Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 May 3

= May 3 =

No Guidance?
Hello I resubitted an article on "Troy Ladd" and it says it was not approved and for me to read the "reviewers comments", but they are no where to be found. I have no way to fix my article with no comments to read on how to fix it. Thank you, Hhrfan. Hhrfan (talk) 02:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Hhrfan, sorry about that, something went wrong with our reviewing script I think. I've given some comments in a new review, which you can see at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hhrfan/sandbox. You're getting closer but this still needs some work -- less promotional language and at least a few references that reviewers can verify. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kitawat
Hi, i posted an article which title was "Kitawat", has beed rejected. I want to know why was it not approved?

Thanks. Regards : Pskitawat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pskitawat (talk • contribs) 05:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, Pskitawat. I have corrected the link to your draft. The reviewer has left comments there explaining why it could not be accepted. Please read the comments in the grey box inside the pink box at the top of the draft and the comment following the symbol Symbol opinion vote.svg. After you have read them, feel free to ask for clarification here if you still find them unclear. Voceditenore (talk) 07:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of User:Dmcanupama/sandbox
Dear Sir/Madam, I am extremely surprised that Dr Sitangshu Bikash Barua has been rejected for several times. I have looked through "Buddhism in Bangladesh". A lot of people's name are included who have very little contribution in buddhist community in Bangladesh or overall contribution in academic. Moreover in buddhanet Buddhism in Bangladesh whole article has been copied from his pamplet. I would be grateful if you are kind enough to reconsider Dr Sitangshu Bikash Barua. I look forward to your reply. Kind regards. Dr Anupama Barua — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmcanupama (talk • contribs) 17:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L.J. Sealey
Hello

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/L.J. Sealey

Please can you tell me if i submitted this page ok after i edited it and re submitted again after you declined it? I was not told that it had been submitted ok when i pressed 'save page' so i don't know if it is actually being looked at or not

Thank you

Lisa LisaC38 (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * No, you didn't resubmit it. You deleted the feedback tag which included the "Resubmit" button; I've added it back in for you.  When you are ready to resubmit, just use that button.  The feedback stays there to help you & future reviewers, but will be removed if/when the draft is accepted for publication. --David Biddulph (talk) 02:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I see that you deleted the feedback again. Perhaps you missed what I said above: "The feedback stays there to help you & future reviewers, but will be removed if/when the draft is accepted for publication". I have reinserted it. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2014 (UTC)