Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 October 31

= October 31 =

06:44:26, 31 October 2014 review of draft by Maharashtradarshan
Maharashtradarshan (talk) 06:44, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi your draft has been moved to the location above. Do you have a question? Rankersbo (talk) 09:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Request on 06:52:56, 31 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Ashagiri2000
Ashagiri2000 (talk) 06:52, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * This is an unsubmitted draft. If you woudl like it to be reviewed you need to place at the head. Then you need to continue to work on it while awaiting review.  Fiddle   Faddle  12:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

09:08:54, 31 October 2014 review of submission by Nicolettarizzi
Hi everyone! My article has been deleted for "copyright infringement": may I know more in detail where this problem was found and how I might fix it? Thanks in advance for your help. Nicolettarizzi (talk) 09:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * It is unlikely that you copied and pasted other content without realising that you had done so. The odds are overwhelmingly against this. Thus I must conclude that you know the source of the problem (0.9 probability). Fiddle   Faddle  12:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

13:46:46, 31 October 2014 review of submission by Economics-NYU
Hi guys,

I've just created my first page and just wanted to know what how long it would take to be reviewed? I know there's a backlog but I wanted to know if what I'm doing is okay before I try and make more articles?

Thanks

Economics-NYU (talk) 13:46, 31 October 2014 (UTC) PAGE''' ]] ) 14:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The backlog is about a month for most articles. As long as your articles and their subjects meet WP:BIO you should be good to go. Make sure you understand what sources are considered reliable and independent. On a second note, your username appears to violate our policy on names that represent groups and organizations (WP:ORGNAME), specifically the New York University Department of Economics. You should consider changing your username. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Hi,

I've applied to change my name now to avoid confusion. Is there a quicker way of creating pages or will it take a month each time?

Thanks

Economics-NYU (talk) 14:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC) PAGE''' ]] ) 17:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Since you are autoconfirmed you can move your articles directly from the "Draft:" namespace to the main namespace yourself without submitting them for review (a "move" option should appear under the "More" menu in the upper right). However, note that articles created that way that don't meet Wikipedia's standards are usually deleted, not just declined and sent back for more editing. --Ahecht ( [[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK

Request on 14:36:26, 31 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Dnhb
I was prompted to write the article about the Warminster Lions Club by the realisation that the Android Wikipedia App 'Nearby' button would alert people to our Bookshop's existence. The material is, as remarked on in the Reviewers comments, based on the Club's Website: however I am the author of that material anyway (I am currently the President of the Club) so there isn't, in my view, a copyright issue here. I would be grateful to know what sort of content I should include in the Wikipedia article in order for it to be acceptable. I note for example that another Charitable trust in the Town - the Athenaeum - has a Wikipedia page. Yours sincerely Digby Barker Dnhb (talk) 14:36, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello Digby. The copyright issue could be worked round if you wished to freely license the text of which you are the author, as explained in Donating copyrighted materials. However, it is probably best not to go down that route, because the material on your own website, complete with "phone us on (number)" and similar exhortations, is not suitable to be an article in an encyclopedia.


 * Take a look at recognised Wikipedia Good Articles on charitable, non-profit and service organisations, for example Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore, Merseyside Skeptics Society, LatinoJustice PRLDEF, or Loyal Order of Moose to see what sort of content is needed for an encyclopedia and how to structure and reference it.


 * An article about your club would not need to be so lengthy or detailed as those articles, but it would need sufficient references to detailed discussion of your club in independent reliable sources to meet the requirements of VRS. There is a possibility that a charitable club in a relatively small town might never be able to meet those requirements, in which case you would be wasting time that might be better spent promoting the club in other ways. Wikipedia is not intended to be a directory of all organisations, even if sometimes it can look like it. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

17:27:11, 31 October 2014 review of submission by Kathyweed
I realize we took a while to update this page, but I logged in today and it looks like someone has taken the liberty to do so for us. While I don't mind because we've been exceptionally busy here at the museum and I have been finding it difficult to revise, I do have some minor changes I would want to note should this draft be approved. Also, is it normal for someone from Wikipedia do this? So, my questions are as follows:

Did someone in fact rewrite this to assist us in getting it approved? Can I make the minor changes once it is approved? Kathyweed (talk) 17:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a crowd-sourced encyclopedia. It is not a place to host a website, no owns the content, and articles aren't "approved" as they are always in flux. Anyone can edit almost anything and everything. You can thank for improving the draft and re-submitting it rather than allowing it to be deleted as a stale draft. To that end, I caution you against making "improvements" that will further delay acceptance. But yes, you and everyone else can edit the draft now and in the future assuming it ever gets accepted.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

17:41:24, 31 October 2014 review of submission by 4.30.148.74
I would like to know why my page was not approved. Thank you. 4.30.148.74 (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I declined this draft for the reasons provided on the draft page itself, Draft:Health Plan of San Joaquin. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 18:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

18:02:03, 31 October 2014 review of submission by Manouela
Hello,

I contributed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Andreas_Dermitzakis#References and it was rejected. I have added references from UEFA.com and other official websites.

I am really not sure what I am doing wrong. My references are:

http://www.football-academies.gr/scoutmagazine/7482-dermitzakis-olympiacos-pyrasos-neas-agxialou.html http://www.uefa.com/under17/season=2015/teams/player=250076616/profile/index.html http://www.uefa.com/uefayouthleague/season=2015/clubs/player=250076616/index.html http://www.onsports.gr/Podosfairo/Super-League/item/440103-Olympiakos-Proto-Elite-Group-me-Mitsel-photos

Can you review and point me to the right direction? He is an athlete and has actively participated in a major amateur competition.

Thank you, Manouela

Manouela (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello. You need to cite your references properly by using the appropriate tags. You can find out about using these tags at WP:CITATIONS. When we're reviewing your article, we really don't know what the references are backing up in your article. If you source your article properly, we can advise you better on how to improve your article. Biographies of living people have a higher standard of sources, therefore you must get as many sources as possible in order to prove notability. The last thing we want is the article being accepted and then being proposed for deletion. You can make as many claims as you want in a Wikipedia article, but these all must be backed up with independent and reliable sources. To address the notability concern, the subject must have done something significant in order to be included on Wikipedia. If you get sources to prove his notability, then the article will be accepted by the reviewers. st170etalk 18:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)