Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 March 5

= March 5 =

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kelly Hall
My article has been declined because of a notability issue. She has also shot for Hot Shots calendars which half the profits go to charity. If I included this in my article and resubmitted it,what would happen?

Thank you :)Wyliecoyote1990 (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I doubt it would make a lot of difference, although I suppose you could wait and see. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

It was declined. I'll try the Teahouse, see what happens. Wyliecoyote1990 (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexis Bonte
Why my article has been declined? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JofreS (talk • contribs) 06:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Have you read the review in the pink box at the top of the page? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:06, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here
A BABY BORN WITH B NEGATIVE BLOOD GROUP WITH BOTH PARENTS HAVING B POSITIVE BLOOD GROUPS. WHAT IS THE COMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE PROBLEMS FOR THE BABY AND THE MOTHER? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.66.191.224 (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * We don't deal with questions like that here, sorry. You could perhaps try asking at the Reference Desk/Science if you are not seeking medical advice. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Dial_H-I-S-T-O-R-Y
Hello,

I would like to know if anyone could point out if there are any advertisement / inappropriate external link problems left in this text. If not, how can this tag be removed?

Thanks Johannesdebruycker (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

CMMI High Maturity # CMMI Level 5 Consultant
×Software Education Service in Asia, Europe and Africa, CMMI High Maturity based process of software process consultants and training in by CMMI High Maturity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.218.180 (talk) 11:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Derek Richter
I have added categories to this article called Derek Richter. His first name is Derek Last name Richter

But when I go to refresh the actual category pages he is listed always under "D" rather than "R". I must have done something or missed out on doing something crucial. I am trying to solve it myself and I am sure I will eventually, but if anyone can shed a light...

Please ignore the above request: that was ancient history going to a rejected page that is now up - but I am still having problems with nomenclature / first name/last name confusion.

Psychetube (talk) 12:25, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Butter Records

We simple want to post this page, we're confused as to how to set it live.

Thanks

(Serioxxo (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC))


 * Have you read VRS? Only the Digital Spy and Guardian articles seem to be independent reliable sources of significant length, and neither of them mention Black Butter Records at all. Wikipedia notability is not inherited. You need references to multiple independent reliable sources that discuss Black Butter Records in depth. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of CytoSorbents
Hi - I have submitted my article for review and it was declined. I have revised it and am trying to resubmit for review, but am having difficulty. Can you please advise as to how to resubmit? Thank you. Amybcvogel (talk) 17:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I've added a references section so that your references actually display - they didn't before.


 * To resubmit, add at the top of the submission page. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Friends of Sabeel—North America
wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Friends_of_Sabeel—North_America

Should external links used in inline citations, and listed under References, also be listed under External Links? In this second draft I've included some but not all of the external links cited as footnotes.

Is that the right approach?

Oscarwildecat (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No; if a source is already used as a reference, it does not need listing separately under External links. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Except if it happens to be subject's official website, that should be listed under External links even if it is used as a reference.

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connor Byrne
First of all I would like to ask why my article has been declined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.205.92 (talk) 20:23, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * It is declined because it appears to be a non-notable company. See, Wikipedia notability guideline for companies and organizations. I'd summarise the guideline in one, "The subject (Connor Byrne} requires significant coverage in wp:secondary, wp:independent and wp:reliable sources". Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  21:37, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anime Revolution
Why didn't my article get reviewed... is there also any way I can see comments or anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.151.118.73 (talk) 20:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You submission page (Anime Revolution) has been reviewed. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  21:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Question regarding rejection of new post "Canadian Association for Equality"
Hi there,

My new submission was rejected, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Canadian Association for Equality

This is the reason given: This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.

However, the submission included references to a variety of mainstream media reports on the organization from major Canadian news outlets: Sun News Network, National Post, MacLeans magazine, Toronto Sun, City News Toronto, and Huffington Post Canada. These articles are featuring the organization and its programs. I do not understand how the post fails to conform to the requirement for notability, namely that "an organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Please help. Thank you, JimSmith123 (talk) 21:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hello Welcome to the Articles for Creation Help desk. You submission was declined because the subject (Canadian Association for Equality) didn't appear notable to the reviewer. Following your concerns, I've re-analyzed the sources and found that many of them are either dead link or YouTube videos. YouTube is not considered a reliable source. There are few sources that does mention "Canadian Association for Equality" but only once. This is not substantial. We need "significant coverage" in the secondary, independent and reliable sources to estblish notability.  Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  21:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I have now removed the youtube videos and updated the dead links. In addition, I have added a number of new media reports on the organization from mainstream media sources including CBC, the National Post, Huffington Post Canada, USA Today, Yahoo! News Canada, MacLeans Magazine, Toronto Star and the Globe and Mail. I added a new section reporting on the organization's more recent campaign to establish a Toronto men's centre which was the focus of significant coverage. The organization motivated an entire episode of TV Ontario's The Agenda focused on men's issues. The Agenda is a major current affairs program. The organization's programs are a major component of the current wikipedia entry on the University of Toronto Student Union. Could you please review these new sources and let me know if this still doesn't qualify as notable.

JimSmith123 (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2014 (UTC)