Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback/archive 4

Profkls (talk)

 * What I liked: test
 * What I didn't like: test
 * What was missing: test
 * What was unnecessary: test
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?:test

--Profkls (talk) 02:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Jovyeramela (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

Individual pages were on the short side.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jovyeramela (talk) 07:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

JessicaParrisWestbrook (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JessicaParrisWestbrook (talk) 16:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Jazzy20 (talk)
Very clear and helpful. Not at all overwhelming
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jazzy20 (talk) 23:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Rroserryan (talk)

 * What I liked:
 * straight-forward info and specific instructions.

...


 * What I didn't like:
 * old fashioned videos

...


 * What was missing:
 * how would i know?

...


 * What was unnecessary:
 * how to use bold text

...


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * it was okay. mostly it was too short, and should have had a more careful explanation of using citations. a

...

--Rroserryan (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Abhic93 (talk)
...It was concise and informative and didnt stray too much from the key concepts.
 * What I liked:

...Often the videos did not work and I was forced to skip them. Also some of the links seemed irrelevant to the main topic being discussed.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing! I think it covered most of the major areas.
 * What was missing:

...Several links in the modules
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a good intro into the editing process but it may help to include a few more important types of wikiedits to help familiarize the user with other techniques before setting them loose.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abhic93 (talk) 20:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Aabundo (talk)
...I enjoyed all the interactive tutorials in learning about how to add pictures, etc.
 * What I liked:

...I noticed there was lots of text that could be decreased to a few sentences that were to be concise.
 * What I didn't like:

...It was missing more pictures and examples. It should have a one page sheet that has all the coding.
 * What was missing:

...Having a variety of ways of being respectful in wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful as it allowed you to click on the actual things so that it seems like you are doing it yourself.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aabundo (talk) 20:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thelukkolukko (talk)
...A lot of videos
 * What I liked:

...too long
 * What I didn't like:

...not much
 * What was missing:

...some videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thelukkolukko (talk) 21:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

TehKevinLewis (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TehKevinLewis (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

JamesBond34 (talk)
...The videos were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...A lot of words that made the orientation seem like it took a while.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great! --JamesBond34 (talk) 22:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

JinelleC09 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the videos were very clear!

...
 * What I didn't like: not much!

...
 * What was missing: coding for italics and underline

...
 * What was unnecessary: n/a

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: very useful!

--JinelleC09 (talk) 22:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

JinelleC09 (talk)

 * What I liked:

easy to use ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JinelleC09 (talk) 22:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Gaurd.vanforlife (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very simple, and yet thought out.

...
 * What I didn't like: I clicked more to get through this than I have in the last month of browsing. (I like fewer clicks, more scrolls)

...
 * What was missing: Honestly more step-by-step tutorials. I benefited highly from the one section on editing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I can't say what was unnecessary until I have become a regular user. Hindsight is 20/20.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: I was a fan of it.

--Gaurd.vanforlife (talk) 00:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Karolina7 (talk)
It was thorough. The videos are VERY helpful.
 * What I liked:

Took me a long time; undivided attention.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Only worked for a little bit.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Karolina7 (talk) 01:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Plloney (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Plloney (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC) Plloney (talk) 02:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Bulleted list item My interests is becoming an Mechanical Engineer. I want to design rollercoasters.
 * Bulleted list item Interests in improving as a freelance sports writer.
 * Bulleted list item Interested in College sports and recruiting.Plloney (talk) 02:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

KPhillips13 (talk)
...I liked being able to click through the tutorial at my own pace, instead of watching a video.
 * What I liked:

... I liked pretty much everything. The explanations were very thorough. I think that practice will help me to understand how to work Wikipedia editing.
 * What I didn't like:

... I do not think anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing. I think the information given was concise and necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought that was the best part! I was able to actually try the editing instead of just reading about it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KPhillips13 (talk) 04:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Fcheng62 (talk)
...It was interactive and concise.
 * What I liked:

...Sometimes it linked to other pages and pressing back was annoying.
 * What I didn't like:

...A video didn't work
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Fcheng62 (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Kaylerz (talk)
The many explanation videos
 * What I liked:

How long the training took
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive editing tutorials
 * What was missing:

Some explanations in some modules that were pretty common sense
 * What was unnecessary:

Really enjoyed it. Need more!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kaylerz (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Ecapelle (talk)
I really liked the interactive tool to set up my sandbox.
 * What I liked:

I didn't like that the interactive tutorial didn't continue through the editing and adding citation process.
 * What I didn't like:

I thought that the continuation of the interactive tutorial was missing. I work better when I DO things.
 * What was missing:

I found all of the information necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I found it INCREDIBLY useful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ecapelle (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Mitc5072 (talk)
The examples and videos that were given.
 * What I liked:

All the text to read was a bit confusing at times.
 * What I didn't like:

I feel nothing was missing.
 * What was missing:

I think all of the information was necessary for helping someone who has never used wikipedia edits before.
 * What was unnecessary:

I think the interactive editing tool was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mitc5072 (talk) 20:58, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Dfcater (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dfcater (talk) 21:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

K.ebersole (talk)
I liked the videos that showed the step by step process of some of the editing
 * What I liked:

Some of the wording throughout the tutorial was confusing for someone like me that does not understand much about technology and doing website editing type stuff. Also, I think showing how to add references could have been better explained.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

All of it was necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful for some of it except adding the references.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--K.ebersole (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Chronophoto (talk)
Very clear.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The box with instructions disappeared when I clicked on the new link I made, and then it started repeating itself. --Chronophoto (talk) 22:17, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

CrazyBotany (talk)Feedback
I enjoyed the good detail of explanation that was presented in the tutorial. Even though it was pretty lengthy for me, I feel like it covered pretty much all that was necessary. ...
 * What I liked:

As I said, it was a pretty long tutorial, even if it was more or less necessary for some who have never edited anything online before. ...
 * What I didn't like:

N/A. ...
 * What was missing:

N/A. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CrazyBotany (talk) 22:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

13ab37 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was short, and useful. Also, very clear.

...
 * What I didn't like: I wish I could have edited alongside and not in another tab, but I didn't try the interactive tutorial. The coding stuff was a bit hard to follow, but I assume it will become clear when I do it.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing!

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing!

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--13ab37 (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Bastewart22095 (talk)
... I was fascinated by the way you can change other authors articles and help improve or change facts about a subject.
 * What I liked:

... I did not enjoy going through each step about how to insert a references or images. Personally I thought it took to long of a process and instead of just having it through the manual steps it should be a pop out while writing. I state that because it will commonly forgotten or messed up in the process.
 * What I didn't like

... When going through the steps and information, I do not think any information was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Just like before when replying to my dislike. I just personally think going through all the inserting information was a waste of time.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bastewart22095 (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Sweet Sparrow (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sweet Sparrow (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Smorrissey7 (talk)
... ... ...
 * What I liked: The YouTube videos were helpful because they showed exactly how to use the editing tools and formats.
 * What I didn't like: I didn't like when there was not a video to accompany a section about specific aspects of Wikipedia. In some cases, the explanation was quite confusing when no visual was presented.
 * What was missing: Nothing in particular was missing, however, I am still confused about certain things such as going "live." Perhaps a bit more detail could have been provided.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I did not think that anything was particularly unnecessary. Each section seemed to have important information about the proper way to use Wikipedia.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought that it was a great way to learn about the sandbox. It worked really well.

--Smorrissey7 (talk) 19:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Ehart25 (talk)
...clear and concise
 * What I liked:

...I thought it was a pretty good, not many complaints. But you go through a lot of content and can't practice all of it right away. It may be helpful to have an easily accessible tab or page to re-explain editing or citing.
 * What I didn't like:

...more editing tutorials
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it, but I wish it would go through more editing examples! Practicing those things which are demonstrated in later videos would be a big help.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ehart25 (talk) 22:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

MissKell (talk)
...The information was detailed and descriptive, clearly explaining the topics.
 * What I liked:

...The computer jargon is definitely more than I am accustomed to and will have to learn.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...All is necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

... The individual steps of the tutorial were very helpful and patient
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MissKell (talk) 01:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Cadupps1 (talk)
...I liked that there were YouTube videos to show you steps.
 * What I liked:

...My pull down tab that had the options for example "Cite Book" wont work.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I noticed, it was very helpful.
 * What was missing:

...I also found nothing unnecessary, it was very informational.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a very nice and helpful tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cadupps1 (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Clwalden (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clwalden (talk) 05:54, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Lizb07 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I enjoyed the videos and how they expanded on the new information.

...
 * What I didn't like: I enjoyed it all.

...
 * What was missing: Very thorough. No complaints.

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

I think this feature should come after the video explaining how to edit properly. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Slightly difficult to use.

--Lizb07 (talk) 06:11, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

MU Senior2014 (talk)
... I really appreciate how concise each topic was and the organization of the training flowed perfectly. As a visual learner, I was able to better understand different concepts through the use of the videos and animations!
 * What I liked:

...As a brand-new Wikipedia creator/editor, I am very overwhelmed with all of the information that was presented at once. Despite the great organization of the training, it is a lot of information to process. However, I think the benefit of having such a rich training section definitely outweighs the amount of information we receive by the end.
 * What I didn't like:

...As a new editor, I am unsure if there is anything missing at this time.
 * What was missing:

...Everything that was presented was clearly intentional and necessary to understand in order to be an educated member on Wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the hands-on aspect of this tutorial and appreciated the chance to see sudden results, as it provided me the opportunity to see what certain 'shortcuts' end up looking like.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MU Senior2014 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Scientist 2020 (talk)
...the videos
 * What I liked:

...omit
 * What I didn't like:

...complex settings
 * What was missing:

...omit
 * What was unnecessary:

...It helped alot
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Scientist 2020 (talk) 17:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Jfriend2 (talk)
...I really liked when the module had a video to watch instead of reading. Especially for the editing module.
 * What I liked:

...I wish there were more interactive modules, so I could practice what I was learning step by step.
 * What I didn't like:

...More interactive modules!
 * What was missing:

...I felt everything reviewed was relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Loved it! Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jfriend2 (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Wconnolly (talk)
…The editing tutorial
 * What I liked:

…It was pretty lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

…I am not sure yet...
 * What was missing:

…I probably won't need to know the advanced editing stuff.
 * What was unnecessary:

…I like that part the best.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wconnolly (talk) 20:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Hmuendlein (talk)
…The training was clear and the editing tutorial was helpful.
 * What I liked:

…It would have been nice if you could create a username and password while staying within the tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

…It would have been nice to have more interactive editing tutorials for topics such as adding references.
 * What was missing:

…The second section could have been condensed.
 * What was unnecessary:

…The interactive editing tutorial was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hmuendlein (talk) 20:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Laurah1992 (talk)
It was clear and concise.
 * What I liked:

The videos didn't work for me unless I viewed them in a separate tab on youtube.
 * What I didn't like:

How to format pages and make categories.
 * What was missing:

Information that would be more necessary for seasoned users (such as Wikilove, etc.)
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good but it would have been nice to know that it would take me back to the training page after so I wouldn't have opened it in another tab.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Laurah1992 (talk) 01:58, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Justaguywithnoname (talk)
... The interactive parts. The best learning is hands on, I find. (Or maybe that's just me!?)
 * What I liked:

... Lack of more interactive learning.
 * What I didn't like:

... More pictures, examples, and interactive learning.
 * What was missing:

... All the text. Say less, show more!
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great! More of this would be awesome!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Justaguywithnoname (talk) 04:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Muhippolover (talk)
...Talked about most of the important stuff.
 * What I liked:

...Could elaborate more on how to everything and give more examples on how to do everything.
 * What I didn't like:

...Examples
 * What was missing:

...Telling everything in detail and going over the five pillars.
 * What was unnecessary:

... they were a little helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Muhippolover (talk) 04:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Jnmarcum (talk)
...
 * What I liked:all

...
 * What I didn't like:all

...
 * What was missing:everything

...
 * What was unnecessary:everything

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?no

--Jnmarcum (talk) 05:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Oliviacd94 (talk)
I really enjoyed the experience overall. ...
 * What I liked:

Nothing to note. ...
 * What I didn't like:

I do not think anything was missing. ... I think the repetition of the code of conduct was a little unnecessary because if people are going to be difficult on wikipedia that will not stop them. ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

I really liked it. It helped me a lot. ... --Oliviacd94 (talk) 15:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Oliviacd94 (talk)
... I really enjoy it overall.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing of note.
 * What I didn't like:

...I do not think anything major was missing.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the video links.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It really helped.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oliviacd94 (talk) 15:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Xaleman87 (talk)
I like the all the details in this information
 * What I liked:

It was too much information to remember Nothing. I believe that everything was necessary to fully understand Wikipedia ... i think that sometimes is better to have something to relate to, and not just letters but also images.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jrios20 (talk)
...It was simple and easy to follow, and for more complex issues or instructions there were great accompanying videos.
 * What I liked:

...That the third phase was slightly lengthy and I did not expect to spend so much time on it.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jrios20 (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Spalazzita (talk)
...concision and clarity
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was difficult to get back to the to the editing tutorial if you were to accidentally click out of it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Spalazzita (talk) 15:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

SCarolina55 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:I really liked all of the videos to give a concrete example of how to do the stuff.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was long, but it needed to be.

...
 * What was missing:Not much, it was pretty comprehensive.

...
 * What was unnecessary:I thought it was all pertinent.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SCarolina55 (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Iutschig (talk)
...The videos were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Iutschig (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Kirah2012 (talk)
... Everything was broken down and explained, and the sandbox tutorial was included in the editing training.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... I think everything was included.
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kirah2012 (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC) Kirah

Cpenthen (talk)
Really interactive, which is super-helpful because I learn by example
 * What I liked:

Nothing I can think of!
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

Really necessary for me, I might have been a little confused without it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cpenthen (talk) 22:01, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Rlambert1893 (talk)
... thorough ... links didn't work with Internet Explorer ... more hands on guide ... too much about community ... very helpful --Rlambert1893 (talk) 23:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Denn4657 (talk)orientation review
...I could understand what it asks of the users of wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...There was no way to show that I actually understood all the applications.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...I do not think anything.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was pretty interesting to see how the process works.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Denn4657 (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Comb7190 (talk)
...It didn't take too long.
 * What I liked:

...It was all alright. No complaints.
 * What I didn't like:

...Didn't notice.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was alright.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Comb7190 (talk) 01:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Triforce.Cat (talk)

 * What I liked:

How in-depth the "training" is, even going as far to help with coding.


 * What I didn't like:

n/a

n/a
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

n/a


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I liked it. I feel like it gives the necessary tools and basic understanding to help someone jump straight into editing.

--Triforce.Cat (talk) 03:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Akhan50699 (talk)
It was short and sweet--I usually have little patience for long, boring instructions. ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Akhan50699 (talk) 04:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

training experience
The overall experience was clear and fun.
 * What I liked:

Some of the details were dragging/ overlapped.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

Tips of how to edit a certain page. Maybe provide an example. None
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--68.48.244.140 (talk) 04:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Wmelancon (talk)
the fact that it gave you the ability to watch videos but didn't make you watch all of them to complete the training
 * What I liked:

nothing in particular
 * What I didn't like:

reasons that would cause speedy deletion of new articles
 * What was missing:

nothing in particular
 * What was unnecessary:

basic recreation of the available editing toolset
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wmelancon (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Jennymvan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jennymvan (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Edonahue7 (talk)
... That I could actually try editing in my sandbox during the tutorial instead of just reading about it.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It would be useful if it could explain how you messed up if you do something wrong.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Edonahue7 (talk) 13:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Estephe9 (talk)
...The interactive tutorials were great and the videos were helpful too.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like having o open everything in new tabs in order to practice doing them. I think all topics should have been given an interactive tutorial that ensured I correctly performed every task addressed in the training.
 * What I didn't like:

...I would have liked an interactive tutorial for advanced editing like that which was offered for basic editing. I also wish the videos went more in depth and covered more scenarios.
 * What was missing:

...The video on barnstars seemed unnecessary. I would have rather seen a video on something else like nominating something for the "Did You Know" or "Featured Article" process.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I enjoyed and benefited from the interactive tutorial, but wish it covered more than just editing basics.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Estephe9 (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

BradLandry (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BradLandry (talk) 19:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Josh.vill (talk)
Everything was straight forward ...
 * What I liked:

No complaints
 * What I didn't like:

n/a ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Josh.vill (talk) 20:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

RegOH (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I appreciated the videos that walked me through editing processes.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The interactive editing tutorial worked but after going through it I had to go through the process again on my own to actually make the edits show up on my sandbox page.

--RegOH (talk) 20:35, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

NWcoffee (talk)

 * What I liked:
 * It was very concise and helpful!NWcoffee (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--NWcoffee (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Monibea11 (talk)
... Good use of videos to explain important topics.
 * What I liked:

...Overall it was good. Can't find anything wrong with it.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very effective in guiding how it works.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Monibea11 (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

MKClement (talk)
I liked the organization of the tutorial and having the videos that went along with the presentation helped for better understanding of Wikipedia. Nothing! Clarifying how to do signatures. I think everything was necessary! I thought it was very beneficial and good practice for when we are writing our own articles. --MKClement (talk) 23:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Curtis Bixenstine (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Curtis Bixenstine (talk) 00:25, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

DChristifano (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DChristifano (talk) 00:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

DChristifano (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DChristifano (talk) 00:43, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Kkakes728 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I felt the interactive tutorial was very helpful. As a visual person, it made learning and understanding the process easier!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kkakes728 (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Orientation feedback

 * What I liked:
 * Detail of orientation.


 * What I didn't like:
 * Nothing.


 * What was missing:
 * Nothing

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

---
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lind6710 (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Rglastet (talk)
...The tutorial videos were quite helpful.
 * What I liked:

...I was not able to use the interactive editing tutorial, but experimenting on another page was useful.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rglastet (talk) 03:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Sargento21 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sargento21 (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

LucasTichawa (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked the outline format

...
 * What I didn't like: The videos did not work with Safari

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LucasTichawa (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Training
Clear headlines that described the process underneath. This made learning simple and easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

Unnecessary advice for writing.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I can think of yet.
 * What was missing:

Controversial advice for writing articles.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jcf028 (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Shelby McPherson (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very thorough

...
 * What I didn't like: Sometimes used wikipedia jargon before fully explaining it

...
 * What was missing: Nothing that I noticed right away

...
 * What was unnecessary: I found it very relevant

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shelby McPherson (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

MUbrooke31 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: This orientation was very easy to follow and included all of the relevant information necessary for a new user.

...
 * What I didn't like: That I have to try to remember all of this information! Although I'm sure there's some page summarizing the majority of these points.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing as far as I can tell.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing as far as I can tell.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a nice way to experience editing for the first time! Very helpful.

--MUbrooke31 (talk) 07:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Lio1787 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:The videos helped put the training into context and the examples of edits were also helpful in learning how to make my own.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lio1787 (talk) 11:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Enajedaw (talk)
...
 * What I liked:the step by step instructions and videos.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Useful because of its practicality.

--Enajedaw (talk) 14:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Caldeira.Jose (talk)
...The broadness and depth in which we're walked through the editing process.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I would've liked there to be a draft editing page exercise in order to get more familiar with the process
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Really helped to get familiar with some of the concepts and processes
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Caldeira.Jose (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Rmiller587 (talk)
The training was short enough to allow me to pay attention through it's entirety but provided enough relevant information to get me started with editing.
 * What I liked:

The explanations of wikicode were a little difficult to follow for me but that may be because I'm very new to any sort of code in general and need to learn how developers provide examples.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rmiller587 (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

70.161.162.188 (talk)
super clear, easy to understand, and filled in gaps in my knowledge. the interactive editing tutorial was fantastic - loved it!
 * What I liked:

some of the videos didn't play
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

fantastic! keep up the good work!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--70.161.162.188 (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Deloebrenti (talk)
the interactive tutorial was great. most of the content was clear and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

in the editing section, i didn't feel like the text was quite as clear as the videos; some of the videos didn't play back and didn't have youtube links.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

LOVED IT! Especially getting the barnstar; great set up for students.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deloebrenti (talk) 17:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Rymiduff (talk)
...It was easy to understand, and answered all the basic questions about how to edit.
 * What I liked:

...The in page videos did not work. However, I was able to watch them using Youtube
 * What I didn't like:

...I would like to see more information about formatting.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful. I would like to see it cover even more advanced editing techniques.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rymiduff (talk) 17:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Lzamudio0792 (talk)
Videos were really helpful. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I really like the training because it short but it has important information. --Lzamudio0792 (talk) 18:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Mrjohnson007 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: straight forward and to the point

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: videos for each element

...
 * What was unnecessary: Wikilove page

… Very helpful and interactive
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mrjohnson007 (talk) 19:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Ashleyweir (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Informational but concise.

...
 * What I didn't like: N/A

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ashleyweir (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Alilafferty (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alilafferty (talk) 20:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

OKRVA15 (talk)
...The interactive videos showing you extra steps on a certain topic
 * What I liked:

...The complexity of it all
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OKRVA15 (talk) 23:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Fmeyers30 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Fmeyers30 (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Ghalp (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ghalp (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Adumas10 (talk)
... Informative and to the point
 * What I liked:

... Some of the videos wouldn't play
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adumas10 (talk) 02:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

EmmaAWeber (talk)
... The training videos. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It didn't work for me? --EmmaAWeber (talk) 03:10, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Custodim (talk)
... The videos were really helpful
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Custodim (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

JBMarquette (talk)
The basic, introductory way the information was covered helped me understand just how to get started on constructing an article.
 * What I liked:

I had trouble viewing the videos, but that could have been a problem with my browser.
 * What I didn't like:

There could have been a little more information on editing in the interactive section, although the interactive part was very helpful.
 * What was missing:

Reference to the beta editing tool. If the tool is not verified to work flawlessly, it would probably never be a good idea for a new user to try to incorporate into page creation.
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was very helpful and got me acquainted with the tools I will be using in the future.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JBMarquette (talk) 05:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Arjbajarj (talk)Orientation feedback
...
 * What I liked:The tutorial videos and the step by step instructions on creating a usable page. I also liked the multiple help options in case you forget something.:

...
 * What I didn't like: There was a lot of information thrown at the user. Perhaps a more interactive tutorial, like the beta one used for sandbox practice, would have been nice:

...
 * What was missing:Read above

...
 * What was unnecessary:nothing really. I'm not sure yet

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was wonderful and definitely made understanding the material easier.

--Arjbajarj (talk) 14:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Emm031 (talk)
...Very clear and concise walkthrough.
 * What I liked:

...Video links did not always work.
 * What I didn't like:

...Several supplemental video links.
 * What was missing:

...Everything presented seemed necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Did not try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emm031 (talk) 16:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

7243HODGSOZ (talk)
...nothing
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

... nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...No
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--7243HODGSOZ (talk) 17:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Sbash71 (talk)
...The videos that helped to further explain certain topics like coding. I especially thought that the sandbox tutorial was very useful.
 * What I liked:

...When links led to long pages to explain something. I think that new users would benefit with the entire page as well a shorter summary to explain. The videos all had to be opened in youtube.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think that new users would benefit from more interactive sandbox tutorials within the orientation to practice coding. Videos without youtube links would not play.
 * What was missing:

...I believe it was very useful but could use some more interactive tutorials with coding.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think it is very helpful to help new users begin to understand how to use wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sbash71 (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Shyrece.C (talk)
...It was concise and very helpful. Making Wikipedia articles seems daunting, but the training made the process seem achievable.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was fabulous. Had I had to do it on my own I would have ended up confused. It's a great tool!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shyrece.C (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Nbabb2 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nbabb2 (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Madison Lasiter (talk)
...Tutorial link to sandbox
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Madison Lasiter (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Susanna.seejle (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Susanna.seejle (talk) 20:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

D23sunn (talk)
...It taught me a lot about wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--D23sunn (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Jammin1993 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jammin1993 (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

LJ112358 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very simple and easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was a little bit boring.

...
 * What was missing: I think it covered everything that needed to be covered.

...
 * What was unnecessary: There were not any unnecessary parts to the training.

It was easy to understand and a good starting point. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LJ112358 (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Tzanon21 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tzanon21 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Kglobalhealth (talk)
... It was easy to follow along with and understand. ... Some of the language was confusing. ... Nothing ... Nothing ... I thought that was the most helpful part of the tutorial. --Kglobalhealth (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Sydval612 (talk)
I liked the simplicity of the tutorial and how it was easy to go through...
 * What I liked:

None...
 * What I didn't like:

None...
 * What was missing:

None...
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was easy to use and well demonstrated the topics...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sydval612 (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Brichr1520 (talk)
It was comprehensive.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brichr1520 (talk) 03:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)Brichr1520

Gamerobscura (talk)
...It was quite easy
 * What I liked:

...There was nothing I didn't like, honestly!
 * What I didn't like:

...Again, I thought it was very well made.
 * What was missing:

...I thought it quite concise.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gamerobscura (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Umm517 (talk)
... I like that it was all in short steps that were easy to read. I also like the videos to help visualize what the steps were talking about.
 * What I liked:

... Not much to dislike.
 * What I didn't like:

... I don't know, I am very new to editing on wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Umm517 (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Ashleylangford (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The tutorials were concise but still informative. The optional videos were a nice touch.

...
 * What I didn't like: No major problems, but some of the content could be removed. It's kind of long, and while I realize that there is a lot of information to be covered, I think there are some parts that seem overly wordy or more like "filler" than actual content.

...
 * What was missing: Is there a way to repeat certain parts of the tutorial at a later time if you forget how to do something?

...
 * What was unnecessary: The welcome module (I think it would benefit from being shortened, at least).

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Didn't try.

--Ashleylangford (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Leav5419 (talk)
It was a decent, comprehensive tutorial.
 * What I liked:

I would have liked the editing tutorial to be part of the main tutorial, not a separate link.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

Nothing I can think of.
 * What was unnecessary:

I wish it had been clearer what I was editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Leav5419 (talk) 04:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

3547anderse (talk)
... Fairly comprehensive and simple to follow. ... Still unsure on some subjects, but, as stated in the tutorial, the best way to learn is just to do. ... More information on talk pages; other basic editing techniques and shortcuts (like headings) ... Policies could be a bit more concise. ... Liked it, but it was very short --3547anderse (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

SamSchultz1 (talk)
Learning how to leave congrats on other people's pages.
 * What I liked:

It could have been less lengthy.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing basic!
 * What was missing:

Uhhh....nothing?
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SamSchultz1 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Rensywu (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rensywu (talk) 16:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Rensywu (talk)
... easy to follow along
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rensywu (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Mreiss9 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mreiss9 (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Stbarker (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The training was very clear and descriptive on how to use Wikipedia.

...
 * What I didn't like: some of the tasks were a little confusing because there was a lot to read and could have been put in a more simple way.

...
 * What was missing: nothing was missing, all of my questions were answered.

...
 * What was unnecessary: some of the videos were a little unnecessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stbarker (talk) 18:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Tlatchaw2 (talk)
...It was easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...Not that many visuals, droned on at times
 * What I didn't like:

...Visuals, pictures, etc.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Quite convenient
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tlatchaw2 (talk) 19:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Brianhalperin (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brianhalperin (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Wuwa (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wuwa (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Mewilner (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mewilner (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Dehringb (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dehringb (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Jordan401 (talk)
...I liked the video tutorials.
 * What I liked:

...The video tutorials sometimes did not work.
 * What I didn't like:

...It is hard to tell at this point.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing seemed unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jordan401 (talk) 20:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

R, S, and V (talk)
...It was very helpful and gave me a great starting point to editing!
 * What I liked:

...It was a little long, but it was filled with great information to make up for it.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing really noticeable, it seemed very good as a starting tutorial
 * What was missing:

...It was most definitely not unnecessary. Without it I wouldn't have had any idea where to start.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I did not try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--R, S, and V (talk) 21:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

WlfSprtd23 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--WlfSprtd23 (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

EDDendocrinelover1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EDDendocrinelover1 (talk) 02:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Andie Dumas (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...None of the video links worked for me
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Andie Dumas (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Tatabox8 (talk)

 * What I liked: Short and straight to the point.


 * What I didn't like: Alot of information.


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

Wish I had two computer screens instead of switching back and forth.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tatabox8 (talk) 04:42, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Ksierrab (talk)
... Clear, certainly helpful. ... Very long, at some points I felt lost. ... Not sure/nothing. ... Not sure/nothing. ... Loved it! So helpful. --Ksierrab (talk) 06:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Enbarlev (talk)
... It was easy to understand and rather straight forward
 * What I liked:

... The introduction seemed a bit repetitive
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing, most basics seemed to be easily understood and explained
 * What was missing:

... The introduction itself
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Enbarlev (talk) 17:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

35.0.59.200 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--35.0.59.200 (talk) 18:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Lguldan (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that they made everything plain and simple, and also had links available to watch the instructional tutorials directly on YouTube (since they weren't playing for me directly on the page).

...
 * What I didn't like: No complaints

...
 * What was missing: I think they should have explained a little more in-depth the process for getting on the DYK page, because the Wiki page itself with the instructions was kind of hard to follow.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lguldan (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Ttruscot14 (talk)
... I feel like it covered all of the basics necessary for editing articles on Wikipedia. I think it gave great insight onto the steps that need to be taken when editing an article with other editors as well.
 * What I liked:

... I was a little confused during the Sandbox portion of the tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

... I thought that it could have went a little more in depth in some places, but it did cover the basics pretty well.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ttruscot14 (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Trinlin (talk)
...Breaking up the training into manageable sections
 * What I liked:

...Had to do a lot of clicking to next page, may have preferred some scrolling down
 * What I didn't like:

...perhaps a summary page at the end of the most important points
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Trinlin (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

LynnNH (talk)
It was very specific and informational. Lots of links, videos, and examples of what to do and not to do. It explained how to find things if a user has any further questions and/or confusion about something. ...
 * What I liked:

N/A ...
 * What I didn't like:

Which link we click on from our home page to navigate back to training and/or additional questions of how certain processes work. ...
 * What was missing:

N/A ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try the interactive editing tutorial. How do we get to it? ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LynnNH (talk) 20:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Dschungsi (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dschungsi (talk) 21:01, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Makendall (talk)
...the videos
 * What I liked:

...longer than i thought it would be
 * What I didn't like:

...more practice
 * What was missing:

...the beginning
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Makendall (talk) 01:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Untitlednumber9 (talk)
It was very informative, with plenty of detail yet not overwhelming.
 * What I liked:

The videos didn't play (Safari?) had to use the YouTube links.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing that I can think of right now.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked for a few screens and then died.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Untitlednumber9 (talk) 03:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Gracewlo (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gracewlo (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Bschewe (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bschewe (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Ccgearig (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ccgearig (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Evaascar (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Evaascar (talk) 19:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Ishagupta715 (talk)
I like that it walked through each step of learning about Wikipedia for beginners ...
 * What I liked:

The interactive tutorial was a bit confusing. It constantly asked me to resave my edits multiple times and did now allow me to move on to the next step. I restarted the tutorial several times. ...
 * What I didn't like:

It would be beneficial to have more interactive editing rather than videos. ...
 * What was missing:

I think they could have summed up the rules and regulations a little bit more. I rather spend more time editing and learning the right way to do that which would indirectly teach me all the rules. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was poorly made. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ishagupta715 (talk) 19:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Nhiggins2013 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nhiggins2013 (talk) 19:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Jaejeong (talk)
...A clear description of the content and a step by step process
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...An animated process or a short clip about the process would have bee nice.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jaejeong (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Quirkejamie (talk)
... simple and organized
 * What I liked:

... videos did not work i had to follow link ... nothing ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Quirkejamie (talk) 20:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Lduboff (talk)
...The layout was not overwhelming with not a lot of text on each page. This made it easier to go through the training.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing in particular I didn't like
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: Some videos did not work and did not have a youtube link

...Nothing in particular was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lduboff (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Aliyellen (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aliyellen (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Dcreilly814 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dcreilly814 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Tarwets (talk)
Good introduction to the major aspects of Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

A bit large for the casual reader
 * What I didn't like:

More descriptions of the various wikicodes
 * What was missing:

It all served a purpose
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tarwets (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Cineyr (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was easy and not very time consuming.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: More information on coding

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful and easy to learn.

--Cineyr (talk) 22:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Eotann (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eotann (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Rahujain (talk)
...
 * What I liked: How in-depth and detailed the orientation was. There was no stone left unturned.

...
 * What I didn't like:Not very interactive.

...
 * What was missing:Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary:Nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rahujain (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Juxtapositionn (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Juxtapositionn (talk) 23:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Lbenderoff (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The orientation made the editing info easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like: You had to open up a new tab to complete demonstrations yourself.

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary: I thought everything was necessary.

... It really helped me understand the correct way to edit documents.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lbenderoff (talk) 23:14, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Tatumpr (talk)
... The videos and the short length ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tatumpr (talk) 23:35, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Jrberns (talk)
.it was easy to follow nothing
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kimpaul17 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The helpful information on how to be a wiki editor

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't know for sure what I was supposed to expect editing an article

...
 * What was missing: More video tutorials and examples?

...
 * What was unnecessary: Not much really

... helpful in getting to know what to expect
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kimpaul17 (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Apollo721 (talk)
... It was informative about the editing techniques of wikipedia and what was expected of the editors.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Apollo721 (talk) 01:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Joshhorowitz0707 (talk)
… the training …the length
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

…nothing
 * What was missing:

… nothing ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Joshhorowitz0707 (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Nhhuq (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nhhuq (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

141.213.154.112 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--141.213.154.112 (talk) 03:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Renf2076 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The training is quick and effective. Allows you to start editing immediately.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Renf2076 (talk) 04:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Kaitdoch (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kaitdoch (talk) 04:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Zalghreiwati (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zalghreiwati (talk) 04:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Tyfrey (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tyfrey (talk) 04:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Jomoakin (talk)
Very concise and to the point.
 * What I liked:

Perhaps a quick way to review each section after finishing it.
 * What was missing:

--Jomoakin (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Xaquamarinex20 (talk)
... The Youtube videos were very helpful in explaining how to use Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... The orientation was a little long but it was still helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

... I had to use all the Youtube links because none of the built-in videos worked.
 * What was missing:

... The orientation could have eliminated the built in videos since they did not work.
 * What was unnecessary:

... N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xaquamarinex20 (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Meholper (talk)
…Went step by step
 * What I liked:

…The videos didn't work
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

…Some of the advanced stuff that isn't basic
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meholper (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Mmcleodoneill (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The break down of the information into modules

...
 * What I didn't like: The material could have been condensed for simpler reading

...
 * What was missing: The idea that anyone can edit Wikipedia which implies some level of chaos and prankster articles

...
 * What was unnecessary: Certain explanations could have been optional during the learning period

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mmcleodoneill (talk) 04:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Witters278 (talk)
... The videos were helpful ... Alot to take in at once
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Witters278 (talk) 04:54, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Eborish (talk)
... it was very straightforward and clear
 * What I liked:

... ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eborish (talk) 05:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Kef4d (talk)
I liked that the videos were short and straightforward. I like that the orientation was organized into sections. Also, the orientation was somewhat encouraging and made the Wikipedia process seem very manageable.
 * What I liked:

At one point in the orientation there were a lot of links and rather than pausing to click each one, I would rather just continue with the orientation. Luckily, the links are saved in the resource tab.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was very useful. I was able to practice while the tutorial was playing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kef4d (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Kef4d (talk)
I liked that the videos were short and straightforward. I like that the orientation was organized into sections. Also, the orientation was somewhat encouraging and made the Wikipedia process seem very manageable.
 * What I liked:

At one point in the orientation there were a lot of links and rather than pausing to click each one, I would rather just continue with the orientation. Luckily, the links are saved in the resource tab.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was very useful. I was able to practice while the tutorial was playing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kef4d (talk) 05:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Nikkicastorhess (talk)
...Very thorough!
 * What I liked:

...A bit wordy... It would be even more fascinating if it were livened up with more images and interactive features than just videos.
 * What I didn't like:

...See above.
 * What was missing:

...n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

...n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nikkicastorhess (talk) 06:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Kevchow (talk)
... Short simple and to the point but it was still very informative and effective
 * What I liked:

... nothing
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kevchow (talk) 07:14, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Chpy (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chpy (talk) 07:24, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Chpy (talk)
...Short and simple. It gets to the point quickly, yet is very effective in teaching the fundamental skills of editing Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like the constant page changes. I wish the tutorial was a single compiled page/video.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing really. Will update as I further explore Wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

...The constant page changes.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was really beneficial and helped give helpful preview of what is to come.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chpy (talk) 07:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

M1092 (talk)
...Very informative and provided a lot of resources and links to more information
 * What I liked:

...At times it was not interactive with just text
 * What I didn't like:

...More graphics and more video tutorials
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--M1092 (talk) 08:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Kml1535 (talk)
...It was very easy to follow and covered the introductory material quite thoroughly.
 * What I liked:

...I have no criticism...it was very effective.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kml1535 (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Alishahc (talk)
...It was very thorough
 * What I liked:

...I wished it was interactive without having to leave the tutorial page.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Everything was relevant
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alishahc (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Jacob Metzger (talk)
...I really enjoyed how user-friendly the introduction was. In addition, the linked videos were pretty easy to follow and very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...Unfortunately, I have no background at all with coding, so as I went along with the introduction and practiced in my Sandbox, it took me a really long time to attempt even the most basic techniques.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not yet sure if anything was missing. I guess I'll find out soon as I begin to make edits and create pages on my own.
 * What was missing:

...I don't think anything was unnecessary, as the tutorial touched on only the most basic and most useful tools.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought that this was helpful because it directly guided me to the links and buttons that I should click, so it saved me the time of scanning the whole page looking for them. This made it quicker and more efficient than if I had not used the interactive editing tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jacob Metzger (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Gvanalst (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gvanalst (talk) 16:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Rvandage (talk)
Very informative
 * What I liked:

Very long
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rvandage (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Srk017 (talk)
...the tutorial was very useful, although there was a lot of information to process and I feel like it will take me some time to learn how to edit.
 * What I liked:

...when I clicked on a link, it didn't open in a new page.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Srk017 (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Eak016 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: interactive videos, having the visual representation of directions was very helpful

...
 * What I didn't like: there was a lot of information to grasp, so maybe orientation could be broken up into a few different sessions so you can grasp the material more before moving on to newer material

...
 * What was missing: I did not think anything was missing from this orientation

...
 * What was unnecessary: many pages could have been added together rather than having many small pages with little material on them


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought it was really helpful in actually getting the experience of editing and not just reading about it. ...

--Eak016 (talk) 17:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

OliviaHall10 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OliviaHall10 (talk) 17:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Adelemg (talk)
...
 * What I liked: detailed and gave good examples, i loved sandbox

...
 * What I didn't like: a little long and some repetition in descriptions

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adelemg (talk) 17:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Jslplainview (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jslplainview (talk) 18:11, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Lamumpa (talk)
... It informed me on Wikipedia with simple and concise instructions.
 * What I liked:

...I felt some slide were verbose.
 * What I didn't like:

...I don;t know.
 * What was missing:

...I don't know.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I didn't try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lamumpa (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Micahguthrie (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Micahguthrie (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Josheric (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Josheric (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Eamjr (talk)
It had all the basics that I felt is needed to be able to start editing and creating Wikipedia articles.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

I think it would be better to have something other than the sandbox to practice in. Perhaps fake articles or really poorly written articles with many different errors that we can fix so we can actually see changes being made. Just a suggestion.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was a bit confusing. A lot of the articles I was taken to did not have any errors or the errors were not that distinctive. However I did learn how to do this, Grammy
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eamjr (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Jazz0722 (talk)
...Organized well with video.
 * What I liked:

...Not much HTML is used.
 * What I didn't like:

...Example links of good/bad.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jazz0722 (talk) 18:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Lgn006 (talk)
...Very straightforward.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...Practice editing.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lgn006 (talk) 19:34, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

HSLightPlayer (talk)
... I appreciated the video elements of the presentation. ... Some step-by-step pictures may have been nice, for those people who are visual learners. ... Just in case, how should we report users when things get extreme? ... The item about barnstars was interesting, but may be better suited to an "if you'd like to know more" link. ... I have no idea if I did the interactive tutorial correctly, or if it was supposed to be that short... --HSLightPlayer (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Se391 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Se391 (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Gcpstudent (talk)
...Very detailed.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the information provided seems like common sense, however some individuals lack that capability so I understand why it is there and explained in detail.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a unique experience. I have never attempted at editing a Wikipedia article so I didn't know much of what I was taught was even possible.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gcpstudent (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Andrewscutt (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Easy to navigate, very straight forward.

...
 * What I didn't like: Links were frustrating occasionally.

...
 * What was missing: Could use more media, especially videos.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Andrewscutt (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Ajl024 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: On the whole, the orientation was simple and informative.

...
 * What I didn't like: None of the videos in the modules played directly on the Wikipedia page. I had to click the YouTube links to view them.

...
 * What was missing: I would have appreciated more videos.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The perfect article section was worthless.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very useful.

--Ajl024 (talk) 22:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Logo Aesthesis (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The instructional videos were well-made, and I believe I learned the basics much faster than I would have experimenting with no guidance.

...
 * What I didn't like: There were some grammatical errors in the instructional text.

...
 * What was missing: I can't think of anything, but since I'm not experienced with Wikipedia yet this question reminds me of the joke "Raise your hand if you're absent."

...
 * What was unnecessary: All of the content seemed and least mildly relevant.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: I thought it was well-constructed and helpful.

--Logo Aesthesis (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Keelanca (talk)
Videos were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

I was a bit confused by some of the coding and there weren't very specific examples outside of the vids.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing as far as I know.
 * What was missing:

Everything seemed useful.
 * What was unnecessary:

Didn't do it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Keelanca (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Ag1430 (talk)
The information was presented in a clear, concise way that made it easy to learn. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful, and I did not experience any problems with it. When learning how to use an editor for the first time, whether WYSIWYG or any other, it's always nice to have an interactive tutorial to get hands-on practice. This is much more effective than just reading about how to do it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ag1430 (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Dwk014 (talk)
I liked how easy to follow and intuitive each step was and how much I learned from the process. Video were also very helpful. ...
 * What I liked:

N/A ...
 * What I didn't like:

N/A ...
 * What was missing:

N/A ...
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked well. Very helpful. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dwk014 (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

MackenzieGlaze (talk)
...It was very easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...Some pages were unnecessary or could have combined into one page
 * What I didn't like:

...NA
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Made it easier to get a hold on what we would need to know to be an active participant in Wikipedia
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MackenzieGlaze (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Tnm2ff (talk)
... The training was written conversationally which made it easier to read. ... I wish there were some opportunities to practice the skills discussed.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... see above ... Nothing :) ... I thought it was incredibly useful --Tnm2ff (talk) 01:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Lizziewalters (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked the video tutorials that either conveyed useful information or showed a step by step tutorial on how to contribute to WIkipedia.

...
 * What I didn't like:A lot of information was presented at once.

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary:N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was very helpful in that I got to practice editing with step by step help.

--Lizziewalters (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hrushi11 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was simple and easy to follow.

...
 * What I didn't like: There were not that many links.

...
 * What was missing: How to format text (advanced)

...
 * What was unnecessary: I didn't think anything was unnecessay.

It didn't have enough information on how to edit. I was a little confused. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hrushi11 (talk) 04:41, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Jjt022 (talk)
... I enjoyed learning about how a simple article can expand into an exceptionally noteworthy article.
 * What I liked:

... I did not like that some of the information was repetitive or obvious.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing seems to be missing.
 * What was missing:

... Some descriptions were a bit unnecessary. I cannot recall any in particular, though.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was helpful and it worked smoothly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jjt022 (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

JuliannePearson (talk)
...It was simple and straightforward. It contained videos which were heloful visuals.
 * What I liked:

... It took a long time to get through.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

...The long explanations of simple topics.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JuliannePearson (talk) 05:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Lizzygabbie (talk)
... very easy to understand
 * What I liked:

... nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...how to make the wavy lines like the ones in the subject line of this heading
 * What was missing:

... nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought it was very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lizzygabbie (talk) 05:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Elisparn (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elisparn (talk) 10:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Jjk5ne (talk)
...Everything was very streamlined and straightforward. It was just enough information without getting into unwanted and de-motivating lengthiness.
 * What I liked:

...n/a
 * What I didn't like:

...The interactive editing tutorial might be improved with a few pop-up windows explaining what the various buttons do.
 * What was missing:

...n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very effective and useful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jjk5ne (talk) 17:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Ryan.folio (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ryan.folio (talk) 19:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Tran3105 (talk)
There were many discussed points and I liked the interactive tutorials; they were really helpful!
 * What I liked:

Everything seemed okay to me.
 * What I didn't like:

I don't know enough to think that anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

Same as above...
 * What was unnecessary:

Oh, I liked it a lot.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tran3105 (talk) 22:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Petejhua (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Brief, but very informative. Especially for a beginner like myself. Videos and interactive tutorials were helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing that I can note.

...
 * What was missing: Again, nothing I can note.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful for me (a beginner).

--Petejhua (talk) 01:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

CZstaR (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CZstaR (talk) 01:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

OrientationYateraid (talk)
...
 * What I liked:It was very informativeYateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

...
 * What I didn't like:reading copyright lawsYateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

...
 * What was missing:N/AYateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

...
 * What was unnecessary:N/AYateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?I will be having a private tutorial later with a learned wiki userYateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

--Yateraid (talk) 02:34, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Student1012 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Student1012 (talk) 03:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Rca-1233 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rca-1233 (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

SebCoyle (talk)
I appreciated the videos in the orientation because they were clear and concise. The checklists provided on most slides were also nicely efficient.
 * What I liked:

There were a few slides that were written a little too casually which meant that it took longer to find the relevant information.
 * What I didn't like:

As a new user there wasn't any lack of info that I could notice.
 * What was missing:

Everything shown to me seemed necessary for editing Wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SebCoyle (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Down6263 (talk)
I enjoyed the in depth descriptions for editing and I am really interested to see how VisualEditor evolves...
 * What I liked:

Some of the material was a bit dry but what tutorial isnt...
 * What I didn't like:

Can't think of anything seem to be very thorough...
 * What was missing:

Pretty basic info on all you need to properly function...
 * What was unnecessary:

All I can say is I can't wait for VisualEditor...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Down6263 (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

BrandonHidaka (talk)
Appropriate length
 * What I liked:

n/a
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

When I returned to the training, I was worried that I had lost my "progress" and that I would have to reclick through the tutorial in order to receive certification, which is an assignment for a class. I'm glad it saved my work!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BrandonHidaka (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Nplus3 (talk)
... Videos ... It was fairly solid. ... Nothing much. ... Some of the punctuation. ... I didn't. --Nplus3 (talk) 17:59, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Grytvikensg (talk) Class Assignment
... Very easy to read. I liked the second option to view videos in youtube because I needed it. ... nothing ... nothing (for an introduction tutorial) ... nothing ... I did not --Grytvikensg (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

CJCstudent (talk)
... I liked how the tutorial showed how to type in the coding in the sandbox to create a page.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like the videos because they seemed somewhat redundant.
 * What I didn't like:

...A reference of all the different codes that can be used for creating a page.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the videos seemed unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CJCstudent (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Aoc001 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aoc001 (talk) 00:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

MizRiz3133 (talk)
...Very informative, gave a lot of information. Helped me with basic Wikipedia code, which I know little to nothing about.
 * What I liked:

...It was really lengthy. Possibly annoyingly so. Finding a way for someone to come back and pick up where they left off would be good.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MizRiz3133 (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Dontsayjk (talk)
... That the videos were not mandatory ... Nothing ... Bacon strips ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dontsayjk (talk) 04:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Rgrundy90 (talk)
... Very useful and informative ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rgrundy90 (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Seancascarano (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Seancascarano (talk) 15:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

CharlotteResearch (talk)
The video tutorials
 * What I liked:

there were not any sub categories for certain topics
 * What I didn't like:

perhaps explain what a stub page is first without a link to it? If not, it was very well organised and covered everything I needed to know!
 * What was missing:

Perhaps details about the Wiki community
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CharlotteResearch (talk) 18:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Jtgura (talk)
... I liked the interactivity and videos ... It was long ... Not much ... Not sure. ... It was cool and helpful --Jtgura (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Heather1993 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Heather1993 (talk) 22:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Meyouandsarahoo (talk)
The interactive editing training was fantastic.
 * What I liked:

Some parts were a bit read-heavy. It would have been more fun if there were little radio-bullet quizzes in between learning sections in order to break it up a little bit.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Really intuitive, though I wish it were possible to move the pop-up boxes around on the page for better functionality.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meyouandsarahoo (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Gaekcr (talk)
It didn't take long to complete
 * What I liked:

-
 * What I didn't like:

-
 * What was missing:

-
 * What was unnecessary:

Simple to understand
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gaekcr (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

MUhelb (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MUhelb (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Ahaglin (talk)
the videos!
 * What I liked:

getting lost in help sub-topics
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was really lovely and rewarding
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ahaglin (talk) 17:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Sarahecook (talk)
... videos
 * What I liked:

... linking away to other pages
 * What I didn't like:

... more on notability
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... great --Sarahecook (talk) 18:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Rory.Bonner (talk)
... The inteeractive aspect used in some parts. ... I didn't like that there is specific code needed to edit articles. ...I'm not sure yet what is missing. I am still pretty new and need more practice.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...I think it was all necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rory.Bonner (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Emariems (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emariems (talk) 15:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Tuxjux (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Detailed step by step process for various tasks

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing that I can think of

...
 * What was missing: More interactive practice when it comes to creating stubs and formatting citations.

...
 * What was unnecessary: ?

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very helpful and made the process seem relatively simple.

--Tuxjux (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Julia Marden (talk)

 * What I liked:

Very clear videos, well done!


 * What I didn't like:

Didn't expect to need to learn a new mark-up language.


 * What was missing:

Is there a reference key or glossary for the wiki mark-up somewhere?


 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Some modules worked better than others, but they got easier with practice. --Julia Marden (talk) 16:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Spinster17 (talk)
...Most explanations were clear and simple, but I tried the first one - how to bold - and it didn't work, which threw me off right at the beginning. For some reason I found it easier to add a reference.
 * What I liked:

...Feeling somewhat pressured to watch videos to enhance what I was reading, as I don't have a huge data plan (I have internet access via tethering with my cell). Especially when these videos were either duplicating what I'd just read or were for the Beta version of the wysiwyg editor, which it seemed I was being discouraged from using...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I tried it. I didn't find it particularly "interactive" to be honest, aside from the first "welcome" (maybe that's not what was meant by "interactive"? But I had this idea that I would make an edit etc. and there would be another pop up window asking me a question or saying "good job" or something. Maybe it just wasn't working for me?
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Spinster17 (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Gracestratton (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gracestratton (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Mackinnico (talk)
Good explanations using plain language
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Hard to get it working at first (I blame my computer/connection) but very well done.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mackinnico (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Mollie14 (talk)
... -Learning exactly what Wikipedia is -Options to watch videos and read text
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mollie14 (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Youngeclecticcaucus1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was the best part, super fun and exciting to actually see it work

--Youngeclecticcaucus1 (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Nina.Artist (talk)
The simple explanations / concise. I found the video's helpful.
 * What I liked:

Took longer than expected.
 * What I didn't like:

Can't think of anything
 * What was missing:

It all seemed pretty necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

a very good idea.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nina.Artist (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Mirandaclara.s (talk)
The orientation was very detailed and incredibly thorough.
 * What I liked:

Nothing really. Everything was great.
 * What I didn't like:

As a newcomer, I'm not too sure if anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was my favorite thing about the orientation. I know the tutorials will help me to be successful. Doing is better than just reading directions.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mirandaclara.s (talk) 00:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Wahoo Ed (talk)
...Easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...a little dry
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...some of the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wahoo Ed (talk) 14:13, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

MeredithRachael (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The training was well rounded and gave me a better idea of what my teacher expects of my Wikipedia page.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some of the slides used terminology I wasn't familiar with- keep in mind that people new to wikipedia will be using the training!

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I really liked the interactive editing tutorial!  It was easy to use and I think a tutorial is better than a video for teaching someone how to do something they've never done before on Wikipedia.

--MeredithRachael (talk) 19:46, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Gntroutman (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gntroutman (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

BigA726 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I really liked the interactive parts that went through step by step to show you how things should look. I think thats an excellent way of introducing someone to something like this.

...
 * What I didn't like: I dont think there was anythings specific i didn't like. I thought it was pretty good!

...
 * What was missing: I'm not knowledgeable enough to be able to know if there was any missing content at this point.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I found some points to be slightly repetitive, but i guess thats the best way of getting across important points.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was awesome. I'll definitely be going back when i'm actually editing stuff.

--BigA726 (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Tgauth1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tgauth1 (talk) 23:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Tgauth1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tgauth1 (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Kaguir1 (talk)
The interactive training in the sandbox
 * What I liked:

That there wasn't more interactive training
 * What I didn't like:

Should be tested on the interactive training after you finish to see if you can do it yourself
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

really helped breakdown what you were supposed to do
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kaguir1 (talk) 03:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Chaslsu2214 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chaslsu2214 (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Chaslsu2214 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chaslsu2214 (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Tkey1 (talk)
I liked the interactive tutorials.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was great.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tkey1 (talk) 06:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Faldhahi (talk)
Interactive Sandbox and videos!
 * What I liked:

Nothing! Simple and straightforward.
 * What I didn't like:

Examples of pages growing from stub to feature. Their progressive growth and how they did it.
 * What was missing:

Nothing! It was concise and precise. It was quick and easy to get through because of the setup and optional videos/interactive editing tutorial.
 * What was unnecessary:

I enjoyed it and appreciated that buttons directed you to the next step, rather than just a list explaining what to do next. Now I feel as if I actually did the steps alone and can visualize it in my head.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Faldhahi (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Sumiko kiyotani (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sumiko kiyotani (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Pat.oleary18 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pat.oleary18 (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Mwons29 (talk)
... It was very descriptive and informative ...bugs
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing ... Nothing ... I think the editing tutorial is very helpful --Mwons29 (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Zrob1084 (talk)
...all of it
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zrob1084 (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC) Zrob1084 (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Lancydane (talk)
... the way it was set up
 * What I liked:

... how much information was covered
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

...the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...i didnt try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lancydane (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Klbarnhill (talk)
...very simple and easy to use
 * What I liked:

...a little word
 * What I didn't like:

...some explanations for more complex actions
 * What was missing:

...some of the explanations were obvious
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Klbarnhill (talk) 19:54, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Wpeissner (talk)
Concise and clear
 * What I liked:

Introduction is too general, not much information in the intro.
 * What I didn't like:

Didn't miss anything.
 * What was missing:

?
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wpeissner (talk) 20:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Pidge25 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pidge25 (talk) 21:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Floorkoudijs (talk)
A good first overview of how to edit Wikipedia. I liked the combination of text and videos to make the examples clearer.
 * What I liked:

There was quite a lot of text and not a whole lot of real life practice. But it's a good start to get over the initial fear of starting to edit Wikipedia.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked the tutorial, it was very helpful if you have little idea of how to navigate the editing pages.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Floorkoudijs (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Joe Boyd 512 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Joe Boyd 512 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Dvo19 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dvo19 (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Manellycg (talk)
... It was informational.
 * What I liked:

... It was too long
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

...so much editing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was too long
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Manellycg (talk) 05:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Smw104 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked how the training was categorized into four parts.

...
 * What I didn't like: There were too many videos, in my opinion.

...
 * What was missing: It was a very broad overview, I don't think anything was missing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: All of the videos; the text seemed to be plenty.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try it. I have many demands on my time and found the videos and reading sufficient for information.

--Smw104 (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Tuckerharding (talk)
Short, clear, only essential information, answers the important questions in a sensible order.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe an example process-- like a short case description of a wikipedia editors journey from account creation to regular community member.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It's a good idea, helpful. Room for expansion.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tuckerharding (talk) 20:39, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Tseay (talk)
...interactive tutorial
 * What I liked:

...wikiscript seems complicated
 * What I didn't like:

...Not sure as this is my first encounter with editing wiki pages
 * What was missing:

...Not sure as this is my first encounter with editing wiki pages
 * What was unnecessary:

...Loved it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tseay (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

DiGRE91 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DiGRE91 (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Llinlor (talk)
The interactive editing tutorial ...
 * What I liked:

Nothing! ...
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive editing ...
 * What was missing:

Nothing! ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked it ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Llinlor (talk) 03:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Tyler.Fiske (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The ease of use of the training

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tyler.Fiske (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

174.66.138.136 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--174.66.138.136 (talk) 04:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Drewhartman15 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Drewhartman15 (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

CanMHayes (talk)
...
 * What I liked:I liked how the tutorials were very helpful and thorough

...
 * What I didn't like:There was nothing that I did not like

...
 * What was missing:Nothing was missing

... ...
 * What was unnecessary:Everything was necessary
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was very helpful and straight to the point

--CanMHayes (talk) 06:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

KenniaGonzalez (talk) Orientation
... very helpful and clear understanding ... i liked everything.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KenniaGonzalez (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Onaerkcin (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Onaerkcin (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

99.120.101.42 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--99.120.101.42 (talk) 14:37, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Yankablr (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yankablr (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Slj825 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Slj825 (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

99.120.101.42 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--99.120.101.42 (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Priyapoomalil (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Priyapoomalil (talk) 21:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Aborghi (talk)
...I liked how they split the sections up so that I could organize the tasks in my head.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like how it was so through and a little bit redundant.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think that they could have made the instructions more interactive.
 * What was missing:

...They did not need to tell me what the tutorial was because I feel it is self explanatory.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought that It was adequate in explaining what to do but not engaging.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aborghi (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Hhthakor (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hhthakor (talk) 00:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Mw8382 (talk)
...I liked that the videos took time to explain each step of the process and provide me with helpful tips for the future.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like the fact that citing a reference page and list was somewhat hurried.
 * What I didn't like:

...More interactive tutorials to practice what was just learned.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing, I'm fairly new to all of this and thought all of what was included was out of necessity.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was so helpful! Include it more often!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mw8382 (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Tatabox8 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tatabox8 (talk) 06:32, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Zaklove (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zaklove (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Unburritoble (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the interactivity of videos and content creation/practice for editing.

...
 * What I didn't like: the lack of a response in regard to knowing what each section should have you know.

...
 * What was missing: links to other wiki's and projects like the Education Program, etc.

...
 * What was unnecessary: the questions at the beginning of the module as they weren't reiterated at the end of the module.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very informative for new users unfamiliar with wiki mark-up language.

--Unburritoble (talk) 21:58, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Madlevine (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Learning new ways to navigate Wikipedia (specifically the editing functions)

...
 * What I didn't like: The sandbox tutorial kept repeating itself and was somewhat hard to follow

...
 * What was missing: Can't think of anything-very informative and useful information.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing!

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was helpful but had some glitches in it's instructions (when I got to the wikilink, it didn't continue and kept repeating the same instruction)

--Madlevine (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Alex trevino13 (talk)
... Videos were great examples. ... Everything was okay. ... Nothing. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alex trevino13 (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Paintbeat (talk)
... Clear and concise. ... Lots of text, could use more elements. ... Nothing that came to my attention. ... Nothing. Everything straight forward and helpful. ... Coding is hard, but the tutorial was helpful for the general idea of editing. --Paintbeat (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Palmigo (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The training was concise. I liked the YouTube videos that explain different subjects.

...
 * What I didn't like: The training takes much more time if you watch the YouTube videos

...
 * What was missing: I don't know.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I think everything was necessary to understanding more about editing wiki.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Palmigo (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Grace eunhye lee (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Grace eunhye lee (talk) 07:27, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Eam3539 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: videos

...
 * What I didn't like: length and word confusion

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: the beginning

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eam3539 (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Ekorch20 (talk)
The training was clear and concise.
 * What I liked:

Nothing,
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

Good. Had some difficulty with the second one, but that was most likely user error.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ekorch20 (talk) 17:05, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Bpnunn (talk)
... very easy to read and understand
 * What I liked:

... it seemed very dry, hard to stay focused
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bpnunn (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Bpnunn (talk)
... very easy to read and understand
 * What I liked:

... it seemed very dry, hard to stay focused
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bpnunn (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

DPVel (talk)
...
 * What I liked:All good.

...
 * What I didn't like:It's a little intimidating.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DPVel (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Stei8237 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The beta interactive tutorials.

...
 * What I didn't like: Not enough hands on training.

...
 * What was missing: More tutorials.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Best part!

--Stei8237 (talk) 05:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

174.60.214.35 (talk)
... I thought it was a very helpful tutorial. It covered everything I needed to know ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--174.60.214.35 (talk) 17:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

PHDiva55 (talk)
The informatin was helpful. It gave me a start. Nothing I can think of. I am new at this, so it is hard to say what was missing. I felt all the information was necessary. It was in plain layman language, easy to understand. I wasn't able to use the interactive editing tutorial on this computer. I will try it on another computer. --PHDiva55 (talk) 21:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Nogentil (talk)
...very easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

...nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing that I can think of.
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nogentil (talk) 03:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

GcLangham (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--GcLangham (talk) 09:03, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Srschwartz0914 (talk)
I liked how specific it was on the process of creating new/substantially editing old articles.
 * What I liked:

I would have preferred for the links to open to new tabs, rather than directing me away from the tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

More practice with wiki code please.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Srschwartz0914 (talk) 19:24, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Nidhithite (talk)
... Detailed ... Interactive tutorials kept getting stuck ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nidhithite (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Rochelle Lunsford (talk)
I liked that the training was quick and easy to follow with clear examples.
 * What I liked:

I didn't like that I could not go back to review a step during the Sandbox editing tutorial without starting the whole tutorial over again. Or maybe there was a way, and I just wasn't paying attention...
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing was missing that I can specifically pinpoint at the moment.
 * What was missing:

Some of the information didn't seem useful to me in particular, but it is still good to have this reference if I need help finding something later.
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was very useful and helpful, though as mentioned above, I didn't see a way to review the previous step if you accidentally miss it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rochelle Lunsford (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

MikeyIDIS (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MikeyIDIS (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Jokiee (talk)i did it twice
...very detailed
 * What I liked:

...too little image
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...those long description
 * What was unnecessary:

...add more image
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jokiee (talk) 21:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Jenni Nyberg (WMSE) (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Really enjoyed the interactive tutorial, it was very helpful for me

...
 * What I didn't like:I noticed a few spelling misstakes, but nothing major. Just me being a grammar nazi!

...
 * What was missing: I found it very comprehensive

...
 * What was unnecessary: I cannot think of anything at this moment

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I really liked it. I would have liked it to be a bit more comprehensiveJenni Nyberg (WMSE) (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

--Jenni Nyberg (WMSE) (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Cnbaker777 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: videos

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: more code info

...
 * What was unnecessary: barnstar

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it worked well, no kinks

--Cnbaker777 (talk) 02:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

WordsUnited (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Short pages of explanation. Clear and concise wording.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--WordsUnited (talk) 09:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

TsherryUSA (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Concise

...
 * What I didn't like: N/A

...
 * What was missing: More work on article formmatting, particularly dealing with multiple sections.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great! The interactive tutorial had a good pace. It could have used a little more content regarding setting up the format of articles. --TsherryUSA (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Prk238 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Prk238 (talk) 18:56, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Abenakidar (talk)
...5 bases
 * What I liked:

...not always clear how to use interactive editor.
 * What I didn't like:

... ? - don't know yet
 * What was missing:

... partly repetitve - may ne necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

... it gave me some difficulties
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abenakidar (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Lovislovis (talk)
… The tutorials on Youtube were great. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

… How to to a filmography, where to write what while referencing to a webpage and rules about uploading a picture taken from internet. ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lovislovis (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Singh116 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Singh116 (talk) 16:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Melissastiefbold (talk)
...I liked how there were videos included with many of the subjects, it allowed for me to understand the information better.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the information was still very confusing and I believe it could have been described better.
 * What I didn't like:

...There could have been a few more practice tutorials in order to get the viewer a better understanding of what they were doing
 * What was missing:

...I don't think there was anything that was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Melissastiefbold (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Gina at Stockton College (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The videos were very helpful! And I also really liked the interactive part.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was like information overload. I wish that I could have stopped and been able to go back.

...
 * What was missing: The interactive aspect should have been a part of every page.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I found everything to be helpful and necessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Absolutely loved it!  So helpful!

--Gina at Stockton College (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Castil18 (talk)
The training was very informative, and i liked how organized and interactive it was. I also liked the fact that it contained videos to help the visual learning side of me. Thanks!
 * What I liked:

It was a lot to grasp for a new user.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I really liked the editing tutorial, it helped me start to grasp what it is like to edit a wikipedia page. --Castil18 (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Tylermil (talk)
...The step-by-step process.
 * What I liked:

...The length of the tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

...More specific information on guidelines. I know, because of the tutorial, that there aren't specific rules that govern sites, but I feel still under prepared.
 * What was missing:

...The how to treat other editors.
 * What was unnecessary:

...This was helpful as it not only provided examples of how to properly edit but allowed me to practice it as well.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tylermil (talk) 01:53, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Vlvincent12 (talk)
I liked that the tutorial used both text and videos. It was helpful to first read the information and then see a video demonstrating the same information.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I also thought the interactive editing tutorial was helpful. It allowed me to practice while having helpful instructions along the way.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vlvincent12 (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Erimieli (talk)
...it was easy to follow and very informative.
 * What I liked:

...the videos didn't work on the page (but in youtube!) and I lost the work I did in my sandbox and couldn't find it anymore -confusing...
 * What I didn't like:

... ?
 * What was missing:

... ?
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Erimieli (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Nemigaite (talk)
The interactive editing tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

More in-depth editing tips.
 * What was missing:

Video tutorials.
 * What was unnecessary:

I think it was great!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nemigaite (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

TurinT (talk)
Simple, but thorough.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

I'm still a little unsure about how to transfer edits from a sandbox to the actual article.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TurinT (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Rww14 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rww14 (talk) 00:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Arden Corvidae (talk)
The short pages and bulleted lists made the information easy to follow and digest.
 * What I liked:

Nothing! It was all very nice and accurate.
 * What I didn't like:

Everything seemed to be included.
 * What was missing:

It was all quite necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive parts were the most useful part of the tutorial to me. I feel like I got some actual practice in!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Arden Corvidae (talk) 02:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Lmestre (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that I gained knowledge I didn't know about editing on Wikipedia.

...
 * What I didn't like: I don't like that I still do not know what I am doing.

...
 * What was missing: Examples

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing, everything was informative.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try it, but I might!

--Lmestre (talk) 03:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Natalijamak (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Natalijamak (talk) 03:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Zian Butler (talk)
...Very informative.
 * What I liked:

...A lot of information.
 * What I didn't like:

...I can't think of anything that was missing.
 * What was missing:

...Everything seemed helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zian Butler (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC) ZB

2601:C:1280:158:9455:5E59:705C:8624 (talk)Feedback
...I like the Barnstars idea. A nice way to recognize Wikipedians hard and great work.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...May be we should do more than issuing a barnstar to a Wikipedian for hard work and dedication. May be we should allow monetary present or gift worth less than $100/year to Super Wikipedians or an annual party to recognize the best and the brightest.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--2601:C:1280:158:9455:5E59:705C:8624 (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2014 (UTC)jeanbapw

2601:C:1280:158:9455:5E59:705C:8624 (talk)Feedback
...I like the Barnstars idea. A nice way to recognize Wikipedians hard and great work.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...May be we should do more than issuing a barnstar to a Wikipedian for hard work and dedication. May be we should allow monetary present or gift worth less than $100/year to Super Wikipedians or an annual party to recognize the best and the brightest.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--2601:C:1280:158:9455:5E59:705C:8624 (talk) 01:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)jeanbapw

Anna josephson (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anna josephson (talk) 02:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Mthurlowksu (talk)
...Very thorough introduction.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mthurlowksu (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Rland95 (talk)
... Interactive activities ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I found the interactive activities extremely beneficial. --Rland95 (talk) 18:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Bn4293a (talk)
...the video tutorials, and the interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

... the reference tool did not work for me.
 * What I didn't like:

...Explanation why the reference tool was not working
 * What was missing:

...The information was very helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is a great way to learn quickly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bn4293a (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

68.36.39.50 (talk)
...I like how strict the Wikipedia owners are with vanadlization. Also, people can check that information comes from a reliable source.
 * What I liked:

... I don't like how information provided from other people, can be edited and posted by other people. Also it cannot be an independent subject.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--68.36.39.50 (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Famstutz (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Famstutz (talk) 00:31, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

130.49.122.141 (talk)
...Although it was a little bit lengthy, it provided helpful information on the contents of Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...I think it could have included a more detailed step-by-step set of instructions as to exactly how to cite sources like it's done on other wiki pages because it took me a while to figure out how to do that and where to go to learn how to do it.
 * What I didn't like:

...It was a little bit bland. Maybe it would help by making it a little bit more interactive. For example, the sandbox tutorial was very fun and easy to follow.
 * What was missing:

...All of the information included was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think it was very useful. Most of what I learned was due to that because I was able to take the information I had read and put it into action.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--130.49.122.141 (talk) 02:23, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

KBB24 (talk)
brief and informational sandbox tutorial
 * What I liked:

so much information about Wikipedia's mission (pillars)
 * What I didn't like:

no specific heading codes and similar features
 * What was missing:

extra information about talk pages
 * What was unnecessary:

super super super
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KBB24 (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Laurenlohfink (talk)
...That it went through how to edit and create a page. And that it gave me the basic background of how the site works
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...It was not missing anything. It shared all information that would be helpful to new wiki users.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Laurenlohfink (talk) 04:29, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Elynn12 (talk)
The videos were very helpful as well as the interactive approach.
 * What I liked:

n/a
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

It was great! I always learn better by doing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elynn12 (talk) 04:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Bornastar82 (talk)
...practical guides, videos, short modules, easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...Practice adding images
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...extremely good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bornastar82 (talk) 11:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Sarah K. Pinto (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarah K. Pinto (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

216.165.95.66 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--216.165.95.66 (talk) 17:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Southern Playerlistic (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Southern Playerlistic (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Smoesjes (talk)
good basic overview, easy to follow, great!
 * What I liked:

no complaints
 * What I didn't like:

not sure
 * What was missing:

all seemed relevant
 * What was unnecessary:

sometimes was confusing and difficult to go back to regular training modules
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Smoesjes (talk) 15:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Mehak Hussain (talk)
...The instructions were very clearly stated.
 * What I liked:

...It was a bit tooo long
 * What I didn't like:

...It should be brief and to the point
 * What was missing:

...some information was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mehak Hussain (talk) 22:22, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Kenitzer.1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kenitzer.1 (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Jiangys2006 (talk)
...The steps are very useful!
 * What I liked:

...None. Everything is perfect.
 * What I didn't like:

... Some successful examples. ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jiangys2006 (talk) 01:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

129.10.8.76 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.10.8.76 (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Sechang.1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sechang.1 (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

AbdulKahloon (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AbdulKahloon (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

UCSFrb1983 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Included basic and more complex overviews, liked videos and text combined

...
 * What I didn't like: n/a

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: n/a

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very helpful but will require more practice

--UCSFrb1983 (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Acallen88 (talk)
I loved the interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

I wish I could see examples of good/bad articles during the diactic portion of the orientation
 * What I didn't like:

See above
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Great! No bugs for me.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Acallen88 (talk) 23:26, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

CmcUCSF2014 (talk)
...The video tutorials are very useful and of a good length. They provide a clear overview of the respective topic.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...I am not sure about this just yet.
 * What was missing:

...No. I think this was very necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...Did not try.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CmcUCSF2014 (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Lmciszak (talk)

 * What I like

i knew nothing about wikipedia. this was inteesting.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...the tutorials didn't work too well or I couldn't work them.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lmciszak (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Simoni217 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the example videos, and not having to click out.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: not enough detail on all editing basics

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Simoni217 (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

EHatch (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The videos were very helpful, as were the guided sandbox demos

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was helpful.

--EHatch (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Jrwalter240 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jrwalter240 (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Stphz (talk)
It is very informative and compact. Highly interactive without making it too boring of a stretch to press the continue button.
 * What I liked:

none
 * What I didn't like:

none
 * What was missing:

none
 * What was unnecessary:

i didn't try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stphz (talk) 19:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Xokellynguyen (talk)
...It was brief and went straight to the point when explaining steps.
 * What I liked:

...The explanation on how to properly create citations could have been more detailed.
 * What I didn't like:

...Where it would be ideal to find online sources.
 * What was missing:

...The video tutorials provided.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was very effective in the learning process, however bugs still need to be fixed.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xokellynguyen (talk) 02:10, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Laura Iyakaremye (talk)
... I like that the guidelines are broken down into smaller sections so it doesn't get boring or overwhelming ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Instructions on how to properly cite my sources ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I think the best way to learn is to actually do it so it was probably the most helpful part --Laura Iyakaremye (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kiki190 (talk)
The interactive tutorials and the videos ...
 * What I liked:

I liked everything ...
 * What I didn't like:

More videos and less words ...
 * What was missing:

N/A ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked the interactive tutorial, it really helped me to get to know where everything is in wikipedia. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kiki190 (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Haleyhebert (talk)
... very organized
 * What I liked:

... very long
 * What I didn't like:

... pictures
 * What was missing:

... nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Haleyhebert (talk) 00:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Jamessze (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jamessze (talk) 17:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Libelle77 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Libelle77 (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

LizBrasa (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LizBrasa (talk) 14:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Training done
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jemcdaniels (talk) 16:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

NuHippie77 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--NuHippie77 (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Kaileywask (talk)
... The videos were easy to understand. I have no complaints. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kaileywask (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Danielsrussell (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... A little buggy
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Danielsrussell (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Cyclostrophic (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cyclostrophic (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Kquinn1981 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kquinn1981 (talk) 21:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hjenkins15 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hjenkins15 (talk) 22:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Liz.Baldo (talk)
The interactive tutorials were very clear and helpful. ...
 * What I liked:

The video are slightly too long ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liz.Baldo (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

RoshiniA (talk)
...interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...They were great!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RoshiniA (talk) 03:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Student0531 (talk)
...The videos.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Fantastic
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Student0531 (talk) 04:03, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Jrandal22 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was a comprehensive guide on editing.

...
 * What I didn't like: I liked all of it.

...
 * What was missing: I don't yet know if something was missing. It answered my initial questions, but I suppose I'll find out if it was missing anything.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Everything seemed necessary.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good. It was better than just written instructions.

--Jrandal22 (talk) 21:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Amina.andrioli (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amina.andrioli (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Zjz8868 (talk)
core...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zjz8868 (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Zjz8868 (talk)
core...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zjz8868 (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Annamarzak (talk)
... Very imformative ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Annamarzak (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Grace eunhye lee (talk)
...add citation
 * What I liked:

...complexity
 * What I didn't like:

...most of it
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Grace eunhye lee (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Tdg0701 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tdg0701 (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Ckedmonds93 (talk)
... Very Helpful ... Not Much I did not like ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ckedmonds93 (talk) 00:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

67.62.66.129 (talk)
...everything
 * What I liked:

... not much it was very informative
 * What I didn't like:

... it covered alot
 * What was missing:

...some of the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

... I did not try this part
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--67.62.66.129 (talk) 03:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Sexuality391 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sexuality391 (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Gonzaleztc (talk)
... It was very and easy to follow
 * What I liked:

... The time, it took a long time!
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing!
 * What was missing:

...The length, maybe something a little more shorter would be better!
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was cool!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gonzaleztc (talk) 03:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Shirnell24 (talk)
... they steps to edit the pages ... nothing ... nothing ... advance module ... great hands on practice --Shirnell24 (talk) 07:02, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Sleepyjacck (talk)
All of it!
 * What I liked:

None of it!
 * What I didn't like:

How to create/edit the Infobox.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

I didn't. I already know the basics of editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sleepyjacck (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

LeaBumbleBee (talk)
...
 * What I liked: How explanatory it was

...
 * What I didn't like: The length of time it took to complete

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: I think the rules were redundant in terms on how to treat other users but I do understand why they are there

... n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LeaBumbleBee (talk) 19:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

67.62.66.161 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--67.62.66.161 (talk) 22:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Bairsarah (talk)
... The helpful videos and step-by-step tutorial process that actually demonstrated the actions.
 * What I liked:

... The tutorial was a bit confusing in the actual wording of the script, and I had to watch the videos to clarify.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I can think of!
 * What was missing:

... The whole concept of WikiLove is a bit over the top for me. It is a cute idea, but something that I do not think I will be using.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was great! As I said before, I often had to watch the videos or go through the interactive tutorial to actually understand the material. It was very helpful and excellent for visual learners like myself.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bairsarah (talk) 04:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Akimbo21 (talk)Overview
I liked the values that Wikipedia has and how they are so dedicated on keeping their values in line. ...
 * What I liked:

The length of the training was a bit extensive, but it was helpful. ...
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't see anything missing, I can't think of anything that should have been included. ...
 * What was missing:

The very basics about editing text wasn't really necessary for me. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Akimbo21 (talk) 03:23, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Akimbo21 (talk)Overview
I liked the values that Wikipedia has and how they are so dedicated on keeping their values in line. ...
 * What I liked:

The length of the training was a bit extensive, but it was helpful. ...
 * What I didn't like:

I didn't see anything missing, I can't think of anything that should have been included. ...
 * What was missing:

The very basics about editing text wasn't really necessary for me. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Akimbo21 (talk) 03:24, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Dickersonam2 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dickersonam2 (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Periwinkle2000 (talk)
tailored for students ...
 * What I liked:

not enough information to fully edit a stub ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Periwinkle2000 (talk) 06:25, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Thesawman44 (talk)
...It was very straightforward, interactive, and informative.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I enjoyed it highly. Keep up the good work!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thesawman44 (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Nvarde (talk)
...There were links to interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

...Not enough interactive tutorials.
 * What I didn't like:

...Didn't really say how to find a good article to fix
 * What was missing:

...Descriptions on how to act to other users online.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it, it was very descriptive and helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nvarde (talk) 01:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

My Orientation
... Was Informative ... Not everything was relevant to me ... Nothing ... Criteria to making my article featured ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brennan.yerman (talk) 03:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Jonathan Tan2014 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jonathan Tan2014 (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Ahareyan (talk)
I really liked the fact that it had an interactive feature and that I was able to try out the functions.
 * What I liked:

Some of the videos wouldn't play for whatever reason. I think it was something to do with Java.
 * What I didn't like:

There was nothing missing in my opinion.
 * What was missing:

Thanking others seemed a little unnecessary as an introduction topic.
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked great and helped a lot.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ahareyan (talk) 23:08, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

EditForWriting (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EditForWriting (talk) 00:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Astolten (talk)
...It was clear and simple
 * What I liked:

... It was a little long
 * What I didn't like:

... An option to skip the advanced editing if users are not interested in doing more than simple changes
 * What was missing:

... Advanced editing being mandatory
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Astolten (talk) 01:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Strawberryfresa (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Strawberryfresa (talk) 04:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Swillats (talk)
...Easy to use and informative
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very helpful and easy to follow
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Swillats (talk) 04:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

DertyMunke (talk)
The interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was very helpful in learning the process of editing a wiki page.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DertyMunke (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

PaulVanO (talk)
It was simple, but to the point. It wasn't too long, nor too short and the instructions were easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

No remarks.
 * What I didn't like:

See above.
 * What was missing:

See above.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--PaulVanO (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Vespir (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vespir (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Ajlovesgolf (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ajlovesgolf (talk) 03:06, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Cassieng28 (talk)
Everything is clear and easy to understanding, nothing complicated.
 * What I liked:

Some content seems to be too much (e.g. the way how to bold etc)
 * What I didn't like:

I don't see anything is missing.
 * What was missing:

Basically everything is important for students to know.
 * What was unnecessary:

The editing tutorial takes a little too long.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cassieng28 (talk) 07:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Tazmanianangel (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that it showed me how to input citations, communicate with other wiki-editors and also how to code for an image.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought the editorial was pretty cool, it was a good hands on chance to mess around with future editing tactics.

--Tazmanianangel (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Jmc457 (talk)
... Was informative.
 * What I liked:

... Was a little bit hard to follow and get the head around. Will have to look through it again.
 * What I didn't like:

... Should have like a summary of things at the end.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmc457 (talk) 00:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

YUNJING LIN (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--YUNJING LIN (talk) 06:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hannahjsong (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hannahjsong (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

SteveUCB (talk)
the information regarding edit wars
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

... adding photos? ... Nothing ...
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SteveUCB (talk) 23:52, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Lime0life (talk)
clear and concise
 * What I liked:

I would have preferred all of the information be on one page, rather than clicking through
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I can think of
 * What was missing:

All good.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lime0life (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Lime0life (talk)
clear and concise
 * What I liked:

I would have preferred all of the information be on one page, rather than clicking through
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I can think of
 * What was missing:

All good.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lime0life (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Bbdgr (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bbdgr (talk) 18:43, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Jongrnl (talk)
I liked the videos.
 * What I liked:

Most of the programming stuff could of just been replaced by the cheat sheet.
 * What I didn't like:

I'll let you know what I start to wright articles.
 * What was missing:

I feel the programming could of been compressed more
 * What was unnecessary:

It was fine.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jongrnl (talk) 23:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Wdjeremy (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I was very helpful and revealing.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? N/A.

--Wdjeremy (talk) 00:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Nickeckenrode (talk)
...Informative and encouraging through out.
 * What I liked:

...While it did present everything as easy and attainable, only practice is going to make the process click. There was a LOT of information that was covered and it did seem daunting.
 * What I didn't like:

...No comments
 * What was missing:

...No comments
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good start to getting hands on.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nickeckenrode (talk) 03:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

JmFrioux (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I thought everything was great! Very informative, simple, and user friendly!JmFrioux (talk) 04:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Emmanuel.O.Danso (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emmanuel.O.Danso (talk) 04:54, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Djsmith12 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djsmith12 (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Kasehose (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kasehose (talk) 23:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Markchen001 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Markchen001 (talk) 23:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Holoclothes (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Interactive tutorial on wikicode/markup

...
 * What I didn't like: How long it took me. A whole 30 minutes! But I'm an impatient person.

...
 * What was missing: I wish I had a better sense of what would constitute violation of copyright law. As a student, I have access to many secondary sources through licenses purchased by my institution. If I incorporate what I learn from those sources, e.g. I read a medical article on UpToDate into an article with appropriate citations, is that a violation of copyright law?

...
 * What was unnecessary: All of it was pretty useful

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: I thought it was great! Sorry I don't have more specific feedback.

--Holoclothes (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Mcmckinley55 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mcmckinley55 (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Bkl.shc (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bkl.shc (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Shk112 (talk)
...It was short and simple!
 * What I liked:

...Some parts were complicated.
 * What I didn't like:

...More on-hands training.
 * What was missing:

...The introduction.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shk112 (talk) 06:22, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Lhillesland (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lhillesland (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

BalthazarG (talk)
Interactive tutorial
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

Fantastic!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

BalthazarG (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)BalthazarG

Eliganrood (talk)
... Very useful!
 * What I liked:

... A lot of references to "your instructor" but I'm not part of a class.
 * What I didn't like:

... More info about the structure of an article (different sections) and how to create it.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Great! Worked perfectly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eliganrood (talk) 17:39, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Kflynn2015 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:The videos were very helpful, as were the interactive tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kflynn2015 (talk) 17:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Robeenp (talk)
Simple interface made it easy to learn
 * What I liked:

Some parts seemed drawn out
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing much
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful for beginners
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Robeenp (talk) 19:05, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Arieltinglee (talk)
... very descriptive
 * What I liked:

... NA
 * What I didn't like:

...NA
 * What was missing:

...NA
 * What was unnecessary:

...NA
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Arieltinglee (talk) 00:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Ajete Kosumi (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ajete Kosumi (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Ajete Kosumi (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ajete Kosumi (talk) 20:52, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

23.122.141.221 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--23.122.141.221 (talk) 07:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Kjn92 (talk)
...Very informative.
 * What I liked:

...Could have been condensed into less pages.
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't think anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Did not try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kjn92 (talk) 07:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Meiki0901 (talk)
...clear and simple
 * What I liked:

...The interactive tutorial was kind of confusing
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

... hard to follow
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meiki0901 (talk) 09:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Abhilashkrishn (talk)
...I liked the interactive steps and sandbox training. It was like a powerpoint presentation with student interactivity.
 * What I liked:

...Popup appearing on Next button
 * What I didn't like:

...Sandbox training should be more with different options.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abhilashkrishn (talk) 18:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

76.181.109.90 (talk)
... The detail the article went into explaining wikipedia ... I didn't like how lengthy it was, i felt it could of been made shorter ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--76.181.109.90 (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Zgrosje (talk)
...Very thorough in detail.
 * What I liked:

...Somewhat lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...Length
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very informational and helpful for future editing
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zgrosje (talk) 03:06, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Bracolli (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bracolli (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Jiyoonan (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The tutorial videos.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing.

...
 * What was missing: If editors name or where it would appear after editing/saving an article.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Helpful, if it would open up in another browser instead.

--Jiyoonan (talk) 22:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Jeanly (talk)
...Very easy to navigate and explainable.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...They were helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jeanly (talk) 11:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Historian (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Very clear and easy to follow

...
 * What I didn't like: I liked everything

...
 * What was missing: I am not sure yet.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I am not sure yet.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very useful.

--Historian (talk) 13:15, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

HalSmitty (talk)
...The tutorial was very clear and provided a lot of useful information.
 * What I liked:

...I thought it was excellent.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HalSmitty (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

HalSmitty (talk)
...The tutorial was very clear and provided a lot of useful information.
 * What I liked:

...I thought it was excellent.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HalSmitty (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

HalSmitty (talk)
...The tutorial was very clear and provided a lot of useful information.
 * What I liked:

...I thought it was excellent.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--HalSmitty (talk) 14:23, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Randy.reno.13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked the interactive parts to the training.

...
 * What I didn't like: Many of the points can be a little complicated. When an error was made, it was difficult to determine where it came from

...
 * What was missing:Didn't seem to be missing anything.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I tried all the interactive trainings and they were very helpful.

--Randy.reno.13 (talk) 20:51, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Elearethusa (talk)
It was very comprehensive and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

It was a little long but I think that is necessary if you're going to be properly trained.
 * What I didn't like:

So far it answered all my questions.
 * What was missing:

--
 * What was unnecessary:

It was great and I thought it really helped me get a handle on basic editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elearethusa (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Sion55 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sion55 (talk) 23:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

LynnMcCleary (talk)
easy to follow and understand
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful and easy to follow.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LynnMcCleary (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Kirbys12 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: all of it

...
 * What I didn't like: lots of pages

...
 * What was missing: do I get a star

...
 * What was unnecessary: maybe advanced

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? good

--Kirbys12 (talk) 22:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

TheVirginiaHistorian (talk)
...interactive modules, alternate video sites, interesting introduction to book citations -- step by step. I'm not sure I'm ready for setting up an article, but I can read the code of others more readily now. Sorry, I'm on the old side of the digital divide.
 * What I liked:

...There was nothing I did not like. Although I've been editing for a while, I found help links useful reminders of where to find more detailed information.
 * What I didn't like:

...instructions on cites from multiple books is listed as To do.
 * What was missing:

...all was enjoyable
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the alternative to skim material as well as the opportunity to key stroke through the practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Brendan.Hunstad (talk)
...The videos and the interactive tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...Thought it was all very good.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm new to this so not sure yet what may need to be added.
 * What was missing:

...I thought it was all very relevant as a beginner.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was amazing and really helped me understand how simple it is to edit Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brendan.Hunstad (talk) 18:42, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Interactive tutorial were great!

RoshiniA (talk) 03:18, 10 April 2014 (UTC)