Wikipedia:Version 0.7 Nominations

{| style="clear:both; background:none;"
 * width="60%" style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid solid #dfdfdf; background-color:#DDFFFF;" valign="top"|

'''This page is closed for nominations. Please add new nominations at Release Version Nominations.'''

'''All nominations after October 20th will be considered for the following release version. Nominations submitted but not reviewed by October 20th will still be considered for Version 0.7.'''

Here, we determine which entries will compose the next offline Release Version, as part of the overall project of producing a fixed version of Wikipedia. This could be released on CD, DVD, paper, or some combination. Nominations here are ongoing, for whichever version is planned next, and nominations will be moved over to the next version page when it becomes available. Links that have a strikethrough are unavailable/defunct at present.


 * In order to nominate groups of articles, use the set nominations page.
 * Featured articles are automatically nominated, there is no need to nominate them here.
 * Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics are automatically nominated and reviewed on the Core Topics Review page.
 * Provinces, counties, etc. are reviewed here.

These entries will be selected based on importance and quality.

Nomination categories
Miscellaneous | Arts | Everyday Life | Geography | History | Language & Communication | Life Sciences | Mathematics | Philosophy & Religion | Physical Sciences | Social Sciences & Society | Technology and Engineering

Eligibility for inclusion in the next Release Version
See the release criteria. Being a test release, the number of articles is expected to be fairly small.

Entries that are nominated will then be considered for inclusion on releases of Wikipedia the next offline release version of Wikipedia, as outlined below. Previous offline releases include:
 * Test Version, 2000 articles, released in January 2006.
 * Version 0.5 (released in April 2007)

If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. You may wish to receive feedback from your WikiProject before nominating an article here, or you may wish to list it at Peer review. If the article is of high quality, you may want to nominate it for Featured article status.

See also Core topics - 1,000.

The approval process
The approval process is designed to be simple, as is appropriate for a test release. Approval will simply involve one member of the editorial team reviewing the article using the criteria outlined above. The reviewer must not have been a major contributor to the article. You may sign up as a reviewer for the team here. If there are quality objections raised, the nomination will be removed from this list and archived. Once the objections have been addressed, you are encouraged to renominate the article. Articles deemed by the team to fail only on the criterion of "importance" will be listed at the held nominations page, for consideration in later releases. Articles that are approved will automatically be submitted for nomination at Wikipedia 1.0 (still under development).

Disputes
If you disagree the decision to include or exclude an article, please use the disputes page.

Purge page cache
 * width="32%" style="vertical-align:top;padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid solid #dfdfdf; background-color:#DDFFFF;" |

For reviewers of currently nominated articles

 * Reviews should only be done by members of the review team (if you want to help sign up here).
 * The reviewer should not have been a significant contributor to the article under review.
 * Long-standing nominations are a higher priority than more recently added ones.

Pass
If the article under review meets the criteria for approval:
 * 1) Remove it from the list.
 * 2) Replace &#123;{WP1.0|v0.7=nom|class=XX|category=YY}} with &#123;{WP1.0|v0.7=pass|class=XX|category=YY}} on its talk page. See WP1.0 for details about the parameters.
 * 3) List the article on Release Version under the appropriate section.

Fail on importance only
If the article is of acceptable quality, but on a topic outside the scope of the latest release: '''Go here and add the page to the list of nominations. Also, please vote on other articles.'''

Fail on quality
If the article fails to meet the criteria because of quality issues:
 * 1) Replace &#123;{WP1.0|v0.7=nom|class=XX|category=YY|importance=ZZ}} with &#123;{WP1.0|v0.7=fail|class=XX|category=YY}} on its talk page. See WP1.0 for details about the parameters.
 * 2) Please leave a clear reason on the article's talk page.
 * 3) Remove the nomination from the list on this page.
 * Articles that are failed are automatically added to this category.

{|
 * }
 * width="100%" style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid solid #dfdfdf; background-color:#DDFFFF;" |

Nomination procedure

 * 1) Check to make sure it is not already on the previous release version.
 * 2) List it below at the bottom of the "Nominations", in the relevant section, by using "#  comment ~"
 * 3) Place &#123;{WP1.0|v0.7=nom}} on the talk page of the nominated article. If the talk page already includes the template, add the v0.7=nom parameter to the existing template.
 * 4) Wait for someone else to approve or remove your nomination.

Nomination categories

 * Miscellaneous
 * Arts
 * Everyday Life
 * Geography
 * History
 * Language & Communication
 * Life Sciences
 * Mathematics
 * Religion
 * Philosophy
 * Physical Sciences
 * Social Sciences & Society
 * Technology and Engineering

Nominations
There is now a list of nominations that have already been selected by SelectionBot. If these have been tagged with the WP1.0 template, these tags should be updated.

Please review articles near the top of the lists first if possible.

Miscellaneous nominations (if unsure what section to use)
your addition here

Arts

 * 1)  B-Class, core article for WP:FILM PC78 (talk) 12:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC) NOTE: We're currently considering the entire core films selection en masse see talk. Walkerma (talk) 04:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Visual arts project: The following were selected after discussion by the project here. I would point out the project is handicapped on the auto-selection because we have few very active editors, and do not rate for importance, nor very often for quality (the ratings VA articles have are normally Biography project drive-bys, often inappropriate, and not updated). We only rarely do GAs either, & few FAs. These would all be Top-importance & are good quality. Looking at the other submissions around, in terms of subject importance, and hit rates, I think we are being too modest & should add more later. We have also suggested a number of removals on the other page. Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1)  Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED BY WP:BIO
 * 2) at the moment there is nothing on Asian art except Ajanta Caves and Japanese art. Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 3) Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) I'd guess a nice C-Class, not a B, but quite important so PASSED
 * 4) one of the few good articles on Indian art Johnbod (talk) 01:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC) HELD: As with many in this area, it's weak on referencing, cleanup tag, though would be good for the next release with a bit of work. Walkerma (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) I'd guess a nice C-Class, but quite important so PASSED
 * 6) Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) B-Class, PASSED
 * 7)  A class for VA, GA & in a FT. Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 8) Johnbod (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 9) fundamental article, covers Asia too Johnbod (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 10) again, asian interest.  Johnbod (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC) B, PASSED
 * 11) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED AT WP:Philadelphia.
 * 12) FA Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:BIO
 * 13)  only ? 1 other woman artist Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED AT WP:GERMANY
 * 14) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED for WP:BIO
 * 15) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 16) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Paolo Veronese ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:BIO
 * 17) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Only Start. FAIL on quality.
 * 18) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Only Start, but already passed at WP:RUSSIA (tagged as Top-Importance there).
 * 19) Johnbod (talk) 14:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 20) Pivotal rock band from the last 25 years, primarly credited with the creation and popularization of alternative rock. WesleyDodds (talk) 22:49, 19 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:BIO.

Reviews above by Walkerma (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

your addition here

Everyday Life
Articles struck out have been reviewed.

I'm not endorsing any of these, all of the above were proposed and seconded by members of the equine project here, please read the arguments there. I'll let the reviewers decide which are appropriate. Walkerma (talk) 03:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1)  GA. See below. PASS
 * 2)  Start. See below. PASS, also it looks close to C-Class to me.
 * 3)  Start. See below. PASS, also, it looks C or even B-Class to me.
 * 4)  B. See below. HELD
 * B, ranked Top by the WP:Horse. PASS

Reviewed by Walkerma (talk) 02:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

From the Fashion project (after also requesting 13 removals). Johnbod (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) shirt, Already selected by the bot
 * 2) coat (clothing), Fail on quality
 * 3) jacket, Fail on quality
 * 4) gown Fail on quality
 * 5) Armani Passed, though needs cleanup
 * 6) Prada Passed, though needs cleanup
 * 7) Karl_Lagerfeld Fail on quality
 * 8) Lingerie - big ghits! Fail on quality
 * 9) Vivienne_Westwood Fail on quality
 * 10) Issey_Miyake Better, but lesser importance, so it is to be Held
 * 11) Alexander_McQueen Fail on quality
 * 12) Elsa_Schiaparelli Passed - helps to balance our selection
 * 13) 1400-1500 in fashion - from our flagship fashion history series, several at A class etc.
 * 14) 1500-1550 in fashion
 * 15) 1550-1600 in fashion
 * 16) 1600-1650 in fashion
 * 17) 1650-1700 in fashion
 * 18) 1700-1750 in fashion
 * 19) 1750-1795 in fashion
 * 20) 1795-1820 in fashion - more could be added, but we go to decade articles after this. Johnbod (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I passed all of the XXX in fashion because (a) they are very nicely done, (b) as a series of articles, they form a very good overview of the history of Western fashion and (c) they give us some coverage in a subject area where we are otherwise weak. My main gripe is that non-Western fashion is not covered at all - what were the styles found at the court of Ulugh_Beg, the Yongle Emperor, Akbar the Great or Dawit II of Ethiopia?  I think perhaps the articles should add the word "Western" (or European?) into the titles.  The last one in the selection also needs the citations formatting.  Otherwise a very nice collection.  These represent the kind of article SelectionBot may miss, because the lack of interwikis is merely due to a difference in how the material is covered - I'm sure that the French, Italian etc. Wikipedias cover this same content, they just break it down differently.  You mention the problem with the decade articles - yes, perhaps it would be good if there were some summary articles.  It may seem hard to describe all of C20th fashion in one article, but all subjects face this type of problem in writing overview articles, and these often make up some of our most useful content because material is shown in a wider context.  Regarding jacket, etc. I think the fashion project should make an effort to bring these very basic topics up to a decent standard - they are clearly important topics, but the content in each of these looks like mainly "drive-by" content on random things rather than a coherent, comprehensive description of the topic. Thanks for a great set of nominations, Walkerma (talk) 08:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair comments, & sorry we were so late. The bot selected Han Chinese clothing and sari etc, but we don't have as much on non-european clothing, though generally these changed much less rapidly in these periods (see Fashion). Johnbod (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all the feedback. It's unfortunate, but I think the edits of (for example) coat (clothing) have reduced the comprehensiveness of the article over the last few months (from a historical perspective, jacket is probably best addressed as a subset of "coat").  But perhaps we need to find some editors who want to do solid research on fundamental topics like shirt.  I do plan to go back through the History of Fashion series and bring the citations up to snuff; working forward through time on that, very slowly. - PKM (talk) 20:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Food and drink


your addition here

Games

 * 1) Came close to 1250 but was unasessed - I have given it a minimal assessment just to get the ball rolling. BOZ (talk) 20:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED, good call. Walkerma (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2)  Article is now GA, and working toward FA. Turlo Lomon (talk) 14:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC) HELD due to low importance Walkerma (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) An FA of top importance to its own Wikiproject, with an overall score of 1,843 - although I'm wondering if we even need to nominate anything on this page? Please let me know. BOZ (talk) 03:50, 5 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 4) Scored 1,535 - is currently a B but has been nominated for GA. BOZ (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 5) Scored 1,489 - was a B at the time, downgraded to C, but as a major publisher has potential and could easily be brought back up to a B if not better. BOZ (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Scored 1,446 - is currently a B, is a major setting for both novels and D&D games. BOZ (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 7) Scored 1,266 - is currently a B, might be a long shot, but worth considering as quite possible the most notable of all D&D "monsters" having served as the basis of numerous supplements, adventures, and novels. BOZ (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 8) Scored 1,746 - is a B, and Top for its own Wikiproject, and essential to understanding anything within it (including everything currently mentioned above). BOZ (talk) 02:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 9) Article is currently rated a B; Arneson is a key creator for the Dungeons & Dragons game; did not get a score as the article was not assessed on any Wikiproject at the time of last data dump. BOZ (talk) 18:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC) HELD: I'm not convinced this topic is notable enough, looking at the data, and it's only a fairly basic B. Walkerma (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

your addition here

Geography
Notes
 * All countries have already been included.


 * 1)  As a Geordie myself, I can't let the Mackems have the upper hand here! (Sunderland is already included) Also a (far more) notable city in my highly biased opinion! B-Class. Walkerma 03:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED BY BOT AT WP:UK Geography

your addition here

History
All the above in this section reviewed by Walkerma (talk) 04:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * History miscellaneous
 * 1)  Lord High Chamberlain of England under Queen Elizabeth.  One of the most intriguing characters ever to rise and fall from grace. Equally interesting, he is the leading alternate candidate for the authorship of the works of Shakespeare. Amazing life story that, in itself, reads like a Shakespeare play. Smatprt (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 2) the most notable political crisis in modern Australia. Graham 87  12:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED BY THE BOT.
 * 3)  self-nom. Although hit-count is low, importance and quality are reasonably high (GA approved). article is stable. Appraiser (talk) 14:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 4)  self-nom. Although hit-count is low, importance and quality are reasonably high; well-sourced; article is stable; city is the capital of Minnesota and site of the 2008 RNC. Appraiser (talk) 14:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 5)  Self-Nomination.  This is currently a B Class article, nominated for GA, Good Article, undergoing an A Class review,  A Class article with High importance. He was a war hero during the wars uniting Germany, and the emperor of Germany inbetween Wilhelm I, German Emperor and Wilhelm II, German Emperor. Banime (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED
 * 6)  self-nom. Fort is first United States presence in Minnesota Territory. It opened up vast area to settlement. Appraiser (talk) 15:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 7)  Legendary life boat captain. Saved the lives of 487 people from drowning during a 30 year long career at the lifeboat service. Was honoured by King William III of the Netherlands with a golden medal of honour. Eventually got a pension so low he had to sell his golden medal. Amazing story, intresting figure. -The Bold Guy- (talk) 10:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 8)  - American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77, and United Airlines Flight 93 were all selected by the bot, and it would be odd to leave this one out.  It's not a featured article, but think it's possible make the edits needed in the next week or so to get it to GA or higher standards.  --Aude (talk) 21:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 9)  - For some reason, the selection bot picked Loose Change (film) which is about 9/11 conspiracy theories, but the bot did not pick this article, which  covers the topic more generally.  I recommend including this article in the selection, and removing Loose Change, which peaked in popularity in 2006, but less popular now. --Aude (talk) 21:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED


 * 1)  - This is a FA, and a subarticle of the World Trade Center article.  It fits well with other articles that have been selected.  Also, I noticed the bot picked World Trade Center (film) which is just start class and I don't think it's such a great an article yet.  To make space for these three articles, I recommend removing World Trade Center (film) from the selection. --Aude (talk) 21:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED


 * Military and War
 * 1)  A-class article, the final battle of World War II Constantine   ✍  17:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY SELECTED
 * 2)  A-class article, very comprehensive treatment of the military of the Later Roman Empire. Complements treatment on earlier Roman military themes like the auxiliaries. Constantine   ✍  17:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Although score is low, I think this is an artefact of the way the bot ranks things; it covers a fairly major topic that provides much context, and is A-Class. PASSED
 * 3)  A-class article, one of the most important and ubiquitous tanks of World War II, still in service in the Six Days War of 1967. Constantine   ✍  17:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 4)  GA, High importance article, documents the rise of the Ottoman Empire. Constantine   ✍  17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 5)  GA, account of origin, use and development the weapon that transformed warfare. Constantine   ✍  17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC) Although ranked low, this is mainly due to low interwiki for this spinoff of Cannon.  This GA covers a significant topic, nicely supports and enhances the major article. Walkerma (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 6)  GA, the father of the British Royal Air Force. Constantine   ✍  17:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC) HELD - topic is not quite major enough.
 * 7)  FA, but just missed the bot list.  I'm not endorsing, for the full argument, see proposal here. PASSED
 * 8)  Featured Article, the largest airborne operation in history, yet oddly little known probably because it was overshadowed by Operation Market-Garden. Skinny87 (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC) PASSED - with newer data, probably would have been selected via WP:Germany.
 * 9)  FA; her sortie is very well-known and is one of the hallmarks of the Attack on Pearl Harbor...(obviously behind Arizona's sinking). PASSED

Above comments & reviews by Walkerma (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Language & Communication
This section checked by Walkerma (talk) 03:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1)  noted organization. Regulatory authority of Urdu language.  Isles CapeTalk 14:20, 18 September 2008 (UTC) HELD: Too low importance
 * 2)  Revived Celtic language, being used as the medium of instruction in a primary school on the Isle of Man. Article has recently been greatly expanded and is now B-class, high importance to WikiProject Celts. —Angr 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY SELECTED FOR WP:LANGUAGES
 * 3)  Only start class, but top importance to WP:WikiProject Indonesia, and by some estimates the 7th most widely spoken language (including 2nd language speakers) in the world (see List of languages by total number of speakers. —Angr 10:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:LANGUAGES
 * 4)  B-class, considered a vital article. By some estimates the 10th most widely spoken language in the world. —Angr 10:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC) PREVIOUSLY SELECTED
 * 5)  B-class, considered a vital article. —Angr 10:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:LANGUAGES
 * 6)  C-class, considered a vital article. —Angr 10:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:LANGUAGES

your addition here

Life Sciences

 * 1)  B-class. A top quality of the class article with a lot of good references. It's also included in 2007 Wikipedia for Schools. OhanaUnited<b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 02:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 2)  Start class. Occurs worldwide and causes major financial complications to fishery because they kill all fishes in the lake/river. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 02:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC) FAIL ON QUALITY
 * 3)  Start class. I have no clue why it's not selected at all. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 12:12, 16 September 2008 (UTC) FAIL ON QUALITY
 * 4)  GA. noted chemist  Isles <b style="color:blue;">Cape</b>Talk 14:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 5)  high importance, b-class WS (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2008 (UTC) ARTICLE CALLED Hearing impairment, ALREADY PASSED FOR WP:DEAF
 * GA, high importance.  bibliomaniac 1  5  21:07, 15 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY SELECTED FOR WP:NZ.

Above section reviewed by Walkerma (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

your addition here

Mathematics
HELD
 * 1)  - GA, top importance to WPMC, mid for WPMATH. It's more of a household name (at least in the United States) than already-included International Mathematical Olympiad. Quality mathematics articles are hard to come by anyways. Finally, it's the only mathematics competition that has non-mathematical sponsors, which arguably makes it the most well-known (though a bit US-centric, I admit). Nousernamesleft (talk) 01:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

your addition here

Religion

 * 1)  Self-nomination. FA-class article of top importance to Wikiproject Anglicanism. RelHistBuff (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED AT WP:Anglicanism
 * 2)  Self-nomination. FA-class article of top importance to Wikiproject Switzerland. RelHistBuff (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC) ALREADY PASSED AT WP:Switzerland

your addition here

Philosophy


your addition here

Physical Sciences
your addition here

Social Sciences & Society

 * 1)  FL class, notable Eagle Scouts —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 2)  GA class, noted Scouting leader and Vietnam-era POW —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 3)  FA class, Scout leader, Order of the Arrow founder. —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 4)  FA class, US Senator, NC governor, noted Scouter —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 5)  GA class, first Eagle Scout —  Rlevse  •  Talk  • 00:11, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 6)  FA class, featured on the main page, largest military marching band in the world  — BQZip01 —  talk 06:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 7)  FA class, featured on the main page, world's largest annual bonfire, collapse in 1999 was one of the year's major events.  — BQZip01 —  talk 06:43, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 8)  GA class, mid importance. The aodai is a type of dress, the Vietnamese national costume. Article has gorgeous pictures. Self-nomination. Kauffner (talk) 14:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED- was only Start when it narrowly missed the bot selection.
 * 9)  It seems this article would be interesting to a wide audience. Appraiser (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) FAIL - article is in poor shape
 * 10)  Although being a start-class, it will be a big mistake not to include these climate-change treaty and organizations when almost every country in the world participate. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> PASS - only start, but it's a decent one, and stats indicate a pretty important topic.
 * 11)  Same as above comments. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 02:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED - comments exactly as for the previous article.
 * 12)  B-class. In good quality, just one point short of reaching the inclusion threshold. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 12:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 13)  Self-explanatory. Every encyclopedia should have this, whether print or electronic. It has high importance on not just a few projects, but the entire Wikipedia and the world. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 12:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC) PASSED
 * 14)  FA class. Noted social scientist. Self-nom.  Isles <b style="color:blue;">Cape</b>Talk 13:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC) PASS- I'm surprised this wasn't bot-selected. Walkerma (talk) 03:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 15)  Article has been highly expanded and referenced but wasn't re-evaluated prior to the scoring run. It is part of WP Crime, WP South America and the barely operating WP Guyana. A companion article, Jim Jones, has been chosen and this article is as qualified as the Jones one. Recommended through WP Crime. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC) PASS
 * 16)  Article has been highly expanded and referenced but at present is only claimed by WP:WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area which didn't seem to have articles in the run. It is rated as high importance by the project and has been re-assessed as B quality. It is part of a series of companion articles, including Jim Jones which was chosen and this article is as qualified as the Jones one. Wildhartlivie (talk) 04:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC) PASS
 * 17)  GA-class article. A community from the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Article contains detailed research of the culture, customs and the Anti-Brahmin movement from a vast collection of books, magazines, newspapers and periodicals.- Ravichandar <sub style="color:aqua; font-family:Monotype Corsiva;">My coffee shop  16:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC) PASS
 * 18)  - Major unsolved murder case fousing on missing white woman syndrome. The article is a good article. HELD - stats indicate that this case is not prominent enough.
 * 19)  (self-nomination) Key piece of economics and business knowledge, but well below B class. Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 20)  One of the world's top 3 largest consumer cooperatives, and one of the world's top 10 mutuals. B class Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 21)  (self-nomination) Another of the world's top 10 mutuals, would be C or B class if re-assessed Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC) PASS
 * 22)  Just assessed it as B class.  2nd largest employee-owned company in the 2007 ICA Global 300.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 21:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC) PASS
 * 23)  B class article, Top importance for the Texas Tech WikiProject, and High importance in the Texas WikiProject.  This article is about a medium sized public university in Texas. (Self-Nom) --MarkRomero (talk) 14:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC) HELD

Above articles reviewed by Walkerma (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

your addition here

Technology and Engineering

 * 1)  B class, high importance. Soxred93 has a boring sig 15:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC).  HELD to see if it improves before release date. Walkerma (talk) 05:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC) NOW PASSED BY SELECTIONBOT VIA WP:Video Games.
 * 2)  B-High. Was unassessed when the algorithms were run. The computer that saved Apple and heralded in a new age of industrial design.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 00:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll punt this one, as it satisfies the criteria for inclusion based on importance, but it is lacking a lot of detail on the impact of the iMac on Apple, which is one of the primary reasons given in the nomination. I'll revisit this in a while, and I'll decide whether to pass or fail on quality at the time. Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 04:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC) HELD based on Titoxd's comments - though could have been categorised as FAIL on quality, but we should definitely review it next time.
 * 1)  B-High. Was unassessed when the algorithms were run. The very first Mac; the one that started it all.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 00:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 2)  GA, unrated importance. One of the largest radio telescopes in the world (and one of the largest telescopes full stop, for that matter). Mike Peel (talk) 21:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC) HELD
 * 3)  Needed for providing context to the related articles. Top importance for WP:CCISTF, and narrowly missed automatic selection. No inline references but has a bibliography :) --h2g2bob (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC) PASS

Passed

 * 1)  PASSED
 * 2)  PASSED
 * 3)  PASSED
 * 4)  PASSED, now a GA
 * 5)  PASSED
 * 6)  PASSED
 * 7)  PASSED
 * 8)  PASSED
 * 9)  PASSED for MCB
 * 10)  PASSED
 * 11)  Ranked as Start but looks at least C to me, major uni.
 * 12)  PASSED: Borderline - weak B, but important.
 * 13)  - a nice GA, used to replace a weaker but more prominent article (now removed).
 * 14)  PASSED
 * 15)  PASSED
 * 16)  PASSED
 * 17)  PASSED
 * 18)  PASSED
 * 19)  PASSED
 * 20)  PASSED - almost in as B, now GA, and we removed several from that project.
 * 21)  PASSED, B
 * 22)  PASSED, B, replacement for Aztec mythology which is in bad shape.
 * 23)  PASSED, tagged Start but looks like B to me, high importance for Hinduism.
 * 24)  PASSED, B.
 * 25)  PASSED, B
 * 26)  PASSED, B
 * 27)  Was already close when it was Start, and now he's a VP candidate and the article's a GA.
 * 28)  Now B, much more prominent
 * 29)  Now B, much more prominent
 * B, continues to have huge hit ranking
 * 1)  Ranked as C, but looks like a good B, huge hit ranking
 * 2)  Happened in October, B-Class, the equivalent 2006 article (also B) is already in with a score of 1347.
 * 3)  New president of South Africa, replacing Mbeki.  Only ranked Start, but looks like a usable C to me.
 * 4)  New president of Pakistan.  Only ranked Start, but looks C to me.  Has a POV tag, but that's almost inevitable given the topic.
 * 5)  Ranked 60th most viewed page, even in October, two months after the war. B-Class, extensive, POV tag is not surprising given the topic.
 * 6)  Has more gold medals than any other Olympian, and seven world records.
 * 7)  From Liberia set nom
 * 8)  From Liberia set nom
 * 9)  From Liberia set nom
 * 10)  From Liberia set nom
 * 11)  Now going for GA, looks good and also pretty important tourism site. Walkerma (talk) 08:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 12)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS
 * 1)  PASS

Held or failed

 * 1)  HELD - no compelling reason to add this B
 * 2)  FAIL - only a weak Start
 * 3)  FAIL - Start
 * 4)  HELD
 * 5)  FAIL - Start
 * 6)  FAIL-Start
 * 7)  FAIL- Start
 * 8)  FAIL- Start, though topic is certainly notable.  Please improve this article and we could then maybe take it!
 * 9)  FAIL, Ditto.
 * 10)  HELD - decent article, but not quite notable enough.
 * 11)  Borderline but only a weak B (C?) HELD - but if article is improved a bit it should be included.
 * 12)  FAIL - Start, needs a lot of work.
 * 13)  HELD - only a very weak B, once it gets better - ideally GA or FA - it should be important enough to include.
 * 14)  HELD
 * 15)  HELD
 * 16)  HELD
 * 17)  HELD

To be checked

 * }