Wikipedia:Version 0.5 Set Nominations/Deities & Religions

Deities & Religions
Underpopulated section, hope some of these articles can be added to the project. Lincher 16:04, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Quetzalcoatl, Aztec : Start-class
 * Buddha, Buddhists : close to B-class
 * God, Many religions : GA-class
 * Trinity, christianity : B-class, NPOV
 * Amun, Egyptians : B-class
 * Isis, Egyptians : B-class
 * Osiris, Egyptians : Start-class
 * Zeus, Greeks : B-class
 * Brahman, Hindus : B-class
 * Trimurti, Hindus : B-class
 * Allah, Islamic : Multiple tags (Cleanup, NPOV, source)
 * Jehovah's Witnesses, the religion : B-class
 * Judaism, the religion : B-class
 * Maya mythology, the religion : B-class
 * Mormon, the religion : better than Start-class
 * Norse mythology, the religion : close to A-class
 * Roman mythology, the religion : Start-class
 * Sikhism, the religion : FA
 * Slavic mythology, the religion : A-class


 * I'm not sure it's a good idea to mix religions and particular deities in a single discussion. Having said that, a few other ones to consider:
 * Enki, Sumerian/Babylonian : B-Class
 * Moloch, Phoenician : B-Class
 * Athena, Greek : high B-Class
 * Satan, Christianity : high B-Class
 * Shinto, religion, : B-Class
 * Zoroastrianism, religion : B-Class
 * Idolatry : B-Class
 * Kirill Lokshin 03:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I have to agree with you but can't really not mix both religions & deities for the quality of deity articles is too poor. (Should I try and make more sets?) Lincher 14:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry I took a while to comment. This is a good list of important topics, and a set ensures people don't complain too much of bias!  I see Quetzalcoatl has been assessed as a B now, maybe it's improved - it looks to me like a poor B.  I would propose accepting the full list, including Kirill's additions. Any objections?  Walkerma 04:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The list seems a bit incomplete, IMO, as there are several Greek dieties, but not a single Roman god or goddess. Adding these should be all right, although I'm still iffy about Osiris, it being Start-Class and all... Tito xd (?!?) 04:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Fair point, Tito, though I would consider the Greek gods more important, since the Romans basically just renamed the Greek gods (Jupiter=Zeus, etc.). As for Osiris, he is looking distinctly better now, and has been rightly ranked B by the Ancient Egypt project.  Walkerma 01:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm... fair point about Osiris, although I'd still like a few Roman dieties. Roman mythology doesn't give much justice to the Roman culture. Tito xd (?!?) 03:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The mythology article does at least list the major Roman deities and give pictures - that may be worth something. Apollo is a good article. Care to pick some, bearing in mind that for balance we only want 2 or 3? If only they had been monotheistic this would've been so much easier! Walkerma 03:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

OK, let's include all of the original list, plus Kirill's list, and also Roman mythology and Apollo. I'll add these on Friday barring any objections. Walkerma 04:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Final discussion before inclusion on Friday