Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 August 3

= August 3 =

07:50:56, 3 August 2014 review of submission by Condemore
Condemore (talk) 07:50, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * You seem to be producing a draft which says "carnage magaluf mamading" and that is all. WHat are you trying to do? Fiddle   Faddle  13:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

08:12:45, 3 August 2014 review of draft by Cecile Gallina-Duret
I do not have specific references other than those no doubt kept somewhere in the archives  of Vallourec or of Ensam where I sent his notes and research work found at home after his death. I am not sure it would fit into editing of Vallourec History Page. As I am new to this, your assistance would be much appreciated. Cécile Gallina-Duret 08:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * One of Wikipedia's key pillars is verifiability, so without sources your draft cannot be published. Also, you need to remove or rewrite the first couple sentences to focus on the subject, as WIkipedia articles don't start with a preface. Finally, your userpage is not to be used as a sandbox, so please remove that content. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

13:00:40, 3 August 2014 review of submission by Nupur2000
Hi Please consider my article for review and publish. Thankyou :) Nupur2000 (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * for reasons stated on the draft. Fiddle   Faddle  13:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

15:57:51, 3 August 2014 review of submission by Trancegenre
HI I'm trancegenre why did you deleted my new passage about IMAN ALIPOUR Trancegenre (talk) 15:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The article you wrote was deleted because the subject is not notable. Your draft has been declined for similar reasons. Your draft has no sources so you haven't made a case for notability. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Draft:IMAN ALIPOUR exists happily. Are you referring to something else? Fiddle   Faddle  16:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see you are. Please work on the draft. Fiddle   Faddle  16:11, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

16:02:47, 3 August 2014 review of submission by Nupur2000
Please my review my article once more. I have provided more links in ref to my article :)
 * Please don't re-submit until you have addressed every Wikipedia requirement. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

16:27:29, 3 August 2014 review of submission by 197.237.27.216
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hello Sir. I am trying to make wiki for Aakash Dhaiya. All my info s are correct. Can you please guide me what else I need to put in the article so that it can get accepted. I am through the REQUIREMENTS as u said. But totally confused :( Thank you :)


 * You need to look at the advice given at the two reviews and either follow it or ask the reviewers to explain what they mean. Reading User:Timtrent/A good article may be of use to you. It has helped others. What we are looking for is an article that shows WP:N and meets WP:42.
 * What I suggest is that you spend some time reading, then work on your draft. Anything you do not understand or need advice on, please ask a specific question about that thing. Do not resubmit until you are sure it is good enough. Even then it may be declined. And that is ok. Just do the next thing you have been advised to do. The process is iterative until we can accept your draft, and we want to accept it. Fiddle   Faddle  17:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

19:47:51, 3 August 2014 review of submission by CJBlevins
Hi. Thank you for your quick and speedy review. I am curious. I've read the help areas, and it says it was denied because it doesn't read like an autobiography/format. What makes it sound so commercial? If you could guide me on what specific elements stand out that would help better resolve these issues as quickly as possible for an approval, I'd really appreciate it. I'm trying to get it posted before I have to take a leave of absence due to a medical condition. Thank you for your attention. Oh..and I keep getting a "No Draft Specified" error. The draft page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Scott_Hosfeld Draft:Scott_Hosfeld Please tell me what I'm doing wrong! The learning curve for this is steep...whew. :-)

CJBlevins C. J. Blevins (talk) 23:43, 3 Aug 2014 (UTC)   C. J. Blevins (talk)

CJBlevins (talk) 19:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

19:47:51, 3 August 2014 request for review by CJBlevins


 * Phrases like "greatly sought after" and "Internationally acclaimed violist" aren't neutral, even if they are true. All of that wording has to be removed. I'd also like to point out that your draft relies heavily on AllMusic and Imdb, neither of which are reliable sources. To that end, you haven't made the case for the subject's notability. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:57, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

22:52:17, 3 August 2014 review of submission by Atowfiq
I submitted this work 3 weeks ago. Initially I was told that Wiki has 500 submissions and mine will take over a week. Then it keeps updating and increasing the number of submissions and required time. I don't understand why it would be like that. An article should be processed as submitted in a serial order. If you now have more than 2000 submissions, mine should still be at the top ...not at the bottom. So why I was told that mine will take over a month now. I don't understand the logic behind this. I would greatly appreciate if you can expedite my submission please. Atowfiq (talk) 22:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a common misconception. Submissions are not addressed in order; reviews happen randomly. I declined your draft and explained my reasoning on the draft. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)