Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture/Peer review/Antonin Raymond

Antonin Raymond
I have significantly expanded this stub and was hoping to get it to Good Article status. I would be grateful if somebody could read it through, rate it for me and let me know how I may improve it. (I do also have it on the Requests for feedback page, but the volunteers over there seem to be snowed under with new articles and I thought that some more specialist feedback would be better). Thanks Kenchikuben (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I read the article with great interest, about this extremely active and very influential architect. His biography is certainly not an usual one, and I think it poses a particular challenge to summarise in an encyclopedic style, and not let dominate the article. I hope there will be a lot of interest in reading, reviewing and improving this article. As it stands, I think it provides a very good introduction to the subject, but needs further work for a comprehensive overview. My suggestions are:
 * The lead should provide a better summary of the subject, in about 3 paragraphs per WP:LEAD.
 * There could be more written about his architecture: for instance the awarded Nanzan University Chapel isn't mentioned at all, nor is his design for the Golconde dormitory in India.
 * I find the legacy section too short for somebody considered "the father of modern architecture in Japan". His influence on Japanese architects would need to be explained here. I also just discovered that his last company in Japan still exists. This probably should be also mentioned.
 * As any article about architecture, illustrations would be very useful. I know this will be a difficult task, as is generally hard to obtain free images of residential architecture, however it should be possible for his public buildings. The Japanese Wiki article has several images which could be useful in the absence of better quality ones, so if somebody with Japanese knowledge can figure out if those images are consistent with wikimedia commons policy, it would be good to import them to commons. (This is however not a GA criteria, there are even FAs with only one image).
 * The infobox indicates nationality as American. I wonder if he also retained his Czech citizenship given that he was honorary consul of the Czechoslovak Republic.
 * There is an inconsitency between the last statement that he died in Langhorne and the lead+infobox indicating New Hope.
 * Hope these comments help, and don't get scared by the critique, some of these issues are beyond GA. --Elekhh (talk) 07:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that Elekhh. I'll improve the Lead and the Legacy sections and check the nationality. As you say, the photos are a problem, but I'll look at the Japanese Wiki article. Kenchikuben (talk) 08:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I have tried to address the points you raised above:
 * I have added more text to the LEAD.
 * I have included more information about his architecture, including Nanzan University and Chapel and have added a section about his work in India.
 * The Legacy section has been renamed and I have concentrated on his influences derived from his use of concrete.
 * I also amended the inconsistencies and added a line about his naturalization. I've also added a section about the influence of his wife. Thanks for adding the additional photos. I've also found a couple more from wikimedia commons and uploaded another from Wiki Japan (it had a Creative Commons license).Kenchikuben (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Good progress, but I am not sure of two images you added: the image of the Tokyo Woman's Christian University does not seem to be representing his work: it simply does not look like his architecture. It might be an altered building or a different building in the same complex. If you're not sure, better remove it. It hasn't been included in the Japanese wiki article either. By the Nanzan University image I am again not sure: the red/orange building seems to be more recent, while the concrete building is barely visible. If you wish to nominate it at GA this month you'll most certainly get a reviewer quickly, as result of the current GAN backlog elimination drive. I think the article has a fair chance. Elekhh (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)