Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 April 20

= April 20 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ThreadSafe
I have submitted this article twice, and it has been rejected both times with an explanation of the reason. I have now resubmitted it after having made improvements and hope that it will now be satisfactory.

Question: I have retained the explanations of the reasons for rejection at the top of the article. Should I remove them now, before the review has taken place, or leave them there for the reviewer to consult?

Thanks Dsannella (talk) 12:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Dsannella. It is best to leave them there for the next reviewer to refer to. Also the links in the decline reasons may come in useful. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Startup Village - Yokneam
I accidentally clicked "Resubmit" while it was waiting for a second review (from March 26). Can someone please delete the April 20 resubmit request? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unclefeet (talk • contribs) 15:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ It actually makes no difference - submissions are listed under the date of the oldest "review waiting" template. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wigberto Ramos
Hi, my article for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wigberto Ramos had been decline for the second time. This time because of this: "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes". This is my first article and I´ve been doing it on my own, but this time I would love to get someone who could guide me in order to fit the minimum requirements at list. In order to learn how to correctly submit articles to wikipedia and clean up this one. Thanks.(Mahnuee (talk) 23:58, 20 April 2014 (UTC))