Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 January 30

= January 30 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918)
Dear Wiki Friend,

Is this article still in line for review? I have made all the changes suggested and wondering when I might spect to hear if it has been accepted?

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918)

Thanks so much, RufusL1948 03:46, 30 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RufusL1948 (talk • contribs)


 * Yes this article is submitted for review. Currently reviews normally happen within one or two weeks of submission. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barrister M.Zahurul Haq
Hi, I am disappointed that the article has been declined twice. In the first instance I was asked to delete puffery which I did, Now I am asked to give references? Kindly explain, thanks (Silverline1 (talk) 07:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC))


 * Please refer to the links provided in the two decline explanations on your submission Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mahmood Zahurul Haq. As explained in the first decline of the submission, referring to a range of independent, reliable, published sources is required to prove notability of the topic. This requirement is summarised in VRS. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here
Siddhi Vinayak Logistics Limited Siddhi Vinayak Logistics Limited (SVLL), with a turnover of over Rs.1400 crores, speedy growth of 80% per annum, is India’s one of the most rapidly growing company in the road transportation sector. By building up an expansive network with companies in around every state in India, SVLL, an ISO 9001:2008 certified company, gains a unique advantage as it draws its strength from enormous infrastructure, operational expertise and strong financial base. The company has 75 branch offices all over India with its registered office in Surat and Corporate office in Navi Mumbai. With the largest fleet size of 6795 vehicles in India, currently SVLL has 45 loading points in the states of Gujarat, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh providing a comprehensive network and easy access. SVLL is also in the business of manufacturing trailers with our own in house maintenance unit which gives us an edge over our competitors. At SVLL, our mission is to achieve customer delight through improvement in the quality of the services provided, constantly boosting the company’s manpower to deliver excellence and striving eternally to provide a foundation that meets corporate objectives. This philosophy helps SVLL to be labeled as trusted partners for all its leading clients. The services offered by SVLL include: 3PL Services, Ammunition Transportation, 	Automobiles Transportation, Cement Transportation, Chemicals Transportation, Container Transportation, FMCG Transportation, Pharmaceutical Transportation, Bulk LPG, Packed LPG, Rack Handling, Steel Transportation, Stock Yard and Warehousing. SVLL launched ‘Chalak se Malak’, a CSR initiative powered by Tata Motors in 2012 with an objective of uplifting the standard of living of drivers/pilots and making their lives comfortable. Along with this initiative, SVLL has also launched another professionally managed company called Siddhi Vinayak Pilot’s Club Pvt. Ltd., the only members being the Pilots themselves who will also be the equity shareholders of the Pilot’s Club. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.237.250.140 (talk) 08:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * This is not the place to post article submissions. Please do so at WIZARD instead. You should first read Conflict of interest and PSCOI. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here
I would like to know the reasons about declining my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.114.98 (talk) 10:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol question.svg|16px|link=|alt= ]] Additional information needed: What is the name of the draft? Your contributions only show your question here, probably because your ISP uses dynamic IP addresses. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 19:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of User:Sibadd/Arestides Metallinos
I am a British citizen with a second home in Corfu, Greece living in the village of Ano Korakiana on the island. I have, over the last year, come across the almost unknown work of the self-taught village sculptor Arestides Zacharias Metallinos (1908-1987) and, via a friendship with his family, have begun a catalogue of 250 plus works that are kept in a closed museum in the centre of the sculptor's birth village of Ano Korakiana. There are very few references to this man's work. I am currently translating two Greek academic pieces - one a book chapter - that describe this man's work. These were written in the mid-1980s while Metallinos was alive and his work evolving. I propose to reference these pieces to ensure credibility and to establish that I am not expressing opinions or working on primary sources. I would welcome constructive advice on ensuring that this artist merits the wikipedia article I have submitted in draft. Obviously such an article must include examples of the sculptor's work so I would also value advice on whether these should be submitted in the same draft, so that consideration can be given to the feasibility of the proposed wiki article about Metallinos. The reason the 'museum' that contains the sculptor's work is closed to the public, despite the artist's wish at the time of his death, is because his family cannot afford, under current economic conditions in Greece, to maintain and curate a public institute. I believe Wikipedia could play a part in making the unique work of a talented man accessible, at least via the internet. I have submitted other articles to Wikipedia - two of them biographies. I affirm that neither I nor anyone in my family nor the subject's family have any financial interest in this project. Simon Baddeley (talk) 14:48, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The immediate problem, as pointed out by the reviewer, is that your draft doesn't cite any sources at all. Please add references to the sources you used to write the text so far - see WP:Referencing for beginners. Another issue is your prose - take a good hard look at just how long the first sentence is, try to write in a more formal factual style. Adding images to an article is a complex issue and is best left for after the text has been accepted. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfdan M. Hanson, Architect
Dear Sir or Madam:

Recently, I submitted an article for review on an architect from Gloucester, Massachusetts named Halfdan M. Hanson. It is still in the queue. Fortunately, I have been able to get permission from Hanson's granddaughter to use a photograph of him which is in her possession. The photograph has been used by Historic New England and is on their website, and has also been used by Martha Stewart Magazine.

Of course, I have reviewed Wikimedia's requirements for uploading photographs. Secondary to the complexity of copyright laws and the fact that Historic New England is currently using a copy of the photo on their website, I just wanted to make sure I was following the appropriate steps in citing the source of the photo. On January 23, I sent an email regarding this question to Wikimedia Commons, but have not received a reply. I appreciate your time and any assistance with this matter.

Sincerely, Jennifer Holmgren (Jenglo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenglo (talk • contribs) 15:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting info.svg Just a reminder: Commons only accepts "free content," that is, content that may be used by anyone for any purpose with few restrictions. If this permission you have been given is only specific to Wikipedia, then the image is not acceptable on Commons.


 * If in fact the permission is for anyone, OTRS on Commons is the place to go. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 18:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edgar W. Denison
I have submitted my new article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Edgar W. Denison for review, and have since made some edits, which I saved. Do I need to resubmit the article?RWeaver 2014 (talk) 16:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No, if no one reviewed the article before you made the changes, you do not need to resubmit it. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 18:44, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation: Zerihun Seyoum
Hi there

I was wondering why the following article was rejected: Your submission at Articles for creation: Zerihun Seyoum (January 27)

I value your feedback and extensive expertise.

Ria Ria Cortez (talk) 22:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. The reviewer, MatthewVanitas, left some remarks on your draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zerihun Seyoum. Not only do you need references, you also need inline citations, which you have actually provided in the form of parenthetical citations. (It's possible that MatthewVanitas didn't see the parentheses.)
 * Other than that, you will definitely need to find more outside (that is, independent) reliable sources, otherwise this will be declined for not meeting notability requirements. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 23:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S. I make some formatting improvements shortly.

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harold A. Lancer
Hello, I was just wondering for what reasons my article was not accepted. I followed the guidelines quite closely and would love to get the article posted ASAP. Thank you! MadelineDavis (talk) 23:26, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting info.svg Note: The reasons for a draft being declined are shown in the box at the top. If you did not read them, please do and keep this in mind if you decide to resubmit the draft and it is declined again.


 * You have some references, which is good, but you also need inline citations. These are notes after statements in the article that refer to the sources in the reference list. The most popular way to do this is with footnotes (see below).


 * Reply here if you need more help. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 05:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * There are also comments about notability, which are also probably related to the draft being declined. In short (maybe even shorter than the super-simple verison), subjects of articles must have been discussed in a significant number of outside reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, scholarly journals, etc.). If you can find these sources, add them to the references list. If you can't, then it may just be too soon for this subject to be on Wikipedia. --User:Anon126 (talk - contribs) 05:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)