Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 November 12

= November 12 =

02:45:12, 12 November 2014 review of submission by Madhu Gopal
I do not agree the Mandali Mendrilla is not notable, she won several prices in for Fashion, both in Croatia and Italie, she translated the Ramayan, and Mahabharata and many other books in Craotian. In fact she translated the Ramayan for the first time ever. Further more she recently was on the Croatian Fashion Week. All of these events have been referenced. Please help me Madhu Gopal (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC) Madhu Gopal (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

11:47:49, 12 November 2014 review of submission by Hamid bin qasim
Hamid bin qasim (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2014 (UTC) why my article is deleted and also told about improving the article

PAGE''' ]]) 15:53, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Draft:Interference of biological psychological and sociological activities in fighting activity and to finish it is currently awaiting review and has not been deleted. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * As I posted in reply to your talk page message, all statements in your article should cite a source. You can get instructions on how to cite sources at WP:REFBEGIN. If you need publishing information on a book, you can usually find it at Google Books or Amazon. However, you must make sure that the books are specifically talking about "interference of biological psychological and sociological activities in fighting activity" and that you aren't writing a synthesis of published sources. In addition, you need to edit your submission to correct the grammar, capitalization, etc, and it needs to be broken into paragraphs and have a proper introduction to provide context for those not familiar with the subject. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

20:19:06, 12 November 2014 review of draft by DravetArt
Hello !

I am writing because I believe there may be some sort of problem with my wiki account and pages... I began creating a page for Louis Boudreault last week. It was a draft that I saved. I was working on Wiki in french. Today, my article is no longer findable and my wiki is half french (side and top bar) and english... Help?

Thank you kindly,

Amélie

DravetArt (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello, DravetArt. "French Wikipedia" and "English Wikipedia" are different websites within the Wikipedia system. Though you can use the same account for all of these, your writings, contributions list, watchlist, etc are all specific to that language wiki. I searched on fr.wikipedia under your account name, and there I find your list of edits: fr:Sp%C3%A9cial:Contributions/DravetArt. And here I find your draft article: fr:Utilisateur:DravetArt/Brouillon.


 * The reason your top and side bars are in French even though you're on English Wikipedia right now is because you can choose in Settings to make those whatever language you wish. To see which language Wikipedia you're in, just look at the very top left corner, or look at the web address to see if it says "en.wikipedia" or "fr.wikipedia", etc. It's easier than I'm describing it, but does this make sense? MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Request on 20:32:26, 12 November 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by TheatreJa9
I have two articles that have been declined, one of which I had resubmitted with additional citations in September. I'm not seeing any other notations as to why they were declined and am wondering if they require further citations or if there are additional issues?

TheatreJa9 (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Draft:Globus Theatre (Bobcaygeon) has been declined twice for the reasons given on that page, and is not currently submitted for review.


 * I can't see any other drafts submitted by you. You can't submit a draft article on your own talk page User talk:TheatreJa9. Your talk page is for communicating with other editors, not for posting drafts on. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

21:04:56, 12 November 2014 review of submission by 106.208.45.208
To check out our summary gramatically. 106.208.45.208 (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Which edit or summary do you mean? You have not edited any other page with your current IP address, so we cannot see what page you are referring to. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

==23:30:38, 12 November 2014 request for review by Nguyen Si Phuoc ""Please help me to understand more about the reasons of the rejection two articles Digital to digital filter transformation and Pascal matrix equations"==


 * I wrote two articles, Digital to digital filter transformation and Pascal matrix equations, these were rejected with the reason “This is taken almost wholly from editor’s white paper at:http:/www.vi-institute.org/assets/1/7/siphuocnguyen_diital2digitalfilter_final.pdf”. I really don’t understand what that means, because the paper “Design of Digital filter using Pascal’s triangle” is mine and I myself submitted it to Vibration Institute on 06/2014. All the works on that paper are my self-work and I did not copy from anyone. I could only think of some reasons which might cause my articles to be rejected:
 * - My works are already submitted to Vibration Institute so I cannot submit them again to Wikipedia.
 * - I cannot repost almost wholly my works from my self-work which were submitted to another publication. What if I rearrange the article in a new order or bring the original one and a reference next to it?.
 * I’m not sure if any of these reasons are right. Could you please explain further for me ? It is a shock for me and also unfair when you said and posted on public website like google that “I took almost wholly from editor”. I am the very author of those works after all.
 * The reason I’ve written my works to Wikipedia because I think this is a very popular dictionary with a wide range of viewers, therefore I would like to introduce something new, some definitions of Pascal matrix equations, Inverse Pascal matrix equations, Digital to digital filter transformation and more. I would be thankful if these articles will be reconsidered.
 * Thank you very much for your time and understanding!
 * I’m looking forward to hear from you.

NguyenSiPhuoc 23:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I've replied on your talk page. Rankersbo (talk) 10:21, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

23:45:45, 12 November 2014 review of submission by Efrain Ib
Efrain Ib (talk) 23:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Would you please provide an ETA, estimated time of arrival, or completion, of the edit of our submission. Thank you very much.


 * Your draft is submitted for review, I would estimate that it should be reviewed in less than six weeks. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)