Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback/archive 5

Ilingwiki (talk)First Wiki Experience
−		 −	−	videos ... This was a very informative tutorial. −		 −	−	... I can't think of anything. −		 −	−	... I thought it covered all of the bases pretty well. −		 −	−	... N/A −		 −	−	... I thought this was the best part of the tutorial. − This was a very helpful tutorial because I had no idea what to expect nor how to even work this website prior to completing this tutorial.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

−		 −	--Ilingwiki (talk) 04:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC) It was informative.

1980na (talk)
...It was comprehensive in its coverage.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I think there should be a quiz at the end.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--1980na (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

27.32.236.212 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--27.32.236.212 (talk) 07:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

BeCcar168 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BeCcar168 (talk) 10:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Mohamed Dini (talk)My Thoughts on the orientation
... The videos as well as the examples that were used in the training to help me take on practice editing.
 * What I liked:

... How most of the content was described with words.
 * What I didn't like:

... More hands on videos.
 * What was missing:

... Everything was necessary to fulfil my understanding in wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was very easy to use with the help of the examples below and wikipedia is very user friendly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mohamed Dini (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

16astrid (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--16astrid (talk) 03:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Shadowfaolan (talk)
Simplicity, topics were spread out so it wasn't all in one clump.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shadowfaolan (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

49.180.171.78 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--49.180.171.78 (talk) 11:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Izzybiz263 (talk)Training Feedback
Informational and very helpful
 * What I liked:

Too many slides
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive aspects
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Izzybiz263 (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

BaxterT (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...too much words, not enough interesting
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BaxterT (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Jkwek (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jkwek (talk) 00:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Lbea2564 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lbea2564 (talk) 02:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Colombo2496 (talk)
... The video tutorials that made it easier to follow, if you were tired of reading the text
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Colombo2496 (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Mirdus (talk)

 * What I liked: The interactive sandbox sections were a big help in learning the basics.


 * What I didn't like: Some sections of the tutorial seemed a little irrelevant to the learning stages.


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought the interactive tutorials were quite helpful in learning how to use some of the basic editing functions.

--Mirdus (talk) 10:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeonjoo3 (talk)
... Examples ... Too long ... Clear instruction on sandbox ... Videos ... Cool --Yeonjoo3 (talk) 12:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Callie06 (talk)
The videos were very good and helpful.
 * What I liked:

Took too long...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Callie06 (talk) 06:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Gher0491 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gher0491 (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Goipil (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Goipil (talk) 11:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Capn.Smith3y (talk)
It was interestingly presented. And the tutorials especially the video ones were helpful. ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Capn.Smith3y (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Amad6877 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amad6877 (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Gavbridge (talk)
Clear instructions, videos and interactive portions in particular.
 * What I liked:

Rudimentary format, could have a nicer UI, but still pretty good.
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive material
 * What was missing:

-
 * What was unnecessary:

Terrific
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gavbridge (talk) 00:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

129.78.56.194 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.78.56.194 (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

ZenaAlexandra91 (talk)
...the simplicity and step-by-step instruction format made complicated editing processes easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...It really helped cement new knowledge of Wikipedia editing processes. I am much more confident in applying the processes as a result of actually doing so, as opposed to just reading about them.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ZenaAlexandra91 (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Amarino1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amarino1 (talk) 01:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Tigbits (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tigbits (talk) 06:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Afalcone12 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Afalcone12 (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Astronomiee (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Astronomiee (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Redjar33 (talk)
Very good format and well explained
 * What I liked:

A bit tedious.
 * What I didn't like:

Some real-life examples
 * What was missing:

Thought most of it was necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

Okay
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Redjar33 (talk) 08:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Mrwright57 (talk)
...Videos complimented the written material. Not too overwhelming in terms of the amount of information provided.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the interactive tutorial. The only bug I found was when I made a mistake editing a page and for some reason when I went to re-edit the sandbox page incorporated all of the code from the pop up screen.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mrwright57 (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

IB8207 (talk)
They had video tutorials to help you understand
 * What I liked:

it was a lot of information to take in
 * What I didn't like:

videos for all of the step by step processes
 * What was missing:

nothing was unnecessary no comment ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--IB8207 (talk) 09:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Nath aylward (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nath aylward (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Weezus (talk)
Very thorough. :)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Weezus (talk) 10:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Lmul3244 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...some of the videos didn't work
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lmul3244 (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Naomi333 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Naomi333 (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Aguo5540 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aguo5540 (talk) 11:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

110.175.73.96 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--110.175.73.96 (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

first wiki post
...
 * What I liked: easy to use

...
 * What I didn't like: a little repetitive

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eder7475 (talk) 12:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Mafroulis (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful --Mafroulis (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Tyront99 (talk)
Quick, Concise.
 * What I liked:

Lack of information regarding certain parts, specific phrases used for editing, would have preferred to have been asked to login or create an account at the beginning.
 * What I didn't like:

Not much.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tyront99 (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Keatonsmith4 (talk)
... cheese ... not having any cheese ... extra cheese ... that feta ... bit cheesy.. --Keatonsmith4 (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Milimego (talk)
Clear and concise tutorial, easy to learn what was happening...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Extremely useful. Helped to cement the different commands in my mind...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Milimego (talk) 03:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

129.78.56.195 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.78.56.195 (talk) 04:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

RemnantPK (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RemnantPK (talk) 04:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Etidite (talk)
... optional videos
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Etidite (talk) 04:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Jkim6485 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jkim6485 (talk) 05:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Madelinesheard (talk)
…Broadness of the intro, simplicity.
 * What I liked:

…Perhaps went into a little too much detail in parts.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

…Was good, however the interactive box came up on different pages at times which was confusing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Madelinesheard (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Jkim6485 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jkim6485 (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Klee2051 (talk)
easy to navigate
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Klee2051 (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

SparkyR 1 (talk)
...Easy to follow instructions and details.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SparkyR 1 (talk) 06:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Le Quyen Nguyen (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Le Quyen Nguyen (talk) 06:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Ghol1963 (talk)
... very clear
 * What I liked:

... happy ... nothing ... nothing, very to the point ... very clear, thank you --Ghol1963 (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Eamonn Powers (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eamonn Powers (talk) 07:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Epin3995 (talk)
...Video tutorials
 * What I liked:

...Long module
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Epin3995 (talk) 07:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Palliee (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The Wikipedia training was very helpful and I learnt so much more about Wikipedia than I thought.

...
 * What I didn't like: I don't think there was something that I didn't like.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Palliee (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Adrianabonnibel (talk)
Very informative and well explained.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adrianabonnibel (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Jessicachahine (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jessicachahine (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Clotildeselienhart (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clotildeselienhart (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Fin83 (talk)
...it was easy to understand, the step by step instructions
 * What I liked:

...i found the practice modules very confusing with all the different symbols and ways of doing things.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... i thought it was all necessary ... it takes time to get used to it. --Fin83 (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Rushski (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rushski (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Ch8351 (talk)
Very informative and gave great examples
 * What I liked:

Introduction module was very long and was very kinda a bore to read through
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was kind of difficult considering that it was the first i have ever used it but the steps by step tips were very helpful. Just need more practice to get the hang of it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ch8351 (talk) 10:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Lvee95 (talk)
... easy to use
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lvee95 (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

OscarScene (talk)
... Simple, easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

... It was a bit lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I can think of
 * What was missing:

... Some parts were repeated which added to the length.
 * What was unnecessary:

... Pretty good.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OscarScene (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Abdul96 (talk)
...It explained how to use the necessary functions of editing a wiki page
 * What I liked:

...it was very lenghty
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abdul96 (talk) 12:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Tarantulaguy (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tarantulaguy (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Asin9452 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Asin9452 (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Ppor2353 (talk)
That the instructions were thorough, that it contained interactive parts.
 * What I liked:

That the information will be soon lost.
 * What I didn't like:

An interactive tutorial that combined what was learnt.
 * What was missing:

Nothing that merits a mention.
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ppor2353 (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

110.146.128.100 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--110.146.128.100 (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Todderk1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Todderk1 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Jkwek (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jkwek (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

KellyN.KN (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the interactive tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like: how long it took

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? love it

--KellyN.KN (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomi-smith (talk)Wikipedia training
The depth and simplicity of the training
 * What I liked:

The coding
 * What I didn't like:

I couldn't tell
 * What was missing:

Not sure
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nomi-smith (talk) 01:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

JayTee09 (talk)
... Easy to understand ... Too long ... N.A ... N.A ... N.A --JayTee09 (talk) 01:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

129.78.56.192 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.78.56.192 (talk) 01:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Rubyz95 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: how they explained how to use wikipedia

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? didn't work for me

--Rubyz95 (talk) 01:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Karyna.louise27 (talk)
... it was simple ...a bit repetative
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing ...the repition
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was fun and easy --Karyna.louise27 (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Pineapple200 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was easy to follow and well formatted

...
 * What I didn't like: It could've been condensed down and not as repetitive

...
 * What was missing: Nothing, everything was covered

...
 * What was unnecessary: It was all necessary

... I have not tried it yet
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pineapple200 (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Michael3329 (talk)
...People could talk and discuss to others
 * What I liked:

...Some information provided by others are not true or reliable
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Hard
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Michael3329 (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Curtis.judge (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Curtis.judge (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

129.78.233.212 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.78.233.212 (talk) 03:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Gaz789 (talk)
... Concise information, detailed instruction. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gaz789 (talk) 03:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nickcameron22 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nickcameron22 (talk) 03:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Pemery7 (talk)
...The detail that was provided
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...Even more training through videos
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pemery7 (talk) 03:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Jmer4927 (talk)
It was very helpful in understanding wikipedia editing
 * What I liked:

There was a lot of reading
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

A lot of it was very understandable
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmer4927 (talk) 03:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

129.78.56.205 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--129.78.56.205 (talk) 03:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Jekun (talk)
... sandbox and the help box at the bottom
 * What I liked:

...too long, too much information
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jekun (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Gfl3m1ng454 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gfl3m1ng454 (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Monica.joan (talk)
I liked that it was very informative in a simple way
 * What I liked:

It wasn't as interactive as it could be.
 * What I didn't like:

Interactive activities
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Monica.joan (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Liam.jimmies (talk)
Simplicity.
 * What I liked:

Extensive.
 * What I didn't like:

Rela.ing to topics that i enjjoy?
 * What was missing:

Page creation and editing.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was okay. --Liam.jimmies (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Ying3179 (talk)
...Insightful and informative
 * What I liked:

...Dull and not interactive
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ying3179 (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Ansaf.ahmed (talk)
Concise
 * What I liked:

Lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Really informative
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ansaf.ahmed (talk) 06:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

ArmishTechSupport (talk)

 * What I liked:

I liked that systematic approach to setting the tutorial out.


 * What I didn't like:

That you didn't have to answer anything


 * What was missing:

N/A


 * What was unnecessary:

Some of the information at the beginning


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

N/A

--ArmishTechSupport (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Max.barrett (talk)
... I liked that i am now able to utilize wikipedia properly
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...great help very simple
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Max.barrett (talk) 06:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Bk4732 (talk)

 * What I liked; it was intrested

hard to understand
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

was good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Feedback
It was very informative
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Parbs95 (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The real Alan Davies (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--The real Alan Davies (talk) 07:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

GGW5083 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--GGW5083 (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Cpun4015 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cpun4015 (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Taeinjeon (talk)FEEDBACK
...I can actually fix some article in Wikipedia where everyone access their information.
 * What I liked:

...The coding
 * What I didn't like:

...list of coding?
 * What was missing:

...too much information therefore people tend to skip the tutorials.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Article about sports science
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Taeinjeon (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Ji Won Bang (talk)
... It was informative ... It was boring ... none ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ji Won Bang (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Qson1401 (talk)
...very specific and clear
 * What I liked:

...too much content that cannot be understood all at once
 * What I didn't like:

...not much
 * What was missing:

...all good
 * What was unnecessary:

...quite clear instruction, could give more practice
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Qson1401 (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Vybee (talk)
The videos
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very good, so that the person understands the tutorial fully. The use of the videos really help.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vybee (talk) 13:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Rhetoric1001 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rhetoric1001 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

SonicPaul (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SonicPaul (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Farceoffarce (talk)
Ease of use, well structured.
 * What I liked:

Excessive clicking, no endless scroll.
 * What I didn't like:

Test based progression.
 * What was missing:

Very little.
 * What was unnecessary:

Not bad.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Farceoffarce (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Akou3067 (talk)
The detailed and simple procedure has made me feel more confident.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

All parts were necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

Videos were great. --Akou3067 (talk) 01:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

QLPham (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--QLPham (talk) 03:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Acho7228 (talk)
... It was in short sections. ... It was too long. ... Actual examples? ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Acho7228 (talk) 05:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Kane.snowman (talk)
The videos summarized the accompanying text in a way that calarified the information, making it easily memorable.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I found the tutorials quite helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kane.snowman (talk) 07:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Squishy Cheese (talk)
...Clear and easy to follow.
 * What I liked:

...Uhm
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't know??
 * What was missing:

...Some of the videos were kind of not really needed
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked. It was helpful and is a good introduction to the basics of editing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Squishy Cheese (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

krishna chalise
... was mostly illustrative and contains more infos. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--krishna chalise 08:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

KTakenak (talk)
... It was useful and I will refer to it again for sure when it comes times that I will try to contribute to this site. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KTakenak (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

CourtneyStaib (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CourtneyStaib (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Seloesch (talk)
... I enjoyed how everything was split into categories. This made it easier to understand.
 * What I liked:

... I thought some of the more technical areas could be explained more in depth.
 * What I didn't like:

... I think it could have included examples of articles that reach the highest level.
 * What was missing:

... I thought all parts served a purpose.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Seloesch (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Marrosann (talk)
...very detailed, all directions seemed mostly clear
 * What I liked:

...very long, a lot of information that didn't always seem necessary and became too much to remember
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...some of the advanced editing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Marrosann (talk) 21:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Dwang41 (talk)
Everything was clear and concise. Well organized.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dwang41 (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

J.R. Council (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Very thorough. I learned new things even though I've been an editor for a couple of years.

...
 * What I didn't like: Interactive tutorials left you in your user sandbox or somewhere else rather than taking you back to the main tutorial.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing important that I could tell.

...
 * What was unnecessary: It all seemed useful to me.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? See comment above about what I didn't like. Once the bugs are worked out, interactive tutorials will be a great resource.

--J.R. Council (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Training Feedback
...Big, bold font and straight forward language!
 * What I liked:

...I had previous knowledge of editing and so did not need all info given. However, others may benefit from the info.
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MCRU (talk) 03:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Ryanclements (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ryanclements (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

J.marshall c (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--J.marshall c (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Mykwan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mykwan (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

70.44.187.136 (talk)
Clear, concise videos
 * What I liked:

There is a lot of information to take in if you are unfamiliar. It is totally understandable, but just a lot to learn in one sitting.
 * What I didn't like:

Perhaps a recap "quiz" after each module to help users remember what they've just read.
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--70.44.187.136 (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Djyatesusi (talk)
...I liked the videos that illustrated where to go and how to get there.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djyatesusi (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Kvanschilfgaarde (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kvanschilfgaarde (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Pishoygouda (talk)

 * What I liked:

It was short, to the point and divided into manageable chunks. The practical aspect of training was helpful ...

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Fantastic! So much better than just reading about it! ...

--Pishoygouda (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Aqjiang (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The orientation was very informative. I liked the links to videos and additional resources.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was helpful and gave me a good sense of how to edit.

--Aqjiang (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Dmou (talk)
The interactive sandbox was very helpful! I found the text and instructions easy to understand, and there are just enough links to Wikipedia etiquette in the training pages that I'll be inclined to come back and reference them. I didn't enjoy the videos and would have much rather learned through means of text and pictures or the sandbox. As such, I skipped a few. A set of example pages, possibly? Though anyone could easily find them, a set of examples of what to or not to do would have been more illustrative than just text. For instance, the visual difference between a stub and a B-class article. The emphasis on being bold, but I'm sure that has its reasons. It just seemed to stop working sometimes but it is a very effective tool. It's like the WYSIWYG editor, and makes a lot of sense to me.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dmou (talk) 03:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Alexliow (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The guide was very comprehensive, but still short enough that it wasn't overwhelming.

...
 * What I didn't like:There are a lot of links in the training and it was kind of confusing by navigating us away from the page.

...
 * What was missing:Nothing I can think of at this point.

...
 * What was unnecessary:It was all relevant and helpful.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alexliow (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Isabella.krell (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Isabella.krell (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

FlamingTsunami (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... When I linked to bold the boldness article came up (which I'm guessing is a fairly recent change) and the editing tutorial viewed this as an error. At the time, I was unable to continue. Otherwise, the interactive tutorial worked well and was helpful. --FlamingTsunami (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kjatczak (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kjatczak (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Sohamdhesi (talk)
Short yet descriptive ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Worked Well. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sohamdhesi (talk) 23:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

OLucier (talk)
...Very informative.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OLucier (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

BSchilling (talk)
The interactive tutorial was helpful, as was seeing what it should look like.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

It was a little unclear what the accepted methods of starting a new page or editing other pages should be. It could have given a better step-by-step instruction of when a stub article is appropriate and what expansion to that would mean versus a DYK article.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BSchilling (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Samjam830 (talk)
...readable
 * What I liked:

... (((LINKS))) ... Printed handout ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...(((Challenging)))Bold textwish you could see both screens
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Samjam830 (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Cbku1987 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cbku1987 (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Martin.2489 (talk)
...I thought it was very helpful. I didn't know there were so many specific rules to editing pages and I found this tutorial very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing. I found all the information very informative.
 * What I didn't like:

...Maybe a few more examples of good article topics to start editing first.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing. I feel like everything was where it was for a reason. Everything was very helpful.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Martin.2489 (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Appleangel11 (talk)
... It was very comprehensive and I liked how we were able to go to the Sandbox and try out the concepts we learned
 * What I liked:

... It was a bit overwhelming and there were SO MANY PAGES! Also that one bit with the firework noise... It was cute but the noise went on for quite awhile and it was disruptive with the video tutorial
 * What I didn't like:

... I wish there was more about stubs and seeing stubs to edit
 * What was missing:

... The fireworks noise
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was straight-forward and very helpful. It gave us a great time to practice, although it did not necessarily correlate with our actions at the time
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Appleangel11 (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Lindaticket (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the pages were really easy to read and follow

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What was missing: a helpful link lists all of the manuals for formatting for future references

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lindaticket (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Post Orientation
What I liked: ...Interactive enough that I just wanted to find a topic and try it!

What I didn't like: ...There seems to be a limitless amount of things that one could write about -- duh it's an encyclopedia. Somewhat daunting, but I know that small steps are better than no steps.

What was missing: ...I couldn't tell.

What was unnecessary: ...Most things seemed relevant.

If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? ...It was good, easy to use.

--Benito103910 (talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hatigges (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hatigges (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Zephyra35 (talk)
I liked the interactive approach that was used to effectively instruct new participants in using and editing Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

I did not like the videos that were provided and thought they were unnecessary to the learning process.
 * What I didn't like:

Step by step instructions on how to communicate with others on Wiki would have been helpful.
 * What was missing:

I thought the step by step instructions that were given after the sandbox tutorial was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked that interactive editing tutorial, it gave great information and the step by step instructions allowed you to learn the material more quickly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zephyra35 (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Andreabocincova (talk)
... I liked the videos and the step-by-step organization of the training.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was good, but got stuck or disappeared several times in the process.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Andreabocincova (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Lhe3460 (talk)
... The step by step interactive tutorials, the well-made videos
 * What I liked:

... The pace of some of the videos (could move along faster), the clumsy navigation
 * What I didn't like:

... More examples
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very helpful for understanding step by step how to do something
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lhe3460 (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hkm24 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...rewarding other users for their good writing & work. I'm not sure if I plan to use this highly social feature.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hkm24 (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Locke Perkins (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the interactive sandbox was helpful

...
 * What I didn't like: I had to open all of the videos in a different web browser, there were so many links that I wanted to look at but I didn't want to stray from the orientation page

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it worked fairly well except the last one the box covered the page so I couldn't compare if I had done all of my edits correctly

--Locke Perkins (talk) 21:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

24.112.136.7 (talk)
The detailed information.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing that came to mind.
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Very informative. --24.112.136.7 (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Mwp2014 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mwp2014 (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Asp212 (talk)

 * What I liked:

I like the interactive features that were used in the third module.


 * What I didn't like:

I didn't like the user interface of the orientation; it looks a bit dated and boring.


 * What was missing:

There wasn't anything that was missing.


 * What was unnecessary:

There wasn't anything unnecessary.

I thought it was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Asp212 (talk) 04:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Aaie21 (talk)
…The format was very easy to follow and interactive as well.
 * What I liked:

…The video links did not work.
 * What I didn't like:

…There could have been a more thorough walk through of the editing materials available.
 * What was missing:

…I felt like everything was necessary and it was a very comprehensive tutorial.
 * What was unnecessary:

…It was easy to use!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aaie21 (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Montyhasan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Montyhasan (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Sposney3 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sposney3 (talk) 05:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Wesselkamper.1 (talk)
...very detailed
 * What I liked:

...kind of long, too many videos, got very complicated at times
 * What I didn't like:

... more pictures
 * What was missing:

...everything is pretty necessary to figure out how to edit correctly
 * What was unnecessary:

...pretty helpful but I had a hard time with the "coding" stuff
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wesselkamper.1 (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Rgalts (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Interactive tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like: Some repetition of information

...
 * What was missing: More interactive tutorials--like for citing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Many of the videos

Really helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rgalts (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

KathyQX94 (talk)

 * What I liked:

I liked how there were different videos to accompany some of the topics. They made the training more engaging. I also liked how there was hand on learning, especially in regards to editing.


 * What I didn't like:

I'm not sure if this was just a glitch, but I had trouble with the bold link. I put the word bold into the double brackets: bold, however it always took me to the wiki article about boldness, not the article about bold. There was a pop up that said I should try again, and I did, but still obtained the same result. Is there a way to just get the link to open to the wiki article about bold?


 * What was missing:

I think it would have been neat to have users set up something on their own user page. Maybe involve editing our own user page as part of the training. For example, you could have users type in Hello Wikipedia, and bold it, then save to their own user page.


 * What was unnecessary:

For me I'm more of a visual learner, so although the training made good use of lists I still felt there was a lot of text. I definitely remember the information from the videos much better. Perhaps if there is a section with text and video, just use the video and elaborate on it further.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Overall I thought it was very helpful. The only trouble I had was with the link going to the bold wiki article, as mentioned above.

--KathyQX94 (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

165.134.208.196 (talk)

 * What I liked:

I very much enjoyed the explanations and examples involved with the different modules. Each one firmly demonstrated what needs to be done.


 * What I didn't like:

There were not enough visual examples to go along with the modules. I would of liked to see more demonstration visually.


 * What was missing:

I felt there was nothing missing from the training session. If there was, I will be able to notice once I start creating my Wikipedia page.


 * What was unnecessary:

Everything seemed necessary for the most part.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I did not see the interactive editing tutorial, therefore I did not participate.

--165.134.208.196 (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Cales23 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cales23 (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

LHall19 (talk)
Helpful, easy step-by-step instructions. Helpful videos.
 * What I liked:

Some glitches with editing tutorial.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Some glitches, nice tool for learning basics.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LHall19 (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Magenstat (talk)
...What I liked most about this orientation was the variety of mediums it used to communicate the relevant information. The switch between well-made videos, blocks of text and bulleted lists made the training interactive and engaging.
 * What I liked:

...I wish their had been clearer, more step-by-step information about how different types of articles usually get started. It was pretty clear, but I think breaking it down into more subparts might help.
 * What I didn't like:

...See "what I didn't like."
 * What was missing:

...I didn't feel that any of the information presented in this training was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I tried it briefly and thought it was very useful! It took some of the fear away from that "initial edit" that I will soon make.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Magenstat (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Steph.solomon12 (talk)edit training
...videos were helpful!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...more about the grading process
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...attempted but was confusing for me to work
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Steph.solomon12 (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)steph.solomon12

Nnlpz (talk)
Videos
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good, but reading what to do would have probably sufficed for me.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nnlpz (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Svaughan90 (talk)
...Great, in depth explanation of how to navigate through the cite.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...How to create a user page. That is very self explanatory.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Great help if you can't understand the steps without visuals.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Svaughan90 (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Zy87 (talk)

 * What I liked:

Go through the content and do the interactive practice


 * What I didn't like:

Length


 * What was missing:

More interaction


 * What was unnecessary:

N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zy87 (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Wodarcyk.5 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wodarcyk.5 (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

12thManSeaFan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--12thManSeaFan (talk) 04:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Solanki.15 (talk)
... the interactive portion ... the videos ...nothing
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... the videos ... i liked it --Solanki.15 (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Rl11ge (talk)
... I really enjoyed the incorporation of the tutorial videos. ... I didn't like how some of the tutorial videos went too fast assuming that the observer could follow at that speed. ... If anything, I'd say little quizzes would've been a nice add-on to this training, just to remind us of what we just learnt after all the modules...considering this was a lot of information to take in at one time. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was fun, but I got lost a lot since the tutorial videos were a bit quick. --Rl11ge (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kv13hu (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kv13hu (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Zombiesatemyneighbors (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Fun and informative

...
 * What I didn't like: A big buggy, made my browser freeze. Had to restart several times.

...
 * What was missing: It seemed to cover everything!

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing!

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? As it warned, quite buggy. I had to avoid the rest of the interactive features to finish the tutorial.

--Zombiesatemyneighbors (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Cw585 (talk)
I liked learning about the pillars behind Wikipedia, as well as having the opportunity to learn some of the basic wiki markup.
 * What I liked:

I thought it was rather long. However, I do think that all the information is necessary.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing particular comes to mind.
 * What was missing:

Again, nothing particular comes to mind.
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked well! I had my Sandbox opened in a different window and followed the instructions in the tutorial. I also liked the interactive tutorials!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cw585 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

ADavil (talk)
I liked the overall presentation of the information. Each page contained useful information in a concise manner, so the training did not feel like a chore.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

The videos were not as helpful as they seemed
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial did a really good job of teaching; however, there was an issue when linking to the bold page. When I applied the double square brackets around bold, it already linked to the boldness page instead of to the typography page.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ADavil (talk) 21:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Thisismyusername1994 (talk)
...Very well done and informative.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing at all.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very interesting. It will be very helpful knowledge in anything I edit.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thisismyusername1994 (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Hy13ac (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The practice article that was given to me was completely un editable, it was so bad.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hy13ac (talk) 23:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Aadedoyi (talk)
I like the video explanations, it showed me step by step as to where to click and what to do upon clicking.
 * What I liked:

I liked all of it
 * What I didn't like:

I don't know, hopefully everything was covered.
 * What was missing:

Nothing was unnecessary, all the information provided was excellent
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful. I was able to make edits live and saw the results of my edits.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aadedoyi (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

GrandpaFly (talk)
This orientation provided an excellent overview of how to use wikicode, including supplemental videos and sandbox tutorials.
 * What I liked:

Sometimes the orientation malfunctioned and I had to reload it and find where I left off.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was the best way to learn to use wikicode.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--GrandpaFly (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Sjoo446 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was split up into sections.

...
 * What I didn't like: The tutorial let you away from the orientation.

...
 * What was missing: More pictures.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Wordiness.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was pretty good.

--Sjoo446 (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

MaScott14 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MaScott14 (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Nativ32 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nativ32 (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Robbins.260 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Robbins.260 (talk) 01:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Tylercpetersen (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tylercpetersen (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Mzw3 (talk)
Video tutorials were nice, length or pages made it easy to follow
 * What I liked:

sometimes felt repetative
 * What I didn't like:

nothing that I could identify
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mzw3 (talk) 01:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

NMartin319 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the videos and tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like: wordiness at times

...
 * What was missing: more videos and pictures to help convey thoughts and directions

...
 * What was unnecessary: excess words (too wordy at times)

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? very beneficial to have a step-by-step process to help with editing

--NMartin319 (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Kmarth.9 (talk)
... the modules were very straight forward and to the point; there was little wasted reading. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... The interactive editing was useful for learning the basic things like making words bold and adding text to the sandbox, but I had problems when I tried to make a link, the link worked but the tutorial kept saying I was on the wrong page; then it was difficult to get back to the orientation. --Kmarth.9 (talk) 01:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Grumblis.6 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Grumblis.6 (talk) 02:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Pinkfloyd6491 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The interactive tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like: There was a bug in programming the bold link. It always automatically redirected to the boldness article so you could not officially complete the tutorial.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Really good and very helpful, with the exception of the bug.

--Pinkfloyd6491 (talk) 02:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Mwong850 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The interactive editing tutorials and useful information.

...
 * What I didn't like: There was a bug on the "be bold" interactive tutorial when I was learning how to add a link, and even though the link went to the right page it said there was an error and wouldn't let me continue.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The length, I think it could've been condensed just a little more.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Good except for one bug.

--Mwong850 (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

MiaJ601 (talk)
...The interactive tutorial was extremely helpful.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the modules were a little lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...The videos reiterating things that were already present in the text
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MiaJ601 (talk) 03:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Tkw32 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tkw32 (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Ozana75 (talk)
the manner of writing "nobody does it like You" Wiki, even when it comes to training ! ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

very clear and helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ozana75 (talk) 03:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Skylerd23 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Skylerd23 (talk) 03:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

RunIowa (talk)
...I liked the detailed explanations and opportunities to practice using some editing basics.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like how some of the information seemed repetitive.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think it would be beneficial to have a summary of this information on a page for users to go to in order to provide a central location to refer to these basics without going through the entire tutorial.
 * What was missing:

...The large number of links away from the training seemed unnecessary and more like things I would want to look at when I was done (especially the pages for choosing an article)
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful to have the interactive editing tutorial allow me to see how simple it can be and know how to put the text into action.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RunIowa (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Rdusan1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rdusan1 (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Xucy (talk)
... The pillars of Wikipedia's rules. They establish a set of guidelines that is a great balance of lenient and stringent.
 * What I liked:

... The explanation of how to edit an existing article in the Sandbox was unclear.
 * What I didn't like:

... N/a
 * What was missing:

... N/a
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very helpful. Helped to reinforce knowledge.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xucy (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Huimin Zhong (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Huimin Zhong (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Djansen15 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Djansen15 (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

The Da Crook (talk)
... It was short and simple
 * What I liked:

... hard to get the videos to play
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

... nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... it was good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--The Da Crook (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Harry3740 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Harry3740 (talk) 15:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Drakeu19 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Drakeu19 (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Lh13lg (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The tutorial was clear and easy to understand. I know much more about Wikipedia already!

...
 * What I didn't like: It was much longer than I expected.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lh13lg (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Carolynella (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Carolynella (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Vw13mp (talk)
I enjoyed the videos and I thought that they were very helpful. They assisted in my understanding of the topics and points being discussed in the slides.
 * What I liked:

I did not like how all of the links changed the pages. I think that they should continue to update the orientation and make it pop into another browser automatically.
 * What I didn't like:

I did not think that anything was missing from this tutorial. I thought it was very beneficial and helpful to have before I began to edit any articles.
 * What was missing:

I did not find that any part of the tutorial was unnecessary, all of it was useful in editing articles.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vw13mp (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Ap14bq (talk)
... It was easy ... It was not very entertaining ... Simpler instructions ... The videos ... Very helpful --Ap14bq (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

GrandMasterEdit (talk)
...I felt that the content was accurate in the sense that it was up to date with the times and it even said that all the rules are not concrete, which is good because things always change.
 * What I liked:

...It was lengthy, but there was a lot of information so it had to be some depth.
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't think anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

...There was not anything that I seen that was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I did not try the editing tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--GrandMasterEdit (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Canalesa (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Canalesa (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Dm14qk (talk)
...it was very descriptive.
 * What I liked:

...nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...the videos alone helped me so I found the written part unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was a little confusing
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dm14qk (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Vr13zk (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vr13zk (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Gruhl.1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gruhl.1 (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Emily Grobe (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emily Grobe (talk) 23:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Shelby.a.schields (talk)
...
 * What I liked:It was very thorough with what we should or should not post as articles on this website.

...
 * What I didn't like: How many slides I had to click through.

...
 * What was missing: An in detail option of the computer jargon of making a page. The technical stuff is confusing to me and an easy go-to guide would be incredibly helpful.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shelby.a.schields (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Kimvalleeee (talk)
...It was informative.
 * What I liked:

...It was way way way to long!
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... Some of the pages repeated what was on the last page. ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kimvalleeee (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Fox.1030 (talk)
...Thorough walk-through of each step
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Fox.1030 (talk) 00:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Iannelli.4 (talk)
... I really enjoyed having the videos to watch and having the interactive editing tutorial that showed me what to do in my sandbox. I am a visual learner, so this helped me greatly ... The training very long and extensive, but I realize that it would be difficult for you to change this since there is so much to teach ... Nothing, as far as I noticed ... There were times when the videos present stated exactly what I had just read from the instructions. It would probably be best to pick one method or the other ... I really liked this little tutorial! I did have slight difficulties every now and then when I missed a direction, since hitting the "go back" button in the tutorial box sent me back to a page that didn't always load. Other than that, the interactive tutorial was wonderful! --Iannelli.4 (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Murakami.107 (talk)
... Nice tutorial
 * What I liked:

... Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Murakami.107 (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Canvaswrtr13 (talk)
...The Wikipedia training was simple and easy to follow, yet very informative.
 * What I liked:

...It appeared at times like some material was repeated more than once and got a little overbearing.
 * What I didn't like:

...I cannot think of anything off the top of my head that was missing from the Wikipedia training.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the repetitive information that was presented was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I did not try this because I didn't have an account created yet.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Canvaswrtr13 (talk) 02:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Xmizuro (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xmizuro (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Briekm (talk)
It was easy to follow and quite thorough.
 * What I liked:

N/A.
 * What I didn't like:

N/A.
 * What was missing:

N/A.
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked well.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Briekm (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Kr13al (talk)
...The videos on several of the pages were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...There were a lot of links to other pages which I think I needed to read and did read but which overall made it a bit overwhelming. Also it said it would take approximately one hour but I spent significantly more time than that and still feel like I could spend another hour easily going through the links. Some of the text was redundant with the videos and the videos much more useful.
 * What I didn't like:

...I don't think I will be able to answer this until I get into trying the editing out a bit more and find out what I am missing.
 * What was missing:

...All of it was necessary for me.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Every time I tried the one example in the editing practice it went directly to boldness, never did it go to bold which was confusing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kr13al (talk) 02:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Canvaswrtr13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Canvaswrtr13 (talk) 02:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Alombard.9 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alombard.9 (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Sagarshamman (talk)
...
 * What I liked:The way it broke down the rules

...
 * What I didn't like:A little too long for a tutorial

...
 * What was missing:Nothing to my knowledge

...
 * What was unnecessary:Everything seemed pretty necessary

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?It was alright.

--Sagarshamman (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Kt13us (talk)
The orientation was very informative and beneficial to first time Wikipedia users. Covered a large variety of questions a first time user may have.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kt13us (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Orientation Feedback
The interactive sandbox guides and the detailed instructions.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

A quick sheet of all the editing code and tricks for easy reference.

The videos often just repeated the text.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I found it very helpful.

--Dodier.k (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Ashleynaleman (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ashleynaleman (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Nicbie7 (talk)
The videos
 * What I liked:

Editing
 * What I didn't like:

Not sure since I haven't started
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

Liked it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nicbie7 (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Bt13kybrock (talk)
...very simple and easy to read
 * What I liked:

... the videos
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing it was great!
 * What was missing:

... unnecessary videos ... did not work well
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bt13kybrock (talk) 15:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Ar14bj (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ar14bj (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

128.237.140.27 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--128.237.140.27 (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Md13sd (talk)
... the video options for a more advanced learning opportunity
 * What I liked:

... How time consuming it was to continue to click the back button once a new link was opened
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing that I can think of
 * What was missing:

...no, very informative for a new editor!
 * What was unnecessary:

... it worked well, only sometimes was not able to detect the problem once you tried again. For example, trying to figure out how to link to the article titled, Bold, I originally linked to the word bold, and the computer new how to help but not as thoroughly as I would have liked.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Md13sd (talk) 18:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Thomas.2662 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thomas.2662 (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Hill.1770 (talk)
Easy to understand for a beginner.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very useful. However, the instructional boxes are able to move if you click the arrow, even if you didn't complete the task, which was confusing for a moment. It's not a big deal though.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hill.1770 (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Sg13vp (talk)
The information was very detailed and informative.
 * What I liked:

It was bland and somewhat dry at times and difficult to focus.
 * What I didn't like:

All information was there!
 * What was missing:

I feel there was some information that repeated itself throughout (choosing good articles vs. bad articles)
 * What was unnecessary:

It was beneficial and informative, however, it did not like how it downloaded to the computer, rather than simply being able to watch and take part online.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sg13vp (talk) 01:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

76.68.71.13 (talk)
...How clear it was and how much I feel like i learned.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing!
 * What was missing:

...Not at all. It was very necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...That was awesome ! Very clear and also fun.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--76.68.71.13 (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Kg13la (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kg13la (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

I give it an 8 MeetingoftheMinds (talk)

 * What I liked:

Clarity Interactive modules WikiPhilosophy ...


 * What I didn't like:

The occasional grammatical error in the advanced pages, and feeling I should not edit these pages. bold link isn't working correctly and, as a result, slips up in the interactive module. It goes to Boldness ...


 * What was missing:

After looking to edit the training page, I realized that I'm not sure if I'll be copy-pasting the current article into the edit field, then making changes, or if it comes up In the edit field automatically and I simply insert my minor edits. Any major changes would go in a sandbox or do we always start with a sandbox edit. ...


 * What was unnecessary:

I believe everything was useful. ...


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Good. But not easy to resume if I navigated away from it. I'm using an iPad- that may account for some lacking functionality. Also, not a technology expert. ... MeetingoftheMinds (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC) --MeetingoftheMinds (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Wd14bt (talk)
... It was a good experience. I did not have idea how to edit Wikipedia and work to improve this page, so now I can say that I can do this. All the process, which explain how to use, are good. Videos help a lot to understand the process and have a clear view the ideas.
 * What I liked:

... Instruction are good although some points such as examples and "Did you know" are a little confusing and unnecessary.
 * What I didn't like:

... Some pictures can be used to illustrate ideas the context, so it can improve understanding the context.
 * What was missing:

...In general all the points are necessary, but some points are more relevant than others.
 * What was unnecessary:

...This exercise is great and very important because the person can practice what he/she has learned, and the same time, she/he review his/her understanding about the context and rewrite if necessary some missing points.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wd14bt (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Vloewen (talk)
Good overview of formatting.
 * What I liked:

The interactive editing tutorial was a bit confusing because I wasn't sure if I'd lose my place or not if I followed it.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * It was helpful to be able to see the sandbox and the instructions on one page rather than switching back and forth
 * Sometimes the tutorial box would be displayed in the wrong place, or carry over onto a separate wiki page that I had open, so this was a bit bothersome

--Vloewen (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Lb13an (talk)
...how it was simple and informative and the videos
 * What I liked:

...the interaction when trying out wikicodes in the editing module
 * What I didn't like:

...I am unsure because I am unfamiliar with editing
 * What was missing:

...the barnstars at the end seemed childish and not useful
 * What was unnecessary:

...I didn't find it useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lb13an (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

1992MC (talk)
I like how they allowed you to try what you learned from what you read.
 * What I liked:

I thought some information wasn't explained to well.
 * What I didn't like:

A little more in depth about citing would be nice.
 * What was missing:

I wasn't a fan of the adventure game.
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked it because you were able to test yourself on what they were explaining.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--1992MC (talk) 02:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Patrick.fagan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Patrick.fagan (talk) 04:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Sunghea Khil (talk)
...
 * What I liked:I liked the interactive tutorial. It made it very practical and hands-on.

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't like how I had to go back or open a new page after looking more into some details and links that was on the tutorial pages.

...
 * What was missing:Maybe a whole writtten summary in the end might be helpful.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It's the most helpful part.

--Sunghea Khil (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Historystudent26 (talk)
...broad perspective on wikipedia from an organisation towards the practical tools
 * What I liked:

...to fast, I think I have to check it multiple times again when I'm going to use wikipedia
 * What I didn't like:

...how you add yourself to a page
 * What was missing:

...most video's
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Historystudent26 (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Bryanmerino94 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The easy navigation

...
 * What I didn't like: Too many steps and very time consuming

...
 * What was missing: The layout needs to be arranged. Information is everywhere.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very Helpful!

--Bryanmerino94 (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Vs12vf (talk)
… I liked how throughout the Wikipedia training there were videos explaining different editing techniques, and facts about Wikipedia that we should remember. The videos helped make the written instructions easier to understand.
 * What I liked:

… Although there was nothing that I did not like about the training, it was very long. If the Wikipedia training was a little more condensed, the training would be perfect!
 * What I didn't like:

… In my opinion, there was nothing missing in this training. The training was very well put together, and it was very thorough leading to a successful training.
 * What was missing:

… In my opinion, there was not one aspect throughout the whole Wikipedia training that was a unnecessary. Every part of the training was useful, and helpful in learning how to effectively edit and use Wikipedia.
 * What was unnecessary:

… I thought it was a very effective way of being able to try the actual editing process. It made me feel more comfortable about what I was learning knowing that I had a chance to try the actual process.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vs12vf (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Emmashavrick (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emmashavrick (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Kb14ie (talk)
...I especially liked the videos showing and explaining exactly how to work some of the things on Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was interesting and helpful! I found that it created great conditions for practicing step by step how to use the tools on Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kb14ie (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

EmilyDuggan96 (talk)
...Everything
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EmilyDuggan96 (talk) 20:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Jc13ex (talk)
In depth help on how to edit and create citations.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jc13ex (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

1992ml (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--1992ml (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Kf14af (talk)
... The video tutorials ... The links didn't work directly from the tutorial. Some regular explanations were long and confusing. ... Nothing ... Too much information on the pillars ... Very helpful --Kf14af (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jessiejohnston07 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Nothing

...
 * What I didn't like: Everything. I think wikipedia is confusing and time consuming.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: the wording and descriptions were to wordy

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It confused me. I didn't know what I was supposed to do. I tried. Maybe I am just not smart enough for it. Wikipedia wins.

--Jessiejohnston07 (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Sp14ud (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sp14ud (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Kh13zl (talk)
...I thought that it was very informative. All the videos were helpful.
 * What I liked:

...I'm feeling a little overwhelmed by all the little tricks I need to learn in order to reference material, cite, add photos, etc. Thankfully, I know that practice makes perfect.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kh13zl (talk) 01:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Otaylor123 (talk)

 * What I liked:

it was interactive ...

...
 * What I didn't like:

it was a lot of reading

...
 * What was missing:

even more interactive activities

...
 * What was unnecessary:

videos that explained what could be simply read on the page

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

it was great and easy to use

--Otaylor123 (talk) 01:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

K. Bautista (talk)
I liked the simplicity of the whole process. I also liked the accompanying videos.
 * What I liked:

I did not find anything I disliked.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing. All the things necessary for basic understanding was included.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked it for the most part although there were a few bugs.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--K. Bautista (talk) 02:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Jm14kq (talk)
...The thoroughness of the orientation.
 * What I liked:

...It was long.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jm14kq (talk) 02:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Ceaseandexist (talk)
... I liked the comprehensive walk-through, the pop-outs, and the videos that accompanied some of the concepts.
 * What I liked:

... There were a few minor glitches, especially in the sandbox feature.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing I can think of. ... Every component seems very helpful, even if I am not ready to put it to use yet. ... '''While buggy, it has the potential to be a great walk-through tool for getting one's 'wiki sea-legs'. ''' --Ceaseandexist (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Pww264 (talk)
The videos
 * What I liked:

How much text there was to read through
 * What I didn't like:

I'm not sure if anything was
 * What was missing:

All of the text
 * What was unnecessary:

I didn't
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pww264 (talk) 02:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Caro.woods95 (talk)
...It was informative.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Caro.woods95 (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Obrugal08 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Obrugal08 (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Kd14hf (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kd14hf (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Jg11pv (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jg11pv (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Deborahlelis (talk)
... The orientation is pretty clear and understandable.
 * What I liked:

...I liked everything
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing was missing
 * What was missing:

...Everything was necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the interactive tutorial but I think it could be improved adding more information on it, because they are pretty short.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deborahlelis (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Rb14kabrock (talk)
...I liked the slides and subtitles of everything, it gave a better understanding
 * What I liked:

...All the editing techniques are very hard to understand but will come with experience
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rb14kabrock (talk) 22:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Ss13zf (talk)
... videos
 * What I liked:

...many pages to click through
 * What I didn't like:

... nothing ...videos
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...laggy
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ss13zf (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hw13na (talk)
It was very organized, easy to follow and kept your place if you needed to come back to it. The videos were also helpful. The module was pretty long and used a ton of new words only pertaining to Wikipedia. It would be nice to have a similar introduction to all the new words and concepts. More pictures. Stuff about being respectful online. Helpful. Gave a great visual.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hw13na (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Ba13qy (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ba13qy (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Mh14wc (talk)
...Went through all of the basics
 * What I liked:

...There was so much information all at once that it is difficult to remember
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mh14wc (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Ek13ld (talk)
... Links to youtube, thorough explainations
 * What I liked:

... Length of training
 * What I didn't like:

... Someone talking me through it would have been more helpful
 * What was missing:

... N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ek13ld (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Zk13be (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Very user friendly and easy to get into, great for a newcomer.

...
 * What I didn't like: Would move alittle too fast at times and had difficulty finding some of the keys to create proper edits.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Hightlight of the tutorial, it was like practicing a math formula you just learned, very helpful and completed the experience.

--Zk13be (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

KL5607445 (talk)
it was very informative
 * What I liked:

some of the tutorials did not work ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

The youtube videos that conatiend no important information
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful but not always working
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KL5607445 (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

As13sx (talk)
...
 * What I liked: This orientation was very informative, providing me with detailed instructions for editing articles. I think the Editing Cheatsheet is a great tool that I can easily access when I need help bolding text, creating bulleted lists and so forth.

...
 * What I didn't like: There is nothing that comes to mind.

...
 * What was missing: Absolutely nothing!

...
 * What was unnecessary: Everything was beneficial for me.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a fantastic way to put what I learned into practice.

--As13sx (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Ak13sn (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ak13sn (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Cnorton1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cnorton1 (talk) 07:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Liu, Y. 90 (talk)
...interactive editing tutorial
 * What I liked:

...Editing tools are more difficult to memorize than policies, yet they have fewer illustrations
 * What I didn't like:

...not enough exercises
 * What was missing:

...the contents of the videos overlap with that of the text
 * What was unnecessary:

...More helpful than just explaining with words
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liu, Y. 90 (talk) 07:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Adrianna Mathis (talk)
... The thorough step-by-step instructions and videos
 * What I liked:

...I liked everything
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I can think of
 * What was missing:

... Nothing was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...Great hands on experience. I think that I may have been a little lost without it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adrianna Mathis (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Sg13bc (talk)
... I really liked all of the spots where we could practice what they were trying to teach us. That way we feel confident about doing it for real. As well all of the videos created a deeper understanding of the content. I also enjoyed how they kept track of our progress as we went through the training.
 * What I liked:

... It was a lot of information all at once.
 * What I didn't like:

more pictures would be nice
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

clicking the arrow every time you had to switch. Making scrolling for sections would have been better

... It was very helpful in understanding how to properly do all of the tasks on wiki
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sg13bc (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Jhf893 (talk)
... I liked how the tutorial went through how to do things step by step.
 * What I liked:

... There was nothing that I didn't like.
 * What I didn't like:

... There was nothing missing.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved it. It really helped me try to understand what I was doing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jhf893 (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Dg14pv (talk)
... That I learned something new that i had never been exposed to before.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I found it to be confusing at first, but helpful over all.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dg14pv (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Kd14hf (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kd14hf (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Deirdre.romer (talk)
...Very in depth about how to use one's own page. Also provided a guideline on the side and went through each step.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It helped me best because now I know how to actually perform these tasks.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deirdre.romer (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Adnotatia (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adnotatia (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

LingAnthNerd (talk)
...
 * What I liked:Fairly easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like:Too many links, things were summarized, but then I had to read about them elsewhere.

...
 * What was missing:More explanations in fewer places.

...
 * What was unnecessary:The numerous links.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--LingAnthNerd (talk) 03:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Ns14cj (talk)
...How to add pictures and how to cite on wiki page
 * What I liked:

...Somewhat repetitive
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ns14cj (talk) 04:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Sachels (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sachels (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Notmrjones (talk)
...The interactive tutorials were helpful
 * What I liked:

...The process seemed a bit complicated
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was helpful to see the process in action
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Notmrjones (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Emily.fisher94 (talk)
... How much detail was included in each of the modules. I also liked how Wikipedia went the extra mile and included additional videos for more help. ... I didn't like the "welcome and introduction" module. ... There could have been a little more detail about the topics that are available to choose from when editing an article. ... The "welcome and introduction" module was a little long and felt unnecessary to me. ... I didn't try it. --Emily.fisher94 (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Annamargit (talk)
It covered all the basics very succinctly.
 * What I liked:

It was fun practicing those skills in my sandbox! Its helps me retain the information when I apply skills instead of passive listening.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Annamargit (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

EricB.UND (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was a very comprehensive look at the basics of Wikipedia.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was slightly verbose and redundant at times.

...
 * What was missing: On screen editing tutorial instead of leaving to a sandbox.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EricB.UND (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Mo14rnn (talk)
I liked how it step by step covered every little detail about how to use wiki
 * What I liked:

too much reading not enough tutorials showing how.
 * What I didn't like:

more tutorials
 * What was missing:

the quote by joseph.
 * What was unnecessary:

did not try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mo14rnn (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Czeer (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Czeer (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Cv14bk (talk)
I liked how the training was laid out step by step outlining a great amount of detail.
 * What I liked:

There was not much I didn't like as it was very informative and helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

I felt it outlined the basics and therefore, I feel nothing was missing.
 * What was missing:

The quote I felt was unnecessary because it wasn't as helpful as the rest of the training and found it to be pointless.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Cv14bk (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Charlimckee (talk)
How clear and concise all of the instructions are.
 * What I liked:

N/A
 * What I didn't like:

Actual direction to the parts needing to be clicked. For example, consider moving the pop-up windows that walk users through different stages to the actual areas they are directing a user to go. This could clarify even more and make it more understandable.
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

It's very helpful to learn by doing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Charlimckee (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Jaxsun (talk)
overall it was fine. ...
 * What I liked:

many pages could be combined, it felt like I had to click unnecessarily to go between pages. keeping all the text in one little box just felt unecessary. some of the information was presented differently/used different nomenclature/etc compared to what was presented in the editing brochure. The brochure by the way was excellent. ...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

it had some issues where it seemingly expected links to go to places they didn't. The bold link took me to the page for Boldness not Emphasis (typography), although the Emphasis page claims that bold should redirect there... ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jaxsun (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

JeheliO (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JeheliO (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Sbernt13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sbernt13 (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Scout37 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was all very good!

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing, it was all good for me.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: I did not try it, I just used another tab on my browser.

--Scout37 (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

TheTurf (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TheTurf (talk) 22:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Chiver620 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chiver620 (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

AEsquibel23 (talk)
... Very informative.
 * What I liked:

... Can't think of any dislikes
 * What I didn't like:

... More video.
 * What was missing:

... Can't think of anything that was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very descriptive.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AEsquibel23 (talk) 04:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Dk802 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dk802 (talk) 04:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Elizabethrivelli (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elizabethrivelli (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Karlfinai (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Karlfinai (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Bryan Wicker (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bryan Wicker (talk) 17:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Jcbjaw12 (talk)
...I liked the follow-along tutorials and how a completed tutorial in the sandbox was rewarded with fireworks sound effects.
 * What I liked:

...I felt like I was receiving too much information at one time.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was very helpful, though I struggled with linking the text for some reason, even though I followed the directions specifically.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jcbjaw12 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Deliirving (talk)
...The video tutorials were very helpful
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Everything seemed very thorough
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...Unfortunately, I wasn't logged on, so I was unable to try the interactive editing tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deliirving (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Kmutley (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kmutley (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Ae482 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: it was simple and concise

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: maybe less videos, they felt repetitive.

...pretty useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ae482 (talk) 02:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Jihyun2p (talk)
... Detailed and specific training was good then.
 * What I liked:

... A little complicated. So it was difficult to understand.
 * What I didn't like:

... More specific example.
 * What was missing:

... It was all necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I think it is more practical than just explain. It was easy to understand.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jihyun2p (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Mccordj (talk)
...informative
 * What I liked:

... not interactive ... nothing ... nothing ...
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mccordj (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Liannahosein (talk)
...
 * What I liked: step by step process

...when I finished tutorial I couldn't find my way back to my training
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...all of this
 * What was unnecessary:

... couldn't find my way back to training --Liannahosein (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

CaityJanelle (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CaityJanelle (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

RekishinoJinrui (talk)
...Breaks things down well, good way to figure out where to start with the site.
 * What I liked:

... I feel like the information having to do with coding could be broken down a bit more in terms of editing.
 * What I didn't like:

...Everything involved seemed important.
 * What was missing:

...nothing. All was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RekishinoJinrui (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Wilson.3308 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:The training was very helpful. Thank you.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wilson.3308 (talk) 00:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Ollin nahui (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ollin nahui (talk) 01:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Lucyinthesky123 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lucyinthesky123 (talk) 03:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikitrishslp (talk)
... the windows with a step by step explanation, and that each window was not too long ... once I clicked on some of the example links, eg. Sandbox, it was not obvious or even possible to get back to the main page, maybe this was part of the glitches mentioned. ... easy examples along the way ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

ok, but not fun, it is not obvious where you have to click, even finding the B for bold.

AVR22 (talk)
...The training and the videos were very informative.
 * What I liked:

...I liked everything.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing was missing from the training.
 * What was missing:

...The username video was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It taught me how to edit quickly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AVR22 (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Bibliophileb (talk)
The interactive editing tool
 * What I liked:

repeated a lot of information from the Wiki handouts
 * What I didn't like:

more examples to illustrate certain points
 * What was missing:

Videos
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful to be able to practise the skills immediately!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bibliophileb (talk) 07:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

TQGrey145 (talk)

 * What I liked:
 * The videos and the interactive tutorials!

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * I loved it all!

...
 * What was missing:
 * Some exercises, I think.

...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Nothing.

...


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * Brilliant!

...

--TQGrey145 (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

KMacClellan (talk)
How laid out everything was.
 * What I liked:

Sometime it was hard to tell what characters are needed to be typed and which ones were just the example.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KMacClellan (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

JuhieAhmed (talk)
interactive module was very helpful
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JuhieAhmed (talk) 18:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Bhongwiki (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

There were example videos to show how exactly to perform certain functions like linking and editing pages.

...
 * What I didn't like:

Some of the instruction pages were edited by other users with their practice edits and that looks less professional.

...
 * What was missing:

N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was useful and interactive, but could have had a smoother flow into the next sections of training.

--Bhongwiki (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Keithpaulmedelis (talk)Thanks, all good. Much to be looked back upon soon.
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Keithpaulmedelis (talk) 23:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Jessiechapman (talk)comments on 'orientation'
...comprehensive
 * What I liked:

...I had trouble navigating back to the tutorial when I clicked on linked words
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not sure, perhaps access to a savable wikicode cheatsheet
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it, and did not encounter any bugs. I enjoyed receiving a 'cookie' at the end.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jessiechapman (talk) 01:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Christina papadopoul (talk)
The interactive editing.
 * What I liked:

The videos, preferred doing the interactive aspects more.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Great, best way to learn Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Christina papadopoul (talk) 03:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

CourtneyStaib (talk)
Interactivity
 * What I liked:

Reading the laws in the beginning
 * What I didn't like:

nothing
 * What was missing:

nothing it was helpful (CourtneyStaib (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)) --CourtneyStaib (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Ilingwiki (talk)First Wiki Experience
... Wikipedia is a very professionally done resource center then I though it was.
 * What I liked:

...As a foreign student, English is not my first language. it took me awhile to read the training program.
 * What I didn't like:

... It's a pretty solid system. no comment on this
 * What was missing:

...none
 * What was unnecessary:

... It's a good way to present its idea and it has clear explanation to help the wiki newbies get their hands on.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ilingwiki (talk) 04:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Dollywei (talk)
...I liked the helpful visual aids.
 * What I liked:

...There wasn't anything that I did not like. Everything was pretty much useful and helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

...I did not notice anything missing.
 * What was missing:

...Maybe the slides that had information that was said in the videos, becomes repetitive.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I have yet to try the interactive editing tutorial. I will go back to it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dollywei (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Bsaf (talk)Completion of orientation
...the help videos showing step by step what to do. Also the extra links.
 * What I liked:

...Not as much general format of links or examples.
 * What I didn't like:

...examples with more than one word.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing that I can think of.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bsaf (talk) 05:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Monica Parisi (talk)
...I liked the tips and how easy it was to navigate while doing the training.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I think it would have been helpful to show more clips, i liked being able to watch how everything worked instead of just reading it and trying to figure it out on my own.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Monica Parisi (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Scrubbing (talk)
... A lot simpler than I expected
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Scrubbing (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Arleneperez (talk)
...What i liked was that the training was filled with details and made it a bit easier to understand.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Arleneperez (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

JohnSZuluaga (talk)
... I enjoyed completing the editing module. Learned many useful tricks on how to edit in Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

... There wasn't really anything in particular I didn't like. The entire orientation was extremely helpful.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I know. It basically touched down on all the key points.
 * What was missing:

... Again I couldn't find anything that I would call unnecessary. This was all newly provided information to me so I wouldn't call anything unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I did not try the tutorial because I did not want to lose my progress, but I'll be sure to go back and try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JohnSZuluaga (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

VSummer (talk)
... How it covered all of my questions.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

... I don't think anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I liked how hands-on it was. It really took you step by step to learn everything which was very helpful. --VSummer (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jsattler07 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The Sandbox tutorials. It was a good "do-it yourself" introduction to editing

...
 * What I didn't like: The basic editing section was a little long. It could be broken into more subsections for users to skip if they feel confident in their abilities.

...
 * What was missing: Maybe a very basic introduction and video to a new user home page and what each link is at the top. It would just be nice to have a general walk through.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Love it!

--Jsattler07 (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

BrandonMitchellOliver (talk)
... I liked the step-by-step process that was easy to follow by navigating with the arrows. I learned a lot from a very well ordered orientation. Thank you!
 * What I liked:

...I couldn't get the videos to work, but that could be due to the lack of tech skills. So I just watched them on YouTube like it said.
 * What I didn't like:

...Honestly I don't think anything was missing, it was a very thorough orientation, and will probably refer back to it while I edit my article
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BrandonMitchellOliver (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Baptiste fassin (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Baptiste fassin (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

1994ms (talk)Answers
... It was very detailed, included examples and picture that really helped. ... I thought there was too much wording. Simpler and more to the point would've been more effective. ... Color. The black and white layout was plan and made me lose a little interest. ... The excessive wording. ... I didn't try it. --1994ms (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Psycschool (talk)
...The information was well stated and easily understood. I enjoyed the video attachments as well as the links to further editing information.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Psycschool (talk) 20:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Clord18 (talk)
... Very clear and well organized ...It will take me a while to get used to the code
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:not much

...
 * What was unnecessary:the video about the edit button

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?very helpful!

--Clord18 (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Bananaschoolbus (talk)
...
 * What I liked: stuff

...
 * What I didn't like: eh

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: eh

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Made it easy to learn

--Bananaschoolbus (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

MusingMollusk (talk)
…Training seemed very well organized, and gave additional information and resources that I can explore later.
 * What I liked:

…The sound quality on the videos was not very good. They were very quiet, and hard to hear.
 * What I didn't like:

…I am still a little confused by sandboxes. More information on exactly where they are and who can see them would be nice.
 * What was missing:

…Everything seemed very relevant.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MusingMollusk (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Katiekelsey (talk)
...There were videos to watch as well
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was great!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Katiekelsey (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Murphyaeliz (talk)
I liked how in depth and detailed it was, and the videos helped clear some things up.
 * What I liked:

It seemed a little dry, but that's probably because I don't learn much by simply reading lots of text.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful for me since I am a visual learner.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Murphyaeliz (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Kellypm94 (talk)
The walk-through/cool interactive tools that led me through editing
 * What I liked:

The modules trying to explain editing without showing it.
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe quotes, the cool side bars, the really advanced stuff.
 * What was missing:

It all helped me, I thought it was all necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I really like the interactive tutorial, because it showed me how to do things rather than try to explain it in a complicated way.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kellypm94 (talk) 01:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Stephvau (talk)
...the explicit explanations on how to use everything.
 * What I liked:

...some editing is very confusing.
 * What I didn't like:

...more examples.
 * What was missing:

...nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stephvau (talk) 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Cnorton1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Found it difficult to go from the interactive editing tutorial back to the Student Tutorial. --Cnorton1 (talk) 03:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Lf480 (talk)
The concise nature of the tutorial===lots of info in a relative .Loved the videos...very helpful..
 * What I liked:ly short amount of time

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was just ok --Lf480 (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of

Spacemansuit (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Spacemansuit (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Rjmcd3010 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that the tutorial was kept concise and easy to understand. It could have portrayed editing Wikipedia as very complicated.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rjmcd3010 (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

A mzungu (talk)
The interactive tutorial portions, they helped guide me through the actual process of editing.
 * What I liked:

The cheesy rewards for each module...
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--A mzungu (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Doddsjennifer (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Doddsjennifer (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

AnatuZeder (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AnatuZeder (talk) 14:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Janevoss (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very approachable for a beginner.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary: There was too much info about choosing articles to edit.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Janevoss (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Lauraelizabeth95 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lauraelizabeth95 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Kfruiz (talk)
... The videos were incredibly informative. ... Long and used words that were somewhat confusing ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... Very long ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kfruiz (talk) 18:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Lauraelizabeth95 (talk)
I liked that we were taught how to do both basic and advanced editing.
 * What I liked:

There is nothing I can think of that I disliked.
 * What I didn't like:

I do not think anything was missing.
 * What was missing:

I thought it was unnecessary for it to take as long as it did.
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lauraelizabeth95 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Jiangw17 (talk)
Interactive editing tutorial, and YouTube video.
 * What I liked:

wiki code.
 * What I didn't like:

Not all the sections have interactive editing tutorial.
 * What was missing:

links that jump to other pages.
 * What was unnecessary:

Great for learning, pick up material a lot faster than reading alone. --Jiangw17 (talk) 18:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Deirdre.romer (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deirdre.romer (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Nnassr (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nnassr (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Mudassarhusain01 (talk)
...FAQ
 * What I liked:

...To be confused
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

... photo of personal user
 * What was unnecessary:

...ok it good. thanks
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mudassarhusain01 (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

1993pg (talk)
it was short
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

nothing it was a great tutorial
 * What was missing:

nothing was missing


 * What was unnecessary:

everything was necessary


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

very cool

--1993pg (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Hansheat (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hansheat (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Zhmurcha (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zhmurcha (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Nadinecross78 (talk)
I enjoyed the tutorials and videos, which illustrated nicely the content described.
 * What I liked:

The first tutorial was a little glitchy (the basic on on editing, bold, and Wikilinking)
 * What I didn't like:

How to find another user's user page (which might be especially helpful for class projects, when a student wants to find the teacher's page or vice versa)
 * What was missing:

Nothing. This was all incredibly useful information.
 * What was unnecessary:

See note above!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nadinecross78 (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)nadinecross78

C2zhaobi (talk)
... the explanation on how to edit bold p, creat links ... nothing ... edit the layout of a page ... nothing is unnecessary ... I cannot open the interactive tutorial on iPad --C2zhaobi (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

EthanBazos (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The ease and straight forward nature of the tutorial

...
 * What I didn't like: I'm a visual learner so text is not the best means of explaining something

...
 * What was missing: More visual or video based explanation.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing, the tutorial in terms of content seems to touch all bases.

Overall good presentation of the skills needed to add an augment different pages. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EthanBazos (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

KurukaNyuki (talk)
I liked the interactive learning experience.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was fun
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KurukaNyuki (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Liuxia26 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liuxia26 (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Spacemansuit (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Spacemansuit (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

1985ap (talk)

 * What I liked: is that is very clear and easy to understand. videos are great source for understanding

...

...
 * What I didn't like:too long

...
 * What was missing: it will be good if one can actually practice on a sample it will be easier to memorize

...
 * What was unnecessary: none

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--1985ap (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Razcam (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Razcam (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Lainov (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Learning about all of the features.

...
 * What I didn't like: Some features probably won't apply to me.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Excessive features

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good.

--Lainov (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Slarrab (talk)
... It was very informative!
 * What I liked:

... I can't move the pop-up windows
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing
 * What was missing:

... Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Slarrab (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Alexisyos (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The Wiki markup cheat sheet was very helpful for covering the formatting of how to get certain markups. I also like that there are multiple ways to ask for help when either picking out topics or needing help in editing. The talk board will be great for discussions and deciding whether to continue on a certain path or veer in another direction.

...
 * What I didn't like: There was not anything that I can say I did not like. It was all rather informative.

...
 * What was missing: I do not believe anything was missing, however I am a first time user.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I tried it but was not able to get it to work.

--Alexisyos (talk) 19:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Durantulaa (talk)Wikipedia Orientation
... What I liked most about the training course was the ample amount of examples used to get points across and videos and pictures to visually show exactly what they meant. ... The only thing I didn't like about the tutorial is that it didn't provide us with enough videos. In every module sectioning, there should have been a video on every other page. ... There were a few images and videos that should've been placed to explain some things more thoroughly. ... The first two slides in the first module was unnecessary because it was more of a common sense thing that didn't require a tutorial. Durantulaa (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC) ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Durantulaa (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

MichelenaOctavia (talk)
...The videos were really helpful. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helped me understand the editing directions.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MichelenaOctavia (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

TortugaEnojada (talk)
...All the basics were laid out for me, leaving me with what I think is enough information to get started.
 * What I liked:

...The tutorials were a bit unhelpful; one of them got screwed up and I had no idea how to get back to where I had been.
 * What I didn't like:

...I have no idea what additional information is needed as I haven't yet started to edit.
 * What was missing:

...Again, I have no idea.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Buggy.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TortugaEnojada (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Mengsun945 (talk)
The translation of Chinese language is helpful and correct.Mengsun945 (talk)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mengsun945 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Jwill74 (talk)
... I liked the tutorials that led me throught the process. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe add more examples ... Nothing, I felt it all was quite helpful ...I liked it alot, found it helpful
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jwill74 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Rmpatel9 (talk)
...I liked that this tutorial is very specfic and gives explanations on how do do the major concepts of Wikipedia
 * What I liked:

... I did not like that the editing styles were on two different pages
 * What I didn't like:

... I think everything that I needed to know was there
 * What was missing:

... I think that some of the information, while nice to know, was unnessacary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought it was easy to use after the tutorial
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rmpatel9 (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Dhechuis (talk)
The orientation was very broad and covered important knowledge and skills needed to properly edit Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

In some areas, I think the orientation was too broad. For example, in the five pillars section, it provided the guidelines, but didn't elaborate very thoroughly.
 * What I didn't like:

Only very specific information that may have been covered in videos anyway.
 * What was missing:

Nothing felt unnecessary. All the information was valuable for editors.
 * What was unnecessary:

I did not try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dhechuis (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

ZangAnqi (talk)Wikipedia is a good place for everyone to learn and research
...Everyone can edit wikipedia and correct it.
 * What I liked:

...Other people may edit what I edit as my favourate part
 * What I didn't like:

...About the copyrighr of pictures
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It is helpful and get to knwo more about Wikepedia
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ZangAnqi (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Shadowbolt7 (talk)
... The step by step guides
 * What I liked:

... Unable to read the guide and edit on the same page without opening a new window
 * What I didn't like:

... I think a full walk through in sandbox mode and editing would be helpful
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was ok though i would have liked it better if you you could have worked/guided is through that for everything.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shadowbolt7 (talk) 23:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

JLebowski94 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JLebowski94 (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Conner Johnson (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Conner Johnson (talk) 02:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Student.richard (talk)

 * What I liked:


 * I liked how videos were provided to accompany text. This made it easy to follow along after reading each section. I also liked how there were interactive editing tutorials.


 * What I didn't like:


 * I did not like how you had to keep manually opening up each link separately (to avoid losing your place in the tutorial).


 * What was missing:


 * I think that more interactive editing tutorials should be added. I would have preferred an interactive tutorial for every section. As well, a potential quiz or review at the end would have been a wonderful learning tool.


 * What was unnecessary:


 * I do not think anything was unnecessary.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?


 * I really appreciated the effort it took to create the interactive editing tutorials. I thought it was a great learning tool to become oriented with Wikipedia as well as with all the tools and services it has to offer. For myself, I thought that these interactive tutorials were more useful than the videos, since they allowed for hands-on practice.

--Student.richard (talk) 02:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Emmaleighrose1992 (talk)
... It was thorough and helped along each step of the way
 * What I liked:

... It was a bit too lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...The social pages
 * What was unnecessary:

...Awesome
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emmaleighrose1992 (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Oksoha (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Interactive

...
 * What I didn't like: one of the links were not working

...
 * What was missing: nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Can't think of anything

... As mentioned earlier, one link wasn't missing
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Oksoha (talk) 04:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

BrandonAndrews (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BrandonAndrews (talk) 04:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Clucomm (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clucomm (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Mattgarv (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mattgarv (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Takemetothebeach (talk)
... I liked that all of the information was broken up into small segments so that I was not overloaded. ... The only thing that I didn't like was how long it took, but I understand that this is a long and in depth process and that it needs to be taken seriously. ... I don't believe that there was anything missing. ... I do not believe that there was any information that I did not find helpful. ... I liked the interactive editing tutorial because it was like having someone with you to personally walk you through everything. --Takemetothebeach (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

AlliH14 (talk)
... I liked how in-depth the training was, and how a large range of topics was covered. The tutorial videos were also very helpful. ... Though the training was helpful, it was too long and comprehensive for new users like myself.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Everything seemed right to me.
 * What was missing:

... Perhaps all of the video tutorials, maybe edit some out.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AlliH14 (talk) 08:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Icekubes17 (talk)
...it was easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Icekubes17 (talk) 16:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Amcook14 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The videos

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What was missing: Have a create an account section

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amcook14 (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Thewitt1 (talk)
The information given in the orientation was very detailed and helpful.
 * What I liked:

Alot of pages, maybe too much information for a beginner.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

Some of the shorter pages/slides with little information.
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Thewitt1 (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Sgipson13 (talk)
...I liked the interactive training
 * What I liked:

...I wish there were more videos
 * What I didn't like:

...When the training doesn't allow you to go to other pages.
 * What was missing:

...Nothing comes to mind
 * What was unnecessary:

...I wish the graphics looked better, but nothing else.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sgipson13 (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Dionnecoe (talk)
... The way each module was explainedDionnecoe (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dionnecoe (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Waleed Shahid1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Very helpful --Waleed Shahid1 (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Sjensen3 (talk)
... very helpful!!
 * What I liked:

...long though
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...loved it!!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sjensen3 (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Sarahmey (talk)
I have a much better understanding of the requirements and the ways to edit articles.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

Nothing.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarahmey (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

AtlasCaproni (talk)
Straightforward
 * What I liked:

Interactive bits were buggy
 * What I didn't like:

Finished interactive bits
 * What was missing:

Not much; fairly brief
 * What was unnecessary:

A little buggy, I found the regular, non interactive tutorial better. I think it has potential though!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AtlasCaproni (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Brendanguyen5 (talk)
...the videos were very helpful and the interactive tutorials.
 * What I liked:

...was how the sections were subdivided, there should have been a more specific title than advanced section.
 * What I didn't like:

...a pdf version of the instructions for editing features for future reference.
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was great and really solidified learning.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brendanguyen5 (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:831C:8920:6C09:F009:B546:AB32 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--2602:306:831C:8920:6C09:F009:B546:AB32 (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hansenr11 (talk)
…Videos
 * What I liked:

…Links were overwhelming
 * What I didn't like:

… I was confused with where to find links to stubs that needed editing
 * What was missing:

… Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

… I needed more practice but the tutorial was fine.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hansenr11 (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Stedesivank (talk)
...Easy to understand, good description, straight forward
 * What I liked:

...on the long side
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Good tool
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stedesivank (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Anika.sikder (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Informative

...
 * What I didn't like: Interactive tutorial

...
 * What was missing: More reinforcement

...
 * What was unnecessary: Everything was fine

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Still needs working on

--Anika.sikder (talk) 17:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Seanaleys (talk)
... the youtube videos were helpful in showing how to use wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Seanaleys (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

DiSchamelrider (talk)
...
 * What I liked: easy to work with

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing

...
 * What was missing: more detailed editing

...
 * What was unnecessary: nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? enjoyable

--DiSchamelrider (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Cjkeen (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helped me put what I read into practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cjkeen (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Kunselman304 (talk)
… The interactive edits were very useful. I felt like I was able to get a better handle on the editing process than if I just read how to do it.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

…I thought the pop up screens helped me navigate the page more effectively
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kunselman304 (talk) 21:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Tbritvan (talk)
...It was very informative.
 * What I liked:

...It was a little longer than I would've desired.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I'm aware of.
 * What was missing:

...Some of the information was unnecessarily long.
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tbritvan (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Christina Dailey (talk)
...I liked the interactive tutorial of the basic mechanics to try editing myself.
 * What I liked:

...The length and extra details added in.
 * What I didn't like:

...A simplified version of the information. A helpful tool to remind me of the features when editing in the future.
 * What was missing:

...Extra details and the time it took to complete the tutorial.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked how helpful the interactive editing tools were, and how easy they were to understand.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Christina Dailey (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Aasthak (talk)
...Answered most questions & was interactive.
 * What I liked:

...Lengthy/redundant in certain parts.
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...Redundancies about the four tildes.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aasthak (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Jmil226 (talk)
... Knowing about the helpful links for getting started. Jmil226 (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmil226 (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Jo v 123 (talk)
...very easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...sometimes very dull
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I really liked it, it was very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jo v 123 (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Hdewey (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hdewey (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Henry150 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Henry150 (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Ilingwiki (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ilingwiki (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Lilitiana (talk)
It is very imformative. It allows you to practice just after learning it, which is the best way to learn something.
 * What I liked:

I wasn't ineterested in some of the things.
 * What I didn't like:

Some sections didn't have a 'practice' or a video to make them more clear.
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

It was awesome! A very good invention.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lilitiana (talk) 01:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Lindsey Mangus (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lindsey Mangus (talk) 01:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

204.19.244.2 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--204.19.244.2 (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Kipet15 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kipet15 (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

JlaingIII (talk)
... The fact that there was an interactive component to the instructions
 * What I liked:

... Took a while to read through everything
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing
 * What was missing:

... Some of the instructional videos
 * What was unnecessary:

... Most helpful part about the training, great way to start getting familiar with wikipedia --JlaingIII (talk) 06:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Scowan3 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked how it was simple, yet informative.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good but I would have been easier if the tutorial opened in a new window automatically.

--Scowan3 (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Mvfarrell (talk)
I liked the videos and interactive tours. They were really helpful. ...
 * What I liked:

Maybe some more specifics on referencing. Some parts of the video were unclear where info was just copy and pasted and I wasn't sure where it came from. ...
 * What I didn't like:

Maybe more interactive videos. ...
 * What was missing:

Mostly everything was necessary. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

I really found it helpful. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mvfarrell (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

24.216.69.89 (talk)
How helpful it was
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--24.216.69.89 (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

LongliveJoy (talk)Wiki Feedback
... I liked how the tutorial takes you step-by-step through getting started. ... I would like a page that is dedicated to familiarizing the new "wikipedian" with Wikicode. There were only a few basic codes and I would like to know more. ... Like the previously stated, it needs a more in-depth Wikicode guide. ... Common courtesy was overstated. I understand that Wikipedia is edited by people and people can be cruel, but it was overkill. ... It was nice that each step was right there and you could get a feel for editing right away. --LongliveJoy (talk) 19:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

KoreanThunder17 (talk)
...I think that is was a very helpful guide and showed a very basic guide to what to expect for editors of the site
 * What I liked:

...Nothing really
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KoreanThunder17 (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Sean McKnight (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sean McKnight (talk) 00:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Secahill (talk)
...interactive module
 * What I liked:

...code
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...nice
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Secahill (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Kmarc94 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kmarc94 (talk) 01:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

THENEXTLEVEL94 (talk)
...It showed me how to edit things on Wikipedia and did it at a very nice pace
 * What I liked:

...no complaints really, overall it went pretty well
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...the last couple of pages in module 4
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--THENEXTLEVEL94 (talk) 03:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

165.134.208.184 (talk)
...short pages of the module
 * What I liked:

...pretty extensive for an intro
 * What I didn't like:

...summary page of what's crucial to know
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--165.134.208.184 (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Manaiaperese41 (talk)
... learning how to write and edit statements ... i didn't like the reading it ... nothing was missing in my opinion ... nothing really ... its good. it shows me how to really do it and walk me through step by step --Manaiaperese41 (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Lohlin (talk)
I liked all of the tutorial videos, and how they coincided nicely with the written text.
 * What I liked:

I did not like the hands-on tutorials. They did not work for me and I felt like I was being rushed.
 * What I didn't like:

If there was a spot where we were shown how to d something, then had to actually do it (for the more difficult tasks), I feel that could be helpful.
 * What was missing:

Some of the extra links. They were distracting on the pages.
 * What was unnecessary:

They didn't work well for me.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lohlin (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Larharmon (talk)
...I enjoyed the interactive tutorials.
 * What I liked:

...The videos didn't have as much information about the topics as they could have.
 * What I didn't like:

...I wish there were more interactive tutorials.
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...I enjoyed it, and think it could be expanded to encompass more of the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Larharmon (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Aputulyan (talk)
... informative ... it was long ... nothing ... nothing ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aputulyan (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

TroastH (talk)
...The text and videos were very easy to follow and understand.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The interactive editing tutorial was great. It was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TroastH (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Wendyxie99 (talk)
Concise, informative and very helpful starter tutorial
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Aside from the few glitches that I encountered, it was tremendously useful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wendyxie99 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Btrentin (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Btrentin (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Anaff91 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anaff91 (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Jjl1515 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that it was short with not a lot of reading.

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't find it helpful. After completing the training I still have no idea on how to do anything on Wikipedia!! Also, when I tried to do the training for editing I couldn't get back to the actual training. I had to exit out and go back in to get to the training modules.

...
 * What was missing: Basic explanations from the beginning.

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Terrible, thats what got me messed up and I had to exit out just to get back to the module.

--Jjl1515 (talk) 17:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

DmccarthyUMASS (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DmccarthyUMASS (talk) 20:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

JillSutton12 (talk)
...I liked that it was a step by step process and that it was easy to follow along.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like when it brought me to a new page and then I lost my spot
 * What I didn't like:

...I didn't think anything was missing
 * What was missing:

...Everything sounded necessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...I thought that the interactive editing tutorial helped me a lot. It really showed step by step guidance and made the orientation go by a lot smoother
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JillSutton12 (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Jboyar9 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jboyar9 (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Jwade3910 (talk)
That the orientation answered all the questions I had going into it.
 * What I liked:

It was a little long.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing
 * What was missing:

Some of the parts at the end.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

It was very helpful. --Jwade3910 (talk) 00:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Isabel Sarah Mitchell (talk)
... I liked that the information was concise yet very in depth
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Isabel Sarah Mitchell (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Phoebepoonn (talk)
...it is clear with the video tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Phoebepoonn (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

KBrajkovic (talk)

 * What I liked:

...Simple step by step process of the basics. I liked the videos and being able to practice in the sandbox

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KBrajkovic (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Andrew.Bechtold (talk)
...the detail
 * What I liked:

...how long it was
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...the long depth
 * What was unnecessary:

...how it helped me get an even better understanding --Andrew.Bechtold (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Stedesivank (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stedesivank (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Mayooran.athithan (talk)
... very informative ... to many codes and symbols ... videos ... symbols and codes ... very informative and it helped me as a university student learn a new program --Mayooran.athithan (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jfeight (talk)
…Brief and to the point, yet educational.
 * What I liked:

…Confusing interactive widgits
 * What I didn't like:

…N/A
 * What was missing:

…N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

…confusing, a little misleading…should have a sort of "grading" component that tells you if you have completed the task correctly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jfeight (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Liamqc (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liamqc (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Clavaden (talk)
... It was interactive
 * What I liked:

... Would have liked more hands on tutorial or videos
 * What I didn't like:

... Visual aids
 * What was missing:

... Choosing a topic
 * What was unnecessary:

... Should be more relatable to a topic
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Clavaden (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Pnwkev (talk)
Great overview of editing! I was interested in working on some articles before I even signed up for this class, but now I'm even more motivated to do so and feel like I have the knowledge to start with a basic article.
 * What I liked:

The pop-up guide didn't always work when I opened a link in a new window. But I was able to go back and figure most of it out.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

No issues that I saw.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pnwkev (talk) 23:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Halbero (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Halbero (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Casinobrawl (talk)
I liked the editing tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

I think the editing tutorial was very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Casinobrawl (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Bryantch12 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:I liked the interactive modules that let you walk through it without any penalties

...
 * What I didn't like: there wasnt anything that I didnt really like

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/A

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was really helpful more so than reading everything and just sitting here

--Bryantch12 (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

DominicRHocutt (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The interactive tutorials.

...
 * What I didn't like: The lack of open in new tab features for tutorials.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing, from what I can tell.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The extra lines in interactive tutorials

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a good teaching tool but it needs more flexibility to teach better.

--DominicRHocutt (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Natker (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Natker (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Mfate87 (talk)
... being able to do practice edits in the basic editing section. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

... Being able to practice advanced editing in the advanced editing section ... Some of the tutorial videos. I prefer interactive practice. ... This was the most helpful section for me.
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mfate87 (talk) 20:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Menyenangkan (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The writing style was clear, easy to read, helpful, and at times, aptly amusing.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Menyenangkan (talk) 21:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

208.186.43.98 (talk)
...It was laid out very well and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--208.186.43.98 (talk) 23:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Liamqc (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Liamqc (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Yoginih (talk)
...This was a great overview. I learned a lot.
 * What I liked:

...The section on adding references was a little unclear - I had to go through that one twice to understand.
 * What I didn't like:

...I'm not sure yet!
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yoginih (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Jovanme (talk)
It was very streamlined and clear
 * What I liked:

There is a broken link when you do the first interactive sandbox tutorial. It doesn't take you back to the training
 * What I didn't like:

Adding images should be moved to the beginning editing section
 * What was missing:

It all seemed relevant
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked the videos that accompany the editing text
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jovanme (talk) 03:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

FeedbackYaeRamKim (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very informative.

...
 * What I didn't like: It was a little lengthy and repetitive.

...
 * What was missing: Video tutorials.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very helpful and straight forward.

--YaeRamKim (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

YaeRamKim (talk)

Kareagan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:Explained a lot of the legitimacy that wikipedia offers

...
 * What I didn't like: I'm not ready to make any edits yet and will have to review the basic and advanced instructions again when I'm ready.

...
 * What was missing: I don't know enough to know what's missing yet.

...
 * What was unnecessary: All was relevant

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try any of it since I will review them when I'm closer to editing.

--Kareagan (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Cameronpage25 (talk)
... I did it twice so I guess I learned a little more the second time.
 * What I liked:

... That I had to do it twice.
 * What I didn't like:

... I have no idea.
 * What was missing:

... I don't know.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was pretty straight forward and simplified. Cameronpage25 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cameronpage25 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Mushpatatas (talk)
The videos demonstrating the processes
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

more demo videos, maybe?
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mushpatatas (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Gyrodrew (talk)
...Interactive tutorial is a thoughtful way of teaching.
 * What I liked:

...Could summarize the orientation in a few slides.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful, Efficient
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gyrodrew (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Riverajoel (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Riverajoel (talk) 18:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

wikipedia orientation for COM 482
... I like all the video, it is pretty cool.
 * What I liked:

... To much information, but good detail.
 * What I didn't like:

... Not sure, what I miss.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was ok.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rabbit white (talk) 22:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Tingsonn (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

… The interactive editing tutorials were an easy-to-follow, modern way to learn how to use Wikipedia. I believe that the easiest way to learn how to do something is by following along. The interactive tutorials did just that! I also found the youtube videos to be extremely helpful. Overall, this orientation was a great way to learn how to use Wikipedia.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tingsonn (talk) 23:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Tingsonn, 09-26-2014;7:06PM

Hhhzzzani (talk)

 * What I liked:
 * The structure is clear and navigation is easy.
 * Text is easily understandable.
 * Videos are great and include subtitles.
 * The Interactive editing tutorials are helpful option.
 * The feature that displays the current page out of the total pages in that section is helpful.

I like everything about it. However, some of the pages included test edits by new Wikipedians (mistakes) which made the pages confusing. Some of these edits were not corrected for months. In order to clean those pages, I did undo some changes on one page and reverted another page.
 * What I didn't like:

It was complete.
 * What was missing:

There is nothing notably unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * I like how it is offered as an option since not everyone will need it.
 * I find it very useful that it continues in a new browser tab, and that you can move back and forward through the interactive tutorial. Because it does not disappear if you mistakenly go to another page (not page specific), you can go back to the previous page and continue the tutorial.

--Hhhzzzani (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Kewall27 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Great training! Good examples and very clear instructions. I liked the additional links provided to access more detailed information.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kewall27 (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

98.232.42.216 (talk)
helpful
 * What I liked:

too much text, maybe use bullet points
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--98.232.42.216 (talk) 23:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Elyriz (talk)
The interactive sandbox tutorial was very help. Things are better understand when you actively do them.
 * What I liked:

I found some points to be redundant.
 * What I didn't like:

More interactive tutorials. A tutorial on navigating around all of wikepedia (not just sandbox) would be helpful.
 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive tutorial was very helpful. It is much easier to learn and remember things when you are actively doing them and someone is there to help you. --Elyriz (talk) 23:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

JasminePrincess (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Interactive editing lessons every now and then.

...
 * What I didn't like: It took quite a long time.

...
 * What was missing: More pictures would be nice. I like visual aids.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The videos on the side.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It really helps. I highly recommend it.

--JasminePrincess (talk) 23:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Checapili (talk)
The tutormal was very straight forward, it was easy to grasp and start the hands on training.
 * What I liked:

There wasn't anything I didn't like, I understood the editing process and working within the sandbox.
 * What I didn't like:

--Checapili (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Jonylight (talk)
... Nice and well organized, easy to follow
 * What I liked:

... coding is hard ... nothing that I am aware of. ... Nothing ... Did not used it --Jonylight (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jetstreamjenn (talk)
...I liked that there were visual tutorials
 * What I liked:

...nothing!
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jetstreamjenn (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Thiessen (talk)
... I thought the orientation was quite clear and simple to follow. The use of text, images and multimedia is excellent in that it covers the wide range of learning paths. Thoroughly enjoyed it!
 * What I liked:

...Apparently my browser could not view the image on the page. I had to continually view in YouTube format, but, it was manageable and hitting the back arrow to get back to the tutorial was simple.
 * What I didn't like:

...I cannot think of anything now... once I am a superstar wikipedian, I am quite positive I will have commentary. :-)
 * What was missing:

... Not sure... the topics flowed and it appeared to cover the basics.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked quite well for me. I was able to produce the correct page easily.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Andrew Thiessen (talk) 01:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Aidaja12 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...the interactive editing was the most helpful for me
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aidaja12 (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Jmarieg08 (talk)
... Very informative ... Kind of a lot of information, and felt a little overwhelmed but I think I'll have to go through the training again for future projects. ... I think everything was there and helpful ... N/a ... I made my own account and just tried everything there, instead of what I think was the interactive tutorial --Jmarieg08 (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Jswcp2015 (talk)
...Links to videos, they seemed like they would be a helpful reference if I ever needed review.
 * What I liked:

...A lot of links, but what else can you do?
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was a very good step by step guide to edit, pretty helpful. Jswcp2015 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jswcp2015 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

KEGrowdon (talk)KEGrowdon feedback on editing Wikipedia training
...The writing and video instruction was clear and concise. The tone was positive and encouraging.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

PaulaBalondo (talk)
...It was very informative and straight to the point.
 * What I liked:

...Some things were repetitive.
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...The video repeated everything that was already said, although it was more helpful when seen visually.
 * What was unnecessary:

...It became easier when doing it rather than just reading/watching it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

PaulaBalondo (talk) 00:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Ianmills93 (talk)
...It was very clear and informative towards what I will be doing.
 * What I liked:

...Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing comes to mind.
 * What was missing:

...Repetition, but I guess it was to help remind us of what was just said.
 * What was unnecessary:

...Didn't try.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ianmills93 (talk) 00:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

wiki training for students feedback Zoebloom (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was very clear and to the point. I have a lot of information now that will be helpful in my college course.

...
 * What I didn't like: hard to say, it was very helpful

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zoebloom (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Xxdboixx (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xxdboixx (talk) 04:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Deanbakeberg (talk)
...I liked that I was informed on how to use good manners on wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...Seems more confusing that it should be
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing from what I can tell
 * What was missing:

...Don't know
 * What was unnecessary:

...I got confused
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deanbakeberg (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

2601:6:3F80:683:DD05:123F:33DC:708D (talk)
informative
 * What I liked:

too long
 * What I didn't like:

examples
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

sandbox stuff is nice
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--2601:6:3F80:683:DD05:123F:33DC:708D (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

my feedback
informative
 * What I liked:

too lengthy
 * What I didn't like:

article examples
 * What was missing:

nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

sandbox hands on stuff is crucial
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hwan18 (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Brendanguyen5 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Brendanguyen5 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Nwallenb (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nwallenb (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

KateNegley (talk)

 * What I liked:

I liked how user friendly it was. It was a very linear presentation that was easy to move through and understand. I also liked the badges of accomplishment.


 * What I didn't like:

Sometimes reading a page like a stub page or a list of requested articles, it was hard for me to figure out what I was looking at. I really needed to study the text to know what it was.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

I did prefer the game over the tutorial/training just because of the fun element. :)

KateNegley (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Jk1618 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jk1618 (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Nkavish (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nkavish (talk) 19:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

BUKNAE (talk)
I really liked the demonstration videos. I'm a visual learner, so it helped me remember certain steps.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BUKNAE (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Alexateo (talk)
...It was thorough.
 * What I liked:

...It was boring and at times tedious
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...That was the best part, the whole thing should be like that.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alexateo (talk) 05:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

SleeepyD (talk)
...I liked the hands on exercises.
 * What I liked:

...It was confusing to complete without getting drawn off course.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing that I could tell.
 * What was missing:

...I found all of it pretty necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I am a big fan.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SleeepyD (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Samantha M Kennedy (talk)
... videos
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Samantha M Kennedy (talk) 02:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Rabbit white (talk) Wiki train for com 482
... I liked all the video that describe the detail
 * What I liked:

... I didn't like that the training was too long.
 * What I didn't like:

... I hope I didn't miss anything. Some of the link highlight in blue, I skipped some.
 * What was missing:

... not sure.
 * What was unnecessary:

... The tutorial was good, but just need to have some more step for the tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rabbit white (talk) 21:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Rabbit white (Linh Le)

SamiraDF (talk)
detailed information and how serious is this work
 * What I liked:

too much information in short time, it is sort of complicated guideline
 * What I didn't like:

I don't know
 * What was missing:

More assignments ...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SamiraDF (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia Editing Training
It was really useful to know how I will edit the Wikipedia page. Also, I like the videos explaining the process of editing. While watching them, I could practice editing using sandbox tutorial.
 * What I liked:

Nothing.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing.
 * What was missing:

No. Everything seemed to be necessary and useful to know.
 * What was unnecessary:

I tried the sandbox tutorial while watching the videos. It was awesome and very effective to follow and remember the process.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sh1208 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Cbazinet (talk)
...It was easy to follow
 * What I liked:

...coding like this is not what I'm used to
 * What I didn't like:

...a little more in depth about the template/picture formatting
 * What was missing:

...Nothing, everything was helpful
 * What was unnecessary:

...A+ great
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cbazinet (talk) 13:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Nhullus (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nhullus (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Ra13chelli (talk)
I like the coding examples which taught me how to do anything from basic bolding to inputting images.
 * What I liked:

Seemed biased towards the idea that I wouldn't know anything about editing at all.
 * What I didn't like:

I feel like there should be more emphasis on coding for edits.
 * What was missing:

I'm not sure that people need to be encouraged to give others "wikilove".
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ra13chelli (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Alex Redding (talk)
... How simple it was to follow ... the videos were repetitive ... ... ... The videos ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alex Redding (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Shoelace453 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Shoelace453 (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Lexiconjuration (talk)
...
 * What I liked:It was fairly simple and easy to understand.

...
 * What I didn't like:I did not feel like it being split into so many parts helped at all.

...
 * What was missing:Nothing that I could see.

...
 * What was unnecessary:Nothing that I could see.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lexiconjuration (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Rcannon2 (talk)
Explanatory and easy to understand
 * What I liked:

Slightly overwhelming, not sure where to go from here. Might have to read more than once.
 * What I didn't like:

Link to sandbox didn't work?
 * What was missing:

Extra introductions or "congratulations" pages just get to the point of it straight away in a tutorial.
 * What was unnecessary:

Have not tried yet. Might need to re-read tutorial again before that.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rcannon2 (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

GraLimon (talk)Completion of the Wikipedia OrientationGraLimon (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--GraLimon (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Kielyk77 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: very informative

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kielyk77 (talk) 19:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Bmgibbs (talk)
...There was a lot of good information and it was easily explained to someone who has no idea how to do coding.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It didn't really work for me.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bmgibbs (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Pjplummer (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Pjplummer (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Historygirl31 (talk)
... I liked that the tutorial gave complete information on the basics of formatting for edits and that it talked about proper etiquette for users.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Historygirl31 (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Yibo719 (talk)
...the process of editing the Wiki page
 * What I liked:

...video doesn't work on my device
 * What I didn't like:

...how to change the contents' color/ highlight
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...it might take a few time to practice due to amont of details
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yibo719 (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Adaar117 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Very clear.

...
 * What I didn't like: Tutorials didn't work.

...
 * What was missing: I can't think of anything.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing in particular.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Adaar117 (talk) 22:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Bananasae (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bananasae (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Graciehope (talk)Training FeedbackGraciehope (talk)
...very straightforward, and quick to get through
 * What I liked:

...not sure if I'll remember the technical wikicode in the future, so constant reference to that would be awesome
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...the video about how to edit. I get that that the point was to show how easy editing an article was, but because it is so simple, I didn't see the point of a video for it
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Graciehope (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Nlb329 (talk)Feedback
... How easy the code is once you put it to use ... Nothing ... Nothing ... Nothing ... Worked fine for me --Nlb329 (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Nerd648 (talk)
I enjoyed the videos being paired with text since it accommodates for different learning styles...
 * What I liked:

I didn't like how all the information was put on tiny individual pages...
 * What I didn't like:

I couldn't get most of the interactive tutorials to work...
 * What was missing:

There seemed to be an excessive number of pages. Most of the information could be placed on the same page...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nerd648 (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Andrew.blackowiak (talk)
... The presentation was simple/easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...The amount of content was rather daunting, but that's to be expected.
 * What I didn't like:

...An expansive, hands-on tutorial for editing full pages and their subsections would be helpful IMO
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The tool was a little confusing at first. After accessing my sandbox, the tutorial would not begin until I reloaded the page.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Andrew.blackowiak (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

KelCP (talk)
... The training was very simple and easily understood. I liked how it did not drag on and kept my focus. ... Nothing, the training was extremely fluid and basic. ... Nothing that I saw. ... Everything was needed, or at least recommended knowledge. Not much was superfluous ... We are learning web design and coding in some of my other courses. This was relatable and interesting. --KelCP (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

KriGod110 (talk)Thank you
...Was very helpful and informative
 * What I liked:

...Was that it kind of stressed me out more with all the coding but the videos helped with that
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing all good
 * What was missing:

...Nothing all good
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KriGod110 (talk) 17:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)KriGod110

James.Travaglini (talk)
... It's cool to be able to edit and use a resource I use daily. ... Wikicode seems a bit confusing, but I'll get a hang of it. ... Nothing. ... Nothing. ... It was a cool way to learn the software. --James.Travaglini (talk) 22:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

RachelNCF (talk)
... helpful with the basic functions
 * What I liked:

... some lengthy portions
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--RachelNCF (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Davis2018 (talk)
...I liked the way that it went step by step and had different tutorial videos through out the modules.
 * What I liked:

...I wished that it had more interactive parts when going through something new, instead of having to open a new tab to go to your sandbox. I am a visual learner and it would help me catch on quicker if it had something interactive.
 * What I didn't like:

...The interactive parts were the only things that I though was missing.
 * What was missing:

...I feel it could have been shortened and not been so lengthy.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Davis2018 (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)davis2018

Rreth (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rreth (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Yvaeth (talk)
... For the most part, this was a helpful tutorial. ... ... A permanent link to the list of editing resources (a bit over halfway through the tutorial, I believe) would be convenient for future reference. Transcripts of the YouTube videos would also be welcome. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... I couldn't get the interactive tutorial to load on Chrome, but the idea is a good one. --Yvaeth (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Meeshell645 (talk)
...the videos. They helped make the explanations of editing and such more clear.
 * What I liked:

...the fact that there were also written explanations of things when there was a video that explained the same thing.
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing I can think of right now.
 * What was missing:

...the written explanations when there was already a video.
 * What was unnecessary:

...it didn't work on my computer.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Meeshell645 (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Informative OrientationRisqueraiche (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that it went through many of the different kinds of edits and that it explained that Wikipedia is not a dictionary or anything like that, but instead purely an encyclopedia.

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't like how long it was to read. I would much rather watch a video diagramming all of it.

...
 * What was missing: I can't think of anything off the top of my head that was missing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I thought it was all useful.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was an awesome way to help engrain how to do various things on the website. It was great practice.

--Risqueraiche (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Alexandra.eich (talk)training feedback
... the short informative videos ... the 3rd module was too long and wasn't "to the point" ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I tried to use it but the page didn't open --Alexandra.eich (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Emmak96 (talk)
... The training session was concisely worded and very informative.
 * What I liked:

... The interactive training tools would not operate on my system, rendering them useless to me. I very much wish that I could have used them.
 * What I didn't like:

... I still have many questions about how to format headings and subheadings.
 * What was missing:

... Often, the video components could have replaced the text components and vice versa.
 * What was unnecessary:

... It did not work on my system.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Emmak96 (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Tjt597 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tjt597 (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Safeldma (talk)
...
 * What I liked: very straightforward approach, easy to understand

...
 * What I didn't like: Sandbox editing link didn't work

...
 * What was missing: N/A

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Safeldma (talk) 19:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Ravenzoo (talk)
...
 * What I liked: very informative

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing: Sandbox orientation was not working

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? didn't work

--Ravenzoo (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Flightless13wings (talk)
... Orientation was informative and straight forward. ... Orientation had too much depth for a beginner to use without more visualization or interactive functions. ... More visualizations and interactive functions could have been incorporated. ... Nothing was unnecessary. More information is always better to familiarize students that want to be very active in editing wiki pages. ... I thought that it was very easy to follow and informative. --Flightless13wings (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Albrch (talk)
...the power of editing is pretty cool
 * What I liked:

...its hard to keep up with all the codes and symbols
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Albrch (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Wayneblue (talk)
...easy to use, good flow of information
 * What I liked:

...the seemingly limiting recommendations for choosing an article.
 * What I didn't like:

...i don't know
 * What was missing:

...Extensive information on choosing an article
 * What was unnecessary:

...I enjoy the process and admire the simplicity.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wayneblue (talk) 22:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Noirowoze (talk)
Very thorough.
 * What I liked:

N/A
 * What I didn't like:

N/A
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

Helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Noirowoze (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:CE91:2600:E6CE:8FFF:FE2A:4714 (talk)

 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--2602:306:CE91:2600:E6CE:8FFF:FE2A:4714 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Wolfpad4 (talk)
... Concise and informative. The videos were helpful for illustration. ... The interactive tutorials did not work with Mozilla. ... Nothing I can think of. ... All information provided seemed pertinent. ... I couldn't use it due to the browser or incompatibility with Java/Javascript. --Wolfpad4 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kramer121
...
 * What I liked: The thoroughness of educating a potential Wikipedia editor, identifying how to participate correctly, and freely.

...
 * What I didn't like: n/a

...
 * What was missing: n/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: n/a

... n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kramer121 (talk) 05:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Karaerickson (talk)
... super helpful! Cant think of anything negative or useless!
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Karaerickson (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Dpboyer (talk)Training Feedback
...
 * What I liked: I liked the way the videos explained some of the instructions. Overall, I think it was helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: I think some of the instructions on how to edit Wikipedia was a little confusing and could use more clarification.

...
 * What was missing: I would have liked to see more videos on how to create headings and maybe a table of context. I am a visual leaner, so videos really help me and so in regards to me I would have appreciate a more visual tutorial.

...
 * What was unnecessary: I think that the pages were fine. Some of the pages that were like little comments probably weren't really necessary, but to someone else they might have been.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: I liked and found it very helpful, but I would have liked for it to do a very more examples.

--Dpboyer (talk) 06:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Tgrider23 (talk)
... The tutorial was very straightforward and easy to follow. ... It could have been shorter and emphasized the more important points. ... N/A ... Some of the comparing and contrasting of good and bad (pages to edit for example) seemed unnecessary at times. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tgrider23 (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Saferrin (talk)
-Videos; Bullet Point Lists
 * What I liked:

-Everything was great!
 * What I didn't like:

--Saferrin (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Dillon-robertson (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dillon-robertson (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Handsanitizer123 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Handsanitizer123 (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

KD1004 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KD1004 (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Trickwik22 (talk)
...Great format
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Trickwik22 (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

TasneemE (talk)
...Very detailed and thorough tutorial.
 * What I liked:

...I'm worried I won't remember everything; such as how to bold, use the sandbox, link to articles, and other necessary "shortcuts."
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...I'm doing this for a class, so I really only needed to know how to edit an article.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TasneemE (talk) 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

SavanahNicole (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SavanahNicole (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Jgb343 (talk)
...I learned about the editing and citing aspects of wikipedia
 * What I liked:

...nothing i didn't like
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jgb343 (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Ashley M. W.
...It was very straightforward and to the point
 * What I liked:

...It was a dry read
 * What I didn't like:

...Some commonly asked questions would have been nice to have
 * What was missing:

...Everything was nescessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ashley M. W. 21:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Jms457 (talk)
...It was straightforward, and the videos helped a lot.
 * What I liked:

...There was a lot of information that I know I won't be able to remember correctly.
 * What I didn't like:

...Simple practice sessions
 * What was missing:

...Not much.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jms457 (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Aciurcina (talk)
Very helpful, clear, concise! Great community
 * What I liked:

Tutorial video audio would echo or lag as another audio layer underneath
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Really helpful!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aciurcina (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

164.107.47.208 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--164.107.47.208 (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Run desdemona (talk)
I liked the videos, and especially that they had subtitles to help with verbal comprehension.
 * What I liked:

Nothing I can think of :)
 * What I didn't like:

Again, nothing I can think of.
 * What was missing:

Nada!
 * What was unnecessary:

I liked it, it was pretty useful, taught me the basics, and since it was just a tutorial, it didn't come with the anxiety of being a first time editor on something real.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Run desdemona (talk) 17:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Elk234 (talk)
...It was helpful and interactive
 * What I liked:

...It was long
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was well done
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Elk234 (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

MediSyntax (talk)
It gave a good introduction to the editing process and was witty enough that I didn't resent going through it
 * What I liked:

Nothing in particular
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was confusing at first and I think I went through the "bolding" step four times before I realized that I had accidentally left the module.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MediSyntax (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

It was good
good training
 * What I liked:

should be more hands on
 * What I didn't like:

hands on training
 * What was missing:

everything it should be mandated --Tommyshortbeard (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Theannetelope (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Theannetelope (talk) 03:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Zyvzyva (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Could be broken down into more steps that teach us wikicode. I found it difficult to figure out and in the end copied/pasted the code which was not instructive enough.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Zyvzyva (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Farabeeandrew (talk)
Videos
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

An explanation of the "Food and Drink" and "Kitten" options in the barnstar video.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was wonderful!!!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Farabeeandrew (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Ohart3 (talk)Orientation
...I liked the step by step help, as well as the practice modules.
 * What I liked:

...The coding is hard to understand for somebody that has not done computer codes or Wikipedia before.
 * What I didn't like:

...One thing that was missing from the practice was what to do if your article gets flagged or ends up being taken down.
 * What was missing:

...The only unecessary part was the beginning of the tutorial when it is explaining Wikipedia, it could have skipped to rules and editing.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I think the interactive tutorial helped, but still not enough to fully get the grasp of how to edit.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ohart3 (talk) 14:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Jcitrullo (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jcitrullo (talk) 16:45, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

OCCalagrimas (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OCCalagrimas (talk) 17:57, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Wesleylum (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wesleylum (talk) 19:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Eunjee.son.151 (talk)
...interactive tutorial
 * What I liked:

...descriptive parts
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was helpful to be used to it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Eunjee.son.151 (talk) 03:42, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Mjkobaya (talk)

 * What I liked:


 * I like the five pillars that Wikipedia follows.

...


 * What I didn't like:


 * Tutorial material was a little bland. But, I guess its presentation has to reflect the style of Wikipedia or an encyclopedia.

...


 * What was missing:


 * Nothing from what I can tell.

...


 * What was unnecessary:


 * Not sure.

...


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?


 * It was alright.

...

--Mjkobaya (talk) 01:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

AryCol (talk)
I like the interactive sections of the editing.
 * What I liked:


 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very useful and allowed for guided practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AryCol (talk) 02:29, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

QCommunity1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked the detailed overview of how to edit Wikipedia pages.

...
 * What I didn't like: The training did not include a list of key points or a summary sheet.

...
 * What was missing: The training did not include how to add pictures or external links to a Wikipedia page.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Some of the editing tutorials presented duplicate information that was covered elsewhere.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? This tool was beneficial.

--QCommunity1 (talk) 03:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Editor417312 (talk)
Everything ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

Explanations on some of the buttons, although they seem obvious enough as to what they do/what their purpose is. ...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Great! ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Editor417312 (talk) 09:11, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Sarcone.2 (talk)
... Easy to digest information ...Not very intuitive interface. Took too long to click through.
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarcone.2 (talk) 13:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

AMaldo18 (talk)
I liked the interactive tutorials, they were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

I didn't like the last section titled "Advanced editing." The title leads one to believe that it will go more in depth with editing than the basic editing page, but this is not so.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

The interactive editing tutorial was great. It worked just how it was supposed to and helped me quite a bit.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AMaldo18 (talk) 19:12, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Wilburchen (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wilburchen (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Krupin.1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Krupin.1 (talk) 22:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Love.347 (talk)
All of it.
 * What I liked:

N/A
 * What I didn't like:

An example of article grading (Stub, start, FA, GA, etc.)
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Love.347 (talk) 00:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

ConorDuff (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ConorDuff (talk) 01:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

John.delia.14 (talk)
... The videos provided throughout each section.
 * What I liked:

...Text heavy at time.
 * What I didn't like:

... Screenshot visuals
 * What was missing:

... Over linking
 * What was unnecessary:

... Confused at first but figured it out quickly.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--John.delia.14 (talk) 08:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Lashlar (talk)
...Lessons were very straight forward and simple, and the sandbox walk-through sections were very helpful. ...n/a
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

...It worked well, didn't notice any bugs
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lashlar (talk) 19:39, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Yankeeken (talk)
Good overview.
 * What I liked:

A little long. Not as easy to jump between topics as I'd like.
 * What I didn't like:

idk, you tell me
 * What was missing:

Everything seemed necessary, but was dependent on skill level.
 * What was unnecessary:

n/a --Yankeeken (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Valerie Wittman (talk)Thanks
...
 * What I liked: I liked how clear and to the point the instructions were. It made it easy to understand and was overall very helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: Sometimes the instructions were a bit redundant.

...
 * What was missing: There was nothing that seemed to be missing.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The 'happy editing' at the end of each youtube video.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I found it helpful to practice as I was learning it.

--Valerie Wittman (talk) 00:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Thanks again, Valerie Wittman

Siphorus (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Siphorus (talk) 01:20, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Jachen1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jachen1 (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Kochlaura (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kochlaura (talk) 02:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Amcknight.95 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amcknight.95 (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Gkg105 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gkg105 (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Sve413 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sve413 (talk) 17:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Laurel2017 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Laurel2017 (talk) 18:38, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

160.39.124.175 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--160.39.124.175 (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Whclass (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Whclass (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Ahung315 (talk)
...All the useful information
 * What I liked:

...The videos
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ahung315 (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Nar5414 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nar5414 (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Goffe.2 (talk)
... Interactive tutorials
 * What I liked:

... A couple of the instructions in the interactive tutorial weren't very clear
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... The tutorials helped me to understand how to edit Wikipedia pages, rather than just reading through the modules which became tedious. --Goffe.2 (talk) 23:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kristinnlizz (talk)

 * What I liked:
 * Covered everything on a basic level


 * What I didn't like:
 * N/A


 * What was missing:
 * N/A


 * What was unnecessary:
 * The videos were redundant and repeated the same information as the training.


 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * Helpful, very helpful.

--Kristinnlizz (talk) 02:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Colles.3 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very helpful for learners like myself how need to actually try it to grasp it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Colles.3 (talk) 03:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Stutsman.1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Stutsman.1 (talk) 03:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

B.brittney29 (talk)Tutorial Feedback
...Very basic, easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...I am not very confident in my editing abilities but it will take practice.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...It was all necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...My sound did not work.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--B.brittney29 (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Zhao.737 (talk)
There are videos show me how to do it. The training is together with too many information which I think it should be categorized. Nothing. Introduction. Nice. --Zhao.737 (talk) 04:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Schoenig.3 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Schoenig.3 (talk) 05:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Kellebelle53 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kellebelle53 (talk) 06:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Steven.bow.13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Steven.bow.13 (talk) 07:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Perry.407 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Perry.407 (talk) 12:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Gruenwald.10 (talk)
... Everything was very easy to navigate and the information was presented in a way that made it easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gruenwald.10 (talk) 14:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Tsukichild (talk)
... Simple and direct for the most part.
 * What I liked:

... Citing a book with multiple pages was a bit long and confusing at first.
 * What I didn't like:

... Maybe a small cheat sheet one could print out or save.
 * What was missing:

... Videos.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I dd not.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tsukichild (talk) 14:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

CriticalAlways (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CriticalAlways (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

AbbieCarr (talk)
...It was very detailed and the many included step made it easy to learn.
 * What I liked:

...Some of the quotes/images were unnecessary.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...As I said above, some of the quotes/images in the presentation were unneeded.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--AbbieCarr (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Avprice02 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Avprice02 (talk) 22:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

5680023.navee (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Everything

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:More examples

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Helpful

--5680023.navee (talk) 05:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Whitek67 (talk)
... Very Useful! Really helped me understand the editing better. Loved all the YouTube videos
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Whitek67 (talk) 14:12, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Azebzda (talk)
...Short tutorial videos
 * What I liked:

...Editing explanations without videos.
 * What I didn't like:

...More basic information about creating wikipedia account.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...They are very helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Azebzda (talk) 15:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Krsmith3704 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Krsmith3704 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

SK6074 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: It was quick and explained all necessary information well.

...
 * What I didn't like: The arrows on the bottom shifted on each click, it would have been smoother to have them stay constant at the top since no screen had more than a screen's worth of viewing (no scrolling was necessary).

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?: It worked well and was very instructive. I think it is a good idea.

--SK6074 (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Lttruong (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Organized and logical order

...
 * What I didn't like: A bit too wordy

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lttruong (talk) 22:42, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Dr. MRM 23 (talk)
Short, sweet, and to the point!
 * What I liked:

Nothing :)
 * What I didn't like:

N/a
 * What was missing:

N/a
 * What was unnecessary:

N/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dr. MRM 23 (talk) 22:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Nancyuta (talk)
...The training was easy to follow along and had tutorial videos embedded in it.
 * What I liked:

...N/A
 * What I didn't like:

...N/A
 * What was missing:

...N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

...N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nancyuta (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Ispravky (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ispravky (talk) 06:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Sho2014 (talk)
each page was short, contained useful information
 * What I liked:

hard to use the interactive trainings because couldn't open them in a new page
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sho2014 (talk) 07:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Jmtseng (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jmtseng (talk) 16:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Venividivici1 (talk)
...The wiki community videos.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... It wasn't very elaborate but it got the job done and was helpful. --Venividivici1 (talk) 17:11, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Carolina84laguardia (talk)
...
 * What I liked: is very clear and the steps are very helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: is

...
 * What was missing:more examples

...
 * What was unnecessary: everything is necessary to make this project

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? very helpful

--Carolina84laguardia (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Anjackso (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Anjackso (talk) 18:15, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Seunathm (talk)
...all of it especially the videos
 * What I liked:

...none of it
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

... no
 * What was unnecessary:

...no
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Seunathm (talk) 18:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Reed0310 (talk)
...Interactive part
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...GREAT
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Reed0310 (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

SS95776 (talk)
...Good overview. Really straight forward.
 * What I liked:

...It was as interactive as I wanted
 * What I didn't like:

...Videos on someone editing a dummy page
 * What was missing:

...nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was good but needs to open in a new tab or window.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SS95776 (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Happyiowa (talk)
interactive videos!
 * What I liked:

it's harder than I thought!
 * What I didn't like:

Everything was great
 * What was missing:

none
 * What was unnecessary:

It was really intuitive and I enjoyed it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Happyiowa (talk) 21:49, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Tjt597 (talk)
...it was quite informative
 * What I liked:

...sometimes the videos wouldn't work very well
 * What I didn't like:

...I'd say just the video quality at first, however I got them all to work in the end
 * What was missing:

...I'd say that even though some things got repeated, it was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tjt597 (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Ias914 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ias914 (talk) 23:53, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Veexkee (talk)

 * What I liked:

the videos that help take you step-by-step through the editing process for those of us that are not code-savvy

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Veexkee (talk) 00:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Newflew (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The videos were very helpful. I liked that they were short and to the point, and showed the actual user interface.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Newflew (talk) 00:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Tytang (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tytang (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Cdiep (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cdiep (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Chinski888 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The sandbox training was very helpful

...
 * What I didn't like: I sometimes had trouble navigating back from the sandbox to the section I was on.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Personally, the whole "did you know" section was not useful for me

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good

--Chinski888 (talk) 02:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

SK2016 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SK2016 (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

MelissaHeng (talk)
I liked that it was interactive
 * What I liked:

I wanted there to be more interactive practice
 * What I didn't like:

More information about what the content should look like
 * What was missing:

The videos
 * What was unnecessary:

It was really helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MelissaHeng (talk) 04:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

TomtomRx (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TomtomRx (talk) 04:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Victoriapalestine (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Victoriapalestine (talk) 05:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Kdelrosario8 (talk)
I liked that there were videos illustrating the main points. I am a more visual learner.
 * What I liked:

n/a
 * What I didn't like:

I feel that more detail could have been added regarding starting a brand new page. For someone who is technologically challenged, some of the parts of the tutorial went over my head, but perhaps it will make more sense once I actually start making edits on wikipedia.
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was a helpful visual for all the text at the beginning of the orientation. It made the process a little easier to understand.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kdelrosario8 (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Mzxc0nfusd (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mzxc0nfusd (talk) 05:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Kdelrosario8 (talk)
I liked that there were video tutorials embedded in the orientation because I'm a very visual learner.
 * What I liked:

n/a
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it was helpful because I am a more visual learner and this helped make the text that was presented at the beginning of the orientation make more sense.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kdelrosario8 (talk) 05:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Moraa232 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Moraa232 (talk) 05:33, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Rxbmx (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rxbmx (talk) 05:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Mmuas (talk)
I liked the interactive videos that were embedded throughout the modules.
 * What I liked:

It would have been helpful if these learning modules were turned into a video that would allow us to watch the presenter go through the different components of editing Wikipedia.
 * What I didn't like:

n/a
 * What was missing:

n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

It was helpful in drawing the concepts together.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mmuas (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Jcillin (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jcillin (talk) 05:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Yendu (talk)
...the sandbox tutorials were helpful to instantly see the effects of my edits
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...it was great!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yendu (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

KelvinL.wiki (talk)
The interactive sandbox tutorials were a nice touch, as was the gamification created by receiving badges for completing various stages.
 * What I liked:

The directions for creating new sandboxes when editing articles could have been more specific.
 * What I didn't like:


 * What was missing:


 * What was unnecessary:

A+
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--KelvinL.wiki (talk) 06:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Ruthe006 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Easy to understand approach.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ruthe006 (talk) 06:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

DTP1989 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--DTP1989 (talk) 06:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Nbaquino16 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nbaquino16 (talk) 06:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Rarepurpletiger (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rarepurpletiger (talk) 07:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

ACL75 (talk)
...Informative as a general overview on how to use/edit wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I would like it to go into more detail about wikicode.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful practice.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ACL75 (talk) 07:17, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Maxxrivera (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Maxxrivera (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Victoriakataev (talk)
... I liked how it was very informative. I liked the st up of it too, it was separated into sections making it easier to find what i am looking for. ... I didn't not like anything, I thought over all, it was a great training website. ... Nothing was missing. ... I thought the videos was unnecessary, i thought what was provided outside of the videos was more than enough. ... i did not try the editing tutorial. --Victoriakataev (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Yesse0912 (talk)
What I liked about the training was that it was very detailed and helped me understand a lot of things about Wikipedia that I was not aware of before.
 * What I liked:

I enjoyed everything in the presentation. I don't believe any was missing in the training exercise. Everything mentioned in the training exercise was pretty much necessary.
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

I have not had the time to try the interactive editing tutorial but I believe it would be very helpful and good when I try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yesse0912 (talk) 16:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Deceptitom (talk)
The tutorial was very informative and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

I loved all of it.
 * What I didn't like:

How to a table/column on the right side of the article that has general information about the person.
 * What was missing:

All was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

Essential to my understanding.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Deceptitom (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

146.111.144.130 (talk)
... Personally, i'm not the best with computers so it made things a lot more easier for me to understand. ... There was nothing that i disliked about the training. ... Nothing was missing, everything was straight to the point. ... No it wasn't, it was actually insightful. ... I haven't tried it, but i'm confident that it will be just as good. --146.111.144.130 (talk) 18:44, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Czy pharm (talk)
...
 * What I liked: simple worded

...
 * What I didn't like: too many steps

...
 * What was missing: better videos

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Czy pharm (talk) 22:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Aleksobe (talk)
It was very informative and it successfully guided me through basic editing steps.
 * What I liked:

Nothing comes to mind, everything was straightforward. I can only practice what I've learned to become better. I don't know I don't know It was very helpful and a good guide. --Aleksobe (talk) 23:55, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Rachelshensy (talk)
... It was very detailed and delicated. Basically, after going through this tutor program, I already know core rules of wikipedia and get to know about wikicodes. ... Wikicodes are still hard for me to use. I feel I need to spend much time practicing before I can use these fluently ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... Every content is necessary to guide a new editor, in my opinion
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rachelshensy (talk) 02:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Selenaaz (talk)
I liked how detailed it was and the videos.
 * What I liked:

I didn't like that it was really long.
 * What I didn't like:

I think it pretty much covered everything I needed to know.
 * What was missing:

Some of the videos were unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

I thought it helped explain how to use the codes better but it was a little difficult to do it myself at first.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Selenaaz (talk) 06:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Cheerstar13 (talk)
...I liked that it included videos that gave visuals to better understand the content.
 * What I liked:

...I didn't like that it would not automatically open the videos in another tab and that the new addition had bugs.
 * What I didn't like:

...I would have liked maybe the entire thing to have just been a video. maybe 4 different videos by section and took out the text.
 * What was missing:

...Somethings were resaid like about signing your post on talk pages and I felt it was not needed.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked it, found it helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cheerstar13 (talk) 06:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Marlinamarie (talk)
video tutorials helpful and went along w/ text
 * What I liked:

theres should be an overhead bar that lets you navigate back and forth between the different sections, rather than just the arrows
 * What I didn't like:

nothing I can see yet
 * What was missing:

Definitely!
 * What was unnecessary:

little tricky to navigate, but helpful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Marlinamarie (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Kilroy.15 (talk)
... It was interactive
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Worked perfectly for me
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kilroy.15 (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

MasonnTaylorr2219 (talk)
…The in-depth details about exactly how to use Wikipedia. The videos and ability to practice is also a good idea.
 * What I liked:

…There was not much I did not like. All of the information was informative for a non-user like myself.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

…Very helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MasonnTaylorr2219 (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

BionicTwinkie (talk)
The format was concise, and informative. Packed a lot of information in a small training session. The break-down of the editing examples was nice. 'on each side for bold,  on each side for italics. Seeing it is better than guessing.
 * What I liked:

The amount of time it required to complete the training. It was still worth it though.
 * What I didn't like:

I am still too new to Wikipedia, so this is something I am not likely to have an adequate answer.
 * What was missing:

N/A
 * What was unnecessary:

N/A
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--BionicTwinkie (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

D5481026 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--D5481026 (talk) 14:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Ananasanana (talk)
It was nice It was a little bit too detailed, I can't handle all this information at once
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:

More pretty pictures
 * What was missing:

Don't have to say so many times that the userbase should be polite and act in good faith, we're not children.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ananasanana (talk) 15:47, 30 October 2014 (UTC) Ananasanana

Gaiabulbanix (talk)
... i liked the interactice videos ... nothing, everything was good - cookies made me hungry ... everything was covered nicely ... videos repeated the written text too much ... i thought i was quite good and intuitive --Gaiabulbanix (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

169.231.104.181 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--169.231.104.181 (talk) 22:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Writ1001tutorialexercise (talk)
... that i have completed this exercise
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Writ1001tutorialexercise (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Bedelia13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Short videos were helpful, with links to info pages for further reading.

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Bedelia13 (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

SogeKingBruce (talk)
... I liked how user friendly it is and really wants to get you trained on proper wiki protocol
 * What I liked:

... There were some bugs that could be fixed ... where to find sources, but that is the editors problem not the training's ... not much ... That has some bugs that needs to be fixed. --SogeKingBruce (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Kate5405 (talk)
Orientation was broken down nicely. The format made sense and was easy to understand.
 * What I liked

It seemed like a lot of information at once.
 * What I didn't like:

Nothing I can think of right now.
 * What was missing:

Some of the sections had some unnecessary additional information like how to have a good discussion.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kate5405 (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

PakpongICCH444 (talk)
...Easy to understand and clean tutorial
 * What I liked:

...So many slides with so many texts
 * What I didn't like:

...some training or guide in actual work
 * What was missing:

...Maybe too long introduction
 * What was unnecessary:

...very quick and suffice
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--PakpongICCH444 (talk) 04:12, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Rsc.kimn (talk)
...It was short sweet and to the point
 * What I liked:

...Maybe more videos for visual learners
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...Some information was repeated
 * What was unnecessary:

...A little confusing but good practiceRsc.kimn (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rsc.kimn (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Jennafaherty (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jennafaherty (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Szorich922 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Szorich922 (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Jusino2 (talk)
... interacting with the things that I was learning ... Everything seemed fine, but it just seemed a little to lengthy. ... Nothing that I can think of ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

... It was cool. It helps me because I learn better that way --Jusino2 (talk) 23:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Yeeboyeee (talk)
... Very interactive
 * What I liked:

... hectic screen
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

... guiding notes were all over the screen
 * What was unnecessary:

... very helpful for a beginner (so thorough)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Yeeboyeee (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Imaybeanorangepeel (talk)
I liked how the balance of depth with choice. It covered just enough for competency without forcing in depth training in an introductory orientation, but the option of pursuing more information was always available.
 * What I liked:

There isn't much to take issue with. It was a relatively enjoyable experience.
 * What I didn't like:

I'm not sure right now. If I have trouble with something after editing a few articles, and I think it should be in the training, I'll make it known.
 * What was missing:

It all seemed pretty important. Again, if a realization comes later, I'll make it known.
 * What was unnecessary:

It was useful and validating. Didn't get frustrated, and felt slightly accomplished when done.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Imaybeanorangepeel (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

MadiSholtz (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MadiSholtz (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Starfry2001 (talk)
I liked the interactive tutorials very much.
 * What I liked:

There was really nothing that I disliked.
 * What I didn't like:

More hands on tutorials!
 * What was missing:

Loved it!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Starfry2001 (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Ktlough (talk)
...informative and breadth of coverage
 * What I liked:

...a little long - and having to go off page for tutorials (navigation)
 * What I didn't like:

...more intuitive, in page tutorials
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ktlough (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

L33tVivi (talk)
It was readable and easy to understand.
 * What I liked:

Too many video tutorials.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Interactive tutorials work much better than videos.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--L33tVivi (talk) 17:46, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Chunkybiscuits (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Chunkybiscuits (talk) 19:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Abbbabb (talk)
...Everything
 * What I liked:

...Nothing
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...Everything was necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I opened it in a different tab, but the step by step videos were helpful enough on their own.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abbbabb (talk) 20:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Romulusrosen (talk)
I thought it was informative.
 * What I liked:

Some details I think are unneeded.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Romulusrosen (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Dlsansom (talk)
The training provided a lot of information on the basics of editing and being involved in Wikipedia.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It worked perfectly! --Dlsansom (talk) 16:45, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

171.98.42.5 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--171.98.42.5 (talk) 03:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Adshakoo (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I like how informative this was

...
 * What I didn't like: I didn't like that you had to manually go to the next page

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I kept receiving too many bugs so I stopped working

--Adshakoo (talk) 17:57, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Abdobrow (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Abdobrow (talk) 21:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Jatraveler (talk)
...Nice interactive experience!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jatraveler (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Jlscott1 (talk)
...I like how Wikipedia taught me step by step how to complete different ways to edit an article
 * What I liked:

...Wikipedia could have made it a bit simpler
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

...the videos
 * What was unnecessary:

...i didnt have the chance to try it.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jlscott1 (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Desidaros (talk)
The trainig was complete and easy to follow. I loved the fact that all the writtent information was followed by a video tutorial on youtube! That was extremely helpful.
 * What I liked:

The presentation is a bit long and it's a lot to take all in once.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

That was extremely helpful to fix ideas into my mind.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Desidaros (talk) 18:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

OneHundredFiftySix (talk)
The instructions and rules were clear and concise.
 * What I liked:

It is only just a little lengthy, but perhaps that was just me.
 * What I didn't like:

Some further explanations on the rules. What about Weasel Words?
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--OneHundredFiftySix (talk) 18:42, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Gretagia (talk)
It was very simple and clear!
 * What I liked:

--Gretagia (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Nicola lnn (talk)
Some technical things of editing Wikipedia are quite useful. Both the video and textual instructions are clear.
 * What I liked:

too many extra links that confuse me at the beginning.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

tutorials are easy to understand, and exercises are particular useful.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Nicola lnn (talk) 23:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hiefilmbuff (talk)
Concise bullet points outlining the specific procedures clearly
 * What I liked:

that videos were downloaded and opened in a different browser Nothing I can think of
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

Nothing
 * What was unnecessary:

It was good!
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Hiefilmbuff (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Xamason (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Xamason (talk) 01:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

204.235.168.6 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--204.235.168.6 (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Dadeboe94 (talk)
...all the information was very clear and gave me a better understanding on how wikipedia works.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dadeboe94 (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

I now feel ready to be Wikipedia-bold!
Short, clear sections.
 * What I liked:

The videos only added a little to the accompanying text, which makes text somewhat irrelevant.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

Repeating information in video or text.
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Janitranslates (talk) 02:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Mebryant (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mebryant (talk) 02:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Mpenders7 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: I liked that there were a few interactive demonstrations

...
 * What I didn't like: The interactive demonstrations were incomplete and harder to follow than the written instructions

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mpenders7 (talk) 02:54, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Amdaye (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Very informational with how to work Wikipedia.

...
 * What I didn't like: I did not like how long there orientation was.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing was missing at all.

...
 * What was unnecessary: The repetition of a couple things.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Amdaye (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Alessia.acqua (talk)
It's essential and straight-forward.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

Very good.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alessia.acqua (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Rafaella Athan (talk)
it was very good explained
 * What I liked:

everything was great
 * What I didn't like:

no
 * What was missing:

no
 * What was unnecessary:

very very useful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rafaella Athan (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

KPark21 (talk)
... Very helpful ... Lenghty ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... Nothing ... NA --KPark21 (talk) 13:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

KPark21 (talk)Feedback
... Very helpful ... Lenghty ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

... Nothing ... NA --KPark21 (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Gnrw wright (talk)
... The guidelines were fairly detailed
 * What I liked:

... Some of the videos wouldnt play
 * What I didn't like:

... maybe more interactive activities
 * What was missing:

...I didn't see too much that was unnecessary
 * What was unnecessary:

...It was helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Gnrw wright (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Kjhinton (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Kjhinton (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Tasmith33 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Tasmith33 (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

TeenLibEmmy (talk)
...A lot of information was covered and concerns were addressed
 * What I liked:

...The amount of information covered made the Wikipedia editing processes seem more daunting than it may actually be
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I think of off the top of my head
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... I didn't use this feature
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--TeenLibEmmy (talk) 02:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Jaseward (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jaseward (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Darrenr33 (talk)
...easy to follow instructions
 * What I liked:

...would like more editing topics incorporated
 * What I didn't like:

...same answer as above
 * What was missing:

...a lot of the things on discussing and interacting with other editors
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Darrenr33 (talk) 21:19, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Ekmoyer900135 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ekmoyer900135 (talk) 20:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Mjhohl (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The coding videos were helpful.

...
 * What I didn't like: It seemed fine to me.

...
 * What was missing: Nothing for my needs.

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing.

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mjhohl (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Aesaulsb (talk)
...
 * What I liked:the basics of writing in wikicode. interactive videos

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aesaulsb (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Rachel.Doenges (talk)
...the editing information was great
 * What I liked:

...the sandbox module was hard to use
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...too much info on the pillars.
 * What was unnecessary:

...They are good
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rachel.Doenges (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Vishal0soni (talk)
...Short topics, easy language, fun-sort feeling !!! Thanks.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...At first, when switching to sandbox, i thought i would loose my track of learning progress. But that was well taken care. Thanks.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vishal0soni (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Sarat.iisc (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
... Everything ... Nothing ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sarat.iisc (talk) 18:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Samantha (Wiki Ed) (talk)
Loved the videos! They were great!
 * What I liked:

At one point, I accidentally ended up in my sandbox but had somehow lost the training tool that was following me around telling me what to do. I had to close the page, re-open the training, and use the menu page to get myself back into the training (yay for listening to the instructions on the first page!)
 * What I didn't like:

Not sure yet... haha
 * What was missing:

So far, it all seems pretty "need to know"
 * What was unnecessary:

Awesome, but like I said, I somehow ended up in the sandbox but outside the tool, it was very confusing.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Samantha (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Qj.woods (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Qj.woods (talk) 02:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Smasresha (talk)
I like how it covered everything I needed to know for my class assignment.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was very helpful and allowed me to learn the ways of editing much better than just reading instructions.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Smasresha (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

CSJordan (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--CSJordan (talk) 14:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Sleidenfrost (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sleidenfrost (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

RowdyMikeMach (talk)
... Showed me how to use Wikipedia. How to start pages and editing. Also made Wikipedia seem legit.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

... Thank you it was very helpful. --RowdyMikeMach (talk) 00:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

Khmccorm (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the tutorials

...
 * What I didn't like: none

...
 * What was missing:none

...
 * What was unnecessary:none

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I really enjoyed it, it was easy to follow.

--Khmccorm (talk) 15:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

JeffreyLaser (talk)
...
 * What I liked: Clear, concise.

...
 * What I didn't like: Nothing

...
 * What was missing: Nothing

...
 * What was unnecessary: Nothing =)

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JeffreyLaser (talk) 18:35, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Jenncurt2014
...it explained everything in great detail
 * What I liked:

nothing ...
 * What I didn't like:

...nothing
 * What was missing:

..couldn't find anything
 * What was unnecessary:

.it was very helpful and descriptive.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jenncurt2014 17:56, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Vv dng (talk)
...I liked how it covered the main points on how to start editing in Wikipedia thoroughly. The videos and the interactive editing tutorial really helped to understand the different topics covered.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...How to copyright an image that you may want to use.
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...I really liked it, because it helps to understand the topics better.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Vv dng (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Jmsmith13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: The general and clear nature of the descriptions and instructions.

...
 * What I didn't like: N/a

...
 * What was missing: N/a

...
 * What was unnecessary: N/a

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? The option to actually see things happen.

--Jmsmith13 (talk) 03:29, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Fmanzon (talk)
... explained everything clearly ... videos were difficult to access ... a chart on editing basics ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Fmanzon (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC) didt load on my computer

FengY (talk)
... I can discuses with other volunteers. ... the settings of words are complicate. ... Everything looks good. ... Nothing. ... It is a neat guide for editing Wikipedia. --FengY (talk) 03:42, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:
 * What was unnecessary:
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

JonBorazjani (talk)
...It answered my questions
 * What I liked:

...I actually liked everything about it, maybe more direction on how to do the talk page.
 * What I didn't like:

...Nothing
 * What was missing:

...None of it
 * What was unnecessary:

... I thought it was coolJonBorazjani (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--JonBorazjani (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Megnardo (talk)
...comprehensive tutorial on basic editing needed for my school project
 * What I liked:

...kind of difficult to get through when talking about some coding
 * What I didn't like:

...more video tutorials
 * What was missing:

...interactive practice in the sandbox
 * What was unnecessary:

...helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Megnardo (talk) 22:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Wjl5326 (talk)
I liked that it was brief!
 * What I liked:

I didn't see any obvious pdf's that I could download on pages that show how to edit, cite, etc. clearly this is a memorization function like learning how new software works.
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Wjl5326 (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

LoriLarson (talk)
I learned so much about adding/editing Wikipedia. I was overwhelmed before, but it now seems simple. I appreciated each of the embedded videos the most. ...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like: It took a long time to get through all of the pages and I thought the arrows were sometimes hard to click through. I also thought it was hard to start and stop over a few days.

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I think the interactive editing was awesome.  It gave me the confidence to make changes and not worry.

--LoriLarson (talk) 03:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Tmjacks2 (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the tutorial was very informative, and it covered all the questions I had about how to begin improving articles

...
 * What I didn't like: the tutorial moved a bit more quickly than I would have liked; it was a bit difficult to grasp certain things without rewinding the videos

...
 * What was missing: how to re-cite citations that already exist on a page that you are editing

...
 * What was unnecessary: I felt that everything covered was necessary for learning to appropriately and effectively edit a page

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It helped tremendously! I am personally more of a practical learner, so simply reading the instructions would not have been sufficient for me.

--Tmjacks2 (talk) 03:51, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Mjhohl (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mjhohl (talk) 04:49, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Egstell (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...references were still somewhat of a mystery in how to properly enter them. but it was not to difficult once played around in the sandbox.
 * What was missing:

...The advanced editing was not necessary for the type of course work we are doing
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Egstell (talk) 05:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Dacplayer96 (talk)
...Step by step process
 * What I liked:

...Length
 * What I didn't like:

...Summaries
 * What was missing:

...Video and word description
 * What was unnecessary:

...Helpful
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Dacplayer96 (talk) 06:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Jawiggins93 (talk)
...The tutorials were very helpful.
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...I didn't find anything missing.
 * What was missing:

...The videos were interesting but not necessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

...I loved the interactive editing tutorial. It was a nice first hands on experience.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jawiggins93 (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Alexis.santos13 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Alexis.santos13 (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Jontin5 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jontin5 (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Ekmoyer900135 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ekmoyer900135 (talk) 15:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Sjankowski (talk)
...graphics accompanied instructions
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...need a "getting started" section
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...s
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Sjankowski (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Cuevasalexis22 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Cuevasalexis22 (talk) 21:59, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Schoenig.3 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Schoenig.3 (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Ananasanana (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Ananasanana (talk) 05:03, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Aesaulsb (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Aesaulsb (talk) 01:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Jolley15 (talk)
...I liked that the training was very thorough, allowing for new users to grasp a relatively nice understanding of what to expect and how to begin creating and producing pages.
 * What I liked:

...It would have been nice if there was more practice editing/formatting, the tutorial gave the user an idea, but some uncertainty still remains after completion. Through practice and becoming more familiar with the website, once should be able to understand and gain familiarity with how editing works.
 * What I didn't like:

...I think the tutorial explained everything that a new user should expect and was thorough on what the site expects, as a new user it is hard to determine was exactly could be missing from the training.
 * What was missing:

...There was a couple of sections which were repeated, and although they were repeated for emphasis because they are important, it also added more pages to the tutorial. For example, the emphasis
 * What was unnecessary:

...I liked the interactive tutorial because it allowed the new user to actually see how the bracketing and coding worked. I think this was the most important part of the training because one can read about how to edit and create pages and add to pages but until they actually start writing it's hard to completely understand what exactly and how exactly editing works.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jolley15 (talk) 21:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Mykkramer (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mykkramer (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

1994ms (talk)
... The details
 * What I liked:

...Too long
 * What I didn't like:

...More tutorials
 * What was missing:

...All that wording
 * What was unnecessary:

...I truly enjoyed it
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--1994ms (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

SallyCinnamon3 (talk)
... Thought it was informative, especially about Wikipedia's missions. ... Very broad in terms, should have had more concrete examples. ...
 * What I liked:
 * What I didn't like:
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--SallyCinnamon3 (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Missladancer (talk)
...All of the videos
 * What I liked:

...Couldn't think of anything
 * What I didn't like:

...how to resolve disputes
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Missladancer (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Applejojo714 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Applejojo714 (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Allisonmurrayj (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Allisonmurrayj (talk) 23:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Craalli19 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Craalli19 (talk) 23:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Osawai92 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Osawai92 (talk) 23:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Katharinemichele (talk)
The videos were very helpful to me. ...
 * What I liked:

Nothing. It was extremely user friendly and easy. ...
 * What I didn't like:

I don't believe it was missing anything. ...
 * What was missing:

Everything was pretty necessary for someone who has never done this before. ...
 * What was unnecessary:

It was easy to follow and understand. I understand how stuff works a lot better now. ...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Katharinemichele (talk) 01:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Jordynckove (talk)
...
 * What I liked: the combination of videos, texts, and tutorials to learn the material

...
 * What I didn't like: nothing was not helpful!

...
 * What was missing: everything seemed to be covered

...
 * What was unnecessary: i liked all the topics covered

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it worked great!!

--Jordynckove (talk) 09:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Rjdoenge1 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Rjdoenge1 (talk) 19:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Cindyvergara (talk)
...
 * What I liked:
 * That it was organized and that it had the interactive portions to it.

...
 * What I didn't like:
 * Nothing that I can think of at the moment

...
 * What was missing:
 * More interactive links
 * End page where has all summary & review

...
 * What was unnecessary:
 * Nothing I can think of at the moment

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
 * It was helpful just would like for it instead of saying to start over in case of an error to have an option to show you what you did wrong and give you suggestions to avoid errors.

--Cindyvergara (talk) 21:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Jeaku (talk)
VERY HELPFUL
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

IT WAS HELPFUL. I WAS JUST CONFUSED WITH THE CITING PART. I THINK I GOT IT DOWN THOUGH
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Jeaku (talk) 11:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Mjnoori (talk)
...The tutorial was comprehensive and provided options for further questions.Mjnoori (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...The interactive tutorial was very helpful. Mjnoori (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mjnoori (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

MMEELLIIOO (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--MMEELLIIOO (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

ConorDuff (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--ConorDuff (talk) 00:51, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

EndicottRM (talk)
...The tutorial was basic and covered everything
 * What I liked:

...n/a
 * What I didn't like:

...n/a
 * What was missing:

...n/a
 * What was unnecessary:

...n/a
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--EndicottRM (talk) 16:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Mhartman82 (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Mhartman82 (talk) 20:20, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Airmaxgeneration (talk)
... I really liked the video tutorials. They helped a lot by being able to visually see what to do and what not to do.
 * What I liked:

... I did not dislike anything about the training.
 * What I didn't like:

... Nothing that I thought was missing.
 * What was missing:

... Nothing that I thought was unnecessary.
 * What was unnecessary:

... I did not try the interactive editing tutorial.
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Airmaxgeneration (talk) 23:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Lauraestclair (talk)
...
 * What I liked:

...
 * What I didn't like:

...
 * What was missing:

...
 * What was unnecessary:

...
 * If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?

--Lauraestclair (talk) 06:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)