, but perhaps not necessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I liked the tutorials, though I didn't navigate the first one correctly.

--Archie0401 (talk) 22:10, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chrislid49 (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I really liked the sandbox tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

some of the short videos
 * What was unnecessary:

super helpful, wish there were more even
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RoseKorn (talk) 16:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the interactive editing sessions.
 * What I liked:

There was a lot to learn, still is, but there is no way to work around it.
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive tutorials would be nice.
 * What was missing:

It was all good information.
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorials were the most helpful part of this orientation. I was very pleased to get the guidance of the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TheRondanimal (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Easy to follow, and super informative.
 * What I liked:

A lot of information at once. Afraid I'll forget it all.
 * What I didn't like:

More practice.
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TexanBackpacker (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I really like the videos, they helped me out a lot.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some information was confusing like the steps of bold.

...
 * What was missing: More in depth information or even examples.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Some was pretty confusing and one helped me out.

--Celena21 (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Videos
 * What I liked:

... Length
 * What I didn't like:

...Pictures/graphics
 * What was missing:

...making a profile
 * What was unnecessary:

...Loved it, wish it could all be like that
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Breezyshore (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

Everything - training really helpfully acquainted me w/ the basics, and gave me enough links to seek out more advanced info. I wish I had this when I started wanting to edit in the past!


 * What I didn't like:

n/a


 * What was missing:

I don't know yet! Maybe there's some weird wiki magic I am unaware of? I know most of what to do that I think I need to do.

I'm still a bit confused about how to select specific pictures from wiki commons when adding them to an article (where to get the filename for the first section of the template).


 * What was unnecessary:

n/a


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was super helpful! I feel a lot more confident about my knowledge now, and have a bunch of sandbox pages to look at if I forget anything.

--LookOnMyEditsYeMighty (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was very positive and thorough ... The images to help check if we had formatted our page right were misaligned ... nothing ... nothing ... Loved it! --Emmaeadwyer (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...I liked that it offered video help in case that was something you're interested in
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clpgator (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos were short but covered all of the necessary material.
 * What I liked:

The codes seem as though they will be somewhat difficult for those without coding knowledge to learn.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing comes to mind.
 * What was missing:

Explaining how to make words bold seems rather self-explanatory when there's a button on the edit page for it.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was fairly helpful, though it disappeared at one point and I couldn't find it again.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mattwithoutabat (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked how it went into great detail about everything, and that it was easy to follow and understand.
 * What I liked:

... It was way too long in my opinion
 * What I didn't like:

... I didn't think anything was really missing
 * What was missing:

... the beginning of every section.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I didn't do it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KENNYTHEMANAGER (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
What was missing

... How do I use the Talk page on my user toolbar? The tutorial explains talk pages in articles, but it looks like I have my own. Is this just a log of my activity? or is it a comment section?

--RocketSams (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
it was presented. ...
 * What I liked: I liked the abundance of material and the style in which

...
 * What I didn't like: There were a couple of technical glitches.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing of importance.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I found it all relevant and encouraging.

The tutorial was an etremely useful tool.Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?...

--Matthisvalerie (talk) 20:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Loved the interactive tutorials!
 * What I liked:

...I noticed that for some codes it would help to write to remember putting a space between # and item 1 for example
 * What I didn't like:

...I would have liked an example of what an edit summary should include
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved it. Made things easy and learning fun!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Linjess (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I found the fact that we could make edits to practice very useful. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was really helpful with the right alerts and prompts to guide a first time user. --Sm1986 (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Friendly instructions that were thorough without bogging down the reader.

...
 * What I didn't like: Module 3 was a little long.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Perhaps the division between medical and other edits.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not try.

--Shangguthrie (talk) 02:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It was easy!
 * What I liked:

...The interactive training made it less daunting.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked and it was very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oshinrai19 (talk) 00:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The whole thing was very easy to follow along with, and presented just enough information to the point where I didn't feel overwhelmed. ... I had no issues with this training module. There was a nice balance between information presented in both text and video form. ... Nothing that I can think of. ... Nothing ... Works just as they showed in the tutorial videos. --Blue.goggles (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: It is nice to have interactive options. It makes people interested

...
 * What I didn't like: I understand that there are many laws people have to abide to but the training is quite long

...
 * What was missing:I didn't see something missing for my part

...
 * What was unnecessary: All that has been said was useful.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jonathan isengingo (talk) 21:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Thoroughness with instructions, guidelines and sources
 * What I liked:

...Complicated process ie. sandbox, Did You Know, grading, citing, editing, watch list, types of articles, etc. Too many different pages and areas that can be overlooked. ...Nothing that I can think of.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...I'm not sure yet. Just beginning.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was informative and helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Guilfordpsych (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yoonsz25 (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos made it easy to understand because it showed what was being talked about.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JjoeE360 (talk) 23:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos that went along with the sections were helpful. It was also nice to learn about the different aspects of community that I never knew went behind the pages.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lcgpbdp (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... useful info for beginners
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

Too wordy... ...


 * What was missing:

Not really. ...


 * What was unnecessary:

some advice on how to find articles are not useful for beginner ...

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jchow601dvc (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The intro is really clear ... It's a little bit too long, and lots of redirections- sending me to another page and then go back, etc. ... More specific about about different areas and topics. Also a chance to really practice whether we really learnt or not. I feel like I've seen and practiced a lot, but remembered only a few. ... Not that I can think of. Everything is really instrumental ... It is really helpful!!!! But I wish it could be harder, like really asking us to do some editing instead of just copying and pasting. --Gabriella Ji (talk) 05:59, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Very easy to use. The popups were intelligent and helpful. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nick4nike23 (talk) 03:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Objectives listed at beginning of each module helped me focus my attention.
 * What I liked:

Videos were buggy and caused problems. Dialogue boxes kept popping up, even when I moused-back to a previous page.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I know of.
 * What was missing:

NA
 * What was unnecessary:

See above --Flinnre (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The organization, the videos
 * What I liked:

There was nothing I did not like
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Everything was necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

It was easy to follow
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Melissa Edwards (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked that the tutorial gave thorough instructions and made it user friendly. It also came with videos to watch in case I was still confused.
 * What I liked:

...I think the coding instructions were a little overwhelming if youve never done anything with coding before.
 * What I didn't like:

...More tutorials on how to do coding and what it means.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lexidg (talk) 23:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * Y'all--not bad at all. Well done. I think you struck a pretty nice balance between detail and overview. Tell you what, though, I also want my students to learn "History", diffs, etc... Dr Aaij (talk) 03:06, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos ... The wording of the HTML is confusing ... What pictures are appropriate to upload. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was useful --Willowjohnson23 (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... it's very simplified ... nothing ... nothing ... the training ... i think it's very useful --Chrissiejr (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Suman6395 (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was comprehensive, easy to follow, and encouraging.
 * What I liked:

I would have preferred more hands-on work.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe a pro/con list of editing with code v. without.
 * What was missing:

It all seemed relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

I tried one of them and it was very useful to have different parts of the page pointed out so clearly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aandrewwangg (talk) 21:10, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Short and concise descriptions on each page. Hit the main points without being too overwhelming.
 * What I liked:

...Videos seemed repetitive of what was written in text.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Samantha.myhre (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... easy to understand ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rupal Dugar (talk) 16:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The training was very comprehensive, and I liked how it was broken up into logical, "manageable" modules or subsections -- made it an enjoyable learning experience, and ideal for self-paced learning. Also, the alternate links out to YouTube were helpful.
 * What I liked:

...Really don't have feedback for aspects I didn't like. Again, very well done, well designed, user-friendly.
 * What I didn't like:

...I suppose the more experienced that I become editing Wikipedia articles may suggest something, but nothing at this time.
 * What was missing:

...All was good. As much information as a person could want, and the extra embedded links make additional content available for those who wish to click to explore further.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Have not tried it yet, but I plan to go back and do so.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hijodecarl (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The interactive bits in the Sandbox
 * What I liked:

...The videos
 * What I didn't like:

...More interaction
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SingingInSpring (talk) 19:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kmay1208 (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the quality of the explanations and how it engaged the person to continue
 * What I liked:

I would like to learn more about advanced editing and markup in the Advanced Editing section
 * What I didn't like:

As explained above
 * What was missing:

Nothing; everything was well-explained and crucial in scope
 * What was unnecessary:

Wonderful. I loved them, thank you.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Coderenius (talk) 03:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The training was very clear and concise. Covered a lot of the basics with some activities included.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some of the training was slightly too basic. Would have liked to see more demonstrations of editing in progress.

...
 * What was missing: Showing examples of the different quality of articles.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The interactive material worked well! Good demonstration and did not experience any problems along the way.

--ObscuraScientia (talk) 03:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked everything.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rong Lee (talk) 01:29, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was very easy to navigate through and was clear and concise ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Staceyjanke (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djrlandry (talk) 07:55, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Overall comprehensiveness and simplicity ... the videos played all choppy-like but that could have been my internet connection ... more guided and expanded tutorials ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was good but could be expanded upon to really hone skills --Djrlandry (talk) 07:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the videos

...
 * What I didn't like: was how it didn't let me try the interactive editing

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Am.alau.1118 (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Very comprehensive tutorial

...
 * What I didn't like: Some videos did not work

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I fond it very helpful

--Hyemmm (talk) 23:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: neutral

...
 * What I didn't like:length of training and still couldn't grasp the how to or why Wikipedia is a useful tool for students in this course - I can see this training being useful to students in the Computer or technology studies


 * What was missing: Not a question I can answer since I don't know anything about Wikipedia yet as I am new to this forum...however, having a printable "cheat sheet" at the end would be helpful so that we can refer to the code

...
 * What was unnecessary: Why have EDIT source if Edit Beta is so easy...many people do not care to know how to use source/computer code, even make your own web pages (such as word press...) doesn't use source code...its all done in a user friendly way for people who are not computer literate.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? ...

Instructions were easy to navigate

--Froglady1969 (talk) 14:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I noticed one problem with the tutorial. Every time it said to click the Edit tab, what it actually wanted you to click was the Edit Source tab. There is an Edit tab right beside that, so it was confusing at first because selecting the actual Edit tab did not work. If it helps - I am a chrome user, Version 43.0.2357.132 m --AnneMcCoy (talk) 16:37, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Easy to follow. Videos are helpful because it's more visual and makes more sense.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I liked it. I had a little bit of a problem when I was trying to advance at one point and it kept telling me to save even after I had saved it and was trying to see the preview.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ferryrac (talk) 04:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the plagiarism and copyright video - excellent resource ...the overall design. This was direct and specific
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...not yet...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Marentette (talk) 20:22, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... There was a lot of detail and useful cheat sheets for easy reference. Thank you for that!Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

... Nothing really.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great learning tool. I'll be able to remember the information and techniques better. Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dragonfly5660 (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback from Ziggy2012
Interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I found it useful. For me, just reading material isn't enough to remember how to do it so having the opportunity to read and then try it out was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ziggy2012 (talk) 12:33, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... This training is amazing! For the first time to use it, I got lots of information of Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...Some explanation aren't easy to understand.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing, I think.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think the tutorial is wonderful! I will definitely suggest my friend the tutorial if they want to use Wiki. --Masked Shaco (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
videos & pace
 * What I liked:

going back and forth between tutorial and my sandbox, tricky
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * what was unnecessary:

liked it, but hard to get back to main program sometimes
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--InstructorUCD (talk) 10:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The explanation of the importance of the five pillars
 * What I liked:

...The YouTube videos
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing, that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

... The YouTube videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very helpful to get interactive experience
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BVenzke1 (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:I liked the visual aspects of the training. I like to see the specific symbols to utilize during editing, etc.

...
 * What I didn't like: The length of the training. I know it was all crucial for the intended training, however it took a while to get through all of the relevant information.

...
 * What was missing: no comment

...
 * What was unnecessary: no comment

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Did not use it.

--PaulaY (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were helpful
 * What I liked:

... It would have been better if links automatically opened in a new window
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...It was all appropriate and necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Trachelleleach (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Supporting documents, converstational tone, sense of being on same team
 * What I liked:

...some techy jargon. Maybe a better to put in an easy to find reference area
 * What I didn't like:

...na
 * What was missing:

...na
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Christianmay0101010 (talk) 03:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Easy to follow. Lots of good do's and don'ts. I tried a wiki assignment a couple of years ago and clearly did not understand the background and ground rules.
 * What I liked:

All good.
 * What I didn't like:

I won't really know that until I get started.
 * What was missing:

Maybe Barnstars. I'm just getting started and probably a long way from worrying about others work. But it is an interesting first intro to the community.
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked well and was especially helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jennifer.Queen (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the step by step instructions on how to edit, the videos and the interactive editing tutorial were extremely helpful. Everything was very clear in regards to both culture and expectations within the Wikipedia community.
 * What I liked:

I really thought everything was great.
 * What I didn't like:

I really couldn't say at this point what was missing, I felt satisfied and informed.
 * What was missing:

I appreciate all the input I can get, I cannot recall thinking something I encountered was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I found this aspect the most helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Danewelle (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was a very helpful introduction for me: it was at an appropriate level, summarized the most important information, and provided links for more detailed information. I'd be much more interested, however, in what my students might think about it.
 * What I liked:

Nothing comes to mind right now. Again, I'd be interested in knowing whether or not my students would agree with my comments above.
 * What I didn't like:

There was nothing missing because you provided links to videos and (especially) articles that provided additional information.
 * What was missing:

I don't remember thinking that something was unnecessary as I went through the training modules.
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it. --JRicker,PhD (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:Liked the combination of videos and text and the downloadable bits. Liked diversity in the faces

...
 * What I didn't like:Could have had more examples from real pages.

...
 * What was missing:Probably lots but then it would be longer.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Fine.

--Agelaia (talk) 16:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
the sense of community provided was very welcoming and calmed many inhibitions about this being over my head. ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I found it helpful. Reading about how to work with technology is far different than trying it out. It provided clarity on what i was reading. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Madysonegan (talk) 10:36, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Easy and included everything which I need or I don't
 * What I liked:

too lengthy ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Guddan08 (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...very easy to follow. It explained everything well/
 * What I liked:

...Not a hundred percent sure how to add photos but that is okay.
 * What I didn't like:

...Clear instructions on where to save photos.
 * What was missing:

...The videos promoting wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was handy and helped a lot.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alexisolson (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the training
 * What I liked:

...that it says i did not complete the training
 * What I didn't like:

...me completing the training
 * What was missing:

...me doing this page for the second time
 * What was unnecessary:

...i did it was handy
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alexisolson (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)alexisolson

Training feedback
.The videos were very helpful ...Liked the whole thing Could be a little more comprehensive ...Didn't love the explanation of how to decide what article to work on. As someone who needs to write a wikipedia article from scratch, Im still not reall sure where to start
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

Thought it was all necesary
 * What was unnecessary?

Pretty helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jbaron96 (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:The training videos were very helpful!--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?:it was very helpful. There was a lot of info; I hope I retain it all.--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--Bjhayden (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Each page provided concise, straightforward instructions while communicating welcoming and encouraging messages along the way.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The tutorials were excellent! They covered basic skills in detail without being overwhelming. Coming in, I was not familiar with code, so this was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Senicely (talk) 03:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was extremely informative. I have a much better understanding about how to edit and write Wikipedia articles. ... It was long and the tutorials were a bit confusing. ... A comprehensive examination at the end to ensure each trainee had the right understanding of the information. ... The videos at the end. They basically reiterated everything that had already been said in the paragraphs. ... It was confusing in some areas. It should have been in a pop-up window so that I wouldn't have to press the back button to get back to the training. --Orobins66 (talk) 16:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
It was helpful to actually make the edits discussed within the tutorial rather than just reading about them.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tool was the most helpful part of the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kgocinsk (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:The videos.

...
 * What I didn't like:Not much

...
 * What was missing:A little more helping in the coding aspect.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Simple font changes such as bold.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The step by step process helped alot.

--Adowney31 (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The youtube videos.
 * What I liked:

...Some links did not work in Module 4.
 * What I didn't like:

...An advancing arrow on Module 4, page 1.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LesBrooks (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked learning about the wikipedian community
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Did not try the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AnonARK25 (talk) 23:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos showing how things like editing and citations could be done. The sandbox tool freezing up and taking me back to the instructions on how to bold face a word every time I entered it.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing, I thought it covered a lot. N/A
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

It was a bit clunky at times when it would keep asking me to edit the summary even though I had but, I found much of it helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cbiology (talk) 02:09, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

== Training feedback: The training is lengthy... It's difficult for a student to set aside time to go through all the slides at once. It was a lot of reading especially for the editing portions that were best communicated visually anyway. ==

...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lopezospina (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC) MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
figuring out what the good article is
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jihyek13 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...There was a lot of information on a lot of different important topics and there was a sense of community portrayed.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the tutorials were a little bit extensive and slightly confusing, but overall helpful. It is just a matter of applying them myself.
 * What I didn't like:

...I am not really sure, being new to this and all.
 * What was missing:

...The training was a little bit lengthy, but all of the concepts that were covered are important.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I found that they were helpful for most things, but for some of them they were a little bit confusing with all of the new symbols.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC) MarzitaMermaid (talk) 08:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The details

...
 * What I didn't like: When you go to try out the sandbox, you lose your place in the training

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mdanzo0807 (talk) 18:03, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the edit section, because it was very helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wikinils24 (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...All of it. It was very informative.
 * What I liked:

...Can't think of anything.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not sure. I'm very new to this.
 * What was missing:

...I felt it was all neccessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it worked out well. It showed me exactly how to do things.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pubh101 (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Learning new things that I had no idea Wikipedia was able to do.
 * What I liked:

...It's a little confusing, but I'll have a better understanding the more I use sandbox and Wikipedia overall.
 * What I didn't like:

...Not sure, the presentation was on point.
 * What was missing:

...Overall great presentation, a lot of good information.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Esco12 (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The tutorials
 * What I liked:

... Wish there were different tutorials
 * What I didn't like:

... More interaction
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was good. Wish there was more to it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Taylorkwest (talk) 04:02, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked using the interactive editing tutorial because it allowed me to visualize the descriptions of techniques from each module. These tutorial videos should be kept!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cmbakwe (talk) 04:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

Videos inserted at strategic points

Article was too long
 * What I didn't like:

... An intro that how we can complete the training in parts ... N/A ... Great tool --Abhina (talk) 14:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

This was a refreshing view into the modern wikipedia.


 * What I didn't like:

I didn't like the videos, the text and tutorial was much more worthy of my time.


 * What was missing:

What constitutes a good Wikipedian in reference to his/her work.


 * What was unnecessary:

I didn't think the videos were helpful, the text was sufficient.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was informative.

--Yihengsong (talk) 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
… It was fairly thorough. … There is no way I'll be able to remember everything, but that's what the help page is for. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

… I thought the interactive editing tutorial was very helpful. --Jmarrs94 (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... detailed and helped me truly understand Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... It was difficult to practice in the sandbox. A little confused.
 * What I didn't like:

... more practice.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... confusing
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ericito1995 (talk) 21:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
simple details for beginners seems too long more interaction some of the videos helpe to get familiar
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sluology (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Nice combination of text and video.   Although there was a lot of content, there was not a lot of minutia.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

worked ok but not being able to go right back to where I was in the tutorial was a bit annoying. ...

As the instructor I thought it was important to go through the student training myself. Great job all around. Barn-stars for everyone involved. --KatieBU (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
There should be a like user's manual on the basic knowledge on editing.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

Few video tutorials
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xhy279 (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was very informative about the basic details of training on wikipedia. It gives people a good head start to editing articles on wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... There was nothing that I didn't like.
 * What I didn't like:

... There was nothing missing.
 * What was missing:

... There was nothing unneccesary
 * What was unnecessary:

... It did a great job of actually showing how to do things. It is easier to learn when you have a real life example of something.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abigailgreen (talk) 20:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Abigail Green

Training feedback
... It was very informative about the basic details of training on wikipedia. It gives people a good head start to editing articles on wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... There was nothing that I didn't like.
 * What I didn't like:

... There was nothing missing.
 * What was missing:

... There was nothing unneccesary
 * What was unnecessary:

... It did a great job of actually showing how to do things. It is easier to learn when you have a real life example of something.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abigailgreen (talk) 20:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Abigail Green

Training feedback
Plenty of information
 * What I liked:

A lot of reading and videos How to create a user page?
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

Nothing really
 * What was unnecessary:

It was actually kind of hard and difficult to remember what to do next --Kikischiciano (talk) 21:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

The article was informative and concise


 * What I didn't like:

NA


 * What was missing:

NA


 * What was unnecessary:

NA
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

NA

PratikPratik5791 (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The videos and tutorials helped concrete what was being said.

...
 * What I didn't like: No explanation on how to create a new article for your sandbox. When discussing the importance of using your sandbox to edit an article, there was no instructions on how to create a article within your sandbox.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Using Edit source is confusing, perhaps adding more tutorials on using regular edit function rather than source.

--S.Steinbrueck (talk) 23:39, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was easy to go through and navigate. ... Slides filled with too much information. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... The videos that didn't show a demonstration but instead just discussed what I had already read. ... I liked it due to it getting me involved and seeing the proper results. --MikeJS22 (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...I liked how accessible the tutorials were!
 * What I liked:

...I am still a little confused on some of the topics. There is a lot to learn about Wikipedia.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the editing tutorial the most. I thought it was very useful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Armars (talk) 01:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... How helpful this was ... Some slides were unnecessary ... Not sure ... Some slides repeated the same information ... Very helpful --Kjb033 (talk) 02:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...The videos were a big help.
 * What I liked:

...It was not very exciting.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not quite sure about what it would be missing yet.
 * What was missing:

...Again, I'm not quite sure what was unnecessary yet.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked decently.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ClimateCoins (talk) 02:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)ClimateCoins

Training feedback
...The fact that the content was straightforward and easy to comprehend. The articles explained the process in-depth, providing a litany of helpful content and access to elements of the expansive Wikipedia community.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... The edit warring article contained repetitive information (e.g., the description of the 3RRR policy). Some concepts were described nearly verbatim from paragraph to paragraph, with no new contributing content to justify the repetition.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Musicbox107 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thiel.logan (talk) 14:22, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I enjoyed how easy it was to learn how to edit, particularly with the new beta features.
 * What I liked:

The course seemed a bit long.
 * What I didn't like:

I would have liked less focus on the "ethic" of editing on Wikipedia and more practice on actually editing as well as the "code" that is used to edit.
 * What was missing:

Wikipedia's training seems to focus a lot on rules for an internet community based on a lack of formal rules.
 * What was unnecessary:

I really enjoyed the ability to actually practice the skill of editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vnguyen518 (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The interactive editing training. Very helpful. ...
 * What I liked:

Some photos were awkwardly placed in the pages without much context. ...
 * What I didn't like:

Slight background information about the beginning of Wikipedia could have been helpful/interesting at the start. ...
 * What was missing:

The superfluous "pep talk" text and videos. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was smooth and accurate. In very few cases did the directions lack clarity. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DNMaurer (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)DNMaurer

Training feedback
... It was very in depth and explained how Wikipedia worked. The visual images and videos were very helpful for me. ... Sometime I got lost in how certain things worked. The coding in particular was difficult for me to grasp. ... I just started using Wikipedia in this sense, so I really don't know what could be added at this time. ... Nothing as far as I know. ... I was confused at times where I was supposed to make the edits. After a few try's I stopped the interactive editing tutorial and just went back to the training tutorial. --AMC-er93 (talk) 00:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: informative and easy to understand

...
 * What I didn't like: time it took

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: amount of videos

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? n/a

--Ashleyx95 (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
very informative!
 * What I liked:

a lot of information so I could not process it all at once
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Annkat22 (talk) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: the videos were very comprehensive

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it didn't work super well for me

--Lnicholson14 (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Iamonawave (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked that things were divided up into much smaller sections, instead of having to scroll through long pages of text

...
 * What I didn't like: I felt like it dragged on at points

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rukataro (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I particularly like having links to articles associated with how to edit and other various topics such as how to perfect articles and being able to bookmark these links. Unlike a regular encyclopedia or help page the information can be updated and made easier to understand through others.
 * What I liked:

...I did not enjoy the videos because I felt as if the text was more explanatory.
 * What I didn't like:

...I feel that a better introduction to the sandbox would leave me feeling more confident about becoming a wikopedian.
 * What was missing:

...The videos didn't seem to offer much guidance aside from the one about picture uploads.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I much prefer the interactive editing tool because of the simplicity it provides.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bhardy7 (talk) 07:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Thorough information.
 * What I liked:

...Took forever!
 * What I didn't like:

...The tutorials were confusing and did not help much. Horrible instruction.
 * What was missing:

...The instruction window in front of the buttons they are telling you to press in the tutorial. The window should be somewhere else.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Horrible:-(
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--NaturalWonders208 (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...very informative
 * What I liked:

...We didn't need to provide feedback to show we are understanding
 * What I didn't like:

... Questions for us to quiz ourself
 * What was missing:

... None
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vschlum (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)vschlum (Victoria Schlumbrecht)

Training feedback
The orientation just didn't teach the technical details of writing a wiki but also the do's and don'ts of being an editor on Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

I think you can include a hands on tutorial of creating and publishing a new sample article on Wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful and gave step-by-step guidance on editing on wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jitendra92 (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that there is a a tutorial so you can do it yourself
 * What I liked:

It was fairly long
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

This was my favorite part
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amber.l.cusey (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

I liked the way entire training module is designed. At the end of this training, I have a basic idea of how wikipedia works, its rules and policies, how to edit articles, how to communicate with other editors and get help.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Its perfect for the beginners. They can practice all the basic features from these tutorials.

--Panktidesai (talk) 23:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jai Rogers (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The tutorial was very informative, clear and easy to follow. I may go through it again just to have the practice. Can't wait to become active in the Wikipedia community. Sending a big thank you to JIMBO for staying true to his entrepreneurial spirit and for not giving in to advertising banners!

Training feedback
... Learning how to code on Wikipedia. ... The confusing path to complete the training. ... A better flow throughout the training to limit confusion. ... The amount of clicks to get through the training. ... All in all it wasn't too bad. Very informative. --Kzwiener (talk) 00:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... The information on Wikipedia's core values.
 * What I liked:

... Some of the charts and graphs were confusing. Specifically, the chart depicted the science articles that were started, stubbed, etc.
 * What I didn't like:

... More information on the actual writing style of Wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... That was one of the best parts. Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thepunalsorises (talk) 00:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very clear, to the point. I enjoyed the videos.
 * What I liked:

...I liked everything.
 * What I didn't like:

...Perhaps more assurance that if we make mistakes it can be corrected easily.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I enjoyed it, I learn very well visually so I felt the videos and the interactive editing tutorial the most helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LucyAsp (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Interactive opportunities to try editing
 * What I liked:

...Overall wordiness; could have been more concise
 * What I didn't like:

...how to get to my own user page
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Efoxman42 (talk) 01:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The training was really easy to follow - pretty comprehensive
 * What I liked:

...I wish it was more interactive and showed us how the code was written by someone else.
 * What I didn't like:

...A through qualitative analysis of what is editable and what kinds of information you shouldn't
 * What was missing:

...pretty essential.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought the interactive was much better than just the normal one.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Romildcp (talk) 02:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I really enjoyed the video and words to explain it!
 * What I liked:

...I found nothing I didn't like.
 * What I didn't like:

...I found nothing missing as I am new to Wiki and it all looked comprehensive to me!
 * What was missing:

...I found nothing unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it, it was helpful for those who have never used wiki before.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Trevor1902 (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the interactive training. Reading how to do something is helpful, but being guided while performing tasks is definitely preferred.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the tutorials were mildly buggy, but were still helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

...More information on editing profiles and pages.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think it was the most beneficial part of the training.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thiel.logan (talk) 14:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the interactive editing tutorials.
 * What I liked:

...I did not like that the training was over an hour.
 * What I didn't like:

... The training needs some more interactive tutorials.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the information was the same.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought the process was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SRuss12 (talk) 14:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... how there was a video and such detailed explanation of everything.
 * What I liked:

... everything was pretty straight forward, no complaints
 * What I didn't like:

... more visuals, minus the videos. Some stuff didn't have videos, it was okay but i prefer the videos.
 * What was missing:

... the explanations plus the videos, maybe just have one or the other.
 * What was unnecessary:

... i liked it. Shows step by step
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jessihymel (talk) 21:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Gave a good general overview of the expectations of Wikipedia as well as how the website functions.
 * What I liked:

Had to reload the training page after one of the interactive editing tutorials.
 * What I didn't like:

An explicit example on how to move an article from your sandbox to a main page
 * What was missing:

Most of the information presented was relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very useful in showing how editing an actual article or sandbox would be like.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ADLins (talk) 22:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Gave a good general overview of the expectations of Wikipedia as well as how the website functions.
 * What I liked:

Had to reload the training page after one of the interactive editing tutorials.
 * What I didn't like:

An explicit example on how to move an article from your sandbox to a main page
 * What was missing:

Most of the information presented was relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very useful in showing how editing an actual article or sandbox would be like.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ADLins (talk) 22:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the elaborate step by step details on how to edit.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't the repeated focus on wikipedia's goals, I felt it would be more important to focus on more editing procedures.
 * What I didn't like:

...I didn't think anything was missing from the training.
 * What was missing:

...I felt it was unnecessary that the videos almost exactly repeated word for word what was just read.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarahutchinson (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very descriptive and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

very long.
 * What I didn't like:

nothing.
 * What was missing:

nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

very helpful to be able to learn interactively!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mackenzi Otto 22:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: To the point.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Great.

--Ssweene2 (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked how the orientation included informative videos on how to do specific things that would be harder to figure out by just reading everything all at once.
 * What I liked:

...It was a lot of information all at once. I most likely will have to back and rematch the videos and read when I am editing or creating a Wikipedia page.
 * What I didn't like:

...It was very thorough.
 * What was missing:

...Repetitiveness on being polite to others. Keeping it professional is very important in a college setting when editing papers, etc.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Duchamp123456 (talk) 04:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... There was ample amounts of information covering many different topics.
 * What I liked:

... I think it was a little too confusing for people who are not good with technology. There was a lot of info and it is hard to pick up on everything when you don't understand technology easily. ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Allielael (talk) 17:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
the training was useful and very helpful with telling me what is expected of me.
 * What I liked:

...I dislike how long the training was but I understand why it was necessary
 * What I didn't like:

...I felt like you had all the information needed, I feel like nothing needs to be added.
 * What was missing:

...the videos I felt were a little unnecessary but they were helpful
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was a little confusing at first but simple after I tried it for a little bit --Demonleafninja (talk) 18:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... It answered questions and talked me through everything that I will use on this site. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I was able to follow it and it was very helpful. --Amusiclover1325 (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
I did like how helpful and useful it was.
 * What I liked:

I didn't like how long the training was.
 * What I didn't like:

I thought that maybe showing how you edit a article would benefit the students as well.
 * What was missing:

Some
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was very helpful. It showed me step by step on how to do the edits.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vlebla4 (talk) 20:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that the training was not overly complicated. The steps were very clear, and the directions were very succinct.
 * What I liked:

There were too many pages.
 * What I didn't like:

I would have liked more basic, interactive instructions on communicating with other users.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I would have liked the interactive editing tutorial to be more clear in its directions. I found myself clicking back and forth.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MYao (talk) 20:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The content was concise and easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like: There were not really any "interactive" parts to the tutorial making it more difficult to practice some of the editing/coding techniques.

...
 * What was missing: Interactive piece to the tutorial. Perhaps an interactive walkthrough of how to cite a source, for example.

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I mentioned there were no "interactive" pieces because it doesn't really walk you through steps. Someone who has less experience with computers may find this challenging.

--Trobi33 (talk) 22:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was easy and concise. ... The link that said "click on edit" didn't work correctly. You had to click on "edit source" instead. ... Nothing I noticed ... A lot of paragraphs that prefaced the lesson, that didn't actually teach you anything.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... Don't remember which part that was --GraphiteDirigible (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:very easy to understand

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mianina0 (talk) 15:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I loved the interactive tutorials and how concise, but informative the different modules were.
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...More tutorials would be helpful for new users, but the tutorials that were present helped a lot!
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved it. It seriously took me step-by-step for using wikicode in articles that I will edit or write.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HBov (talk) 18:13, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The videos were extremely helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: The tutorials were not very clear in direction.

...
 * What was missing: More videos, since the hands- on tutorials were not effective.

...
 * What was unnecessary:N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? They were not helpful enough they need to be more clear in instruction and guidance.

--Abtrahan (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I thought it was an excellent introduction to many of the key things that students need to know for editing Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

While I didn't mind the videos in and of themselves (its a much more interesting way to present data) there were cases were information was only available by video. I would have found it helpful if the text transcript for the video was also available, so that those of us who prefer learning through text could save a bit of time.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

The basic formatting is less necessary now than it once was and may eventually be entirely unnecessary, as much of it can be handled very intuitively by the beta Visual Editor. While it is my understanding that the Visual Editor still contains some bugs, and so it is important to know how to use regular source editing, this will be less true over time.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dyz30 (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Training was informative
 * What I liked:

... Too complicated, too wordy.
 * What I didn't like:

... Clear instructional videos
 * What was missing:

... na
 * What was unnecessary:

... I got lost. I ended up editing something without knowing it and someone messaged me asking if I needed help. I didn't know how to respond. Then I was left hanging and had to start over to go back to where I was in the training. It is not streamlined/linked well
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DereenyKentoni (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2015 (UTC)DereenyKentoni

Training feedback
...The videos and the links to outside training.
 * What I liked:

...The length.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing I noted.
 * What was missing:

...All of the information felt necessary to create good wikipedia content.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it very much and felt that it helped me better understand the terms that were being used.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RSaucedo00 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the interactive parts of the training, the videos, and how straight forward all the information was presented to me.
 * What I liked:

... There were some pages that didn't explain enough.
 * What I didn't like:

... More interactive sessions that walk you through the steps.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing was really unnecessary, everything helped.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I loved it, definitely made me understand it better because I was actually doing it! --Madimorris (talk) 08:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I thought the tutorials were well laid out, and presented the rules and foundations of Wikipedia very well. As something non-editors are unfamiliar with, I think that's the most useful part of the training.

...
 * What I didn't like:I think there could be a bit more emphasis on the actual Wikicode, as I know I'll have to go back and recheck how to perform certain functions.

...
 * What was missing: As above.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Very little; I think the training could be longer, but it certainly does not need to shorter.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Artfuldodger08 (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rosandguil (talk) 16:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

Links to PDF's and such that can be saved

...
 * What I didn't like:

Videos didn't work or upload well

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Collaboration0826 (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

I couldn't turn off the fireworks sound when it started, so when I started the tutorial on the same page I couldn't hear it. It was cute, but a little frustrating.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--April ahmed (talk) 19:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I think the videos may need updating to include the changes in features. It was a little confusing at first trying to figure out whether I was supposed to be using 'Edit' or 'Edit source' while practice editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stooty (talk) 20:56, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the tutorials
 * What I liked:

... When you clicked on links you had to start the tutorial over.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought it was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Laura.silverstein1 (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Interactive editing
 * What I liked:

A bit repetitive
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Too many links in some sections
 * What was unnecessary:

Great way to introduce a new user to the system
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Srcheng (talk) 05:24, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the videos. They clarified many of the editing techniques. I also liked how it helped you go through the sandbox. It gave a good starting point for when I start creating an article in it. Ill have a little knowledge about it. ...Some of the slides were repetitive.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Showing a way to access the links for topic suggestions later without having to go all the way through training again.
 * What was missing:

... how much time was spend driving the point home that Wiki is a community. There were many slides devote to this throughout the WHOLE presentation. ...Very helpful!!!
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ApolloSunrise987654321 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... There were videos and opportunities to find out more about how to do different processes. ... Nothing! ... I think it would be great to keep working on Beta (the visual editor). ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I loved it. I don't have to go back and forth between the training and my own sandbox. --RockyLeng8 (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Very informative!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--A.Farrar0696 (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)A.Farrar0696

Training feedback
Clearity information
 * What I liked:

too much information to process
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Reminds me of the word processor --Gilmore814 (talk) 23:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
Pages were short - no information overload. Menu was helpful for navigation. Interactive editing tutorial was definitely very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Training/For_students/Sandbox_edits_for_stubs Broken page? Doesn't redirect back to the tutorial]
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vellichor (talk) 23:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked how easy it was to understand the material with corresponding videos for almost every section. It made it easy to understand and navigate through my pages.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like how much information there was at one time. I feel like there is a lot of information I will not remember so I hope the help pages will be easy to view and comprehend.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing, there was plenty of information explaining the process that was easy to understand.
 * What was missing:

...Everything was necessary in order to understand the process.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was helpful since it gave step by step instructions on each part we needed to learn about.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meliacarlin (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... i loved the interactive tutorial that allowed for on the spot training and feedback. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... nothing! ... it was awesome, so helpful. --155190Martin (talk) 01:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...There was a lot of useful information that was written out in the simplest form. The videos were also very useful. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...More videos.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The interactive editing tutorial was great. It's perfect for getting started because it allows us to actually start writing in our sandbox.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jbarrerawgss (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Simple and step by step instructions.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mpatel61 (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I appreciated the interactive training and videos. It made this processes easier and allowed me to actually learn how to apply the information from the tutorials. Having opportunities to practice posed as a real benefit.
 * What I liked:

Some information I found redundant, but I realize that this introductory training must be thorough to ensure everyone (of different comfort levels and experience) has equal opportunity to learn.
 * What I didn't like:

I wish there was more information about the sandbox and reference lists. For example, if someone has already drafted and article in their sandbox, but then wants to have more content in there, will this conflict in the transfer of references in future articles?
 * What was missing:

N/a
 * What was unnecessary:

I really liked it! Keep up the good work, Wikipedia!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ejd2012 (talk) 15:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The cite was easy to navigate.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...The barnstar seemed unnecessary to learn.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I had a difficult time understanding the citation process. I had to watch it three times and still do not feel comfortable. Also it would help to have a short explanation of what constitutes legal pictures to use from the web on our pages. How do I tell what is available and what is not?
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cmconnorusf (talk) 15:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos are helpful, the steps are clear to follow.
 * What I liked:

... ..
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is pretty straight forward.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MoMoDa (talk) 18:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos are helpful, the steps are clear to follow.
 * What I liked:

... It was too long. ..I want to save PDF version of it and read all at once after if I want to check something.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is pretty straight forward.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MoMoDa (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked how clear the rules were when they were presented.
 * What I liked:

... I did not like the length of the orientation. It was long.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Maybe the some of the more detailed parts were unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I was okay.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Louiseishere (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I truly enjoyed the additional videos added to some of the pages further explaining the topic.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the information seemed to be out of order or informed me I would learn it later. I would rather have learned it at that moment or not be told about it at all.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved being able to try out and experience what I was being taught at that moment.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bri5rose (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Simple and straight forward
 * What I liked:

No mention of how to get back to all of these sites!
 * What I didn't like:

How to return to all of the sites, issues with interactive editing tutorial
 * What was missing:

Nothing all relevant
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

parts were good, definitely need to change the Edit popup to say press the edit source button, that was super confusing --Rhumke (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the videos
 * What I liked:

...It's not as easy as it seems.
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing.
 * What was missing:

...nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It helps a lot.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Melisr (talk) 22:31, 7 September 2015 (UTC)melisr

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

I enjoyed the videos showing me things, rather than just lists telling me. ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ABluvsU (talk) 22:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Premaldesai05 (talk) 02:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Short pages ... Confusing ... better navigation ... nothing ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Skannel24 (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Slides and videos were easy to understand. ... I became somewhat bogged down with the amount of information in all of the slides. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mritte10 (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...everything about the tutorial
 * What I liked:

... the examples would have been more in number
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... As a new person i think i dint feel anything unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was not so good.. can be improved
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ramadheeraj (talk) 15:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos
 * What I liked:

...Nothing, a little wordy in spots
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I'm aware of
 * What was missing:

... Nothing, I felt everything was helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

...There were some bugs that made me repeat the same steps over and over
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rgrego4 (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked that there were both tutorial videos and interactive test sessions
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...A table of contents down the side would have been nice with an indicator of where you were. This would have helped when I thought of questions and didn't know if they would later be addressed. Would have helped me decide if it was worth remembering
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it but it would be nice if the links that started them would open a new window or tab. This would have made it easy when I made mistakes and tried to go back to a page that would let me start the tutorial over.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RayneEmily (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was very straightforward and easy to well. And got me excited to be part of such a global community!
 * What I liked:

It's a lot of information at once, but that's not really a problem.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing that I could tell!
 * What was missing:

Nothing!
 * What was unnecessary:

Pretty cool--a lil confusing at first, but definitely helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?



--Kev.w.pri (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The information was presented in manageable segments.
 * What I liked:

... The formatting seems like it is going to be a little tricky.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing major was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Some of the videos seemed a little redundant, simply repeating the information in the text.
 * What was unnecessary:

... The directions did not always seem to match up with what you were presented with in the sandbox.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mv663012 (talk) 23:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Mv663012

Training feedback
... The training on how to add pictures as well as the training on editing
 * What I liked:

... How the training goes into very little detail about how to effectively write a good article
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe have more on the topic of finding substantial sources for your article. ... nothing
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rsowick (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: It was clean and quick.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: There was a weird page in the middle that looked out of place

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Peterhmasters (talk) 23:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The interactive tutorials with sandbox
 * What I liked:

...The repetitive information
 * What I didn't like:

...More interactive tutorials allowing a more hands-on experience with wiki markup
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was very useful and helped me understand the basics as well as get more familiarized with wiki coding
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mjeyaraj (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The video demonstrations.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rkelly66 (talk) 23:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... the detailed way the tutorial is presented and the video tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... the indications on what to do next
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cryola skies (talk) 01:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Overall the training was pretty good.
 * What I liked:

...The edit sandbox page kept messing up on me and I had to redo the section
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I tried it, it was okay, but the edit sandbox page kept messing up on me and I had to redo the section.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bobcatdodger25 (talk) 03:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The practice pages were a great way to actually experiment with Wikipedia and understanding how everything works. Learning by doing is the most effective.
 * What I liked:

...There was not too many opportunities to learn and at times I got confused once real pages were revealed to get back to the orientation pages.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Really liked it, can probably try to make it more detailed to make it a bit more challenging.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MackenzieD16 (talk) 03:03, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--VanceScarlett (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback; the instructions and follow up were really helpful. it helped give a clear knowledge on how to go about the wikipedia project!
... I liked that every information was detailed. ... i did not like the fact that some so many things were a bit confusing to me because this is my first time building a page
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... i think it was pretty helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Uwa barbra (talk) 03:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were helpful.
 * What I liked:

... There wasn't really much not to like. There was just a lot of information, which was a little overbearing at some points.
 * What I didn't like:

... I didn't see much to my knowledge that was/is missing.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... The interactive tutorial was not something that I tried.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HeneryDave31 (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback; the instructions and follow up were really helpful. it helped give a clear knowledge on how to go about the wikipedia project!
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Uwa barbra (talk) 03:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was very descriptive and easy to follow - The videos helped tremendously!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great! The sandbox provides a nice isolated area to fiddle around with the tools.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jd236 (talk) 04:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SiyuanYin 13:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...The explanation of talk pages was kind of confusing.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing crucial.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Claryce (talk) 14:16, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The interactive training segments were helpful and helped to gain hands on experience.
 * What I liked:

...A bit confusing at times.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it a lot! Very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nicolericci95 (talk) 21:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Saharisabz (talk) 23:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Straight forward, and concise

...
 * What I didn't like: Not the most interactive, the sandbox tutorials could be better

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MindMerchant (talk) 23:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: It was very detailed in explaining every portion on how posting to Wikipedia is done. I loved the video of people from all over the world talking about posting to Wikipedia, it really advertises the fact that Wikipedia is so much more than a simple site that feeds people information.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was a little long at times, I found I lost interest after a certain period of time, especially in the 3rd module.

...
 * What was missing: nothing that I can think of

...
 * What was unnecessary: explaining everything and then show a how to video with a more in depth explanation.

... I love it, it really showed me the ropes!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RCEP (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
the interactive video tutorials ...
 * What I liked:

too much info all at once for beginners ...
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:...

...
 * What was unnecessary:

very helpful...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cinemazing (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were helpful because they showed exactly what to do.
 * What I liked:

... Everything was fine.
 * What I didn't like:

... It could have included navigating our class pages.
 * What was missing:

... I think that everything included was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AlexisCarter267 (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The training was very clear and to the point.

...
 * What I didn't like: To much reading ( make this online training less words)

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Raqwedajones (talk) 12:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very Comprehensive.
 * What I liked:

... The interactive editing tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... The editing tutorials should be opened in a new tab rather than on the same page. --Graduate CS Student at NCSU 17:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...The interactive part makes things easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zkwan3 (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Videos were easy to follow ...
 * What I liked:

Too much wikicoding to remember, a single document to print out would be easier ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It let me edit one test page, and then didn't give me the option to continue the tutorial, so I had to go back to the training. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tmeister21 (talk) 23:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The breakdown of material into manageable sections. ... The amount of repetition. ... More feedback on practice simulations ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I think it would be good to have the program check whether the person is taking the correct steps. Ivorobi33--Ivorobi33 (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... The online tutorial pages were pretty easy to follow What I didn't like: ... I'm not a huge fan of coding, so the fact that some of the commands use coding wasn't something that I particularly liked. ... An online quiz to show that we actually understood the stuff ... Having to learn code to do some edits ... I wasn't a huge fan of the editing tutorial because in order to try doing edits, you would need to go to another page on the same tab rather than having a new tab open so you could try editing and it made having to scroll back to the tutorial a hassle. Jas148 (talk) 00:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What was missing
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
What I liked: Everything.

What I didn't like: The second part.

What was missing: The last part.

What was unnecessary: It kept repeating.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a good video.

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: clear and to the point

...
 * What I didn't like: a bit repetitive

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: the various tidbits of coding that are easily forgotten

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? easy to use

--Swu160 (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The information about how to choose a good article. The difference between copyright and plagiarism. Appreciation of good work through WikiLove.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

Information about getting your article on Main Page's featured articles list
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ronak Ghadiya (talk) 08:28, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:It was easy to get through.

...
 * What I didn't like: No interface to go back if you messed up during the interactive portions.

...
 * What was missing: Something to help guide you better if you messed up.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Needed work on navigating on what to exactly do and to be able to do something if you messed up and had to back up.

--Blitzs20 (talk) 08:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the easy format of the training.
 * What I liked:

I wish it would have been more explanatory and straightforward.
 * What I didn't like:

A basic approach to editing Wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

Most of the videos could have been replaced by text examples.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good, but I wish it would have been more helpful by providing more on-screen instruction.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rjc12 (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...When it shows me how to remove citation needed and add reliable source
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Absolutely nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was like my dreams are coming to happen.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ras Benjih (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Great and very helpful, but some UI differences between the tutorial and the actual website were confusing

--Nwerry (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The specific training for psychology and medical related topics.
 * What I liked:

...nothing, I think it was a fairly good tutorial and helpful to get started editing.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it for the most part, I think that it could have been more comprehensive.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amandafoort (talk) 17:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the fact the training was well explained and guided me through the procedures
 * What I liked:

As a first approach to this whole editing process, perhaps it could have been a little less long and complex
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't find anything missing, but again, I am new to this
 * What was missing:

The advanced editing, perhaps, as I will need more time and practice to remember everything I've just read
 * What was unnecessary:

It was actually pretty cool and functional
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Asile91 (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...To evaluate Wikipedia can help to learn what makes a good or bad Wikipedia article. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Editing is fun always.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ras Benjih (talk) 21:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very well organized, and easy to follow the progression of ideas ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like: Timing for subtitles was 1 second too early in the videos

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Serban Sirca (talk) 23:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...How interactive the training was
 * What I liked:

...Sometimes it took me to my sandbox and I couldn't navigate back to where I was in the training and had to start all over
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I can think of
 * What was missing:

...Nothing that I can thnk of
 * What was unnecessary:

...I really liked it! I thought that it was very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CAlvarez33 (talk) 23:38, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The How-To videos.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the modules were too long.
 * What I didn't like:

...More editing exercises.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was pretty useful to see the edits in real-time and get used to seeing how the code works.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nah.vee (talk) 06:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

The videos ...


 * What I didn't like:

How long the editing section was ...


 * What was missing:

Nothing ...


 * What was unnecessary:

Nothing ...

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Keyona m (talk) 06:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
editing section ...
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

...

a brief and concise example that covers all the editing features ...
 * What was missing:

Both the video and description are not required ...
 * What was unnecessary:

Truth be told. Its bad. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pgomata (talk) 14:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I enjoyed how personable and casual the approach of teaching everything was
 * What I liked:

...It was A LOT of content to take in at once
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't believe anything was missing
 * What was missing:

...I also don't think anything was unnecessary. Being that I didn't have any knowledge about this stuff before doing it, I felt everything was valuable.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was very simple and I appreciated how it walked me through step by step
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--S13rown (talk) 23:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Susanne

Training feedback
... the videos, which describe the editing step by step.
 * What I liked:

... Too much reading on one page, gets overwhelming. ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... I dont think there was anything that was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... N/A --Esarikay (talk) 01:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The supplementary youtube videos as demonstration of tasks.
 * What I liked:

The length of time it took to complete.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

It was mostly helpful, the references and citing section was still a bit difficult. i could use more explaining.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AnjelicaR (talk) 02:56, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Short and simple! It wasn't wearisome at all to complete this training. Videos were well made and helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I couldn't get back, so I had to hit the back arrow on my browser. --Alinenaroditsky (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: All of the information was concise and straight to the point. Not too much fluff information in there, everything was short and sweet; really helped me maintain my focus on what I was learning.

...
 * What I didn't like: I wish it was a little bit more interactive, in the sense that we were given the opportunity to upload a sample image and essentially create a sample article.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing. As mentioned above, it was short and sweet and straight to the point. No fluff.

I enjoyed it. While I wish i had the opportunity to play around with a sample image and create somewhat of a sample article, I enjoyed the interactive tutorial. I played around with both the Beta editor and the regular editor and found them both to have a very simple User interface, easy to manage and to work with so that anyone can do it! ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ziadsabaa (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Additional videos help me to understand easily
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Misokkkim (talk) 06:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)Miso kkkim

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: the videos

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Danibridge (talk) 07:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I really liked the videos and the format of the tutorial.

...
 * What I didn't like: I thought that some sections were a bit dry, and the interaction modules could be integrated into the panel for more simple examples such as formatting.

...
 * What was missing: I think the tutorial was pretty encompassing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I think that it may have had too much information for someone new.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kaeri93 (talk) 15:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... it gave me important information that I needed to know of course ... nothing ... everything was in play ... nothing I thought ... it gave me an outlook on how things look on Wikipedia when you are editing --Sadiesae18 (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The succinct sections an links to more information.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Synechdoche5 (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I appreciated the interactive editing tutorial.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

Would like more elaboration on how to edit pages and more of the "coding" aspect

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amcgugan11 (talk) 20:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The video links were very easy to follow and provided a step by step interactive way to learn. I also liked the tutorials which allowed you to practice certain things.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought the interactive tutorial was very useful, as it showed you how to do specific things and allowed practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amdavies (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It was very well organized
 * What I liked:

...It was long
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked well.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Coonic17 (talk) 02:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Really good step by step instructions
 * What I liked:

...Quite long
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...Some of the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sonam Sapra (talk) 03:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: That wikipedia's instructional training course was clear and concise.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AminaZadeh (talk) 03:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Good job covering everything that we needed to know in a fairly efficient manner.
 * What I liked:

Some parts were repeated later on, especially talking about what Wikipedia "is".
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I can think of.
 * What was missing:

Nothing I can think of.
 * What was unnecessary:

It helped a lot actually.. I am glad that I tried it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mdslayton (talk) 04:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...all of the video tutorials
 * What I liked:

...the inability to try out what was being showed on the same screen
 * What I didn't like:

...I dont know yet!
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Natawhee7 (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was comprehensive about everything I would need to use when editing and such on Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... Some of it may not have been simplified enough for the not so tech savvy (I'd consider myself not tech savvy when it comes to the specificity of the editing and using code to change things).
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I noticed.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing that I noticed.
 * What was unnecessary:

... Those helped a lot, the reading seemed kind of dense, so these presented it in an easier format to digest.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ammosnare 22:08, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Short and concise ...not as interactive as I would have liked. Part of the training could include making a mock page from start to finish and having it be a guided tutorial throughout.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I enjoyed it and found it helpful --Hera vc (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The interactive format that let you edit/use wikipedia while still doing the training, the discussion of the basics of copyright/plagiarism laws and policies on wikipedia
 * What I liked:

Too many optional links
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eef1560 (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked how the training broke down every subject and tool, which its a helpful guide to use.
 * What I liked:

How some of them steps are kind of complex and seems confusing.
 * What I didn't like:

I am not sure what was missing.
 * What was missing:

No everything was fine, except it was a bit confusing.
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was okay it is not that exciting like how the actors from the video "edit" seemed.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shawnise.Addison (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I found the video guides to be very helpful, especially with the sections on citations and references. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... It was a very helpful basic tutorial. No complaints! ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Noahsnave (talk) 00:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

really helpful

--Celestecote (talk) 01:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the short and simple slides as well as the simple yet informative videos.

...
 * What I didn't like: The diction and sentence structures are hard to decipher at times.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing that I am aware of.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I did not notice any unnecessary information while reading it.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was quite helpful with only a few minor annoyances likely caused by my computer's operating system.

--AKWildcat (talk) 04:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very informative and interactive.
 * What I liked:

Didn't really understand the chart.
 * What I didn't like:

Hard to say.
 * What was missing:

Not much.
 * What was unnecessary:

Excellent.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Juri.DP (talk) 06:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The video tutorials!
 * What I liked:

...The suggestion to do it yourself without any real guidance.
 * What I didn't like:

...Someone there to guide me through the do it yourself links
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...I wish someone was there looking over my shoulder so I could be sure I was doing it correctly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tiggersabah (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was very thorough in terms of an introduction, covering what seems to be the most salient topics. I especially appreciated the extra links to sources with more information, and the practice tutorials.
 * What I liked:

Nothing that I didn't like...
 * What I didn't like:

I'm not sure yet - just starting out.
 * What was missing:

Doesn't seem like anything was unnecessary. I found the videos a bit redundant in terms of repeating the same material on a page, though I preferred learning in the video format as opposed to reading off the page.
 * What was unnecessary:

Loved this! Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clrlpn1 (talk) 19:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Interactive steps
 * What I liked:

More interactivity and opportunities to try would have helped
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing really
 * What was missing:

The videos seemed redundant. Perhaps they could have been used as tutorials in conjunction with an interactive excercise
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked them
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zkhan93 (talk) 19:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The clarity and step-by-step format ...NA
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...NA
 * What was missing:

...NA
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a bit confusing to get to links, at first.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Inspired95 (talk) 23:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:
 * The tutorials were, for the most part, concise and simple

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * The difference between basic and advanced editing wasn't obvious, especially toward the end of basic editing
 * Tutorials seem to be somewhat out of date
 * Notably in many tutorials, you are asked to select the "Edit" tab to continue working and explaining, however, this brings you to a different method of editing; the correct tab is the "Edit Source" tab.

...
 * What was missing:

The text-based instruction that overlaps with the interactive tutorials, it was frequently redundant, offered little to add to one's editing skill and contained only the barest information. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

Well meaning, but only somewhat informative. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aspera0 (talk) 23:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
..I learned a lot ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nsiss2 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jlbertschmann (talk) 21:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

I very much enjoyed the videos illustrating the code equivalent of various editing tasks. I also liked how there were a number of references provided for those interested in writing medically-related articles.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was very helpful in learning the technical details behind various tasks.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... The videos were very helpful, the encouragement to try things ourselves ... Not being able to leave and return to different points, unless i missed instruction on that ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmowbray27 (talk) 14:25, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

... A bit too long
 * What I didn't like:

... More visual diagrams
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xzhu228 (talk) 20:33, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

I liked that there were video instructions included with most written explanations.


 * What I didn't like:

I did not like how I could not look at the written coding instructions when practicing in my sandbox.


 * What was missing:

I wish it provided clearer instructions to help set up a personal user page.


 * What was unnecessary:

I thought every area was necessary and beneficial.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found it confusing and unhelpful.

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

I liked that there were video instructions included with most written explanations.


 * What I didn't like:

I did not like how I could not look at the written coding instructions when practicing in my sandbox.


 * What was missing:

I wish it provided clearer instructions to help set up a personal user page.


 * What was unnecessary:

I thought every area was necessary and beneficial.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found it confusing and unhelpful.

Ruthchitiz (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)Ruth Chitiz

Training feedback
I liked that there were videos to explain in a visual way the different concepts specifically copyright violation and plagerism.
 * What I liked:

I do not like that the links take you out of the training. It would be better to integrate the tutorials directly into the training rather then having to jump to a different page.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful to have a hands on tutorial rather then simply read about the different editing techniques.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sgilpin4 (talk) 00:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback I felt that without this training site, it would be more challenging to complete the training
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Winslow21 (talk) 16:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the videos and the pdf have been very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--G.ale.1105 (talk) 18:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...detailed explanation
 * What I liked:

...boredom
 * What I didn't like:

...interactive tutorial wasn't interactive
 * What was missing:

...abstract explanation
 * What was unnecessary:

...needs development
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bubblegumcheesy (talk) 21:32, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I like the interactive tutorials on editing and the videos that visualized and presented the information ... Did not like how clicking on some links did not automatically open in a new tab, interrupting the training module. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was very good and going step by step through the editing basics. --Eham27 (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...The information was good for new users.
 * What I liked:

...It was a little wordy, a lot of unnecessary information, the voices in the videos were very monotone, not so exciting to follow
 * What I didn't like:

...A few colours here and there to keep the audience's attention, a list of all the typing commands needed for using Wikipedia
 * What was missing:

...I found it was a little wordy. I would have liked point form and getting down to the basics right away.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Those were very helpful and very easy to follow, extremely effective.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alana Gyemi (talk) 12:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...I would have liked to be able to access parts of the training in other sections again after moving on. ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...The create an account segment since we have to create an account to get in the training.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jofo1230 (talk) 14:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Very informative

...
 * What I didn't like: confusing at times

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: confusing at times

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bmk33 (talk) 16:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: it was straightforward and provided informative resources

...
 * What I didn't like: it could be redundant

...
 * What was missing: nothing comes to mind

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing comes to mind

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? simple

Beedrumms (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)beedrumms

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Language used, tone of reading, accessibility of participation this way.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Mine didn't work fully? After telling me to click edit the editing box opened and then left me stranded. I think I figured it out though.

--Emmaleefk (talk) 00:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The interactive training sessions.
 * What I liked:

...Long and somewhat repetitive.
 * What I didn't like:

...More training on the wikipedia article editing or a step by step guide on how to write an article from scratch.
 * What was missing:

...Repetitive rules in the beginning.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was good. The captcha caught me off guard but the tutorial was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pkgill (talk) 01:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Megan laffey (talk) 02:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... More interactive steps.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hucki (talk) 15:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked how clear the videos were and how we received the info gradually.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like: Some pages were a bit too long and wordy.

...
 * What was missing: nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very helpful!

--Ebanytsu (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked teaching that how to use Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...I think this process is a bit boring.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think it isn't.
 * What was missing:

...Um...nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think it is nice. So this is surely enough for the moment.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gong Ju-young (talk) 06:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Short and concise descriptions of markup languages used on Wikipedia. Not time-consuming and effective.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some rules are too strict. More flexible rules should be provided.

...
 * What was missing: More wiki markup elements needed.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I believe that every element in the training was necessary for beginners!

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: It was a great interactive activity for me. It was easy to learn.

--Hseong2 (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:easy to follow and understand

...
 * What I didn't like:long

...
 * What was missing:nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cunvail (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The interactive training tutorials were a great help.
 * What I liked:

...There was a lot of reading
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...Picking a good article to edit
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a great way of getting to know how to edit
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SherryDai93 (talk) 23:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The training was rather thorough in explaining the required materials.
 * What I liked:

... Nothing ... Nothing ... Nothing ... Cool spaceship --Samspiderman (talk) 02:21, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...Quick and straight to the point...
 * What I liked:

...Nothing...
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing...
 * What was missing:

...Texts with videos...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is very helpful...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tim (talk) 03:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Clear instructions
 * What I liked:

...None
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...They were sufficient for me.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cjchan2016 (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were helpful guideline
 * What I liked:

... A little long; but all the information given was useful
 * What I didn't like:

...Uploading pictures seems a bit complicated
 * What was missing:

...Teaching you how you can bold a word.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I found it very useful; I sometimes forgot what to do after watching the video, but with the help of the interactive editing tutorial, it was easy to follow through
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hhur2 (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
short and concise but still informative. was glad that i didnt have to read a wall of text
 * What I liked:

nothing really
 * What I didn't like:

more tutorials on learning how to edit in markup
 * What was missing:

nothing really
 * What was unnecessary:

i thought it was ok, some more of these would be great
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cheyliew (talk) 00:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
very thorough...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

how to talk to other people...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it was very useful...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--neda

Training feedback
...The videos were very helpful to follow along with while editing the source in the sandbox.
 * What I liked:

...I needed to keep 2 tabs open to watch the video and use my sandbox and was switching back and forth between them.
 * What I didn't like:

...Adding subsections and a table of contents.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was helpful as it showed you exactly what to do while in your sandbox.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LewisKurschner (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... More information on how to add pictures to articles, and the associated rules. How to create a new sandbox. ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alessia.d (talk) 20:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... More information on how to add pictures to articles, and the associated rules. How to create a new sandbox. ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alessia.d (talk) 20:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
All the topics are well organized
 * What I liked:

None. I was able to learn all the details, how to edit the site.
 * What I didn't like:

None.
 * What was missing:

None.
 * What was unnecessary:

It is efficient tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dhur2 (talk) 02:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked that the videos were optional and could be watched at one's preferred pace.
 * What I liked:

... The training seemed a bit long.
 * What I didn't like:

... Everything was covered extensively!
 * What was missing:

... Everything was necessary!
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought it was super helpful and helped the tutorial to be more hands-on!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Epcb15 (talk) 19:39, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos really helped me to get through this training
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...i felt everything was covered for basic training
 * What was missing:

... wikilove
 * What was unnecessary:

...i tried and it makes me to go to my sandbox but when i go into my sandbox from the top bar, it doesnt show my work
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kpark252 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that the tutorial took the time to explain each concept and the purpose of the website on a whole. I also liked that videos were subtitled so that listening was not the only option.
 * What I liked:

Nothing in particular stood out to me.
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't think anything was missing so far.
 * What was missing:

Everything in the training was beneficial.
 * What was unnecessary:

It really helped to cement the proccessof editing with the guided step-by-step prompts.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KCumberbatch (talk) 22:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very informative.
 * What I liked:

A lot of information with some overlap/repeat. Could have been more concise with more video or images.
 * What I didn't like:

More concise videos.
 * What was missing:

Lengthy text and videos.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ccoatsworth (talk) 03:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the detail information on the Wikipedia and interactive training.
 * What I liked:

... I didn't like the way training was set up. It was confusing to go back after finishing interactive video.
 * What I didn't like:

...More practice will be beneficial. More demonstration on editing.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The practice was good.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SikhrakarS12 (talk) 03:18, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked how the modules incorporated videos and that the modules were very succinct.
 * What I liked:

... N/A
 * What I didn't like:

... N/A
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very informative --Alubitz45 (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Well organized and helpful. ... Too informative; I don't think I'll remember most of the codes and may have forgotten some of the more important steps. ... None ... None ... Extremely helpful --Athuang1114 (talk) 07:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...simple explanations, easy navigation throughout training
 * What I liked:

...some of the sandbox training links malfunctioned requiring navigation back to training module
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Great when it would bring me back to main training after complete, there was one interactive section which did not bring me back to where I was in the main training, this made it difficult to navigate back to where I was.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oneeln (talk) 17:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the videos orienting me to where and how to use Wiki features. ... The interactive tools were a bit confusing to me.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sporangia (talk) 18:51, 29 September 2015 (UTC) I was not certain on how to interact with it.

Training feedback
it was simple to use
 * What I liked:

very confusing at first
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it became more complicated later on but worth it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dkim5291 (talk) 02:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful! The only problem I had was having to enter a captcha after "excessive editing," that I've only done in the tutorial --Mmcgarr (talk) 17:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The technical training, especially with the computer codes.

...
 * What I didn't like: I don't need to know about internet communities, I used the internet.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Learning about interacting with the community.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I like it.

--Ktan57 (talk) 18:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos ...None
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... None ... None ... Made it easier to understand. --Arp1317 (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
Very informative and gave a great bail layout for what is required and available on Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

Length. some pages and information seemed redundant and tedious
 * What I didn't like:

I could not think of any additional info or source of information that was not given
 * What was missing:

videos that explained again the paragraphs I just read about the given topic.
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful and allowed me to easily find the different aspects of editing. Probably would not have figured out the steps without the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Atn1414 (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Atn1414 (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2015 (UTC)Nick

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the interactive practice modules.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was a bit glitchy.

...
 * What was missing: Seemed to cover everything!

...
 * What was unnecessary: It was all helpful.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very helpful.

--Angincrod (talk) 02:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked the different videos that were shown.
 * What I liked:

How I was taught to edit. I feel like there needed to be more structure with the sandbox.
 * What I didn't like:

A description of a sandbox. More in depth.
 * What was missing:

The last section was not as necessary as the other three.
 * What was unnecessary:

Needed to be a bit more interactive. More definitions and descriptions of everything.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mindeesmom (talk) 02:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Order and flow of modules
 * What I liked:

...Although visualizing editing techniques was helpful, videos should maybe be accompanied by audio transcripts
 * What I didn't like:

...Where can you easily find good wiki editing references (how-to's) once you are done with the training... Found under the subheading "help" but this wasn't stated (or perhaps wasn't emphasized) in the training modules
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Arella Li15 (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback Comment
It was short and sweet. I have a high edit count and I still learned from the tutorial.
 * What I liked:

The tone was a little condescending but not a problem.
 * What I didn't like:

After about 100 edits it may be helpful for the newer editors to get introduced to some tools that will help their editing go faster.
 * What was missing:

--Barbara (WVS) (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos were helpful in clarifying concepts. Some of the pages were very consistent, not adding much excitement. Perhaps more visuals, such as images.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

There were some portions with too much text or things that were over-explained.
 * What was unnecessary:

I enjoyed it; it helped me to put action what I had been learning --Jahanobik2015 (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Brief and clear information ... I hope there is more samples that I can practice more with direction on side. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Minjiwoo (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Brief and clear information ... I hope there is more samples that I can practice more with direction on side. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Minjiwoo (talk) 04:17, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I enjoyed the videos and tutorials. They gave me a sampling of what I'll have to master in the near future. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... I don't think anything was missing, though I probably wouldn't know if it was missing. ... I didn't think anything was unnecessary. ... The first one didn't work very well, but the other tutorials went great. Simple and easy to use. --Drummerdude987 (talk) 21:16, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... This orientation is well organized. With the help of video and picture, I can understand different concepts about wikipedia better. ... At the first time, I did the training on the Safari, but I can't verify the completion as well as leave feedback, so I have to change to Google Chrome and worked on the orientation again. ... No ... No, I like the way the orientation designed. ... It makes the work easier, but I still like the traditional edition. --LiangShuang97 (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...The process of editing articles
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing missing
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Egaceru (talk) 02:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The orientation is well organized, with the help of pictures and videos, I can understand the materials better. ... At the first, I used safari to work on this orientation, but the verification button didn't work, so I had to change to google chrome to finish the verification. ... No ... No ... The interactive editing is easier to work on, but I prefer the traditional edition. --LiangShuang97 (talk) 02:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The walkthrough approach
 * What I liked:

Some of it was too detailed
 * What I didn't like:

unknown
 * What was missing:

like I said, some stuff was too detailed
 * What was unnecessary:

It was excellent
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brunec21 (talk) 02:42, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was incredibly clear and easy to use.
 * What I liked:

I had a difficult time navigating back to the main module page.
 * What I didn't like:

Not anything I can think of.
 * What was missing:

Nothing really.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was difficult to navigate back to the main module because I didn't understand the instructions provided for that.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tale.Spin (talk) 14:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The vivid videos and the seperated modules that make the materials more readable
 * What I liked:

None
 * What I didn't like:

Can be more specific about the criteria of what is a good editing and what is not
 * What was missing:

None
 * What was unnecessary:

It's easy to understand and follow
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xh79 (talk) 16:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that there were interactive ways to edit, and it took you through the page, and then led you through the page step by step.
 * What I liked:

I did not like that it was a lot of information to read through, but that is inevitable.
 * What I didn't like:

I do not think anything is missing.
 * What was missing:

I did not think anything was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

This was my favorite part of the tutorial, I thought it was very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dfs15 (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos
 * What I liked:

... In sandbox sometimes it didn't specify how exactly to do things rather just told me what to do for this specific example
 * What I didn't like:

... I think overall it included everything a beginner wiki user would need.
 * What was missing:

... There was a lot of repetition.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I answered above.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarahq786 (talk) 21:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Step by step procedural guidance

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Svvuriti (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was very complete and useful
 * What I liked:

Maybe it was a little too long, but it's becuse there are a lot of new things to learn none
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

sometimes it didn't let me go on, but I don't know why
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Anyway, thank you all for this tutorial! XOXO --Xieyilian92 (talk) 16:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos to help further explain in detail aspects of using Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...How the directions on editing/ listing references were not listed again once you moved to your sandbox from the tutorial, so it was difficult to practice correctly
 * What I didn't like:

...Without previous/further practice using Wikipedia I cannot answer this
 * What was missing:

...Without previous/further practice using Wikipedia I cannot answer this
 * What was unnecessary:

...The directions need to be presented again, or a step by step once you begin the practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Doglover93 (talk) 01:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very Simply and easy to understand
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nstudmuffin (talk) 03:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The modules that showed me how to use the various interfaces in real time.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was a little bit redundant. Much of the text was repeated in the videos.

...
 * What was missing: Not much.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I think that everything in this training was relevant

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I enjoyed the hands-on learning experience. Although, it did spontaneously stop mid tutorial some times and did not provide a link back to the training page.

--Bcgeo5234 (talk) 03:19, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The video instructions were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

... Too many coding confused me.
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe more picture about the important buttons and templates.
 * What was missing:

... None,
 * What was unnecessary:

... Extremely helpful!!!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--St798 (talk) 04:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Shimeng Tong

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rummens97 (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
This was a comprehensive training that allowed me to go at my own speed. ...
 * What I liked:

Some of the videos were a little outdated in terms of topics, menu options. ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JSaragossi (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was a little glitchy. It would direct you to a part of the page, but instead of clicking something that said "Okay, got it!" or similar, it just had a back button, which could send you down the rabbit hole of never actually getting started!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bixby2716 (talk) 00:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that it walked me through each component stepwise, and had videos to show how to use it
 * What I liked:

Some of the material about editing code versus using the Visual Editor was a bit confusing
 * What I didn't like:

A flow chart would be useful for documenting the process of starting an article in a sandbox, moving it to a talk page, etc. The full process still seems a little confusing to me
 * What was missing:

Nothing, as far as I can tell
 * What was unnecessary:

It was useful, but a bit glitchy - sometimes it would close for no reason, and other times it didn't seem to link to anything resembling a tutorial. Am not actually sure if I did a tutorial!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bixby2716 (talk) 01:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I really enjoyed the positivity that comes from Wikipedia, it encourages people to not be afraid to write and to also have a voice in their writing. The training was very well informed with helpful videos.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Maritzaespitia (talk) 03:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Videos and the sandbox
 * What I liked:

...it was a little bland
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm a bit overwhelmed by all the new information so it is hard to say what was missing
 * What was missing:

...Same as above I am still new to this so its hard to say what wasn't needed
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it especially how easy it was to use.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Ceoases (talk) 04:13, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Ceoases

Training feedback
Very easy to understand and very helpful
 * What I liked:

nothing
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Definitely very helpful for people who never used it before and does a great job of walking beginners through it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aczerwin (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Short video tutorials
 * What I liked:

…Safari doesn't work well
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

…helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--N704jt (talk) 15:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... that a complete tutorial exists.
 * What I liked:

... the tutorial is perhaps overly thorough.
 * What I didn't like:

... It would be more clear if there were screen shots.
 * What was missing:

... The edits are shown in wikicode, but I'd expect most newcomers will not want to use the code, and would rather just format the document like a word processor. Maybe I'm confuse and you have to use the wikicode, this a is a a little confusing.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It would be better if it continued to guide you step by step.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Robertopennington (talk) 18:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Serchans (talk) 19:37, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... That anyone can edit. ... How long it took to train. ... Nothing that I can think of. ... A lot of this is repetitive. ... I'd like that, hands on is the best way to learn. --Studmuffin1196 (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The training on "The Community."

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--WATERPAX (talk) 22:44, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I really liked how each module offered many resources to expand on what was being taught. The module made everything very simple, and if I wanted more detail, I could look at all of the resources.
 * What I liked:

There was no way to save my progress on the tutorial once I had completed a module. If I had to close my browser for any reason, I had to restart the tutorial and click through each page to get through to where I had left off.
 * What I didn't like:

They were very insightful, and had helped me to practice my editing skills. The interactive modules were simple and easy to use, yet their template was a little confusing if I had to go back and forth between any steps.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Colleen Lim (talk) 04:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos where great, especially with the editing parts.
 * What I liked:

Honestly, I thought it was all good information.
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't feel like anything was left out.
 * What was missing:

I'm not sure specifically, but it did feel a little longer than it could be.
 * What was unnecessary:

I did, I thought it was super useful actually! --DavidpBowman (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...How simple it was to understand the concepts.
 * What I liked:

... Some of the videos I felt could have been taken out and distracted me from what I was trying to take away. ... There are probably many other Wiki rules and guide lines that are not listed. ... Some of the videos. ... I thought this was a perfect was to not just tell us how to do something but to show us step by step. This tool was the most useful. --BrandieBreezy (talk) 21:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... the whole thing. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BMust34 (talk) 22:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mcham005 (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The interactive training
 * What I liked:

... That you have to restart the training if you leave the website
 * What I didn't like:

... Some testing to determine whether the material was learned
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was a major help. Will definitely refer to it in the future.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tlawt001 (talk) 04:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:I am so happy and pleased that I learned a lot. though Most of the stuff I already informed in class.

...
 * What I didn't like: I think It needs some more vedios

...
 * What was missing: I don't think so anything missing.

... lots of pdf files .I think we can use videos instead of pdf
 * What was unnecessary:

... I am fan of movies and media. I would like to edit those.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gonotontroo (talk) 06:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)--Gonotontroo (talk) 06:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Tutorials were helpful and easy to follow. The conduct guidelines presented seem reasonable to me.
 * What I liked:

Training certification appears unresponsive and could use improvement so that it registers properly for all users.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rrock401 (talk) 23:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
interactive tutorial, advice on choosing articles
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Smburns47 (talk) 04:43, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos
 * What I liked:

...too many texts
 * What I didn't like:

...pictures
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...it helps a lot
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ppraaeww (talk) 04:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the videos, they really emphasized the topics.

...
 * What I didn't like: I did not like how some things were repeated.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing was missing that I can think of now.

...
 * What was unnecessary:Everything was necessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? No, I did not. I will in the future.

--Emilynicholemann (talk) 21:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was very thorough.
 * What I liked:

Needed more interactive modules.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe the option for an audio section.
 * What was missing:

I felt that all was important.
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful. --Courtneyreeder (talk) 17:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nicho806 (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The information given throughout the training

...
 * What I didn't like: The editing. It is very confusing

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing

... I did not like it. It's useful but it can maybe be easier in another way
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Klpoi5 (talk) 22:08, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Great organization. Really liked how there was always an intro to each topic and then how it included more detail about the topic. This really helped in knowing what to expect about the topic and to give a general idea of the topic The interactive setting was also really helpful.
 * What I liked:

... I felt like it was a bit too long.
 * What I didn't like:

... I think all the main topics were covered. ... Maybe not including the advanced editing section. Maybe it could be an optional section.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I really liked it. Great way to practice editing and really getting a feel of Wikipedia. --Abbey311 (talk) 02:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... It was great stuff. really covered all the basics. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wpcrosson (talk) 09:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The tutorial is short and easy to understand
 * What I liked:

...some content should be in bullet points for easier reading
 * What I didn't like:

...none
 * What was missing:

...none
 * What was unnecessary:

...it made me understand more of the tutorial
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nacharee.jung (talk) 10:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The thorough infob ... It was long, but I know it's necessary. ... Examples of good pages from students like me! ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... Awesome! --Sgeekie (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
It was fast and easy to understand
 * What I liked:

None
 * What I didn't like:

None
 * What was missing:

None
 * What was unnecessary:

That helped a lot!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abbybeavan (talk) 22:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I like that it teach me different ways on how use the Edit buttons. I like the visual aids that they used help us learn how to use Wikipedia. I learn the five pillars 1.Wikipedia is an online 2.Wikipedia has a neutral point of view 3.Wikipedia is free content 4.wikipedians should interact in a respectful and civil manner. 5.Wikipedia does not have firm rules. Which i found very important to remember. I also learn about the significant coverage in reliable sources. ...I don't think there was anything there i didn't like everything i understand and was easy to follow.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing was missed
 * What was missing:

...nothing Unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

... I try using the editing button i think it was a very good idea. --Nelly4you (talk) 03:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The editing practice and video tutorials.
 * What I liked:

The amount of slides
 * What I didn't like:

How do we insert our own images?
 * What was missing:

So much focus on plagiarism and copyright.
 * What was unnecessary:

I quite liked it!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kgoldbranson (talk) 04:49, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I was confused by it, but I like the idea of having an interactive mode. Perhaps I just didn't understand enough, but I found it difficult to try the interactive mode when I didn't have a specific topic to practice with. --RebeccaGreaney (talk) 05:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...very informative
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

--JaeRoxx (talk) 16:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... that it was helpful
 * What I liked:

... nothing
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

... nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Menahkkarlman (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked how there was hands on practice.

...
 * What I didn't like: I liked it all- I thought it was very brief and helpful.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing, I thought it was a great tutorial.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Everything was necessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was great, practice makes perfect!

--Cmdevenney (talk) 21:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: How thoroughly the orientation described everything and showed me how to edit.

...
 * What I didn't like: How long it took to complete the orientation.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing as far as I noticed.

...
 * What was unnecessary: All the extra gibberish about talking to other people.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Didn't try it.

--The1stmb (talk) 07:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the brevity of the instructions as they were laid out page by page. It made the volume of information a little more digestible
 * What I liked:

... NA
 * What I didn't like:

... NA
 * What was missing:

... NA
 * What was unnecessary:

... NA
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Isaac.zivkovic (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2015 (UTC) Isaac Zivkovic

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Smile10151016 (talk) 02:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Edit everytimes
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zliao3 (talk) 02:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...giving many details, which helpful
 * What I liked:

...a little bit difficult to understand
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...introduction
 * What was unnecessary:

...Chinese culture
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--FIONA0925 (talk) 02:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I like the "editing skills" among the third and fourth part, which taught me some editing skills like how to add the images or Wikilove in the website page. Additionally, the videos are practical for me to learn it.
 * What I liked:

I did not like the long descriptions for the introduction part so much because it is somehow boring to read.
 * What I didn't like:

I think it need to add more pictures and practices on each parts.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Carrie Feng (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
There will be a good way to share my ideas with people all around the world, it is really cool. There are too many formats when I upload my ideas.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

Character
 * What was missing:

Everything is necessary I think.
 * What was unnecessary:

It is really hard for us to remember it when we upload our ideas and essays. --Zzwsb123 (talk) 02:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--PCrapitto (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was informative and helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sasha Tarabanova (talk) 04:05, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
How detailed and fun it was to go through the training. Videos now and then made it interesting. ... It felt rather too long to deal with. ... Nothing much. ... Five pillars were kind of too long of explanation ... ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Skchoi7 (talk) 10:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gurulolyo (talk) 01:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was very informative and helpful. I learned some things about editing Wikipedia that I didn't even know about. ... Nothing much really. ... Nothing ... Some of the rules on how to be civil on the talk pages are pretty much common sense. But to each their own. ... It was actually really helpful! I like the way it actually showed you the way it should be done in certain steps are in turn, we can get help if stuck.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Theflowermaid (talk) 05:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Eased some fears about established editors being upset about having new editors on a project.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AmsNU2015 (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very clear!
 * What I liked:

A little repetitive
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Sandbox was very helpful! --Aliciabobeesha (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... That it gave links and tutorials to try out what you just learned.
 * What I liked:

... N/A
 * What I didn't like:

... A page link for all info links and links to tutorials as seen in the training
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... I enjoyed it, although I wish it would show what you did wrong and how to fix it if you didn't get it right/couldn't figure it out
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emarieg15 (talk) 02:14, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Clear, simple, brief.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Narvalon (talk) 23:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The sandbox! Super interactive and a good tool to learn.
 * What I liked:

It was a lot of reading, which was hard to follow at times.
 * What I didn't like:

A page of all the videos that can show you had to edit a specific thing.
 * What was missing:

I thought everything was important information and helped with the training.
 * What was unnecessary:

Cool way to learn.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ritzg11 (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
The interactive sandbox.
 * What I liked:

A lot of unnecessary reading.
 * What I didn't like:

N/A
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

Cool and engaging way to learn.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rg cp133 group12 (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... There are several short videos that teach well. ... However, there are not one complete video that combines all editing tools and methods. If wikipedia can record one video, instructing how to edit from start, things could be seen more constructive. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cinddyu (talk) 20:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The interactive tutorials were helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing really comes to mind.

...
 * What was missing: It was pretty comprehensive

...
 * What was unnecessary: Again, the training was succinct.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? See above :)

--Belicimo (talk) 23:09, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Brevity, easy to follow, clear and concise, tutorials were short and sweet.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Glam316 (talk) 04:04, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was great ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ttran Group11 (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

The videos throughout the instructions were extremely helpful. I also appreciated the concise instructions per page rather than providing us with a long article to read. This way, the information was much easier to absorb.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

I don't recall a thorough explanation of the sandbox. I was a bit unclear about whether or not this was public until it was alluded to later in the training.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

The interactive tutorials were very helpful.

--Zbetkaa (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tglm002 (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the videos thought the training.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... One thing that was missing was more interaction thought the process.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mmrhet110 (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
the simplicity of the tutorial
 * What I liked:

it was kind of boring more visuals
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it was well done. Very helpful and straight forward
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Roufosse23 (talk) 02:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: the the steps outlined and the videos to support.

...
 * What I didn't like: n/a

...
 * What was missing: maybe like a quiz or self-assessment to ensure good understanding

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ybaykina (talk) 17:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very thorough.
 * What I liked:

Hard to remember.
 * What I didn't like:

What it takes to maintain your own article.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful, could use more of them.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Atmicalizzi5 (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Overview of basic Wikipedia principles and editing
 * What I liked:

videos often didn't play the first time (had to close and re-open)
 * What I didn't like:

more sandbox tutorials would be useful
 * What was missing:

some of the "filler" or "flavor" stuff, such as the introductory video of the people making really vague, empty, marketing-type statements
 * What was unnecessary:

useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bolverkrr (talk) 01:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... it showed very well what i need to do and stated facts about how to do it
 * What I liked:

...it was a little long and drawn out
 * What I didn't like:

...a item missing was the fact that it should have less on the page so you can see better whats important an whats fluff
 * What was missing:

...most the extra words
 * What was unnecessary:

...that was great i now can either know the editing process or i can go back for help
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dafc-i-just-read (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
There were videos that accompanied the sections. This really helped because sometimes I can misinterpret the instructions or skimmed the instructions too fast. I also liked how there were sections that allowed me to practice the instructions.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful, but sometimes it was a little inconvenient when I would forget that it would not open a separate browser/page (it forced me to leave my training page).
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RoyalBlue27 (talk) 00:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked that everything was easily understandable. The language was simple and easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

More examples.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The editing tutorial was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Echung Group11 (talk) 04:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Phongho1 (talk) 07:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very clear and concise structure to the training.
 * What I liked:

...Sometimes a little bit too wordy, especially when it comes to code, etc.
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Samitb28 (talk) 14:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KimRachel25 (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Information was presented in a concise but thorough manner.
 * What I liked:

Nothing in particular.
 * What I didn't like:

No comment
 * What was missing:

No comment
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked for me. It's a good way to learn - doing it actually instead of just reading
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Markbrianszostak (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... The interactive editing tutorial was very easy to follow and the visuals and sound helped to better understand the technicalities of Wikipedia --Kslee22 (talk) 20:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aystowers (talk) 20:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
=it is quite convenient to use as there are all guideline for me
 * What I liked:

=sometime it is confuse and it takes some time to understand the wiki
 * What I didn't like:

=i dont think there was any missing
 * What was missing:

=nothing really
 * What was unnecessary:

=i just followed the instruction, it think it was good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jobsarayutw (talk) 14:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Fun interactive tutorial
 * What I liked:

Very long
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Nothing really
 * What was unnecessary:

Very informative, fun, and easy to use
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sth.niv (talk) 18:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... easy instructions and guides ... i feel like some information could of been shorter ... nothing, very compacted and detailed. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Danysebaz (talk) 19:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very comprehensive and clear information with interactive tutorials to practice alongside the reading. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I'm still practicing but so far it's very user friendly and not too difficult to navigate.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Setenove222 (talk) 04:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...there are interactive parts to try out
 * What I liked:

...interactive parts needs some work, it doesn't tell you what you did wrong or how to fix it
 * What I didn't like:

...more interactive editing tutorials
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...has some bugs still, more feedback for right or wrong moves
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BlueWolf11 (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It was not too long.
 * What I liked:

...Some videos were unnecessary.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...Videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nitika182 (talk) 04:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... i liked that the training included videos and hands on tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... i felt that its a little confusing the way the inserts are placed. --Catherine.peralta1 (talk) 15:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... examples on the videos. ... for a first time user, there are a lot of special brackets and sorts to remember. ... covered material pretty well. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I was a little lost. I wish things were highlighted and worked on step by step like in the video in order to follow properly and be able to remember what to do once on my own. --Merbusby (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC) merbusby
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... it waas very clear ... very loong ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... videos ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ddiazher (talk) 02:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Clear, informative. ...nothing
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... repetition ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Khalile Stackhouse (talk) 15:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked how specific the training was with their explanations on how to use Wikipedia, and explaining what Wikipedia is and also their five pillars helped me understand it's value.

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't like how long the orientation was I feel it could have been shorter and broader.

...
 * What was missing: More visuals and pictures so we can capture the ideas and also help us remember what we learned after completing the orientation.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I felt everything was necessary for the most part.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was helpful because other than reading interacting will actually help you remember how to use Wikipedia the right way on your own.

--Kdominguez24 (talk) 18:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yhuang09 (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos were very informative. The third Module was a little to lengthy. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... It could of had more information on the talk pages. ...Again Module three had to much information.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I did not try it yet but i look forward to it. --Reco AO (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...That it showed you how to use citations and edit words on the wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...everything was very informing
 * What I didn't like:

...I feel like they didn't leave out any information
 * What was missing:

... all the information was useful except the idea of changing things that's supposed to be facts on wiki instead of just keeping it ...it definitely gave you a sense of how to edit the wiki using your own ideas
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mlyoung1 (talk) 07:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The parts of the training were very straight-forward. Quick to get into and know the ways that the website runs, really good for people that are starting out such as myself for class. ... What I didn't like was that I couldn't save my progress during the training. At times I had to start over or continue from where I left off. The coding for the editing process could be a lot better I think. ... A save progress option in case someone wants to continue the training from where they left off. That way when someone resumes the training, they continue on instead of looking for where they left off. ... Didn't see much unnecessary. All of the parts of the training were informative even for topics that may not relate to you, it can be good to know in the future. ... Haven't tried it yet so I wouldn't mention my thoughts on it. --Mel0973 (talk) 15:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... the multiple steps ... the lack of videos ... more videos ... nothing ... very helpful --Madelainegwyn (talk) 19:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...Very informative
 * What I liked:

...Long
 * What I didn't like:

... Short cuts
 * What was missing:

... So long can't remember
 * What was unnecessary:

... not very necessary
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CJSong (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

There was a lot of reading which made it hard to stay focused. This could be more interactive and would help students pay attention. There it was to long.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lee1795 (talk) 23:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos were really helpful
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eliztufts02 (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Seemed very easy to understand and motivated me to get started!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Proud that I was able to figure it out. Yay technology and 4 years of undergraduate education!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Atheistpuppy (talk) 07:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
videos made explanations more interesting
 * What I liked:

the complexity
 * What I didn't like:

some guidance in the sandbox
 * What was missing:

audio
 * What was unnecessary:

the loading process is slow
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Crstn k (talk) 08:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos were very helpful for my understanding of how to use my sandbox. ... Too long. ... Article examples ... Barnstar ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CamilleTea (talk) 08:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Easiness of material, video tutorials and short yet informative training ... Interactive pages weren't working and kept displaying the same pop-up message ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Didn't work or needed more guidelines --Elina Gazizova (talk) 23:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...The videos were very helpful! I also liked that each section was very concise and easy to understand!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I think seeing a quick, full example of creating an article or adding to a stub at the end of the orientation would have been helpful. Just to be able to summarize everything I learned from the orientation.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lewatts17 (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Informative and thorough
 * What I liked:

Redundancies
 * What I didn't like:

Any sort of accountability. It seems like I could have just arrowed through all the pages quickly and gotten the training badge. Shouldn't the tutorials be required, or at least a quiz to verify that one obtained the minimum knowledge?
 * What was missing:

Repetition of "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit." I think after the first, time--"Wikipedia" would suffice.
 * What was unnecessary:

I enjoyed them
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--WikiWikiGod (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiWikiGod (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

... The sandbox tutorial always messed up and then it would lead me to do tasks I already completed
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--FrenchAssasin123 (talk) 18:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The explination on how to use wiki was clear and strait foward
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Maylin1988 (talk) 23:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Concise and clear
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dkforschool (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Concise and easy to follow
 * What I liked:

Not really anything
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Super helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dkforschool (talk) 01:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... --- certification didn't go through without feedback? ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tehhobnob (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... ...
 * What I liked: it was pretty concise
 * What I didn't like: didn't accept the cert without editng

...
 * What was missing: not much

...
 * What was unnecessary: interactive editing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tehhobnob (talk) 23:40, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...What I liked was the simplicity of the Wiki training. The video support on how to do a particular task along side of the written instruction was help
 * What I liked:

...What I did not like were the non-tutorial videos. I understand that people learn in different ways but generally they were redundant
 * WhatI didn't like:

...Maybe incorporate into the different areas of Wiki these simple tutorials that are relevant to the section that they are found in. For example, in the sand box there should be a support button that runs Wikipedians(?) through how to use the different tools in the Sandbox.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I was somewhat thrown off when I clicked on my Sandbox, went to edit it and I did not know how to start a "fresh page".
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--William100397674 (talk) 04:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It was a good basic training if you knew basic coding It was really kind of basic and there is a lot of coding that people won't understand.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... didn't work. --Campw2016 (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...It was explained very well.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TSorrels11 (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Some information I did not know, wikilove specially
 * What I liked:

...pretty lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

...AFD
 * What was missing:

...Debating in Wiki
 * What was unnecessary:

...pretty cool
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: chunking of material into easily digestible pieces; simple explanations and brief video tutorials on how to edit

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AMCoop (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked: Step by step overview and the helpful videos.

...
 * What I didn't like: N/A

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I love it!

--Sumkol15 (talk) 03:48, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
Easy to follow. I liked the work modules that taught wiki syntax
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the audio for the videos were not synced properly to the video. This may be a browser or internet issue on my end.
 * What I didn't like:

I think I have the necessary amount of knowledge to contribute to an article.
 * What was missing:

I thought the barn love stuff was a bit unnecessary but that's just my personal opinion.
 * What was unnecessary:

My favorite part of the tutorial. Made learning about Wikipedia interactive.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Farhanasadmohamed (talk) 04:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was simple but felt in-depth enough that I feel comfortable getting started. I really liked the links to help pages and cheat sheets so I can look more in-depth as I go.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I only tried one portion of it, but I liked it and found it quite useful. I appreciate having a chance to follow instructions in real-time and that I could do a little bit beyond the basic instructions and see the results without leaving the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tucsonhorse (talk) 21:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was easy to go through, the videos were accessible.
 * What I liked:

It wasn't fun.
 * What I didn't like:

Q & A sheet would be helpful
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Orangespider29 (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very organized ... links take me away from the training ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SavannahWilson93 (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Obamaweed420 (talk) 03:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The sections on editing (basic and advanced)

...
 * What I didn't like: Trying to get back to the tutorial after following various links and videos, but I managed.

...
 * What was missing: FAQ (e.g., Why are some Talk pages blank even though a page has a rich editing history?)

...
 * What was unnecessary: It was all good!

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BillyDoo2 (talk) 11:10, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very concise
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CommunicationsClo (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
How the training has been sectioned by distinguish criteria, so it was easy to navigate.
 * What I liked:

Some of the phrasings were irrelevant and can be eliminated to shorten the paragraph.
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive tutorial or video for every section.
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

I think it was adequate, yet could used some improvement in terms of its detail. --Cvesboon (talk) 23:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Celavie97 (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: it was right to the point

...
 * What I didn't like: it was verrry looong

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:the editing video it would have been better on another article

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? did not watch it

--United kingdoms my home (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC) united kingdom is my home

Training feedback
Learning things I didn't know about Wikipedia before
 * What I liked:

I feel like the videos were just saying the same thing as what we were reading everything was covered
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

the videos after the reading, it can only be the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

it helped me understand about how helpful the sandbox is.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--9Clopez4 (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... understanding on how Wikipedia worked
 * What I liked:

... lots of explaining
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

... videos
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ideky (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sheikh-aladdin (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was pretty clear and concise. It kept things simple so it wasn't overwhelming.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I enjoyed the tutorials. The first one was fine. However the additional markup tutorial had some problems. The popup with instructions seemed to close and open very rapidly, making it hard to read and follow. Other than that it was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EPInfiniti (talk) 04:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--U5780138 (talk) 11:12, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Overall tutorial was easy to follow. And especially I liked the video. ... It was a little bit hard to understand DYK part. ... Not really ... Not really ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--U5780438 (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
The editing tool was particularly nice.
 * What I liked:

N/A - It was all helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

N/A
 * What was missing:

I felt like the ranking system was explained to me twice. That may have been redundant.
 * What was unnecessary:

This tool was very helpful for learning how to use the editor. It was particularly important for understanding the basics.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Immcarle18 (talk) 03:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
The content is clear and easy to understand. Practices that are provided are very helpful to know how to edit on wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

I think i don't like that i can't save what i had done. I did two chapters already, but i suddenly had some work to do, so i leave the page which i think that i would saved what i had done. When i came back, i needed to restart everything again until i finished to the entire course.
 * What I didn't like:

Structure of wikipedia and fundamental function that appear on pages are not provided, which i think some people would like to know how to use it first and then they will have better image of how to work on it.
 * What was missing:

none
 * What was unnecessary:

it's very helpful and easy to follow. Thank for creating that.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--U5780710 (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
Short videos with screencasts and closed captioning; links to resources for learning more.
 * What I liked:

Some audio didn't kick in right away -- had to pause and restart the videos.
 * What I didn't like:

Links out to copyright resources would be great, although maybe they're available on other policy pages. Since intellectual property rights can vary by country and by the context of the material's creation (e.g. government v. non-government works), it might be helpful if the tutorial at least nods to how this affects an international resource/community like Wikipedia. There isn't much space in a short tutorial, but even one line noting that copyright is complicated and pointing to a resource for learning more would go a long way.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful, even for those with previous wiki editing experience.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Claireht (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very informative, video helped with both audio and visual descriptions on how to accomplish editing wikipedia pages. ... I felt as if some of the information was obvious but I suppose it is better to have too many details than not enough. ... Nothing ... Section on plagiarism and barnstars could both have been a bit shorter. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anordquist (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Most of the part, it was very informative, and quite easy to follow though it was my first time doing this kind of thing.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing in particular.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing, as far as I am concerned.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Some of the information are a bit straightforward, so one may be able to cut it out to make the training course more concise.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: It was pretty convenient, since it provided relevant hints in case you forgot how to do the editing.

--Nattapat.aur (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... everything ... nothing ... nothing everything as okay ... no ... it was fine --Jryg19 (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Really clear cut, well-written and articulated. Modules were divided up in a way that made it more simple to understand.
 * What I liked:

... There wasn't anything I actively did not like, I just still feel a bit overwhelmed since I had no understanding whatsoever to Wikipedia prior to this exercise, and I'm not a particularly tech savvy person.
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe a bit more information on the facet of Wikipedia that is associated with a classroom
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chloearielm (talk) 03:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Praphai Donphaimueang (talk) 14:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos really helped visualise the help.
 * What I liked:

...Some points were hard to follow in the tutorial sections
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... There were some parts that didn't work properly, mainly where it tells you to click the edit button, I think it is meant to say click the edit source button in one of the first tutorials
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SarahH04 (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
Very informative about the 5 pillars. It also showed me the basic editing and how to choose topics.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Enjoyed the interactive tutorial as it was an easy means of learning.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deepikha101 (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The links that did editing tutorials
 * What I liked:

... The videos took a long time to load, but at least there was a youtube link
 * What I didn't like:

... More detail on how to add an external link because that was confusing
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I really liked it, the tutorial was helpful and clarified how to do certain things.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HelenCI (talk) 22:27, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like: Video tutorials are not updated!

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Slee0727 (talk) 03:09, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos and the tutorials ... The shortness of each page ... Dos and do nots ... The fifth module ... Great but a little buggy --Nicholas Wolf (talk) 21:50, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...it was simple (in terminology), straight to the point and informative for a first exposure to Wikipedia editing.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ThatOneGal (talk) 08:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
the design
 * What I liked:

-NIL-
 * What I didn't like:

-NIL-
 * What was missing:

-NIL-
 * What was unnecessary:

really help me to understand
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kanesskong (talk) 12:57, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Videos to complement the tutorial and the step-by-step process with some of the coding

...
 * What I didn't like: It skips steps sometimes.

...
 * What was missing: Resources on where to find this information in the future

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good, but sometimes the video went a little fast

--Maden0614 (talk) 10:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jaclyn Docherty (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... informative videos ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dakotahz (talk) 00:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)Dakotahz

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:A simple and straightforward guide for sharing information

...
 * What I didn't like:Certain tasks it seems will have to be reviewed for new users to effectively Wikipedia smoothly

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Igrkilldrums (talk) 01:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos ... Repeated information ... Nothing that i know of right now ... Repeated a lot ... Easy to use --Hannahmariemar (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... The orientation was very user friendly and easy to navigate through. The speakers in the videos sounded very friendly and easy going. They did not sound mechanical. ...Nothing
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...You should make the user edit something to make sure he or she understood the material. Until they successful complete an edit or addition, they should not be allowed to move on into the following step.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ochoar01 (talk) 02:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Help on how to choose an article

...
 * What I didn't like: At times, it felt like it was going in circles

...
 * What was missing: I can't think of anything

...
 * What was unnecessary: Everything seemed pretty necessary

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Luxembourg96 (talk) 05:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: succinct and informative

...
 * What I didn't like: videos on the webpage buffered much slower than you tube videos.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Slothford88 (talk) 06:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
Clear and concise. Didn't get bogged down in too many details.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was a good start to learning how to edit. Very useful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Balloons44 (talk) 02:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I appreciated the video tutorials. Being a visual learner, I found them key in understanding the basic coding behind a Wiki article.
 * What I liked:

... The pacing of the video was a little too fast. Aside from that, this training was sufficient enough to gain a general understanding of Wiki's workflow
 * What I didn't like:

... It would be nice to include a chart to download with each of the coding formats (bold, links, citing, etc.)
 * What was missing:

... If any of the information was unnecessary, it was the Barn star tutorial. Yes, it was nice to know I can be awarded for my work, but I didn't necessarily need to know this in order to complete my project.
 * What was unnecessary:

... N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jacob Shockley (talk) 05:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Videos

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing in particular

...
 * What was missing: Nothing in particular

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing in particular

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--PinkVynn (talk) 01:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmlevin123 (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It was passionate about making Wikipedia a better, more usable source. Rules and regulations about plagiarism was explicit. I never knew that Wikipedia was so strict about it, and it is a great thing.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bwongcha (talk) 07:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Each page was clear and to the point so I didn't feel like I was reading forever.
 * What I liked:

...There wasn't anything I really disliked.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

...I didn't feel like the videos added much to my understanding.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was ok, I feel like I'll learn more on my own though.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cbanksy10 (talk) 08:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the clear instructions and help that was offered

...
 * What I didn't like: It took a while to complete there whole thing, and every section should have a video component to help those who don't get it from reading

...
 * What was missing:Nothing, it was well constructed

...
 * What was unnecessary: All good

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try it, sorry.

--Mr.green2911 (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I strongly believe that the videos in addition to the written tutorials help understand better the subjects that are being explained. I am a visual learner and the videos helped me understand the material in a simple and understandable manner.
 * What I liked:

...I did not enjoy the ways in which one has to create a dold, or a link. The signs that should be added before an after are complicated and confusing.
 * What I didn't like:

...I believe that videos about using sandbox could be very helpful.
 * What was missing:

...At the beginning of some topics there is unnecessary information that in a way introduce the upcoming information. The information is unnecessary because the upcoming information will self-explain the information that is presented.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I could not try it because the internet connection failed many times.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ecological Factors (talk) 10:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EmilJacob (talk) 15:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The videos in training sessions are extremely good and helpful ... The training mainly focuses on editing, not on creation of new docs from scratch. It did not discuss how to create the Section headers how to have subsections etc. ... A training session discussing how to create sections and subsections within a wiki document ... I don't feel anything was unnecessary, every bit of the training was important and helpful. ... Didn't try, although tried editing in the Sandbox simultaneously as the lectures proceeded. --Nikraina (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... It was very helpful and useful to help me understand how to use this website for my course
 * What I liked:

Tellegee (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--Tellegee (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...It was nice, concise, and told what I needed to know right away, no needless bells and whistles.
 * What I liked:

...At the end of the 3nd module, clicking the arrow doen't bring you to the next module, but to a page that just says "HOW stress affects undergrad students" with no links out of it.
 * What I didn't like:

...The little connector to the 4th module at the end of the 3rd.
 * What was missing:

...Everything seems good and necessary to me.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I didn't try it for too much, I'm going to be looking into it more after this. So far seems helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Monstar Mash (talk) 05:53, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
It was very brief and short, not conveying to many thoughts or text on one panel. I appreciated the flow and spacial layout for the text.
 * What I liked:

Not really anything. It was very straightforward and easy to follow.
 * What I didn't like:

So, at the end of the third module, when you click to bottom right arrow to proceed to the last module, it redirects you to another page that is different from the tutorial. After experiencing this, I had to backtrack and manually direct myself to the last module to complete the tutorial.
 * What was missing:

Nothing. I really liked how short and simple this tutorial was. It was easy to follow and explained topics in a well-put mannerism. The videos were also very intuitive and helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ARomero96 (talk) 07:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The organization and flow of the training
 * What I liked:

... The Editing module was a little esoteric and hard to follow
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing I can think of
 * What was missing:

... All important information
 * What was unnecessary:

... A bit hard and makes the training more lengthy but is educational and helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oderomosele (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Those videos clearly explain the core functions

...
 * What I did not like: May be more concise?

...
 * What was missing: it complete

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jiaxinyang (talk) 21:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:All of the information is far too basic for as complicated as using Wikipedia actually is.

...
 * What I didn't like:like signing in Igrkilldrums (talk) 08:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC) where is the place to sign it? How do I send this feedback? I think some very basic information is missing. Not everyone is familiar with source characters which is what basically should be explained because this is the basis for Wikipedia editing. Editing is necessary to use Wikipedia.

...
 * What was missing:How is one supposed to memorize all of the characters necessary to cite, edit, post, expand.etc.? Using an image already cleared by Wikipedia commons is mentioned but not explained.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Obvious info, sans all of the necessary requirements to use Wikipedia.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Igrkilldrums (talk) 08:10, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very helpful training.
 * What I liked:

...Some videos were very difficult to view.
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...Barnstars
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JAries328 (talk) 20:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... It had all the information I needed to start using Wikipedia. ... There were some areas that I was confused about. ... None. ... None. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tashmaniac (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:The different formats for learning.

...
 * What I didn't like: The tone of voice in the videos.

...
 * What was missing:N/A.

...
 * What was unnecessary:All of the information on awards when you are first starting.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? N/A.

--Slklose (talk) 03:26, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos were helpful for the most part and the dialogue was overall pretty clear.
 * What I liked:

...The use of the non-VisualEditor distracted me for a moment as I was unable to find how to turn that off, although I resolved the issue. A lot of slides for some things that may not be entirely useful, but then again to some people maybe they are.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think if the information on the VisualEditor could be helpful because I found myself lost with all the extra stuff involved with doing that route, but at the time I had no idea how to change it to the original editor. So just a few demos or some updated videos would be nice. Also, maybe just a little something on not necessarily starting a brand new article but really focusing on the work of adding to an existing article more directly.
 * What was missing:

...Most of the information that I reviewed was necessary, maybe just a few steps in the editing process where the videos or data was outdated could go away. At first, it seemed a little odd to have and editing tab with so much information and then stack on an advanced editing tab with more information. Although they were for the most part different, it still seemed a little excessive at some point.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Echcea96 (talk) 01:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... informaiton ... too much staff ... video power point training with examples
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... a much better lecture to show all steps, ... it was nice --Rahman01 (talk) 04:49, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... The simplicity of the process while still being informational ... Nothing ... How to properly add photos and or video files ... Nothing ... I like the hands on approach of that tutorial --Bathorner (talk) 17:14, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
the examples and the step break down it was fine
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it was nice. Not as smooth though as I imagined, though that may have been due to internet connection
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...very descriptive
 * What I liked:

...more videos
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cmn25 (talk) 22:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Easy to understand!
 * What I liked:

...Wondering if I should have written down all the shortcuts or how to footnotes etc.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ljason821 (talk) 06:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Its simply awesome!!!
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anish karimaloor (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lisha Joshi (talk) 16:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...i liked the lessons which is very interesting.
 * What I liked:

...did not like the 1st module
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing misssing all elements were covered. ... nothing ...would think of conducting an activity.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Alopa gupta

--Alopa gupta (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...i liked the lessons which is very interesting.
 * What I liked:

...did not like the 1st module
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing misssing all elements were covered. ... nothing ...would think of conducting an activity.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Alopa gupta

--Alopa gupta (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked: content with good description.


 * What I didn't like:video is difficult to load.


 * What was missing:clear picture.
 * What was unnecessary:more example


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it: good

--jigdor 17:14, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
This tutorial was very informative.as we new to this,we were able to know more about Wikipedia.

Training feedback
...in-depth detail about the training
 * What I liked:

...lengthy process
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... helpful --Pragyan pallai (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: Interesting

...
 * What I didn't like: Time consuming

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: videos

... its good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Monalisa.sinha93 (talk) 05:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
the separation of content in a systematic manner
 * What I liked:

Some places the information was given before it was explained like the grading of articles based on quality.
 * What I didn't like:

Needs a little more comprehensible language for users from various countries.
 * What was missing:

Nothing that came to my notice.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very well planned out.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Susanmammen (talk) 06:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
The well structured layout.
 * What I liked:

It gets complicated it between.
 * What I didn't like:

lengthy, so the user loses interest in between.
 * What was missing:

nothing that came to my notice
 * What was unnecessary:

very well planned out
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--user:snehatthomasSnehathomas (talk) 06:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:it was interesting

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What was missing:nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:video

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Raj.preethi.g (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... environment of wikipedia ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adhya Mary (talk) 07:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... was really good. thank you!! --Beata4christ (talk) 16:11, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...its simple and very useful way of narration
 * What I liked:

... some instruction are like vague for new users. ... some instructions are not clear and difficult. so new users may find it little confusion with the topic ... ... little difficult --Jacob Ajil (talk) 01:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
The training material designed is easy to understand and cover almost everything.
 * What I liked:

Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Everything was needed. i could not find anything unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was really good.

--Priyanka christ (talk) 06:27, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
The instructions are in detail.
 * What I liked:

Too many instructions.
 * What I didn't like:

Diagrammatic presentations.
 * What was missing:

Too much information on what may be done.
 * What was unnecessary:

I would have tried to summarize everything in short.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kikku16 (talk) 08:33, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Detailed info about using wikipedia ... It is a bit boring. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JustinaJoseph (talk) 10:01, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I just enjoyed doing this training. I had great fun. It is just like a form of game which will help us to increase our concentration.

...
 * What I didn't like: almost everything I liked. Only some examples needed real understanding.

...
 * What was missing: Everything was well organised. There can be a time limit to do foeach mission so that we can learn how to manage time.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Some tasks took a very long time.

...It will be a wonderful experience in doing such activities.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ratish44 (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... helped me learn more about wikepedia ...its complicated
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jiniantony (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2016 (UTC) interesting

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Prerana-christ (talk) 08:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cerin philip (talk) 17:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
simple and understandable
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Akshita13miriam (talk) 05:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Very simple and clear
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LucindaH 06:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The language, very straightforward

...
 * What I didn't like:

...More videos, specifically showing an example
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Merogers4 (talk) 04:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Training was concise and upto the point
 * What I liked:

...I liked everything
 * What I didn't like:

...Video lecture could have been more useful. I prefer to watch video than reading lot of words.
 * What was missing:

... Section about "What's wikipedia ?" :-) Everyone knows about wikipedia :-)
 * What was unnecessary:

... --Mahhegde (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lmfellwock (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The choice of word language was very effective and easy to understand which allows the reader to haul in information at a faster rate.


 * What I didn't like: All though the word language was easy to understand it was way to long the orientation might be able to be broken down into 3 modules instead of 5. ...

...
 * What was missing: I don't believe anything was missing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Like i said before i felt that 5 modules might be too much i was thinking more or less like 3 modules.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try it because i was thinking about talking to my professor about going through it with the class because i feel that in a group we might feel more comfortable.

--Joaquin807 (talk) 19:36, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:Videos that expanded on key concepts.

...
 * What I didn't like:Nothing to critique

...
 * What was missing:Some videos did not load properly

...
 * What was unnecessary:Nothing I can think of.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ejswine (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Akrejci (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
it was very complete and very clear sometimes it was a little repetitive
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Glue janis (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
the fact that everything is clear and well explained
 * What I liked:

anything
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

it's okay
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Luckyjeyne (talk) 22:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The videos in the training help me a lot.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: How to use the talk page to link to my sandbox when I copy things?

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aw1014 (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The small video serves as a good tool to bring the training forward.
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yj122 (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Very helpful with coding, the videos are helpful for those of us who don't code ... It seemed like a lot of information at once ... A clear link to find specific howto's again ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... A little confusing, but I got it eventually --Spearmm (talk) 02:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Spearmm
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
There was helpful videos and everything was explained well
 * What I liked:

There was nothing I didn't like There should have been a quiz or a way of testing those who took the training to really see if they understood everything.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

I did not find anything unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful enough
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gunzy09 (talk) 05:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...training makes me perfect to use use editing.
 * What I liked:

... nothing is to be unlike.
 * What I didn't like:

...as i new here, i think some more videos can be included in this session for the new user.
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...its nice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amitroy007 (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:very easy to follow

...
 * What I didn't like:nothing

...
 * What was missing:nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:nothing

... I didn't try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liz1217 (talk) 00:19, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: I really liked the clear concise set up. easy to follow and easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like: the video links didn't work well, could just have been my internet working slow

...
 * What was missing: unless I didn't see it, how to respond to the person that removed my edit

...
 * What was unnecessary: I didn't see anything that was unnecessary. in fact I found this training very helpful. our instructor was extremely helpful through out this entire process, however this article expanded on what he taught us.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Although I wanted to view the tutorial my internet would not load them. I know that they would have been very helpful due to the fact that I am a very visual learner.

--Mokeeg (talk) 02:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Mokeeg (talk) 02:50, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Not much ... No planets to travel to ... Interactive planet traveling version ... To many words ... --Emivanov24 (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)EH
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... passing my class ... ... my sweet time, and the fun #wikiadventure was 10000000% more fun #why #cant #i #travel #to #other #planets ... the videos and allllll of the words ... didnt work --Sophia Smithzzz (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Sophia Smithzzz (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)SOF DA LOAF
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * 1) stuckonearth2k16
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
I liked the videos with the people in them.
 * What I liked:

There was lots of reading and it was confusing at time.
 * What I didn't like:

There was no fun animals or pop ups that made the tutorial really fun, but it was still cool.
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emuller2468 (talk) 17:59, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
... All was written in understandable language.
 * What I liked:

... There was a huge amount of information
 * What I didn't like:

... Practice
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It is great
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Edul10000 (talk) 08:48, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:It's useful

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: A complete guide on infoboxes creation

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ItalianDrummer (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Matilres (talk) 10:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:
 * I really enjoy the consolidated place with all the links - quick facts, etc. Super helpful!

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jackiekoerner (talk) 22:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos were informative and easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the content seemed outdated - the tabs etc had been updated since.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KarenMotta (talk) 23:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback

 * What I liked:

Everything was very detailed and the videos for the most important parts


 * What I didn't like:

it was way too long!


 * What was missing:

nothing really

everything was useful
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
... Straight to the point and very informative.
 * What I liked:

... Having to click on links to view or edit user page.
 * What I didn't like:

... A integrated interactive section. Instead of telling me to go and try, there should be text editor to do the edit on that page.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Falfaroc (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:Very clear and intuitive explanation. Encouraging good faith and positive attitude.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some videos didn't work. But got there in the end.

...
 * What was missing:nothing. Very comprehensive. Thank you.

...
 * What was unnecessary:/

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?BGreenhalgh1 (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

--BGreenhalgh1 (talk) 10:29, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: The videos that showcased the material. This was easier to see everything in action.

...
 * What I didn't like: that there was not a box to practice as you went along through the tutorial.

...
 * What was missing: some more hands on guidance that would let you try to edit and show how it turned out.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I am not sure yet as I have not tried to edit at this point.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I am not sure where that was during my training. Perhaps make this easier to find/access.

--L.r.c. (talk) 02:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...no
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Crogers313 (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The videos were helpful.
 * What I liked:

...How long it was.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not sure.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Luna Eveningsky (talk) 05:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...I liked the thoroughness of the modules.
 * What I liked:

...I don't feel like the 3rd module did a good job of showing me how to use code for wikipedia, but I may just need more time working on it.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think all the basics were touched, so nothing.
 * What was missing:

... I feel like the introduction and module 1 were the exact same.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think this was the most efficient, because it gave a quiz at the end to refresh
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shelice0610 (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
I didn't know about Teahouse before this. I think I will ask some questions there when I resume editing.
 * What I liked:

Need more interactive tutorial on editing. Maybe split the information further?
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kosin0406 (talk) 06:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The way you described each pillar was wonderful
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Perfect
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Crazymystar (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos
 * What I liked:

That there is no possibility to download a short version of all the editing hacks to look up later.
 * What I didn't like:

see above
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Larissawch (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
The Training was very detailed and one could follow easily
 * What I liked:

Sometimes there was much text to read at once. Not all videos were functioning on safari-browser.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I recognized
 * What was missing:

-
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LeonaKuse (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
Short, precise, yet very easy to assimilate.
 * What I liked:

Text box size (pretty small).
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Served great, it is a good touch to the training program.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Exabruptoao (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos, the well-organized content.
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the most important information could be emphasized by the style somehow.
 * What I didn't like:

-
 * What was missing:

-
 * What was unnecessary:

-
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zsomko (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked that pages tended to be short and concise and that plenty of information was provided.
 * What I liked:

... I know all of the info was necessary, but it seemed long.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I can tell so far.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing that I can tell so far.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I do not think I tried this. I had a separate page open and experimented in my sandbox there.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Willenia34 (talk) 01:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...they have video when explain how to edit the page
 * What I liked:

...the description of each step is not clear enough
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hgh6666 (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Everything
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...Blocking Policy
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Awesome Student Training --Monosodium23 (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...specific/ engaging
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was great --Asj&#39;a Thompson (talk) 02:50, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

... It was to complex. it didn't go straight to the point.
 * What I didn't like:

... getting straight to the point was missing. what I would do is make it more "Interactive by making the user complete objectives to continue to make them learn through experience. its the best way to learn
 * What was missing:

... too many words.
 * What was unnecessary:

... needs some work. I don't think your intention was to make us read a textbook on how to wiki right? well, that's kind of what you did. textbooks don't go straight to the point. they lecture us. I think we students had enough of lectures. we go through it 5 days every week. it's boring. and no this isn't supposed to offend anyone. you guy wanted feedback and here it is :)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RBMcIntosh (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--박혁춘 (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Detailed and kindly explanations.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...I couldn't find it.
 * What was missing:

...I couldn't find it.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is great! It is easier and more interesting.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... lolu ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--jiwon park (talk) 03:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
... ajh ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--jiwon park (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--jiwon park (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked to discover all the secret features of Wikipedia, which were unknown to me. The possibility of creation is huge and i can't wait to create my wiki page and use all of the features offered to me. Il like too that there are so many copyright and plagiarism to protect articles.
 * What I liked:

nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe a video which shows online every stape of Training review.
 * What was missing:

Some explanations about the editors of wikipedia are very interesting but maybe not the main topic of this review.
 * What was unnecessary:

There is a lot of information on it and we are a little bit lost at the end of this huge amount of new information.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Annakrl (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC) --Annakrl (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the training. ... I wish the website could have been more detailed with more videos, since there are people from non-English countries trying to complete the training as well. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djyoo1110 (talk) 03:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
The training was brief and considered the most important topics.
 * What I liked:

The videos were not really useful, slthought they are trying to reacj more peolpe
 * What I didn't like:

I still don't know how to create a link and upload it to Wiki, in other words, I don't know how to create a new page
 * What was missing:

Some videos
 * What was unnecessary:

It makes editing easier --Grezmagro (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Epp066 (talk) 13:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...videos
 * What I liked:

...there was no direct link to sandbox
 * What I didn't like:

...ideas about new pages
 * What was missing:

...all the codes
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--G1ulvia (talk) 13:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
The videos showing what explained in the previous descriptions
 * What I liked:

The length of instructions: they should be shorter
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

I found it quite interesting and more easy to understand
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liuc4tai (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
... i liked the variety of topics this tutorial deal about and it was really complite and accurate ... it was too long ... the link to practise with sandbox ... the videos ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bianchissima Nene (talk) 13:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I liked the fact that it was simple and very useful ... it was too long ... the link to go to sandbox ... the videos ... It was simple to understand
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mal01 (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: it really helps to understand how wikipedia works and how to edit it

...
 * What I didn't like: quite long

...
 * What was missing: it could need a sum up of each section

...
 * What was unnecessary: most of the videos

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Francina* (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Francina*

Training feedback
the accurance of the explanation
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

the second video
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liuc4gv (talk) 14:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Libonancaesar (talk) 00:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yiwen yang (talk) 02:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hvanderlaske (talk) 23:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
the. videos
 * What I liked:

it was vague at time
 * What I didn't like:

more interaction
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

It was effective and helped me learn how to edit Wikipedia
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Austinnb (talk) 10:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Great training!
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Serjhakobyan1999 (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

... there are a few grammar errors within the tutorial! ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Leila N. (talk) 05:41, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Training feedback
...The Training is very interesting, but loaded
 * What I liked:

...I liked every bit of it
 * What I didn't like:

...More videos than words would have made me enjoy it more
 * What was missing:

...Every word and video is relevant
 * What was unnecessary:

...i thought it made my learning more explanatory
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aramidsh (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...the videos were very easy to follow, and supported the written text well.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kirijanept (talk) 14:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... it was easy to comprehend.
 * What I liked:

... took alot of time
 * What I didn't like:

... the basics
 * What was missing:

... nothing was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cheeyy02 (talk) 03:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...Lots of links and through documentation
 * What I liked:

...I preferred the interactive tutorial with the alien, it helped keep me focused.
 * What I didn't like:

...How to evaluate sources explained in more detail visually
 * What was missing:

...expanded etiquette
 * What was unnecessary:

...Really enjoyed the Earth tutorial, it held my focus and made me feel accomplished.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Imthe.echurch (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... the way you teaching
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... Can include bullets for points so that we can easily understand the points.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AnvitaT2H (talk) 05:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: very very easy!!

...
 * What I didn't like: Have nothing to hate

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: A very detailed explanation

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It would be too efficient and convenient.

--Dhksml1 (talk) 13:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
I liked kind explanations about wiki
 * What I liked:

i would like to practice more about how to edit wikipidea
 * What was missing:

I think interactive editing tutorial is necessary and useful. i want it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kjc5031204 (talk) 14:39, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sindonghyun (talk) 02:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... Videos were helpful ... Started editing and didn't realize I hadn't finished the training. ... Can you add photos from other sources if they are properly cited? ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... liked it --ArtzySmartzy (talk) 01:45, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

Some of the pages were marked as no longer available or accurate, but the previous slides referenced their content.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jlcohoon (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...I could not easily find the articles that I can edit right away.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Csawant (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The material was presented in manageable sections. ... That the training still references the "save" button on the bottom of a sandbox page, rather than referring to it as the "publish changes" button. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Isabt204 (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked: very concise, helped me understand how to do things, what not to do, how to start an article, how to avoid biases

...
 * What I didn't like: it felt repetitive to the missions found in the wikipedia start page

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: the areas that repeated (Ex: how to bold and cite articles)

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? i enjoyed it much more

--BekeleLegolas (talk) 08:43, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:
 * It highlighted the most relevant parts for a beginner but still provided links to other information.

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * I had to start again whenever I open it in a new device.

...
 * What was missing:
 * It would help if the progress was saved in my account so I can go back to it at another time.

...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * I think I did not have to know about the editing community in the middle of technical guides.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * The experience really helped me retain info rather than just reading it.

--Irisistable (talk) 03:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... The delivering of the information in easy way ... Nothing ... Nothing ... Nothing ... Very Good --Ismail Fadhil Abbas (talk) 23:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Training feedback
A great overview of Wikipedia fundamentals.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive editing tutorials. This feature was not working at the time. There could be more information about use of images and media files.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

This feature was not active.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ChrisD Strummer (talk) 16:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
... I think all things are really helpful
 * What I liked:

... Only a little advice is I am wondering there are fewer tips about how to use preferences.
 * What I didn't like:

... Preferences.
 * What was missing:

... Helpful enough, thx.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Anqing HuAnqing Hu (talk) 13:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Training feedback
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yeqing2015 (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2018 (UTC) hello Piotr Konieczny

YEQING 엽경  completed it

Training feedback
Bold text;What I liked: ..Wikipedia


 * What I di

... It was educational show me more --Katende Masuud (talk) 10:35, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?