Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Mezcala Bridge

Mezcala Bridge

 * Reason:High res, very educational. Some technical issues kept it from promotion at Featured picture candidates/Mezcala Bridge
 * Articles this image appears in:Mezcala Bridge
 * Creator:Photographed and stitched by Jujutacular, edited by Muhammad Mahdi Karim


 * Support as nominator -- Jujutacular  T · C 17:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment is being the main image in one article really enough to constitute EV for VP?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, yes. The valued picture criteria says nothing about requiring use in more than one article (let alone the FP criteria). Four of the last 12 valued pictures promoted are only used in one article.  Jujutacular  T · C 01:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Jujutacular. Usage in multiple articles is often a good indicatior of high EV, but not exclusive condition for VP. --Elekhh (talk) 04:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I would support if the article were included in any of the following Balsas River, any geographical article about the location of this bridge, an article about the mountains in the picture, an article about this type of bridge, the article Suspension bridge types. I would also support with a proper explanation why the image does not belong in any of these articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I wish I could tell from the main article whether this is a Cable-stayed bridge, Self-anchored suspension bridge or Suspension bridge. I don't fault the nominator, but since he is interested in this topic it would be interesting if it could be clarified.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Added to Balsas River. Adding to Suspension bridge types would be inappropriate as it is not a suspension bridge. It is a cable-stayed bridge, as was already noted in the article (I have added a wikilink).  Jujutacular  T · C 14:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - Seems to be a useful picture that depicts encyclopedic content.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support. Great panorama. One article is all that is needed for adequate EV. Nautica Shad es  17:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Obviously very good image with high EV. --Elekhh (talk) 22:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

--Courcelles (talk) 13:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)