Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 October 20

= October 20 =

01:24:39, 20 October 2014 review of submission by Rosekelleher
After submitting my draft, I now see the message, "Warning: This page should probably be located at Draft:Red Shirley (move)". Am I supposed to move it to the Draft space, or wait for a reviewer to do that?

Rosekelleher (talk) 01:24, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * ✔️ Your draft has already been published by a fellow reviewer. You can find it at Red Shirley. For future reference, however, AfC drafts should be located at Draft:xxx, as opposed to your userspace. st170e talk 16:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Request on 12:35:56, 20 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Ennialingerie
Not sure atb this stage whats wrong with the sandbox submission I have made.. Can you please help at all?

Roger Havell 12:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You should start by looking at it. "Big text" all over the place. Then note the total lack of references or inherent notability. Fiddle   Faddle  13:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

13:41:17, 20 October 2014 review of submission by 117.196.93.219
I am making an authentic article on an Indian Supreme Court Judge. Why is it not being published?

117.196.93.219 (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


 * It would help if you linked us to your article. st170e talk 16:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

15:42:11, 20 October 2014 review of submission by Tdesens
I would like some more advice on how to get more "reliable sources" for my article. I've included 7 accredited articles which directly mention the information stated in the article, but I seem to be at a loss on how to improve the article.

EDIT: Thank you for your advice Chris. I will contact the reward board to rewrite the article. And for the record, I am NOT a supporter of French Hill. Thank you again.

Any help is appreciated. Tdesens (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You have some much larger problems going on here. After doing some research I've found many other sources and content you didn't include like numerous articles from the Arkansas Times (here, here, here, and here). There's also this article at HuffPo, this New York Times piece about the primary results, not to mention this book showing French Hill worked for Pres. G. W. H. Bush and this finding aid for Hill's papers. In that view, this article is looking very deliberately incomplete.
 * I'm pretty sure the subject is generally notable and I would've re-submitted it under your name and accepted it, but deleted your article months ago in part because that article was craven political advertising and a copy of campaign material already online. Because you've muddied the water, I'm going to ask that you at least ensure your draft doesn't run afoul of the criteria causing the previous deletion.
 * I can only suspect that you're a political operative or supporter, so I doubt you're going to make the needed improvements. That said, you ought to give up on writing this draft because opponents of your candidate will savage this article and ultimately you'll quit frustrated with the obvious leftism found on Wikipedia.
 * I've sent you an invitation to try The Wikipedia Adventure to improve your amateurish coding. If you really want to go forward with this, I recommend asking for an editor at the reward board to write this for you. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)