Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 December 1

= December 1 =

Request on 01:19:21, 1 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Hangzhaohans
{{Lafc|username=Hangzhaohans|ts=01:19:21, 1 December 2015|link=

Hangzhaohans (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * {{Ping|Hangzhaohans}} I am not sure what you are asking here. The draft as it stands cannot be accepted regardless of any merits because it is full of extraneous material. Are you getting the right level of guidance from your course leader, {{U|Skearns4}}, here? We have seen many articles from your fellow course members which suffer from varying degrees of what appears to be lack of guidance. You need to take this up with the course leader.
 * Please also see thsi help desk query (note that it will move to archives at some future point) where two of us express concern about the course direction. Fiddle   Faddle  12:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * In order to try to help you further I have posted a request about this course here Fiddle   Faddle  12:27, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

12:57:35, 1 December 2015 review of submission by BOTFIGHTER
BOTFIGHTER (talk) 12:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Why my project was declined???BOTFIGHTER (talk) 12:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Because it is not now, and cannot be considered ever to be the basis of, an article. Why did you think this was worthy of submission? This is just a statement about who you are. Fiddle   Faddle  12:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

21:59:19, 1 December 2015 review of submission by Smcmurry97
I currently have my sandbox being reviewed to go live. I noticed on my edit screen there are seven references and all the foot notes I put in. However, on the read page it only shows four references and takes out all of the footnotes for the three references it doesn't show. I was wondering how to get all seven references on the read screen, or if it'll all be fixed once the article goes live. Smcmurry97 (talk) 21:59, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I'm really unsure. All I can suggest is that you check with great care what has happened. It's possible that you have confused yourself with using the same reference(s) so many times. Zoom in on the screen (literally zoom! Embiggen it!) and analyse what has happened. Fiddle   Faddle  22:26, 1 December 2015 (UTC)