Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 February 25

= February 25 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RESAAS
Hi,

the article I submitted was declined and I was wondering if you could advise me as to why and how to get it approved.

I've moved the link to the title. Anon 126  (talk - contribs)

Thank you, Alyson Resaas55 (talk) 00:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The main reasons are given at the top of the page. In short, you have not shown notability, which generally means that other people have written about or otherwise discussed it. (See the general guideline, the specific guideline for organizations, and the specific guideline for Web content. Notability can be demonstrated by meeting any one of these.) If you can find outside reliable sources of information that discuss this website, please add them to the article. (See the introduction to referencing or referencing for beginners for more information on how to add sources.)


 * The article should also be changed to reflect a neutral point of view in order to be accepted. Such terms as "innovative" and "powerful" are known as "peacock terms" and discouraged if they are not credited to an independent source of information.  Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 03:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Multitasking in Multimedia Art
I hereby affirm that I, PhD Vesna Srnic am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of "Multitasking in Multimedia Art" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Multitasking_in_Multimedia_Art I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported". I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Digitalni035 (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)PhD Vesna Srnic, Croatia, Europe, Digitalni035 (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Media-Via owner and editor (http://media-via.net ) Digitalni035 (talk) 07:55, 25 February 2014 (UTC)copyright-holder


 * Such a declaration is unnecessary. If you contribute content to Wikipedia and it has not been published elsewhere before, you already release it under CC-BY-SA and the GFDL (see the terms of use and the copyrights page).  Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 22:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Er.M.M.Idrees Ul haq Beigh
I have removed all peacock terms used in this article, Now it is perfectly fit to be in Wikipedia, I hope Desk will clear it  soon, as it was submitted on Feb 1st & is awaiting Clearance !!! The citation are fully verified by me, checked one by one !!! Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beighidi (talk • contribs) 08:44, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm currently looking at the article. For future reference, please do not remove the box that says "Submission declined", as it provides important information for future reviewers. Thank you! APerson (talk!) 17:10, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

article creation
Dear Sir, Madam

My name is Avi Tawil. I'm the director of European Jewish Community Centre (EJCC), a non-profit organisation based in Brussels, Belgium, that promotes culture.

As the EJCC is an very active organisation, which hots lots of cultural events, I'd like to create an article on wikipedia with our history. I've been trying to create an article since a few months, but it's has been very difficult to do it, and there is always a different problem with it... which is quite frustrating. It's hard for me to understand what's the real issue, as other organisations do have a wikipedia article. So why can't I have a wikipedia article about my organisation ?

The last thing I read is that I should mention my relation with the organisation, which is not a problem, but then it wasn't written how I should proceed.

I'll deeply appreciate if you help me to create an article on the EJCC.

Thanks in advance for your time and attention!

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Best regards,

Avi Tawil EJCC Director — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avitawil (talk • contribs) 11:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Avi. Wikipedia does not have articles about all organisations, even ones that are very active with lots of cultural events. In addition, even if an article exists about another organisation, that does not mean that such an article is a model for what is needed to be accepted as a new article.


 * Even with your Conflict of interest, you could write your article at articles for creation - Articles for creation which would hopefully mean that the article draft does not need to be deleted each time it is rejected. Instead, you could work to improve it and overcome each problem. One thing to avoid doing is copying and pasting material from your organisation's own website (or anywhere else) into the article draft.


 * Before starting, read Referencing for beginners to see how to references your sources, and VRS to see what sort of sources are needed to prove notability. The latter point is the most frequent problem. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually it seems you could continue improving your existing draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Jewish Community Centre and resubmit it when ready. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bavarian Autosport
I have written an article for review about Bavarian Autosport but I cannot figure out how to submit it?

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bavarian Autosport

Any help is much appreciated!

Sincerely, Laura BurgessLauraLMB (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Put at the top of the page and then save the page. This will submit it for review, although you could have a long wait as there are thousands of submissions waiting at the moment. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Guitar Museum
Hello,

I'm just making sure that my article is in the queue, which I know is very long. I initially had two edits done, and then perormed the updates. Not having heard back from the editor, I'm presuming we're ready to go, or at least be put in the queue. Is this the case?

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Guitar Museum

AndreldritchAndreldritch (talk) 16:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes that page is still pending review. It's fine to edit the page while it's awaiting review (so long as you don't remove the submission template) and doing so will not delay the review. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vu Digital
1) SUB-HEAD SIZE: My subheads look too small in preview. When the article is saved, will they be the same (larger) size in the final published version? Or do I do it, and if so, how?

2) UNDERLINED SUB-HEADS: How do a put the "bar" or underline beneath a sub-head? No underlines occur beneath sub-heads in my preview. Is this automatic or do I do it, and if the latter, how?

3) HYPERLINKED REFERENCES. I cite articles as references. How do I hyperlink the title of the article itself? Right now I've got the article title followed by the url of the story. James Weed (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


 * You can consult the cheatsheet for basic formatting code.  Anon 126   (talk - contribs) 22:34, 25 February 2014 (UTC)