Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Newsletter/3

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#3)
 * Previous -- Next
 * Released: 1 November, 2014
 * Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is the third quarterly update, documenting what's going on in WikiProkect Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list


 * What's new
 * Several new GAs: Cervix, Cranial nerves, Parathyroid gland, Sebaceous glands, Pudendal nerve
 * New FL (Anatomical terms of motion)
 * Finally, an automatically-generated list of articles needing cleanup is available:
 * A list of recent changes is created, and can also be attached as a template for user pages:
 * Reached GA goal of 10 articles! -- now increased to 20
 * We were Featured in the signpost!
 * An essay about the use of Anatomical terminology, WP:ANATSIMPLIFY is released (see below for more!)


 * What's going on
 * We fly past 10,000 articles (now already up to 10,150). Why is this important? Articles under our scope are automatically included in popular pages, the cleanup list, and will be included as the recent changes list is updated.
 * A discussion about the formatting of infoboxes.
 * A lot of editing on the heart article -- can it make it to GA?
 * The medical newsletter, WP:PULSE finds its feet, and Anatomy and Physiology are featured as a subsection!
 * A new WP:WikiProject Animal anatomy (WP:ANAN) is created to focus on animal anatomy.


 * How can I contribute?
 * Welcome new editors! We have a constant stream of new editors who are often eager to work on certain articles.
 * We are always looking to collaborate! If you're looking for editors to collaborate with, let us know on our talk page!
 * Continue to add high-class reliable sources
 * Browse images on WikiCommons to improve the quality of images we use on many articles.

Anatomical terminology is an essential component to all our articles. It is necessary to describe structures accurately and without ambiguity. It can also be extremely confusing and, let's face it, it's likely you too were confused too before you knew what was going on ("It's all Greek to me!" you may have said, fairly accurately).
 * Quarterly focus - Anatomical terminology

In the opinion of this editor, it's very important that we try hard to describe anatomy in a way that is both technically accurate and accessible. The majority of our readers are lay readers and will not be fluent in terminology. Anatomy is a thoroughly interesting discipline, but it shouldn't be 'locked away' only to those who are fluent in the lingo – exploring anatomy should not be limited by education, technical-level English fluency, or unfamiliarity with its jargon. Anatomical terminology is one barrier to anatomical literacy.

Here are four ways that we can help improve the readability of our anatomical articles.
 * 1) Substitute. Use words readers are familiar with -- there is no need to use anatomical terminology unless necessary!
 * Innervated by
 * The nerve that supplies X is...
 * 1) Explain. When using terminology, remember readers will likely not understand what you mean, so consider adding an explanation and providing context. Use wikilinks for terms that a reader may not know.
 * "The triceps extends the arm" may not be readily understood. A small addition may help the reader:
 * "The triceps extends the arm, straightening it". Consider:
 * 1) Separate. Do not use long, complicated sentences. Don't write discursive, long comparisons unless needed. Start with simple information first, then get progressively more complex. Separate information by paragraph and subsection. Bite-sized information is much more easier to digest for readers who don't have a solid anatomical foundation
 * 2) Eliminate. Not all information is necessary on every article. Hatnotes are a simple and effective way to direct readers to another article. Don't provide long lists of synonyms of names for structures that an article isn't about. If a sentence has been paraphrased to the hilt, consider that several editors are indicating it may need to be simplified.
 * "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve (nervus opthalmicus) and mandibular nerve (nervus mandibularis)"
 * "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve and mandibular nerve" is much more easily digestible

This essay is provided in full on WP:ANATSIMPLIFY.

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list