Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 June 1

= June 1 =

HELP!
Can someone please help me edit my page. It is called A Country Doctor (novel)? If any of you have read this novel by Sarah Orne Jewett, please add info to the page. Thank you!--24.225.89.81 (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * You can easily find the relevant link at Country Doctor. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:01, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I did not see it there!24.225.89.81 (talk) 14:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

remove submittal
I inadvertently submitted the beginnings of an article to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lincoln Jones III Please remove it as a submission. It is supposed to be in my sandbox only at this time.

Afrosty (talk) 01:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC) Afrosty


 * We don't have a draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lincoln Jones III. You had submitted your sandbox for a review, but you have removed that submission template yourself. Huon (talk) 02:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Review pending for page on magician Adam Mada?
Hello,

A page I have created for submission on Australian magician Adam Mada is still pending review, I was wondering if I needed to resubmit it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Adam_Mada

As you can see, the page has gone through a few iterations, and in its current version should address all of the previous mods' concerns.

Thanks,

D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Damien Bright (talk • contribs)


 * Hi Damien! That page is not currently submitted for review, so if you think it's ready you should add to the top of the page in order to submit it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 01:57, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, that would explain it. Edit made, should be submitted now.. Damien Bright (talk) 02:20, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Review pending for Lyceum of the Philippines University- Laguna
I created this page, 2 weeks ago, it's rejected for 2 times already and I think that I already edited this page perfectly and put necessary references.

Hoping that my page can be reviewed immediately because I need it very much. Here's the link of my article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Lyceum_of_the_Philippines_University-Laguna

Hoping for your review and immediate approval. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.207.13.167 (talk) 03:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting us know that this needed immediate review. I have now reviewed it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Why was my article at 'Vidmind' declined?
Thanks, Shanie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.116.175.9 (talk) 08:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * It is explained in the decline template at the top of the page at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vidmind and the reviewer also posted further comment. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vishwakarma Vamsavriksham
let me know how to add te section of contentsMadhusai (talk) 08:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * A Table of Contents is automatically created when a page has at least three separate sections - your has only one, the References section. However adding a table of Contents is the last thing you should be concerned about, as the page is now it contains just a bunch (or bunches) of names without any context or explanations. Work on the content first, worry about layout and other technicalities later. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ecological death
Who coined the term "Ecological Death" ? When and in what context was this concept first used. The source may be shown. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CobraBanker (talk • contribs) 17:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Symbol move vote.svg|20px]] This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what the Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try  for an article related to the topic you want to know more about.  I hope this helps. Or you can try asking the author of the draft on their talk page. Huon (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Erste Abwicklungsanstalt
This agency is the first bad bank in Germany which was established on initiative of the EU commission. The establishment is a result of individual management and supervision failure within a bank that used to be Germany's third largest in combination with effects of the overall financial crisis. The assets that were transferred into the EAA were acquired in major banking locations such as London and New York. What else is required to provide notability? I have provided references to articles from major news agencies such as Reuters and Financial Times. Significant coverage? Yes. Reliable sources? Yes. Independent? Yes. Could somebody provide more specific advice as to what else it takes?Lavoulte (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The articles from major news agencies should be what the draft is based on - instead your references are a press release (not a reliable source), an EU newsletter of dubious reliability and little connection to the draft's text, and a German government website that mentions EAA only in passing. While I don't doubt the bank is notable, the article does a very poor job at showing notability and summarizing what reliable third-party sources have to say about it. Huon (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)