Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 April 5

= April 5 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kik controversy
Hi,

I have attempted to add a section into Kik Messenger controversy section, however another user is continually deleting my work.

The edit in question can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kik_Messenger&oldid=602817107

And the current version can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kik_Messenger

The user cites NPOV and lack of reliable sources, however each of the sources are major news networks, I don't see it violating NPOV, I'm not smearing the company in any way.

Any help would be appreciated — Preceding unsigned comment added by MDI1480 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gollum Wiki
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gollum Wiki seems far more notable to me than many of the other Wiki_software that already have articles even if they are stubs. I am in the process of looking for more notable references from reliable sources but would appreciate some guidance on this declined submission. Grantbow (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of User:Dgdavenport/sandbox
I recently posted a trial, fake, article in my sandbox. Confused about the size of the various fonts. I'll keep working while awaiting an explanation.

dgdavenportgordon22 (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If you're just testing, edit all your want in your sandbox. You don't need to submit it for review unless its in article you want to move into mainspace but not sure (or restricted) for moving.  Only rules (I know of) for sandbox articles is no attack articles and no copying from elsewhere. LionMans Account (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)