Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Amusement Parks!

This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's amusement park articles and their relative importance to the project. While much of the work is performed in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, article assessment ratings are used within the project itself to aid in the recognition of excellent contributions and in the identification of topics that need further improvements.

How it works
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Amusement Parks project banner. The class= parameter is the assessed quality rating of the article, and the importance= parameter grades the article's relevance to this project. Adding this template banner on the article's talk page will list the article at Category:Amusement park articles and place it in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Amusement park articles by quality and Category:Amusement park articles by importance. This serves as the foundation for an automatically generated work list. Multiple parameters exist for the template that allow extensive classification within the project's scope.

Frequently asked questions

 * How do I get an article added to the project? : Just add WikiProject Amusement Parks to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. Anyone can add an article to the project.
 * How can I get my article rated? : After adding the article to the project, please list it in the section for assessment requests below. All unrated articles show up under Category:Unassessed amusement park articles and on various work lists.
 * Who can assess articles? : Anyone is free to add or change the rating of an article.
 * Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? : Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have specific questions, you can ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
 * Where can I get more comments about my article? : You can ask on the Amusement Parks Project Assessment talk page.
 * What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternatively, you can ask any member of the project at Amusement Parks Project talk page to rate the article again.
 * Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the project Assessment talk page.

Importance scale
The importance scale for this WikiProject's Task Forces can be found on each Task Force page. They should be modeled after Wikipedia's outline for priority assessments and the suggested criteria at.

The following is a guide for assigning importance within WikiProject Amusement Parks. The process is somewhat subjective. Click the importance grade in the left column to view articles within this WikiProject that have that designation.

Requesting an assessment
If you have created a new article or made significant changes to one, and are seeking another editor's opinion on its assessment, feel free to list it below in the form of:

Note that requesting assistance here is not required. Any editor who feels comfortable doing so may assess or re-assess an article on their own. It is recommended to use the charts above as a reference. Also, you may leave brief comments below when performing an assessment for others, but extensive commentary is best left at the article's talk page. WikiProject members should help keep the list below tidy by periodically removing old entries in the list that have been assessed.

Important: If you assess an article listed below, please indicate ✅, as well as the result, and strike it off the list so that others are aware.


 * The article was a stub however I've added more information. I think it could be start-class now, but I'm not sure so I'm putting it here. --RanDom 404 (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Assessed as Start from Stub, expansion warrants more but good additions. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 23:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This article is "Start" but I added more information and cited many of the un-cited information in history. --SchinLBL (talk) 03:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Assessed as C class from Start, article has a great amount of info, still items needing to be addressed such as missing information, citations, or formatting. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 14:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * This article needs an assessment, I just added the AP Wikiproject to the article. -- from yours truly, Harobouri T • C 00:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Assessed as C class from Unknown, the article is mid-importance. The article has great sourcing, it just needs those touches! Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 01:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)


 * --GossieGoodTimes (talk) 00:05, 30 December 2023 (UTC). Article is classified as a "Start" but I rewrote the history and ensured all the information was sourced.

Assessment log
See Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Amusement park articles by quality log for the log of all articles added to the project.


 * The logs on that page are generated automatically (approximately every three days); please don't add entries to them by hand.