Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 February 22

= February 22 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St. Cloud, Minnesota, Rockets Hockey Team
I have just submitted an article for review. Wikipedia talk: Articles for creation/St. Cloud, Minnesota, Rockets Hockey Team I would like to add several more articles regarding the history of this team. How do I submit articles so that they will all be together under this one title? Thank you. Quintilian3 (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Bev Hofmann

never mind we figured it out!Miss Wasky (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * What did you "figure out"? I don't understand what you mean by multiple articles under one title, that's actually not possible, every article must have a unique title.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/R.J Forrester
I have no interest of completing this article for creation, therefore how am I going to remove it off my back? Thanks you. — SoapFan12 (talk,  contribs ) 10:43, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Just leave it alone and it will soon be deleted - unless someone else wants to work on it. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of User:Jean Venter/sandbox
Our submission on TrendBridge network groups, describes a concept. Please advise the need for corporate notability in this context. The research group TrendBridge is not notable, but it is part of a concepts name that it identified. not sure how to deal with this issue. please assist. Will it help If I link the particular word to a commercial website ? We are not trying to publicize the research group, just the concept Jean Venter (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Whatever it may be, Aggie80 makes a good point: There is no reference provided to an outside source of information. Besides notability, verifiability is also an important requirement of Wikipedia articles. This means there must be references to reliable sources of information. Please see the introduction to referencing or referencing for beginners for information on how to cite sources.


 * Finally, no, linking the word to a website doesn't help. See the external links guideline.  Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 00:09, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elsa Cladera Encinas de Bravo
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elsa Cladera Encinas de Bravo Hi, I'm waiting for an answer concerning my article to know whether it will be accepted. I wonder if I can change the name of the Article from "Elsa Cladera Encinas de Bravo" to "Elsa Cladera de Bravo" this is the name with which Elsa is most known. Does this represent some problem? Nadezhda Bravo Cladera (talk) 16:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * No, this can be fixed rather easily. You can move the page to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elsa Cladera de Bravo. (Or, I could move it for you if you wanted.) Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 00:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monte Cook Games
Hello, I'm not certain if my article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monte Cook Games is currently in the queue for a 2nd look after being declined the first time. I don't want to create a poor showing for myself by resubmitting it if it's already in the queue. The box at the top of the article submission page indicates the article has been declined, what I can do to improve the article (which I've done), and contains a resubmit button. But the box at the bottom indicates that the article has been submitted and that I should wait. Not sure which one to believe at this point. Thanks!

Nightscrawler (talk) 18:37, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The box that indicates the article has been submitted is what the reviewers are looking for, not the decline. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 19:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)