Wikipedia:WikiProject Arizona/Assessment

Welcome to the assessment department of the Arizona WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Arizona related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 program,

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the WikiProject Arizona project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Arizona articles by quality.

FAQ

 * 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? : The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.  Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
 * 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? : Just add WikiProject Arizona to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
 * 3. Someone put a WikiProject Arizona template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? : Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them.  If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the talk page of this department (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
 * 4. Who can assess articles? : Any member of the Arizona WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes.
 * 5. How do I rate an article? : Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the assessment instructions.
 * 6. Can I request that someone else rate an article? : Of course; to do so, please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
 * 7. What if I don't agree with a rating? : You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.  Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process that must be followed; this is documented in the assessment instructions.
 * 8. Aren't the ratings subjective? : Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
 * 9. What if I have a question not listed here? : If your question concerns the article assessment process specifically, please refer to the discussion page for this department; for any other issues, leave a message on the talk page.

Assessment instructions
An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the WikiProject Arizona project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):



Article importance
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Arizona articles.

Importance scale
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Arizona.

''Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.''

Requests for assessment
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Chiricahua Mountains - BAlvarius (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Done, the article is now rated start class. JJ98 (Talk) 10:44, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Musical Instrument Museum (Phoenix) User: Shakinglord
 * Assess as stub class. JJ98 (Talk)  00:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Sierra Madre Occidental --Al Climbs (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Heard Building - Cantstandya (talk) 06:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Meridian Bank Tower (Phoenix) - Cantstandya (talk) 06:29, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Harriet C. Babbitt - --TommyBoy (talk) 21:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Assessment Log

 * The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.