Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 September 16

= September 16 =

00:55:15, 16 September 2014 review of submission by Anztechltd
Hello Team,

This is my 3rd time posting an article about ANZ Tech but got rejected, can you please approve ours? This is really important for ANZ Tech business and the global. They have been in media several times as per links provided, but too often newspager they remove it from main page so by the time we wait for another one, we lose primary one we provided, so we need someone to please approve this for us.

Thanks much

Anztechltd (talk) 00:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not for advertising. Your draft lacks appropriate sources to make a claim of notability. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 02:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Please use good sense. Link to the article in the new outlet, not to the main page. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42
 * What is important for ANZ Tech is not important for Wikipedia. We value articles that meet our criteria. We are not your PR vehicle.
 * Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles. Please do the work to make it possible to accept this one. Fiddle   Faddle  18:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

12:14:07, 16 September 2014 review of submission by Horse Attack Mark
Horse Attack Mark (talk) 12:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC) My article is currently in the 'Review Waiting' status. My article is preceded by a short intro about why I am doing this, which is intended to be deleted before publishing the article. Should i go ahead and edit it now, thus leaving just the article standing alone?


 * . This is one of the reasons. The full rationale is state don the draft. Yes, lose the stuff about yourself. Fiddle   Faddle  18:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

18:13:29, 16 September 2014 request for review by Arn-Henrik Blomqvist18:13:29, 16 September 2014 review of submission by Arn-Henrik Blomqvist
Why was this page declined? Arn-Henrik Blomqvist (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Go to the draft and read the reason. Fiddle   Faddle  18:16, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The draft is at User:Arn-Henrik Blomqvist/sandbox. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

19:13:30, 16 September 2014 review of submission by Davidb8147
Davidb8147 (talk) 19:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

HI, was wondering why my wikipage was not accepted.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Satbotics.

Cheers, Dave
 * As described on the draft, the term Satbotics appears to be a neologism and we don't accept those. Encyclopedias cover well-documented things and do not exist as a vehicle to explain new, un-notable phenomena. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 20:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)